MPs to vote on welfare bill as unrest rumbles on
The Conservatives have said they will oppose the plans as they are not "serious reforms".
The rebellion's scale has ebbed and flowed. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have killed the proposals outright, an extraordinary threat of defeat for a government with a landslide majority.
Now a replacement amendment, supported by disability charities, has attracted around 35 Labour MPs. It suggests that last-minute concessions may have reduced the potential for a government loss - but not comfortably.
A number of MPs have expressed concerns about a promised review of personal independence payment (Pip) assessments, after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced on Monday that it would only report back around the same time that the proposed changes were introduced.
Labour Chief Whip Sir Alan Campbell reportedly told a regular meeting of the parliamentary party last night that they should "act as a team" and government efforts at persuasion are expected to continue up until the vote itself, which is due this evening.
Under the current government concessions people who currently receive Pip or the health element of universal credit will continue to do so. But future claimants will still be affected by the reforms.
Chris Mason: Labour still has a big persuasion job ahead
Welfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes?
'Disability welfare reforms could leave us worse off'
The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, told the BBC her party would vote against the measures
"The benefits bill is too high," she said.
"It was 40bn just before Covid. It is now projected to be a 100bn by 2030. And what Labour is doing is not making any savings at all. It's just reducing the rate of increase. That's why we are not supporting it."
Other criticism of the government proposals has been diverse, with some saying the reforms will not be as effective as the government hopes.
"I strongly believe that these kind of punitive measures of cutting welfare are not going to have the outcomes that we've been told they will," said Olivia Blake, Labour MP for Sheffield Hallam, who is disabled and opposes the reforms.
"I think it will just be about saving money but will actually move spending into areas such as housing services, the NHS and social care," she told BBC Newsnight.
Blake added that some MPs were still considering their vote, saying the rebellion would be "more significant than maybe people realise".
Kendall defended the bill in the House of Commons on Monday, saying it aligned with MPs' shared values around providing support to those that could work while protecting those that cannot.
Modelling published by Department for Work and Pensions suggested around 150,000 people might be pushed into poverty by 2030 because of the welfare cuts - lower than the original 250,000 figure estimated before the government made the concessions.
Sir Stephen Timms is slated to conduct the report that was among the concessions. He told BBC Newsnight that the net effect of the government's policies would reduce poverty - including the measures to help people into work. He also stressed the need to make Pip sustainable in the future.
The Conservatives have criticised the cost of the bill while the Liberal Democrats have called for proposals to be suspended so they can be further looked at.
The government had hoped to save £5bn a year by 2030 before the concessions. These are now likely to cost around £3bn, according to the Resolution Foundation think tank.
What has been driving the rise in disability benefit claims?
Labour MPs press Kendall on rollout of benefit changes
Welfare U-turn means we are in 'better position', says Streeting
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Sticks With Trade Deadline, Pressures Japan
Good morning. Donald Trump sticks with a July 9 tariff deadline. Keir Starmer's planned welfare reforms are slashed. And a London-based startup unveils its latest smartphone. Listen to the day's top stories. Donald Trump stuck with his July 9 deadline for higher tariffs to resume and deepened his criticism of Japan, saying 'I'm not sure we're going to make a deal.' Japanese shares dropped initially but pared losses as some brushed off the remarks as a negotiating tactic. Check our latest markets wrap here.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lloyd Cooper: nostalgic snaps over the years of iconic motorcycle shop
Nostalgic snaps of Watford business Lloyd Cooper Motorcycles have been shared amid an "incredible" outpouring since its closure. The iconic business, also known as Motorcycles Direct, shut after 125 years at Queens Road, with co-owner Des Gregory previously hailing the "end of an era". Bikes upstairs (which had to be carried there!) in the early 1990s (Image: Des Gregory) This week he told the Watford Observer: "The response to myself, Gordon and all the guys over the last few weeks has been absolutely incredible. "The really nice thing is that so many messages and comments have come from everyone and not just from the motorcycling community. Des Gregory, left, receiving an award. (Image: Des Gregory) "We have received so many supportive messages about the store past and present which has meant so much to us all." They sparked memories of the "many customers and characters that we met along the way", he added, which "contributed hugely to the success story of Lloyd Cooper Motorcycles". (Image: Des Gregory) Many voiced disappointment at the closure, calling the business 'part of the town's fabric' and 'one of those shops that make Watford what it is', as Des confirmed retirement as the reason. "Thanks again to everyone and all at the Watford Observer for covering the story," Des added. "We enjoyed the ride!" Picture of the original shop around 1900. (Image: Des Gregory)ANOTHER 1/5 for takeaway 'does not reflect daily standards', owner says Check out the rest of these classic pictures - ranging from around 1900 to the early 2000s. Charlie Heal sitting on the bike in the early 1970s (Image: Des Gregory) Grita Heal behind the counter, Gordon Heal by the bikes, in the 1970s. (Image: Des Gregory) The clothing department in the 1990s. (Image: Des Gregory) Luke Gregory at one of the business's charity nights. (Image: Des Gregory) Des Gregory as Lloyd Cooper Motorcycles named among UK's top 10 motorcycle shops. (Image: Des Gregory) Left to right, company directors: Jim Heal, Gordon Heal, Des Gregory and Luke Gregory. (Image: Des Gregory) (Image: Des Gregory) (Image: Des Gregory)
CNBC
30 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC's UK Exchange newsletter: UK's millionaire exodus spells more trouble for Labour
For most of this century, the U.K. — and London in particular — has been one of the most popular destinations for the world's super rich to live, work and play in. The U.K.'s approach in this period was best summed-up by Peter Mandelson, a senior minister in Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's Labour governments and now U.K. ambassador to the United States. In 1998 he told a group of Silicon Valley business leaders: "We are intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich as long as they pay their taxes." However, that is now changing as the wealthy flee a punitive new tax regime, with potentially severe consequences for the country. Arguably this began when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 and hundreds of Russian oligarchs left the U.K. after being sanctioned. This in itself was meaningful; the upmarket estate agent Aston Chase estimated that, at the time of the invasion, some 150,000 Russians were living in 'Londongrad' owning £1.1 billion ($1.5 billion) worth of residential property. But that was a specific Russian issue and apart from those who had profited from Russian activity, few mourned their departure. Things began to change more broadly during the run-up to last year's general election, when Jeremy Hunt, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, sought to steal the clothes of his Labour rivals in his March 2024 Budget. He announced that, as of April 2025, the U.K. would abolish so-called 'non-dom' status — a quirk of the tax system dating back to 1799, that allowed wealthy people living in Britain but who did not consider it to be their permanent home, or 'domicile,' to pay U.K. tax only on income earned in, or transferred to, the country. This had been a flagship Labour policy and Labour had made hay from the fact that Akshata Murty, the Indian-born wife of Rishi Sunak, the former prime minister, was one of around 74,000 people who had enjoyed non-dom status in 2022-23 (the latest tax year for which figures are available). Hunt claimed replacing non-dom status with his "simpler, residency-based system" would raise £2.7 billion annually. Crucially, though, he chose not to subject overseas assets placed in offshore trusts by non-doms to U.K. inheritance tax. When Labour won the election, in July last year, newly-appointed Chancellor Rachel Reeves, decided she needed to maintain the party's leadership on the issue. So she abolished the exemption on offshore trusts — potentially exposing the entire global wealth of these individuals to the 40% levy. Overnight it turned the U.K. from one of the most attractive destinations for the world's wealthiest people into one of the most expensive places in the world to die. The upshot has been an exodus of the super rich. It is hard to know precisely how many people have left. The analytics firm New World Wealth and the investment migration advisers Henley & Partners suggested in March this year that Britain had lost a net 10,800 millionaires to migration in 2024, up 157% on 2023 and more than any other country except China. Some dispute those figures, among them Stephen Kinsella, a legal advisor and member of Patriotic Millionaires U.K., a nonpartisan network of British millionaires calling for a wealth tax. He told me recently the numbers were an extrapolation based on the number of people on LinkedIn who had said they had left. He added: "There are about 3 million millionaires in Britain so, even if 10,000 had left, that would be about 0.3% of millionaires." Henley & Partners and New World Wealth published a new report last week predicting that 16,500 millionaires would leave the U.K. this year, more than twice as many had been expected, representing the highest net outflow of high-net-worth individuals from any country since they began tracking millionaire migration 10 years ago. Although the actual numbers will not be known until the U.K. tax authorities crunch the numbers some years hence, there have been plenty of straws in the wind. LonRes, which tracks activity in London's prime property markets, estimates there were 36% fewer transactions involving such homes in May this year than in the same month last year. Meanwhile, Companies House data suggests more than 4,400 directors have left the U.K. in the last year, with departures accelerating in recent months. Among those leaving have been some very high-profile individuals, including Richard Gnodde, the South African-born vice chairman of Goldman Sachs; Nassef Sawiris, Egypt's richest man and co-owner of Aston Villa FC co-owner and John Fredriksen, the Norwegian-born shipping magnate. Lakshmi Mittal, the Indian-born steel billionaire who regularly tops the rankings of Britain's richest people, is said to be weighing up his options and is widely expected to give up his U.K. tax residency. Compounding the problem is that other countries are currently welcoming the rich with open arms. They include Italy, where Gnodde has relocated, which allows wealthy foreigners to pay an annual fee of up to 200,000 euros to exempt their overseas assets and income from tax. The top destination for migrating millionaires though, is the United Arab Emirates, now home to Sawiris and Fredriksen. The latest Henley & Partners/New World Wealth report predicts it will attract a net 9,800 millionaires this year. None of this has yet appeared in the U.K.'s fiscal forecasts. Indeed, the independent Office for Budget Responsibility still assumes Reeves' move will raise £2.7 billion in extra taxes a year by 2028-29. It assumes that between 12%-25% of non-doms would go, which now looks an underestimate. Research published by the consultancy Oxford Economics in September last year, based on a survey of non-doms and their advisors, suggested 63% would leave within two years of the measure being implemented. Survey aside, Oxford Economics expects up to 32% of non-doms to leave and under that scenario, with non-doms having paid £8.9 billion in taxes in 2022-23, the policy would start costing the Treasury money. It is not just the foregone taxes such people would have paid that will hurt. Thousands of jobs in sectors like retail, hospitality, legal services and luxury goods depend on the continued presence in the U.K. of the former non-doms. Scores of charities, cultural and sporting institutions depend on their patronage and philanthropy. There would therefore be a much broader impact than just the fiscal one. Belatedly, the government has realized it has a problem. Unfortunately, it is probably too late to lure back those non-doms who have already gone, along with others who have left due to the imposition of VAT on school fees and changes in agricultural property relief and business property relief that exposed previously exempt estates and businesses to inheritance tax for the first time. However, the government can still act to stop further departures. The most effective thing to do would be to restore the exemption from inheritance tax granted to offshore trusts. This would be problematic for Reeves, since taxing the wealthy more is highly popular among Labour voters, even when — as one poll last weekend suggested — it hurts the public finances. But the Chancellor needs to find some way of backing down without it looking too much like a U-turn. And, with many wealthy people looking to relocate in time for the start of the new school year in September, she should probably not leave it until her autumn of England governor: Businesses tell me they are putting off investment decisions Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, discusses the U.K.'s economic and macro outlook at the ECB's Forum in Sintra. Europe's big defense push is putting supply chains in a chokepoint. Here's how they aim to break through European defense stocks have become a favorite play among investors, but extra demand has also put supply chains under strain. The CEOs of Thales, Leonardo and Saab told CNBC how they are tackling those challenges. 'F1' producer Jerry Bruckheimer on strong box office debut, impact of streaming and AI on Hollywood Jerry Bruckheimer, 'F1 the Movie' producer, talks to CNBC about the film's strong box office debut, working with Apple, whether a sequel is in the works and the impact of streaming and AI on autos spared under U.S. tariff cut but steel still in question. The U.K.'s trade deal with the U.S. gives British cars a preferential tariff rate over those imported from other parts of the world. But questions over a reduction in tariffs on U.K. metals remain. How BP became a potential takeover target. Market tongues have been wagging for weeks about a potential merger between Britain's oil giants until Shell denied reports that it's in talks to acquire its rival. Here's how BP became a takeover target. Bank of England chief sees downward interest rate trend as UK hunts for growth. BOE Governor Andrew Bailey told CNBC that interest rates should come down gradually as central banks juggle taming inflation and stoking elusive economic U.K.'s FTSE 100 has resumed its march upwards by rising around 0.3% over the past week, but is still 1.2% off from the record high reached in June. In case you missed it, U.K. vehicle manufacturing fell sharply for a fifth straight month in May as headwinds, including U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policy, hit the automotive industry hard. In addition, thieves are also doing their best to make sure there are fewer cars on the road in the U.K. A new study by the Royal United Services Institute said organized criminal gangs are driving the surge in car thefts — where vehicles are being stolen and shipped from the U.K. within 24 hours.
