Digital inclusion as Africa's economic game-changer
Image: File
In Uganda's remote Buheesi village, a school once disconnected from the world now accesses digital textbooks and submits reports in real time, thanks to a pilot program merging rural electrification with fibre-optic deployment.
This transformation underscores the power of digital inclusion, a force that can reshape economies and empower millions.
At its core, financial technology (fintech), the use of digital platforms like mobile apps and blockchain to deliver banking, payments and investment services, drives this change by making financial systems accessible to the underserved.
For Africa, with 18% of the global population but less than 1% of the world's data centre capacity, digital inclusion is not just about connectivity; it is about economic sovereignty and global competitiveness.
South Africa, with its industrial strength and technological promise, is poised to lead this revolution.
By prioritising fintech, rural connectivity, gender inclusion and youth empowerment, it can bridge the global digital divide and redefine Africa's future.
The digital economy is the backbone of modern progress, with monumental stakes.
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 9 calls for resilient infrastructure and innovation to close digital gaps, a priority echoed globally.
India's digital payment revolution exemplifies this: over 1.2 billion people use the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), a real-time payment system that enables instant bank transfers via mobile apps, slashing transaction costs and boosting financial inclusion.
Africa, however, lags significantly.
With mobile subscriptions projected to reach 1.4 billion by 2024, the continent has a foundation—yet only 24% of SubSaharan Africans use the internet, compared to the global average of 66%. High data costs exacerbate this divide.
Globally, 1GB of mobile data averages $2.59, but in Africa, prices range from $0.38 in Malawi to $43.75 in Zimbabwe. South Africa's $2.04 (R34.69) is near the global mean but burdens low-income users. This gap is economic, not just technological.
As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes industries, Africa's digital lag could deepen inequalities—unless bold action is taken.
South Africa's Path to Bridging Africa's strength lies in its people. With 362 million youths aged 15-24 by 2025, the continent boasts the world's youngest population.
Fintech is catalysing change: Kenya's M-Pesa and Nigeria's Flutterwave have brought millions into the financial fold, with mobile money driving inclusion rates above 80% in parts of East Africa.
Yet, high data costs and limited rural connectivity stifle progress, especially outside urban centres. South Africa faces load-shedding and affordability challenges that hinder its digital ambitions.
To seize this moment, Africa must extend digital infrastructure to rural areas, using shared networks and renewable energy. Only then can its youth and entrepreneurs fully engage in the digital economy.
South Africa stands as Africa's economic and technological frontrunner, with Cape Town's vibrant tech hub and Johannesburg's financial ecosystem.
Yet, its digital landscape is uneven. High-speed internet covers just 64% of the population, with only 24% using it regularly.
Rural connectivity lags, worsened by power outages, while data costs remain a hurdle. The steep price of mobile data burdens low-income households, limiting access to digital tools for education, entrepreneurship and financial inclusion.
Initiatives like TooMuchWifi, providing affordable internet to 400,000 low-income South Africans, highlight the need for broader solutions.
While updated figures are limited, high data costs clearly disproportionately affect low-income groups, who pay more per MB for smaller bundles.
Still, South Africa has tools to lead. Projects like SA Connect aim to expand broadband and private-sector efforts, like MTN's 5G rollout, show promise.
To bridge the divide, South Africa must scale public-private partnerships, subsidize access and expand digital literacy.
Fintech, emulating East Africa's mobile money success, could boost rural inclusion. Policy must foster an ecosystem where innovation thrives.
Digital inclusion demands equity, especially for women and youth. In Africa's informal sector—home to 85% of jobs—women and youth dominate, with 92.1% and 95.8% participation rates, respectively.
Yet, financial service access remains limited.
In South Africa, the gender gap in financial inclusion is narrow, but rural and youth divides persist: only 56% of rural residents are financially included.
Fintech can change this.
The Women Farmers Programme, training over 1,300 South African women in digital skills since 2018, shows the power of targeted intervention. Youth-focused efforts, like CodeTribe, which equips young South Africans with coding skills and Malawi's Tech Hubs, empowering 19,000 with digital literacy, unlock economic potential.
South Africa's Path to Bridging must amplify such programs, ensuring women and youth lead—not just participate—in the digital revolution.
South Africa faces a defining choice: pioneer Africa's digital transformation or risk irrelevance.
The path forward demands bold steps.
First, invest in rural infrastructure—shared digital networks and renewable energy can deliver connectivity.
Second, prioritize digital literacy programs for women, youth and rural communities. Third, foster an innovation ecosystem by supporting fintech startups and government-industry collaboration. Kenya and Nigeria offer models: Kenya's Safaricom and Nigeria's MTN Nigeria provide data plans below $1 per GB, driving inclusion.
South Africa can emulate these through policy reforms and competition.
The rewards are immense: closing the digital divide could boost GDP, create jobs and elevate South Africa's global10. As AI and digital services redefine competitiveness, delay is not an option.
Business leaders and policymakers must act, positioning South Africa as Africa's digital beacon. The future waits for no one—let us shape it today.
Nomvula Zeldah Mabuza is a Risk Governance and Compliance Specialist with extensive experience in strategic risk and industrial operations. She holds a Diploma in Business Management (Accounting) from Brunel University, UK, and is an MBA candidate at Henley Business School, South Africa.
Image: Supplied
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
8 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Public private partnerships can help close Africa's infrastructure deficit
There is a consensus that Africa can increase economic growth by making significant investments in connecting infrastructure. (Photo by EMMANUEL CROSET / AFP) There is a consensus that Africa can increase economic growth by making significant investments in connecting infrastructure — the physical and digital networks that connect towns, cities and countries, enabling seamless trade and data exchange. This includes transport, communication, energy, as well as water and sanitation, which are vital for the free flow of people, goods and services. When this infrastructure operates optimally it facilitates increased trade, communication, commerce and social development — critical pillars in the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) in 2023 stated that the Africa infrastructure deficit reduced continental economic growth by 2% annually and reduced productivity by 40%, an alarming state of affairs. To address this infrastructure deficit, the Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (Pida), an African Union initiative, produced the Pida Priority Action Plan (2021-2030) with the support of the United Nations. The plan has a critical list of 69 infrastructure projects to be developed in Africa for about $160 billion. Intra-Africa trade is extremely low at only 15%, compared with 68% in Europe and 59% in Asia. According to the ECA, once fully implemented, the AfCFTA aims to increase intra-Africa trade to 35% by 2040. The objective is to not only increase trade volumes but also promote economic diversification away from reliance on commodity exports towards manufacturing and value-added industries. The changes in the global trade architecture, tariff regimes, aid cancellation, shifting political alliances and elevated geopolitical tensions indicate an urgent need for Africans to increasingly rely on other Africans. This means addressing the critical infrastructure deficits and unlocking intra-African trade is the most important task facing Africa today. Financing connecting infrastructure The technical White Paper, titled Missing Connection: Unlocking Sustainable Infrastructure Financing in Africa and co-published by the Africa-Europe Foundation and African Union Development Agency – NEPAD for the Finance in Common Summit held in Cape Town, South Africa in February 2025, noted the continent needs about $150 billion annually in infrastructure investment to address the infrastructure deficit. Current investment is about $80 billion annually, of which only 40% of this financing comes from governments. About 35% of the financing is from donors and other international partners. The balance of current financing is from the private sector, whose role has taken on increased significance considering the changing donor patterns and decline in China-led financing in recent times. Creating enabling environments for private sector partners to invest in is critical for closing the significant funding gap. Public private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly viewed as one infrastructure financing modality that should be increasingly considered by African governments. These partnerships are long-term agreements that involve the granting of specific rights to the private sector to build new infrastructure or undertake substantial renovations of existing infrastructure using private financing and at significant private sector risk. In exchange, the private sector investors are granted long-term concessions over the operations of the assets and are remunerated through user charges, government unitary payments, or a blend of the two where revenue viability gaps exist. The assets at the end of the partnership contract are transferred to the state and the state has the option to operate the assets or tender out to the private sector for another contract term. Over the last few years, there has been a huge interest from African governments in using such partnerships to fund their infrastructure deficits. The continent has a low deal flow compared to other regions of the world, but this is set to change if the right policy interventions are applied. McKinsey and Company, in an article titled Solving Africa's Infrastructure Paradox, noted that although Africa has a large pipeline of projects, for example, the Pida Priority Action Plan initiatives, but on average fewer than 10% of these receive funding. There are international funds with an appetite to invest in Africa. So why are so few deals being funded? Some of the reasons for the slow conclusion of public private partnership deals in Africa are: Feasibility studies or business plans are not undertaken in sufficient detail to assess risks or commercial viability. Inadequate enabling legislation, frameworks, and policies tailored for concluding PPP transactions efficiently. The inability of governments to issue guarantees because of weak balance sheets or challenges with credit ratings. A shortage of skilled public servants who possess the necessary experience to conclude PPP contracts. Low liquidity or highly risk averse domestic lenders, thus making foreign lenders the primary option in some markets. Currency fluctuations and other political risk factors discourage investment because of the elevated perceived risks. The African Legal Support Facility (ALSF) based at the African Development Bank undertook a study in 2024 to assess the progress in the development of public private partnership frameworks and supporting legislation. The study, titled Public Private Partnerships, Legal and Institutional Frameworks in Africa: A Comparative Analysis, produced some key findings: Out of 54 countries in Africa, 42 have enacted PPP legislation. Out of the 42 countries, 24 have civil law, 13 have common law and five have mixed legal systems. Western and Central Africa have the highest percentage of economies that have enacted specific PPP laws, with all countries in the region having laws in place, except for Equatorial Guinea and The Gambia. Eastern and Southern Africa have enacted the least specific PPP laws. Among the 12 countries that make up the Southern Africa region, four remain without a specific PPP law: Botswana, eSwatini, Lesotho and South Africa. Annual trends showed that the highest rate of enacted laws was from 2015 to 2017 with 16 laws passed over the three years. The first African country to enact a specific PPP law was Mauritius in 2004, while the most recent is the Republic of Congo in 2022. The restricted tendering method is the most common form of PPP procurement. South Africa had concluded the most public private partnership deals in Africa as of the end of 2024, raising nearly $5 billion, with Nigeria in second place. South Africa appears to have had better success in PPP deal closure because of an advanced financial market, stable economic policy, favourable legal framework and a perceived transparent procurement process according to various studies. The country uses Treasury Regulation 16 under the Public Finance Management Act for national and provincial governments and the Municipal PPP Regulation 309 under the Municipal Finance Management Act for local government. These regulations have been undergoing amendments, with Regulation 16 amendments complete and coming into effect on 1 July 2025 and Regulation 309 amendments still need finalisation. Donor agencies and development finance institutions have directed funding to support the training and institutional building of PPP capabilities in African governments. The Public Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, a World Bank programme, has successfully implemented institution-building activities to enhance the capacity of government officials around the world. This technical assistance helps to catalyse the adoption of PPP laws, regulations and guidelines in a streamlined manner to facilitate investments. 2025 and beyond Attracting both domestic and global private sector investors to Africa is a critical part of closing the financing gap and making inroads to closing the infrastructure deficit that prevents Africa from growing at a rate fast enough to create meaningful opportunities, especially for its burgeoning youth population. One of the attractive features of PPPs is the transfer back to the state of the asset at the end of the agreement. We have seen many privatisations of state-owned enterprises, usually accompanied by opposition from political parties or civil society because of the more permanent transfers of state assets to the ownership and control of the private sector. Governments have raised debt capital in private markets or by tapping into pension funds to fund infrastructure — another at times controversial route because of perceived risks to pensioners of the funds being mismanaged. Public private partnerships are, however, not a silver bullet to the funding deficit because of the complex nature of the agreements and the real risk of African governments assuming contingent liability exposures inadvertently because of a shortage of skilled bureaucrats. It is incumbent upon our governments to develop the necessary legal frameworks and innovative de-risking mechanisms that will allow the successful conclusion of private sector investments. Dr Mthandazo Ngwenya is a managing director at Bigen Africa Group and has also served as Africa director of Intellecap Advisory Services.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
UN report names 48 multinational corporations allegedly profiting from Palestinian occupation
The findings, presented by Francesca Albanese - the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian - during a media briefing in Geneva on Thursday, accuse these corporations of failing to uphold their legal responsibilities, thereby facilitating a system of exploitative occupation. Image: Supplied The United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories has unveiled a report listing up to 48 multinational corporations allegedly complicit in the ongoing war and profiting from the occupation of Palestine. The findings, presented by Francesca Albanese during a media briefing in Geneva on Thursday, accuse these corporations of failing to uphold their legal responsibilities, thereby facilitating a system of exploitative occupation. Albanese's report highlights a troubling landscape where corporations across various sectors—including weapons manufacturers, technology firms, financial institutions, and construction companies—are said to be contributing to what she describes as a 'livestreamed genocide.' The findings underscore a broader complicity, presenting a picture where corporate interests overshadow profound ethical considerations regarding human rights violations in the region. 'These actors have entrenched and expanded Israel's settler-colonial logic of displacement and replacement – and this is not accidental,' Albanese said. 'It is the function of an economy built to dominate, dispossess, and erase Palestinians from their land.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She emphasised that, instead of using their leverage to oppose human rights abuses, these companies have normalised Israel's oppressive actions as mere economic activities, ignoring the escalating atrocities following the 7 October 2023. The report doesn't just stop at identifying companies; it extends its scope to corporations enabling the infrastructure that supports this occupation. Albanese asserted that numerous firms involved in finance, research, advertising, and legal consulting have played a role in sustaining the settler-colonial regime through the dissemination of bias, narratives, and investment. 'Corporate actors are deeply entwined in the system of occupation, apartheid and genocide in the occupied Palestinian territory,' Albanese said. 'For decades, Israel's repression of Palestinian people has been scaffolded by corporations, fully aware of and yet indifferent to, decades of human rights violations and international crimes.' Among the firms highlighted are technology giants like Alphabet, IBM, Amazon, and Microsoft, accused of providing carceral and surveillance services that fuel the machine of oppression. Meanwhile, arms manufacturers such as Elbit Systems and Lockheed Martin have reportedly supplied Israel with military hardware, including cutting-edge fighter jets and drones, enabling destructive operations. According to the Gaza health ministry, more than 56 000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel's military during its 21-month campaign in Gaza. Albanese's findings correlate with the sentiment that the international community must hold corporations accountable. She drew parallels with South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which had repercussions for corporations embroiled in apartheid. 'The serious, structural and sustained nature of Israel's crimes and violations triggered a prima facie responsibility to disengage — one that many corporations ignored,' she said. 'Corporate fixation on narrow technicalities and isolated violations rather than confronting the structural illegality of their ties to Israel's occupation is disingenuous.' Energy companies were also scrutinised for their roles in perpetuating the Israeli blockade. The report revealed that Israel depends heavily on energy inputs from global corporations, which have their own stakes in maintaining an energy infrastructure that serves the needs of both Israeli settlers and the military, while denying similar resources to Palestinians. It mentioned Swiss-based Glencore plc as among primary suppliers for coal that powers electricity in Israel "Glencore was also involved in shipments from South Africa; these shipments accounted for 15% of Israeli coal imports in 2023 and 2024. By supplying Israel with coal, gas, oil and fuel, companies are contributing to civilian infrastructures that Israel uses to entrench permanent annexation and now weaponizes in the destruction of Palestinian life in Gaza," it said. However, Glencore's head of corporate communications, Charles Watenphul, told Business Report that there was no substance in the allegations made in the report. 'We categorically reject all allegations contained in the report and consider them to be without any foundation and legally groundless,' Watenphul said. Albanese called for sanctions and an arms embargo on Israel and for global corporations to be held accountable for 'profiting from genocide' in Gaza. Last month, the Trump administration wrote to UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres calling on the UN to remove Albanese, alleging 'virulent antisemitism and support for terrorism' and alleging that she claimed to be an 'international lawyer' but was not licensed to practice law. Albanese is an Italian legal scholar who has been the special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories since 2022. BUSINESS REPORT
Daily Maverick
5 days ago
- Daily Maverick
France's Macron calls tariffs imposed by powerful countries a form of ‘blackmail'
His comments during a speech at the International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, Spain, came with the European Union negotiating a trade deal with the United States ahead of a July 9 deadline, though he did not specifically refer to the United States or U.S. President Donald Trump. 'We need to restore freedom and equity to international trade, much more than barriers and tariffs, which are devised by the strongest, and which are often used as instruments of blackmail, not at all as instruments of rebalancing,' Macron said. He also urged support – and a rethinking – of the World Trade Organization to bring it in line with goals to fight inequality and climate change. 'Bringing back a trade war and tariffs at this moment in the life of the planet is an aberration, especially when I see the tariffs that are being imposed on countries that are just beginning their economic takeoff,' Macron said. Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs in April in which he said countries would face taxes on imports into the United States ranging from 10% to 50%, though he later reversed course and mostly lowered them for 90 days. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday rejected Macron's characterization, insisting that tariffs were an effective tool to rebuild U.S. manufacturing. She said Trump remained in discussions on trade to aid American workers. 'Europe and the rest of the world might not be used to that, but President Trump is back in town and he's going to do what's right for our people and our country,' she said. The United Nations trade agency had said the tariffs could have a catastrophic impact on developing countries, with some of the world's least developed, such as Lesotho, Cambodia, Laos, Madagascar and Myanmar, facing some of the highest levies. Macron, a vocal critic of Washington's tariff campaign, has also said it is an aberration to ask Europeans to spend more on defence while launching a trade war.
