Texas Approves Judicial Pay Bump, Boosting Own Pensions
Passed just before the legislature adjourned Sine Die, Senate Bill 293 sets the starting salary for state district judges at $175,000, up from $140,000. Because legislative pensions are tied to judicial salaries, the vote also raises the maximum annual pension for lawmakers to $175,000.
The compromise, however, decouples judicial salaries from future legislative pension increases, a move that had been at the heart of a days-long political dispute.
While the legislation tasks the Texas Ethics Commission with reviewing and recommending any changes to legislative pensions every five years, that begins in 2030. In the short term, lawmakers' maximum annual pensions will increase by $35,000.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick had accused House sponsor Jeff Leach (R–Allen) of 'killing' the judicial pay raise after Leach's version of the bill removed automatic pension increases for legislators that are typically triggered by judicial salary hikes.
Patrick struck down that provision on a rare point of order, citing germaneness.
Leach, meanwhile, defended the House's position, saying lawmakers should raise judicial pay without giving themselves a pension bump—a stance backed by House leadership and many rank-and-file members.
The stalemate drew the attention of Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Jimmy Blacklock, who issued a memo over the weekend calling on both chambers to 'find a short-term solution' to address urgently needed judicial pay increases now and revisit the pension debate next session. He noted Texas ranks 49th in the nation in judicial pay.
On Sunday night, both chambers appointed conference committees to come up with a compromise.
'While this proposal may not be perfect, I believe it is a thoughtful compromise that balances the concerns of both chambers while achieving our top agenda—that [of] supporting the integrity of our judiciary and getting something done on this issue this session,' said Leach.
The legislation passed the Senate unanimously, while it was approved by the House in a 114-26 vote, shortly before both chambers adjourned for the last time during this regular session.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scroggins Law Group Launches Guide to Help U.S. Citizens Understand the Divorce Process
New online resource breaks down legal procedures and child custody issues for individuals navigating divorce nationwide. Frisco, Texas--(Newsfile Corp. - July 27, 2025) - Scroggins Law Group, a North Texas-based family law firm, has released a new online guide to help individuals across the United States in understanding the divorce process. The guide provides a step-by-step overview of key elements in divorce proceedings, including filing requirements, child custody considerations, and property division. Scroggins Law Group Launches Guide to Help U.S. Citizens Understand the Divorce Process To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: The resource aims to support individuals at different stages of a divorce by presenting legal procedures in clear, accessible language. While grounded in Texas law, the guide outlines the typical stages of a divorce-from filing the petition to the final decree-in a format that may also assist readers from other jurisdictions seeking general information. The firm, composed of top-notch divorce lawyers and child custody lawyers, said the guide responds to a frequent concern among those dealing with family law issues: the lack of understandable, reliable legal information. Many people entering the divorce process often feel overwhelmed or unsure of their next steps. Scroggins Law Group created the guide to help reduce confusion and provide clarity on what to expect. The firm said by offering this structured and straightforward resource, the team hopes to ease some of the uncertainty people experience when beginning a divorce. It's part of the firm's ongoing effort to make the legal process more transparent for those going through a major life change. The publication covers a range of financial and parenting issues that commonly emerge during divorce proceedings. Topics include temporary orders, discovery, mediation, and trial preparation. The guide also focuses on critical concerns such as child custody arrangements and the division of community property, offering readers a better understanding of how these matters are typically handled under Texas family law. Scroggins Law Group noted that this release represents a business milestone in its wider mission to support individuals during family transitions. Many clients start their divorce journey with limited knowledge of legal procedures. The guide is meant to serve as a foundation for more informed decision-making. Led by attorney Mark L. Scroggins, who is board-certified in family law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, the firm provides legal services across Frisco, Plano, McKinney, Allen, Fort Worth, and other surrounding cities. The team has more than 100 years of combined experience handling divorce and custody matters, including litigation, mediation, and enforcement of court orders. This new publication builds on Scroggins Law Group's ongoing role as a legal advocate for individuals facing both contested and uncontested divorces. The firm's website offers further information on its services and provides free access to the new guide. About Scroggins Law Group Scroggins Law Group, PLLC, is a full-service family law firm based in North Texas. The firm handles a range of family law cases, including divorce, custody, child support, mediation, and high net worth separations. Led by board-certified divorce lawyer Mark L. Scroggins, the practice is known for delivering focused legal representation tailored to the needs of each case. Serving communities such as Dallas, Frisco, McKinney, Allen, and Fort Worth, the firm's team of divorce lawyers and child custody lawyers brings decades of combined experience to resolving complex family law issues. Scroggins Law Group remains committed to offering accessible and practical support for individuals navigating divorce and custody matters. Contact Info:Name: Mark ScrogginsEmail: mark@ Scroggins Law GroupPhone: 972-754-4380Website: To view the source version of this press release, please visit Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Some Republicans aren't backing down from Epstein transparency push
Amid bipartisan calls for transparency and a cascade of Epstein-related headlines, some GOP lawmakers are holding the line — while others are urging more sunlight from the Trump administration. The big picture: The case of the disgraced financier, who died in 2019, has taken on new life under the second Trump administration, creating splinters in the president's base and dominating conversations on Capitol Hill. While some Republicans are falling in line with President Trump and making calls to move on, others are defying leadership and joining in with Democrats by continuing to criticize the administration's handling of the case. Driving the news: Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who are leading a bipartisan charge to force a House vote on releasing files related to Epstein, were optimistic on Sunday's political talk shows that their measure would succeed. "It will pass," Khanna said on NBC's "Meet the Press." Massie warned on ABC's "This Week" that if a vote doesn't come to the floor, the GOP could feel political punishment in 2026, cautioning voters could "check out" because "Republicans didn't keep their promise." And with the House breaking for its weeks-long recess, Massie predicts the pressure will only build: "I don't think it's going to dissipate like the speaker hopes that it will." Yes, but: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) argued in a Sunday interview with NBC's Kristen Welker that the lawmakers' discharge petition is "not the right approach," contending it doesn't build in "adequate protections" for victims. "House Republicans insist upon the release of all credible evidence and information related to Epstein in any way, but we are also insisting upon the protection of innocent victims," he said. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), echoed Johnson on "Meet the Press," saying he's "on board" to "release as much as you can, protecting victims the best you can." The other side: Massie, responding to the DOJ's conclusion that releasing further materials could hurt victims, told Welker, "That's a straw man." He continued, "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted and that no child pornography will be released, so they're hiding behind that." Catch up quick: Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval" earlier this month. But a federal judge on Wednesday struck down the administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts in connection with an investigation into Epstein, writing that the court's "hands were tied." And while Trump has said Bondi should release"credible" information, he's repeatedly bashed what he has dubbed the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" and blamed his political rivals for "making up" the files. Zoom out: While some Republicans and MAGA-friendly figures have turned up the heat on the administration, other Trump allies have echoed the president's targeting of his predecessors. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) sparred with CNN's Jake Tapper Sunday over Epstein's controversial plea deal with federal prosecutors in Florida, arguing the agreement was struck under the Obama administration.

Miami Herald
29 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Fury over Epstein files follows Congress home as summer break begins
WASHINGTON - As members of the U.S. House traveled back to Capitol Hill for their final work week ahead of the summer break, U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Rome, issued a warning. Writing on social media, Greene warned that the MAGA base is angry that Republicans were breaking their promise to release files associated with the sex trafficking investigation of deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. After years of being told the documents contained bombshells that would bring down well-connected Democrats, they wanted results. "The base will turn and there's no going back," she continued. "Dangling bits of red meat no longer satisfies. They want the whole steak dinner and will accept nothing else." But President Donald Trump sent Republican leaders a very different message, urging them to stand down on compelling the release of Epstein files. He said anything to the contrary was playing into Democrats' hands and would risk his wrath. Caught in the middle, House Speaker Mike Johnson mostly chose inaction and even sent members back home a day early. The issue is unlikely to die down with a base that remains dissatisfied and an ongoing bipartisan effort to force a vote on the House floor. House leaders shut down that effort by adjourning a key legislative committee, meaning very little legislative business was accomplished in the final days before the recess. U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter is among the many GOP members who agree with Trump that there is no need to vote now on releasing Epstein documents while the White House, at Trump's direction, is working to make some files public. Carter lamented that serious government spending decisions await lawmakers when they return in September partially because votes on appropriations bills were postponed during the turmoil. "It's unfortunate that we didn't get them done before the August break, but it just means we're going to have work that much harder in September," Carter, R-St. Simons Island, said. U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk said he understands the public interest in the Epstein files but that has to be measured against needs to protect the privacy of young victims and people whose names might be in the documents but who may not be accused of wrongdoing. "My question is: What is it that you want released?" the Cassville Republican said. "And do you know it's there? We keep talking about an Epstein list: What is that list?" No one reflects the tightrope Republican members must walk more than freshman lawmaker Brian Jack, who served as Trump's political director during his first term and who remains close with him. Jack, R-Peachtree City, was among three Republicans who voted with Democrats to subpoena the Department of Justice's Epstein-related documents. Those subpoenas will nowbe issued. The week prior, Jack voted to block a separate Democrat-led measure that would have forced a vote on the House floor on releasing the Epstein files. He has declined to speak publicly about the votes. While Republicans canceled committee meetings to avoid more tough votes on Epstein, Democrats saw an opportunity to take advantage of an issue that could have long-term impact. Congressman Hank Johnson, D-Lithonia, had a viral moment when he posted video on social media playing Jason Isbell's "Dreamsicle" on his guitar with the lyrics changed to highlight the Epstein controversy. He said it proves Republicans will do anything Trump wants them to do, even if it means shutting down the House early. But Johnson said that inaction isn't all bad. "He's doing nothing but increasing prices for the people of this country while taking away their rights at the same time," Johnson said. "So, to stop this Congress from passing additional legislation is a good thing." U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath had a slightly different take. She said Democrats were right to push for the release of Epstein documents, but she warned that the Epstein controversy risks becoming a distraction from kitchen-table issues, such as the cost of housing and health care. "It's all important, yes, but let's not take our eyes off of what's most important to the American people every single day," the Marietta Democrat said. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.