US airlines face heightened risks as global carriers bypass Middle East after attacks on Iran
US airlines face heightened risks as global carriers bypass Middle East after attacks on Iran
Follow our live coverage here.
An organisation that monitors flight risks warned on June 22 that US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region, as airlines continued to avoid large parts of the Middle East due to ongoing missile exchanges.
But following a barrage of early morning Iranian missiles, Israel has reopened its airspace for six hours on June 22 to bring back those stranded abroad since the conflict with Iran began on June 13.
Safe Airspace, a membership-based website run by Opsgroup, said the US attacks on Iran may increase risks to US operators in the region.
'While there have been no specific threats made against civil aviation, Iran has previously warned it would retaliate by attacking US military interests in the Middle East - either directly or via proxies such as Hezbollah,' Safe Airspace said.
Meanwhile, flight tracking website FlightRadar24, said airlines maintained flight diversions around the region.
'Following US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, commercial traffic in the region is operating as it has since new airspace restrictions were put into place last week,' it said on social media platform X.
Its website showed airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. They have chosen other routings such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if these result in higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times.
Missile and drone barrages in an expanding number of conflict zones globally represent a high risk to airline traffic.
Since Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, carriers have suspended flights to destinations in the affected countries, though there have been some evacuation flights from neighbouring nations and some bringing stranded Israelis home.
In the days before the US strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar and United Airlines did the same with flights to Dubai.
Safe Airspace said it was possible airspace risks could now extend to countries including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. 'We continue to advise a high degree of caution at this time,' it said.
Israel's carriers, El Al Israel Airlines, Arkia, Israir and Air Haifa, said earlier on June 22 they had suspended rescue flights that allowed people to return to Israel until further notice.
El Al said it would also extend its cancellation of scheduled flights through Friday and Israir said it had halted the sale of tickets for all flights through July 7.
A spokesperson for Israel's airports authority said the country's main airport, Ben Gurion near Tel Aviv, was expected to reopen for rescue flight landings on Sunday between 11am and 5pm local time.
Flag carrier El Al, Arkia and Israir said some flights would resume at 11am local time. Air Haifa said it had cancelled four flights on June 22, although the Airports Authority said the small Haifa Airport serving Israel's north would also be open from 11am to 5pm local time.
Tens of thousands of Israelis and others who had booked tickets to Israel are stuck abroad.
At the same time, nearly 40,000 tourists in Israel are looking to leave the country, some of whom are going via Jordan's borders to Amman and Aqaba and others via Egypt and by boat to Cyprus.
'In accordance with security directives, we are working to bring Israelis home as quickly as possible,' Israel's Transport Minister Miri Regev said in a statement.
Japan's foreign ministry said on June 22 it had evacuated 21 people, including 16 Japanese nationals, from Iran overland to Azerbaijan. It said it was the second such evacuation since June 19 and that it would conduct further evacuations if necessary.
New Zealand's government said on June 22 it would send a Hercules military transport plane to the Middle East on standby to evacuate New Zealanders from the region.
It said in a statement that government personnel and a C-130J Hercules aircraft would leave Auckland on June 23. The plane would take some days to reach the region, it said.
The government was also in talks with commercial airlines to assess how they may be able to assist, it added. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Major Israeli rights groups brand Gaza campaign ‘genocide'
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Both organisations are frequent critics of Israeli government policies, but the language in their reports issued on July 28 was their most stark yet. JERUSALEM - Rights groups B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel said on July 28 that they had concluded the war in Gaza amounts to 'genocide' against Palestinians, a first for Israeli NGOs. Both organisations are frequent critics of Israeli government policies, but the language in their reports issued on July 28 was their most stark yet. 'Nothing prepares you for the realisation that you are part of a society committing genocide. This is a deeply painful moment for us,' B'Tselem executive director Yuli Novak told a news conference unveiling the two reports. 'As Israelis and Palestinians who live here and witness the reality every day, we have a duty to speak the truth as clearly as possible,' she said. 'Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians.' Israel's war in Gaza for the past 21 months began in response to an unprecedented attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas on Oct 7, 2023. The Israeli assault has left much of the Gaza Strip, home to more than two million Palestinians, in ruins, and according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry has killed at least 59,821 people, most of them civilians. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: BCA to conduct independent probe, act against any non-compliance Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August-October period Business SIA's first-quarter profits fall by 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose All Gazans have been driven from their homes at least once since the start of the war, and UN agencies warn that residents face a growing threat of famine and malnutrition. The International Court of Justice, in an interim ruling in early 2024 in a case lodged by South Africa, found it 'plausible' that the Israeli offensive had violated the UN Genocide Convention. The Israeli government, backed by the United States, fiercely denies the charge and says it is fighting to defeat Hamas and to bring back Israeli hostages still held in Gaza. The reports from B'Tselem – one of Israel's best-known rights groups – and Physicians for Human Rights Israel argue that the war's objectives go further. B'Tselem's report cites statements from senior politicians to illustrate that Israel 'is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip'. Physicians for Human Rights Israel's report documents what the group says is 'the deliberate and systematic destruction of Gaza's healthcare system'. AFP
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US-China relations: Between confrontation and transaction
THE return of Donald Trump to the White House in January has ushered in a new chapter of Sino-American relations marked by aggressive economic policies, strategic unpredictability and a pattern of escalation followed by tactical negotiations. Six months into his second presidency, Trump's approach to China has proved both more confrontational and more transactional than many observers anticipated. And there are now signs that his administration is starting to reassess its moves. Trump signalled a hard line on China with hawkish Cabinet picks, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Michael Waltz. He also wasted little time in implementing his campaign promises on China trade policy. Within weeks of inauguration, the administration launched what many economists dub the most aggressive trade war in recent history. On Feb 1, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from China. Starting in April, Trump imposed a minimum 10 per cent tariff on nearly everything the US imports, although goods from China faced a higher tariff of 34 per cent. The administration's broader China strategy plans to fundamentally restructure economic ties between the two nations. Trump pledged to revoke China's preferential trade status and had threatened at least 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports during his campaign, signalling a departure from decades of economic engagement and the start of a process of decoupling. Beyond trade, the Trump administration is also expanding restrictions on Chinese ownership of American assets. The president has said he will pressure Chinese companies to sell holdings that threaten national security interests. This encompasses farm land, natural resources, technology companies and ports. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up These moves represent a broader shift towards viewing the trade relationship through national security lenses, promoted by the China hawks in office. Economic competition is being framed as a matter of strategic rivalry rather than mere trade disputes. Despite the aggressive opening moves, Trump's second term has also demonstrated his willingness to pull back from maximum pressure when it serves his interests. In mid-May, Washington reached an agreement with Beijing to lower tariffs dramatically and open some markets that both sides had closed off as tensions rose. Tariffs on Chinese imports fell to 35 per cent from 145 per cent – a historic level reached in April following retaliatory hikes. That dramatic reduction demonstrated Trump's transactional approach to international relations. The 90-day suspension of the heaviest tariffs has created space for ongoing negotiations, with both sides apparently recognising the economic costs of sustained pressure. US companies have faced particular challenges adapting to the volatile policy environment. The clash has also seen China retaliating through restrictions on critical minerals and magnets needed by US factories. Some sectors have received temporary relief, with the administration exempting certain technology products from the harshest tariffs, but many businesses report difficulties with long-term planning amid policy uncertainty. Trump's confrontational approach extended beyond China to traditional allies, potentially reshaping regional dynamics in Asia. By pressuring Canadian, Mexican and European partners, his administration has created opportunities for China to strengthen relations with countries seeking alternatives to US partnerships. The unpredictability of Trump's approach has forced some regional powers to recalculate their strategic positions, with some hedging their bets between the two superpowers rather than aligning clearly with the US. The rising costs of a growing confrontation with China has led to the reassessment of these policies in Washington. Most intriguingly, the Trump administration reversed its position on technology controls, notably allowing Nvidia to sell lower-level artificial intelligence chips, the H20, to China this month after banning such sales in April. Some suggest that this dramatic about-turn from the administration's initial hardline stance may reflect the eroding power of the China hawks in the administration, including personnel changes. Alex Wong, a known China hawk and former deputy national security advisor, has been reassigned to another role, and the State Department has shuttered the team involved in South China Sea security. These changes appear tied to Trump's broader diplomatic strategy. Some in Washington are speculating that he may be angling for a Chinese trip as he courts a more assertive China. But it is doubtful that the administration is planning to reset the relationship with China through direct engagement rather than continued confrontation. In a way, several patterns have emerged in Sino-American relationships under Trump. The administration appears committed to using economic pressure as its primary tool for reshaping the relationship, but remains willing to negotiate when faced with economic or political costs at home. The relationship is now defined by cycles of escalation followed by tactical compromises, reflecting Trump's preference for dramatic gestures and dealmaking. Still, neither side appears willing to accept a return to the pre-2016 status, suggesting that heightened tensions and economic competition will remain defining features of US-China relations.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Who buys the F-150s, and more Japan deal mysteries
The long-awaited trade deal between the US and Japan has investors celebrating after months of uncertainty. But as the song goes, nagging questions always remain. Who is going to buy the 'cars, SUVs (sport utility vehicles) and trucks' that President Donald Trump has promised to sell? Who is going to purchase the 100 Boeing jets? And what possible structure could the US$550 billion fund, allegedly financed by Tokyo with 90 per cent of profits going to the US, actually take? Answers are sorely needed, not just because of an already growing comprehension gap between the countries over what was actually agreed, but to inform South Korea and other close US allies who are trying to wrap up similar deals before Aug 1. Let us start with autos, long the main source of Trump's dissatisfaction with Tokyo as well as the largest single cause of the trade deficit. The White House fact sheet (if indeed it can so be called) declared that 'longstanding restrictions on US cars and trucks will be lifted, granting US automakers access to the Japanese consumer market'. Of course, US carmakers have enjoyed unlimited access to the Japanese market for decades. As I noted in April, the problem is that US cars just are not good enough for the local consumer – and Detroit largely is not interested in trying to muscle its way into a hyper-competitive market dominated by domestic players. Tokyo can try making it a little easier to import US vehicles, such as simplifying inspection procedures, but it cannot rebuild cities to fit the bloated models US automakers favour. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Around 84 per cent of streets in Japan are municipal roads with an average width of just 3.7 m. Even if Tokyo gave everyone a Ford F-150 pickup, its 2.4 m width would prevent two from passing on narrow streets. Hence, cute minivans and kei cars – Japan's smallest expressway-legal 'light vehicles' – dominate while, as my colleague Liam Denning said this week, 'US automakers do not, in general, make an adorable little anything.' In any case, Japan's auto market has been shrinking for years, with new cars sold down about 20 per cent from a 1990s peak. Automakers constantly fret that young people are losing interest in learning to drive, while the growing numbers of elderly citizens are encouraged to return their licences. But more significant is what form the US$550 billion investment fund will take. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the 'innovative financing mechanism' was key to Tokyo getting a deal at all. But neither side seems to agree on what it looks like. The idea first surfaced in May when the Financial Times reported that SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son had suggested a joint sovereign wealth fund. The White House calls it an 'investment vehicle' that will 'rebuild and expand core American industries'. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, however, refers to a combination of equity, loans and guarantees that will be led by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and guarantees by Nippon Export and Investment Insurance. That sounds more like overseas development aid than a wealth fund – though few could argue American infrastructure might actually benefit from that. Trump now promises Japan will 'give us 90 per cent of US$550 billion'. Tokyo is saying that applies to projects where 90 per cent of investment is from the US – in other words, profits are proportional. Does the figure include funding already pledged, such as SoftBank's promised US$100 billion? Who knows? Indeed, a leaked photo from the talks shows what looks like a proposal from Japan for a US$400 billion fund, crossed out with US$500 billion handwritten on top. That proposal also suggested a 50 per cent profit share. Is this just repackaged existing spending into a simple PowerPoint slide? After all, Japan already invested US$783 billion in the US in 2023, and Ishiba pledged in January to boost that to US$1 trillion in the future. The problem is that at some stage, this needs to be worked into actual policies. And this is where Ishiba's rush to agreement might come back to bite, especially if he is no longer in the job when the talks get down to details – something that, despite his denials , still seems all but certain after the drubbing his Liberal Democratic Party took in recent upper house elections. There are plenty of parts of the deal that do make sense. The 100 Boeings can find a home at the country's airlines, though Japan has admitted the number includes at least some already-planned purchases. With Japan as the world's largest buyer of liquefied natural gas, Tokyo's participation in the Alaska project always seemed logical. Even if the two sides do not seem to agree on what they decided on defence, Japan needs to spend more and the US is the logical seller. Above all, it is encouraging to see the White House, after all these months of tense relations, again describe its ally as the 'cornerstone of peace in the Indo-Pacific'. But with all these questions – and Washington continuing to hold the threat over Japan's head with a quarterly evaluation of its compliance with the deal – the market's sigh of relief might still be premature. BLOOMBERG
