Ceasefire announced after dozens killed in Syrian sectarian clashes
Defence minister Murhaf Abu Qasra said in a statement that after an 'agreement with the city's notables and dignitaries, we will respond only to the sources of fire and deal with any targeting by outlaw groups'.
The clashes began with a series of tit-for-tat kidnappings and attacks between members of local Sunni Bedouin tribes and Druze armed factions in the southern province, a centre of the Druze community.
Government security forces that were sent in on Monday to restore order also clashed with Druze armed groups. During the day, Israel struck a Syrian government military tank and said it was acting to protect the Druze religious minority.
In Israel, the Druze are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the armed forces.
State-run news agency SANA did not give any details about Tuesday's strike. However, the Britain-based war monitor the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said Israel struck a tank belonging to the Syrian military as forces began to move in deeper into Sweida city.
Earlier on Tuesday, religious leaders of the Druze community in Syria called for armed factions that have been clashing with government forces to surrender their weapons and cooperate with authorities as they entered the provincial capital of Sweida.
One of the main religious authorities later released a video statement retracting the call.
The initial statement called for armed factions in Sweida to 'cooperate with the forces of the Ministry of Interior, not to resist their entry, and to hand over their weapons to the Ministry of Interior'.
The statement also called for 'opening a dialogue with the Syrian government to address the repercussions of the events.'
The commander of Internal Security in Sweida Governorate, Brigadier General Ahmad al-Dalati, welcomed the statement and called for 'all religious authorities and social activists to adopt a unified national stance that supports the Ministry of Interior's measures to extend state authority and achieve security throughout the province'.
Sheikh Hikmat Al-Hijri, a Druze spiritual leader who has been opposed to the government in Damascus, said in a video message that the previous statement by Druze leaders had been issued after an agreement with the authorities in Damascus but 'they broke the promise and continued the indiscriminate shelling of unarmed civilians'.
'We are being subjected to a total war of annihilation,' he said.
Some videos on social media had showed armed fighters with Druze captives, inciting sectarian slogans and beating them.
The Druze religious sect is a minority group that began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam.
More than half the roughly one million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most of the other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Middle East War and annexed in 1981.
Clashes have on several occasions broken out between forces loyal to the government and Druze fighters since the fall of President Bashar Assad in early December in a lightning rebel offensive led by Sunni Islamist insurgent groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Almost half on universal credit are not required to seek work
Almost half of people on Britain's main working-age benefit are not required to look for work, with figures also revealing for the first time that more than a million foreigners are claiming universal credit. There are now 7.9 million people in Britain claiming the benefit — of whom, 3.6 million have no work requirements, 2.2 million are in work, 1.6 million are searching for work and half a million are preparing for work. Experts said that the figures showed how a system designed for the unemployed was struggling to cope with the rise in long-term sickness, as ministers' attempts to reform the system were watered down after a revolt by Labour MPs. A new political row immediately erupted over figures showing that 16 per cent of claimants are not British citizens. The biggest group, comprising almost 10 per cent of universal credit claimants and more than a quarter of a million people, are EU citizens granted settled status after Brexit. There are also more than 200,000 people from other countries with indefinite leave to remain and more than 100,000 refugees. In total, 1.26 million people are claiming under non-UK immigration status, with 1.06 million recorded as having an overseas nationality. Most of the non-British citizens who are claiming are not in work and Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, told The Times: '738,000 migrants on universal credit are unemployed. These figures go completely against the lie we have been told for 25 years that all immigration is positive because they work and contribute to society. And nearly all of it took place under the Conservatives.' However, Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said the 'staggering' figures were 'clear proof that the Labour government has lost control of our welfare system'. The Tories are planning to ban foreign citizens from claiming and Philp said: 'Universal credit should be reserved for UK citizens only. This is about fairness, responsibility and protecting support for those who've contributed to this country. We're calling on Keir Starmer to stop the drift and take action. British taxpayers should not be working hard to subsidise immigrants many of whom have only recently arrived.' However, the 41 per cent of foreign citizens in work is higher than the 34 per cent of overall claimants. Alex Clegg, of the Resolution Foundation think tank, said: 'That's probably because proportionally immigrants are more likely to be in work, more like to be of working age and be here to work. 'They are people who are working on low incomes or people in a temporary situation who have lost their job or got ill and are still likely to be people who have worked — those who aren't working might have been working last month.' He said that there were 'quite clear rules about who could claim benefits based on immigration status' and added: 'No one who is here illegally can claim and it's only people with long-term immigration status, who can work and have the same relation to the labour market as British citizens do, and refugees.' Clegg argued that 'expecting people to work and pay taxes and contribute and then not giving people social security support is quite unprecedented'. He added that a big rise in the number of claimants with no work requirement in part reflected the long-term sick being moved onto universal credit from other benefits. 'There's been a real increase over the past few years,' he said. Clegg added: 'When you've got a benefit system designed around conditional rules and almost half the people on it are exempt from those rules, there are questions about how you adapt the system. 'Universal credit was very effective as an unemployment benefit — the smooth work incentives, the push of conditionality and the pull of employment support. That was very relevant in 2010 but it's looking like the labour market challenge has shifted to health and disability.' Ministers are halving the incapacity benefit element of universal credit to £50 a week, although only for new claimants after a backbench revolt, while increasing the standard rate. Clegg said there was a logic to 'rebalancing' the system to improve work incentives, but said 'a straight halving is a little bit quick'. A government spokeswoman said: 'People in the UK illegally, with no immigration status, cannot receive universal credit, and have no access to public funds. But we want to tighten up the system by doubling the current length of time it takes to apply once legal status is awarded, from five to 10 years, as part of a new contribution-based model to settlement. We inherited a broken welfare system and spiralling, unsustainable benefits bill. We're acting to reform the system, including tightening these sorts of rules.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Here's how UK can produce good, healthy food for generations to come
Britain's food industry should be a powerhouse of economic growth, innovation and job creation. From farmers and suppliers to supermarkets and manufacturers, it's the backbone of communities up and down the UK. Yet for too long, its importance has been undervalued and often misunderstood. Our food system is under significant pressure. Geopolitical instability, climate change and economic uncertainty are shaking its foundations, impacting farming livelihoods and shaping the future of the food we will eat. Healthy choices aren't always easy and the gap between those who have access to the nutritious food they need and those who don't, is widening. It's therefore encouraging to see the government's ambition for a new food strategy to change this. The Good Food Cycle announced on Tuesday sets out a bold and compelling opportunity to make food in the UK consistently healthier, more sustainable and more accessible to all. That's a vision I share, and one I believe our whole industry can get behind. Food is essential to how we live and how we thrive. At Sainsbury's, we see every day how affordability, quality, health and convenience can work together and how supermarkets can help make better choices easier, more accessible and more appealing. As grocery retailers, we must champion the 'super' in supermarket, using our scale, influence and resources to drive real change across the food system with our partners. Only with this commitment can we ensure that everyone, no matter their background or their budget, can access good quality, nutritious food every single day. But ambition alone isn't enough. To achieve the resilient food system required to deliver good food for generations to come, we need bold, practical action. This includes growing more of what we eat as a nation here at home. Increasing domestic production is critical not just for food security but for creating jobs, revitalising rural economies and reducing our dependency on increasingly fragile global supply chains. We must attract private investment into food infrastructure to drive economic growth, strengthen supply chain resilience and boost innovation. To do so, planning reform is essential and, together, we must move faster to unlock the capacity needed for more homegrown production, while we also need a comprehensive workforce plan which can build, nurture and develop the talent required across our food system. As an industry, a clear commitment to mandatory nutritional reporting and, over time, targets for heathier food will help improve diets and positively impact public health. This is a complex area, but it's vital reporting targets are ambitious enough to drive the change we all want to see, while also recognising the important nuances across our food system. The nutrient profile model, for example, is a tool used to assess the healthiness of food and drink products. It needs refining to provide a clear, consistent view of 'healthiness'. Without this, we risk demonising inherently healthy foods and creating patchy reporting that confuses consumers. • Ultra-processed foods make Britain the 'sick man of Europe' This entire mission must be operated on a level playing field and enforced properly. Changes must apply across all large food companies — retail, manufacturing, out of home, hospitality and foodservice — for them to have real and lasting impact. Without this, we risk missing the enormous opportunity in front of us. Sainsbury's is ready to play its part and we look forward to working with government and our peers across the food industry on the development and implementation of these policies. The UK's food system is already remarkable. More than 4.4 million people help it to thrive, with incredible food pulled from every corner of the country on a daily basis. We can forget just how dynamic and resourceful this system is, but it has the potential to be so much more. With commitment, co-operation and clear ambition, we can build something resilient, fair and future-ready. Working with pace and passion across government and our industry, we can unlock growth and make good food happen for everyone. Simon Roberts is chief executive of Sainsbury's
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
UK should consider political donations cryptocurrency ban, says minister
Election officials should consider banning political donations made in cryptocurrency, a minister has said, amid concerns that foreign powers are using untraceable money to influence British politics. Pat McFadden, the cabinet office minister and close ally of the prime minister Keir Starmer, told MPs on Monday he thought there was a case for preventing crypto donations given how hard it is to trace their source. His comments come two months after Nigel Farage announced his Reform UK party would become the first in British politics to accept donations in bitcoin, mirroring a similar move made by Donald Trump in the 2024 US presidential election. The campaign group Spotlight on Corruption has warned this practice could allow foreign countries to undermine British democracy, saying digital currencies 'may play a role in future political interference schemes'. McFadden was asked by his Labour colleague Liam Byrne about banning cryptocurrency for political donations during a meeting of a joint Commons and Lords committee on the national security strategy. 'I think it's a very good question and I definitely think it is something that the Electoral Commission should be considering,' McFadden said. 'The funding of democracy is often a controversial area but I think that it's very important that we know who is providing the donation, are they properly registered, what are the bona fides of that donation. I think it's a very important question you've asked.' He added: 'I always think that the legislation should keep up with the technology and practices of the time. So if you're asking me should the legislation consider whether the current systems are fit for purpose, I think that's a very real challenge.' Byrne, who chairs the Commons' business and trade committee, also urged the minister to consider tightening the rules governing donations made by people linked to 'unlimited companies', the finances of which are difficult to check. McFadden replied: 'We should always keep our legislation up to date to ensure that the financing of politics can be trusted by the public. And if, from time to time, the legislation needs to be changed to make sure that's the case, then of course that's something that should be considered.' McFadden added that he believed ministers should consider putting more resources into the Electoral Commission and the National Crime Agency to help police political donations. Byrne said afterwards: 'Our party finance rules are, in truth, a Kremlin's charter, designed for opacity, not openness. 'If we want to clean up politics, we must root out the dark money, hidden money and foreign money. That means banning cryptocurrency donations, donations from unincorporated associations and donations financed by foreign profits. Crucially it means beefing up the National Crime Agency and Electoral Commission.' McFadden's comments come days before ministers release proposals about how to improve elections, which will lead to future legislation. That strategy paper is not expected to recommend banning cryptocurrency donations, despite his apparent support for the idea. The paper is expected to back allowing people to vote once they are 16 and to set out measures to protect candidates standing at election from suffering abuse and harassment. On election finance, transparency campaigners said they believed the most likely area for action on election finance would be closing loopholes on foreign donations to ensure only companies making profits in the UK could give money. They are concerned, however, that ministers will back away from capping individual or company donations, or giving the Electoral Commission back its powers to launch criminal investigations. They also thought the government would stop short of ordering automatic voter registration, but that there could be greater 'nudge' action reminding people to register. Margaret Hodge, the Labour peer and anti-corruption campaigner, said there was 'a lot of pressure on the government to get things right' and the House of Lords was likely to push for even stronger rules on transparency and checks on political donations. Tom Brake, the director of Unlock Democracy campaign group and a former deputy leader of the Commons, said: 'Safeguarding democracy is one of any government's most important duties. Crypto donations, and the heightened risk of crypto being used to channel foreign money into UK politics, are a clear and present danger to democratic integrity.' On the wider changes expected in the bill, he added: 'Votes at 16 will only be a success if 16- and 17-yearolds are actually registered to vote. More than 6 million eligible voters in England and Wales are not currently registered to vote, with young people among the worst affected. A system of automatic voter registration would ensure no young person cannot make their voice heard. 'Restoring the Electoral Commission's independence is as close to a painless change as Labour could hope for. They rightly opposed the last government's policy to interfere [by introducing a strategy and policy statement [for the Electoral Commission]. We hope they will do the right thing and reverse that change.'
