
‘The script didn't have Jurassic World on the front': Gareth Edwards on Monsters, Godzilla, Star Wars and reinventing dinosaurs
Like an ancient warhorse hearing the bugle for one last time, readers of a certain age will be snorting and whinnying at the words 'Gareth' and 'Edwards'. They are irresistible madeleines for the legends of Welsh rugby: unfeasible 70s sideburns, neck-high tackles and JPR Williams on the overlap.
These days, though, things are different: Gareth Edwards is also the name of the unassuming, Midlands-born fortysomething film director sitting in front of me, who has quietly acquired a reputation as one of Britain's most accomplished franchise movie-makers. 'I've had it my whole life, to be honest,' he says. 'My dad was a massive rugby fan. My comedy goal is that the Gareth Edwards does something and everybody goes: 'Oh, the film‑maker?' That would be it. I could die happy after that.'
While there is no immediate prospect of this Gareth Edwards finishing off an eight-man move and going over in the corner – any more than there is of Willie John MacBride taking on the next Iron Man movie – you sense that the tide may eventually turn in the younger man's favour. With a Star Wars and a Godzilla movie under his belt, not to mention the Christopher-Nolan-esque sci-fi parable The Creator, Edwards is now perched atop the new Jurassic World movie – the seventh in the series, if you count the three Jurassic Park films – which is slightly ominously subtitled Rebirth.
As gigs go, it doesn't get much bigger. Edwards is stewarding the franchise at a critical moment: even though the last film, Dominion, proved as commercially robust as its predecessors, it took such a critical pasting, not least from the Guardian's Peter Bradshaw, that the future of the whole thing was in doubt.
Diplomatically, Edwards says 'they just wanted to press the reset button slightly' – although Rebirth, as its title suggests, does rather more than that. It junks the entire cast and characters of the previous three films, ditches the theme-park-gone-wrong through-line and generally adopts a scorched-earth attitude to what went before. (Devotees of the franchise will be glad to know that the series' basic DNA – involving ferocious dinosaurs and creepy corporate types attempting to exploit them – remains unchanged.) Edwards says a new beginning was very much the plan. 'The honest truth is that, when the script arrived, it didn't have the words Jurassic World on the front. It really felt like a new chapter.'
Even so, anyone who reads the movie-industry trade press will know that Edwards wasn't the first name on the team sheet; what is more, the Hollywood Reporter rather ungallantly described him ungallantly as 'more shooter than auteur'. Edwards, though, brushes this sort of thing aside with aplomb and readily offers an insight into how the Hollywood hiring game works. He says he found out the Jurassic producers were looking for a new director after spotting an article in the very same movie-industry trade press and messaged his agent ('is it worth throwing my hat in to see if they'd be interested?') just as the franchise's producer Frank Marshall was tentatively reaching out to him.
He had a weekend to read the script – 'I basically spent that weekend hoping I would hate it, because I kind of wanted to have a break and not do a big franchise movie' – and then found himself pitching to Marshall, a Hollywood legend who has worked on movies including Raiders of the Lost Ark, Poltergeist, The Sixth Sense and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. 'I just went through my little list and waited for him to have an allergic reaction. And then, right at the end, he went: 'OK, do you mind repeating everything you just said to me tomorrow to Steven?' And I thought: oh shit, I assume he means Spielberg. Maybe there's three Stevens.
'So the next day I am pitching a Jurassic film to Steven Spielberg, which is very surreal. Halfway through, he asked for a pen and paper and started writing stuff down. And I thought: oh, is this a bad sign or a good sign? Then, at one point, he just stopped and smiled and went: 'That's great.' And I felt like: OK, can we just end my life now? Because it can only go downhill from here.''
It's a great pitch-meeting story, perhaps matched only by the one in which he gets a talking-to from another Hollywood big shot, Thomas Tull, just before the pair went in to Warner Bros to sell Godzilla in the early 2010s. 'I felt like my whole life was hanging on what I said over the next half an hour. As we were walking there, he said: 'Remember, Gareth, you are not auditioning for them, they are auditioning for you. If they don't want you to do this movie, we're going somewhere else.' Whether he meant it or not, it was the best thing he could have said to me.'
Quite how Edwards got here seems to baffle even Edwards himself. He is still awestruck by the fact he is rubbing shoulders with his childhood movie heroes – Spielberg, George Lucas – but is focused and tough enough to channel it into his own creative inspiration: 'They managed to make what I consider to be art and commerciality at the same time. They managed to combine [the two to create] the holy grail. Jaws is a masterpiece and it was the most popular movie ever made when it came out. So that's your benchmark, right? Like, what's the matter with you, Gareth? Why can't you try to do that?'
Edwards cut his teeth in visual effects (he won a TV Bafta in 2006 for a BBC drama-documentary about Hiroshima) and applied those skills to his first feature, Monsters; released in 2010, it still looks amazing, despite being produced on an inconceivably small budget. Having established himself as the Kevin Smith of the creature feature, Edwards experienced a vertiginous ascent after being picked by Tull to oversee Hollywood's latest attempt to take on Godzilla, going from Monsters' $500,000 budget to a $160m blockbuster. 'I felt I was getting crushed as I was doing it. I felt like: I don't know if I'm going to survive this.'
Having scrambled up the learning curve, Edwards can look back with a measure of calm. 'Any movie like that is a machine, and the machine kicks in and you've just got to [do it]. You've got to know the battles you can win and the ones you can't, the ones that are worth dying on a hill for and the ones that won't really matter at the end of the day; they might hurt your pride a little bit, but the audience is not going to notice or care.'
The Godzilla gamble paid off handsomely and the lessons appeared to stand him in good stead: he rolled straight in to another fanboy dream project, a standalone Star Wars film. The experience of making Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was marred by much after-the-event muttering that the scriptwriter Tony Gilroy had been brought in to re-shoot and re-edit much of the film, but Edwards remains unbowed: 'It's the nature of doing a massive film with that much pressure on it – the studio just wouldn't leave anything to chance.' In any case, it is evident that the kerfuffle did not have any long-term effect on his standing.
Edwards clearly has a talent for what Hollywood likes to call 'vision': an ability to orchestrate grand, sweeping visuals into which spectacular digital visual effects are seamlessly integrated. Rather more unusually, he also likes a roving quasi-documentary camera, giving many sequences a combat-movie edge. He also has a predilection for a certain type of scene, which you will notice if you watch all his films in a row: people dying horribly trapped behind a sealed glass door, often with someone they love watching it happen. ('Maybe I got trapped as a kid in one of those automatic doors in Sainsbury's, or something, and my mum left and I couldn't get out.')
That was then; this is now. Like most of Hollywood, Edwards is waiting hopefully on Rebirth's box office performance, as movie theatres cautiously haul themselves away from the Covid disaster and try to beat back the menace of high-end TV. On the surface, at least, he seems sublimely unbothered by it all. 'This movie is kind of what I've been waiting for. I felt that if we get the right cast, then really it's a playground for me to do the things I love doing, you know? So I was like: it's mine to screw up.'
Jurassic World Rebirth is in cinemas in the UK, Ireland and the US from 2 July and in Australia from 3 July
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Prince of Wales charity donor sent out '£20K cash for access' invitation without William's knowledge - forcing Kensington Palace to cut ties with millionaire art gallery curator
A donor to the Prince of Wales's charities sent out a £20,000 'cash for access' invitation without his knowledge - forcing Kensington Palace to cut ties with her. Minerva Mondejar Steiner, a millionaire art gallery curator who sponsored William's annual polo fundraiser, offered a meeting with the Waleses for the whopping sum. The Filipina-Swiss philanthropist, 45, also told advertisers 'VVIP tickets', 'access to royalty' and a slot in a magazine given out at the polo could be theirs - for £50,000. The Royal Charity Polo Cup match sees millionaire donors gather to watch the future king play polo and donate to causes important to him. Over nearly 15 years of the prince taking part in the exclusive, invite-only event, set to return in Windsor next month, he has raised more than £13million for charity. Invitee Dr Mondejar Steiner issued her 'strictly private and confidential' offer to members of a luxury travel and lifestyle community, The Sunday Times reports. She told subscribers to A Small World in an email that donating a smaller set amount to her foundation could bag them a spot at the prestigious event. A larger sum, meanwhile, could earn members of the Swiss company - which offers members exclusive travel benefits, deals and events - an invite to meet William and his wife Princess Catherine themselves, she promised. The gallerist wrote: 'As a patron of the Mondejar Foundation, you are invited to support their philanthropic work through a charitable donation, in return for which you will be welcomed to this prestigious occasion. 'Patron contributions: £6,000 - admission for one patron. £20,000 - includes full access plus a private audience with Prince William and Princess Catherine.' The message also promised a 'luncheon' with 'free-flowing champagne', entrance to an art exhibition and a chance to mingle with 'ultra-high-net-worth individuals, cultural icons and luxury leaders'. It warned: 'The attached invitation is for your eyes only and not to be shared publicly or on social media.' It jars with the highly private nature of the annual polo event. The palace often only announces William's involvement and releases event pictures after the match has finished - as happened last year. These recent revelations also threaten to cast a shadow over what is normally a highly important event for the prince. It allows him to enjoy one of his favourite sports since boyhood, surrounded by friends, family and supporters, while continuing his charity work. Previous events have seen him fundraise for causes including the Royal African Society, the Motor Neurone Disease Association and Mountain Rescue England and Wales. The Guards Polo Club, where the fundraiser takes place, also has a long-standing association with his family. The late Queen was its patron, while her husband the late Prince Philip was its president for nearly 70 years, from its formation in 1955 until his death in 2021. It also harks back to similar cash-for-access controversies while the King was Prince of Wales. Charles, who always denied knowing about any such deals, repeatedly met donors who donated purely on condition of meeting or dining with him. Not only this, it raises questions about how Dr Mondejar Steiner's gallery the Mondejar Gallery was allowed to become an official sponsor of the event. A Kensington Palace source said it had not been aware of the behaviour in the email, adding candidly William did not 'condone' it and there would be no 'cash for access'. They said they had since asked that the sponsorship to be terminated and were thankful to learn the truth. The source denied knowledge of her using the match to raise money for her own projects or selling access to William. They added they only knew about Dr Mondejar Steiner's gallery, not her foundation. It is believed the prince will still attend the event and host a private reception to express gratitude to 'those involved' in it. The palace said a Buckingham Palace secretariat had been the one to perform the checks on the Mondejar Gallery as a sponsor. It did not say how much Dr Mondejar Steiner paid to be named as a sponsor or put on an exhibition at the match, saying such sums varied. Documents show she had prepared 1,000 copies of her own magazine which she told advertisers would be given to 'ultra-high-net-worth' art sector leaders at the event. In the magazine, a double-page spread would cost advertisers £50,000, the back cover £35,000 and the inside front cover £30,000. Dr Mondejar Steiner declined to comment. Sources close to her said she could not as she had signed a confidentiality agreement preventing her speaking on the event until after it. They said her main goal is to fundraise for her father's technical college in her home city Tacloban in the Philippines, where she studied a BA in Computer Science, graduating in 1999. The Filipina 'collector and curator', who lives in Switzerland and is married to Swiss director Michael Steiner, studied fashion at University of the Arts London in 2003. She then took a further education course in art history at Oxford University from 2006 to 2008 and an Open University BA in Arts and Humanities from 2009 to 2011. This was followed by a PhD in Educational Management from the University of La Salette in the Philippines, listed on her LinkedIn as completed in January this year. Dr Mondejar Steiner was pictured with Prince Harry last September, at the annual awards of WellChild, a charity for sick children. Around the same time, she was also pictured with Benedict Cumberbatch at a film screening he hosted. It is unclear exactly how wealthy she is. Two operations she is linked to in California failed to file accounts and were struck off for it. She founded a property company in London in January, just before incorporating her foundation as a kind of non-profit, a 'community interest company', in April. Neither have a well-documented presence online. Brunilde Le Jossec, Head of Experiences at A Small World, said: 'To clarify, [our company] is not selling access, or facilitating any private meeting with members of the British royal family.' She said the Mondejar Foundation approached ASW directly, asking to share details of its invitation to become its patron. She continued: 'Believing this a relevant opportunity to support a philanthropic cause, a representative of the events team proactively forwarded this to a small group of members, whom they believed would be interested in supporting this charitable cause.'


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Just what is Meghan trying to hide? After months of fruitless investigation, CAROLINE GRAHAM discovers a shocking new theory on what's REALLY behind the Duchess's jam brand
It is unquestionably the Duchess of Sussex 's most famous product, and the one she lovingly refers to on her As Ever website as 'where it all began'. Yet, three months on from the public launch of her in-demand raspberry spread, mystery still surrounds the provenance of the £6.50-a-jar product.


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Oasis reunion is plunged into fresh chaos as furious crew blast 'uncaring' Gallagher brothers over shocking move - and insiders tell KATIE HIND tour is 'all about the money'
Before Noel Gallagher found fame in Oasis, he was a roadie for '80s band Inspiral Carpets. It was a job he loved, and it gave him helpful, first-hand insight into the background cogs and wheels of the music industry – and, more specifically, the mechanics of touring. But nearly 40 years later all that insight appears to have been forgotten.