Victorian Liberal leader faces backlash after saying he was visiting cyclone-hit parents while also going on cruise
The timing of the holiday meant the newly installed Liberal leader was absent when Labor announced tough new bail laws after months of feverish debate over what some have labelled a 'crime crisis' in Victoria.
Battin had been a vocal proponent of a bail laws crackdown, having claimed Victoria was 'facing a crime crisis that has never happened anywhere in this country at this level'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
His office had told reporters he was on planned leave last week, postponed from January. On Saturday Battin fronted a press conference, in which he said he visited Queensland to see his parents, who had been affected by Cyclone Alfred.
But the Herald Sun on Tuesday revealed Battin also took a four-day cruise on Royal Caribbean's ship Quantum of the Seas, sailing to Airlie Beach from Brisbane.
Several of Battin's Liberal colleagues have since told Guardian Australia they only learned about the holiday from the media report.
'It's not on the same level as Scomo jetting off to Hawaii during the bushfires but it's a pretty bad look,' one MP said.
Another Liberal MP said Battin had 'failed to capitalise' on the government's admission it had had 'got it wrong' with changes to bail laws made in 2023.
'This should've been his moment, but true to our party's form, we've turned what should be a win into an own goal,' they said.
Former opposition leader John Pesutto, who Battin successfully ousted in a spill in December, made a subtle dig at his successor's trip.
'I didn't get a chance to take any leave. I worked pretty hard but I'll let Brad handle that,' Pesutto told reporters as he arrived at parliament on Tuesday. 'He's doing a good job and he's holding the government to account.'
Battin admitted he should have been more upfront about his trip, saying he didn't regret spending time with his family, but that he should have communicated his plans with colleagues.
'I took four nights away up in Queensland. I did take a cruise. I wasn't trying to be evasive. [Had I] been more upfront with it, it wouldn't have been a bigger story as it is today. I have to take a lesson from that,' he said.
The premier, Jacinta Allan, said a cruise ship wasn't her 'preferred method' for a holiday and maintained she was always transparent about her leave arrangements.
She said parliament 'won't be leaving' this week until Labor's bail law reforms are passed, but revealed the changes would be rolled out in two stages.
The first stage, to be introduced to parliament on Tuesday, will scrap the principle of remand only as a 'last resort' for accused youth offenders. In its place, community safety would become the 'overarching principle' when deciding bail for children and adults.
The bill also introduces two bail offences – 'committing an indictable offence while on bail for indictable offence' and 'breaching of condition of bail'.
The former will only apply to adults, which covers bail breaches that are 'more administrative in nature like failing to report or meet curfew'.
Both will be punishable by up to three months' imprisonment on top of any other sentence imposed.
A range of offences such as armed robbery, aggravated burglary, home invasion and carjacking will also face the tougher bail tests.
Further changes – including a new bail test for serious repeat offenders – will be included in a second bill, later this year.
The government is banking on the Coalition supporting the bill but tensions boiled over when attorney-general, Sonya Kilkenny, failed to provide her counterpart, Michael O'Brien, with a copy of it ahead of a briefing on Monday night.
Kilkenny accused O'Brien of 'chucking an absolute tantrum', while the Liberal MP said the government was 'disorganised and arrogant'.
After a subsequent briefing on Tuesday, O'Brien said the opposition wouldn't 'stand in the way' of the bill's passage through parliament but said the crackdown should go further.
Meanwhile, a rally organised by legal, human rights and First Nations groups will be held outside parliament on Tuesday afternoon to urge the government to 'abandon the suite of kneejerk bail law changes'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's Labor Department proposes more than 60 rule changes in a push to deregulate workplaces
The U.S. Department of Labor is aiming to rewrite or repeal more than 60 'obsolete' workplace regulations, ranging from minimum wage requirements for home health care workers and people with disabilities to standards governing exposure to harmful substances. If approved, the wide-ranging changes unveiled this month also would affect working conditions at constructions sites and in mines, and limit the government's ability to penalize employers if workers are injured or killed while engaging in inherently risky activities such as movie stunts or animal training. The Labor Department says the goal is to reduce costly, burdensome rules imposed under previous administrations, and to deliver on President Donald Trump 's commitment to restore American prosperity through deregulation. 'The Department of Labor is proud to lead the way by eliminating unnecessary regulations that stifle growth and limit opportunity,' Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement, which boasted the 'most ambitious proposal to slash red tape of any department across the federal government.' Critics say the proposals would put workers at greater risk of harm, with women and members of minority groups bearing a disproportionate impact. " People are at very great risk of dying on the job already,' Rebecca Reindel, the AFL-CIO union's occupational safety and health director, said. 'This is something that is only going to make the problem worse.' The proposed changes have several stages to get through before they can take effect, including a public comment period for each one. Here's a look at some of the rollbacks under consideration: No minimum wage for home health care workers Home health care workers help elderly or medically fragile people by preparing meals, administering medications, assisting with toilet use, accompanying clients to doctor appointments and performing other tasks. Under one of the Labor Department's proposals, an estimated 3.7 million workers employed by home care agencies could be paid below the federal minimum wage — currently $7.25 per hour — and made ineligible for overtime pay if they aren't covered by corresponding state laws. The proposed rule would reverse changes made in 2013 under former President Barack Obama and revert to a regulatory framework from 1975. The Labor Department says that by lowering labor and compliance costs, its revisions might expand the home care market and help keep frail individuals in their homes for longer. Judy Conti, director of government affairs at the National Employment Law Project, said her organization plans to work hard to defeat the proposal. Home health workers are subject to injuries from lifting clients, and "before those (2013) regulations, it was very common for home care workers to work 50, 60 and maybe even more hours a week, without getting any overtime pay,' Conti said. Others endorse the proposal, including the Independent Women's Forum, a conservative nonprofit based in Virginia. Women often bear the brunt of family caregiving responsibilities, so making home care more affordable would help women balance work and personal responsibilities, the group's president, Carrie Lukas, said. 'We're pleased to see the Trump administration moving forward on rolling back some of what we saw as counterproductive micromanaging of relationships that were making it hard for people to get the care they need,' Lukas said. Samantha Sanders, director of government affairs and advocacy at the nonprofit Economic Policy Institute, said the repeal would not constitute a win for women. 'Saying we actually don't think they need those protections would be pretty devastating to a workforce that performs really essential work and is very heavily dominated by women, and women of color in particular,' Sanders said. Protections for migrant farm workers Last year, the Labor Department finalized rules that provided protections to migrant farmworkers who held H-2A visas. The current administration says most of those rules placed unnecessary and costly requirements on employers. Under the new proposal, the Labor Department would rescind a requirement for most employer-provided transportation to have seat belts for those agriculture workers. The department is also proposing to reverse a 2024 rule that protected migrant farmworkers from retaliation for activities such as filing a complaint, testifying or participating in an investigation, hearing or proceeding. 'There's a long history of retaliation against workers who speak up against abuses in farm work. And with H-2A it's even worse because the employer can just not renew your visa,' said Lori Johnson, senior attorney at Farmworker Justice. Michael Marsh, president and CEO of the National Council of Agricultural Employers, applauded the deregulation efforts, saying farmers were hit with thousands of pages of regulations pertaining to migrant farmworkers in recent years. 'Can you imagine a farmer and his or her spouse trying to navigate 3,000 new pages of regulation in 18 months and then be liable for every one of them?" he asked. Adequate lighting for construction spaces The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, part of the Labor Department, wants to rescind a requirement for employers to provide adequate lighting at construction sites, saying the regulation doesn't substantially reduce a significant risk. OSHA said if employers fail to correct lighting deficiencies at construction worksites, the agency can issue citations under its 'general duty clause.' The clause requires employers to provide a place of employment free from recognized hazards which are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Worker advocates think getting rid of a specific construction site requirement is a bad idea. 'There have been many fatalities where workers fall through a hole in the floor, where there's not adequate lighting,' Reindel said. 'It's a very obvious thing that employers should address, but unfortunately it's one of those things where we need a standard, and it's violated all the time.' Mine safety Several proposals could impact safety procedures for mines. For example, employers have to submit plans for ventilation and preventing roof collapses in coal mines for review by the Labor Department's Mine Safety and Health Administration. Currently, MSHA district managers can require mine operators to take additional steps to improve those plans. The Labor Department wants to end that authority, saying the current regulations give the district manager the ability to draft and create laws without soliciting comments or action by Congress. Similarly, the department is proposing to strip district managers of their ability to require changes to mine health and safety training programs. Limiting OSHA's reach The general duty clause allows OSHA to punish employers for unsafe working conditions when there's no specific standard in place to cover a situation. An OSHA proposal would exclude the agency from applying the clause to prohibit, restrict or penalize employers for 'inherently risky professional activities that are intrinsic to professional, athletic, or entertainment occupations.' A preliminary analysis identified athletes, actors, dancers, musicians, other entertainers and journalists as among the types of workers the limitation would apply to. 'It is simply not plausible to assert that Congress, when passing the Occupational Safety and Health Act, silently intended to authorize the Department of Labor to eliminate familiar sports and entertainment practices, such as punt returns in the NFL, speeding in NASCAR, or the whale show at SeaWorld,' the proposed rule reads. Debbie Berkowitz, who served as OSHA chief of staff during the Obama administration, said she thinks limiting the agency's enforcement authority would be a mistake. 'Once you start taking that threat away, you could return to where they'll throw safety to the wind, because there are other production pressures they have," Berkowitz said.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Inside the Labor Party's bold push to increase taxes on property investors: 'Government now has a mandate to rectify inequity'
Labor Party activists are pushing to scrap the discount on capital gains tax when selling investment properties, despite Anthony Albanese ruling out such changes when in Opposition. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent. The lesson of those election defeats led Albanese to rule out tinkering with capital gains taxes after he took over as Labor leader, and he went on to win the 2022 election and was resoundingly re-elected in May. But now a grassroots organisation within the Prime Minister's own party – Labor for Housing – wants the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount scrapped entirely, not just diluted. That meant someone who made a $100,000 capital gain on their investment property would be taxed on the entire increase, not just $50,000 of it. Labor for Housing co-convener Julijana Todorovic told Daily Mail Australia the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for selling residential properties introduced in September 1999, needed to be dismantled. 'We think it should be removed entirely, so not immediately,' she said. 'Property should not be an investment for which you can claim the discount.' Ms Todorovic, a land rights lawyer, said the Albanese government should change policy before the next election campaign. 'Our view is that the Labor government now has a mandate to rectify inequity in Australian society,' she said. 'While it's clear from the election results that we can't be too radical, we must do something to stem the flow of generational inequity.' She argued the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount should be grandfathered for existing investors but scrapped for future purchases - a position the Greens took to the May election. 'We are proposing that residential property is removed as a category for which the discount can be claimed,' Ms Todorovic said. 'But we're proposing that this change is grandfathered to a certain date – so if people have structured their finances based on the discount, then they will have time to restructure – they won't be left high and dry.' Labor for Housing argued that scrapping the discount for properties would encourage investors to invest in technology and businesses, rather than putting all their funds into real estate and thereby driving up the country's massive house prices. 'Australia's capital resources have become landlocked by a CGT discount on property,' it said in a submission to the government's August Economic Reform Roundtable. 'As Australia electrifies, transitions to renewables and increases our data capacity, businesses are struggling to find adequate capital. 'By incentivising investment in the productive powers of the market, the government can increase the circular flow of capital in the economy, creating jobs and additional economic activity.' The Greens went to the last election with a plan to scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for future purchases of investment properties, and grandfather it to one property for those who already owned an investment property. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it just needs the Greens to get its legislation passed in the Senate without the need to win the support of other crossbenchers. The Labor-aligned McKell Institute has called for the federal government to reduce the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 35 per cent for existing investment properties with a backyard. This means $65,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed, up from $50,000 now. But it has also called for the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to be increased to 70 per cent for newly-built apartments, arguing this kind of policy would boost housing supply and encourage more off-the-plan unit developments. That means only $30,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed - and force more Aussies into apartments rather than homes with a backyard as Labor aims to build 1.2million homes over five years. The McKell Institute's Harnessing Aspiration report argued the existing 50 per cent capital gains tax discount encouraged investor speculators to buy up houses at a time when there is a shortage. 'There is a unique incentive for investors to speculate on existing detached houses rather than non-existing off-the -plan attached dwellings or established attached dwellings,' he said. 'The blanket tax treatment of each of these asset types means an investor is much more attracted to high-growth existing detached dwellings than moderate-growth attached dwellings, especially new builds.' The average, full-time worker earning $102,742 a year is priced out of buying the median-priced house in every state and territory capital city except Darwin. Ms Todorovic said Labor for Housing's call to scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount was not about stopping property speculation, but merely to have it treated the same way as other forms of speculative investment. 'It won't – this isn't the tool to correct speculation, this is about removing incentives which preference land above other more productive investments,' she said.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie Labor Party's plan to raise taxes on property investors
Labor Party activists are pushing to scrap the discount on capital gains tax when selling investment properties, despite Anthony Albanese ruling out such changes when in Opposition. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent. The lesson of those election defeats led Albanese to rule out tinkering with capital gains taxes after he took over as Labor leader, and he went on to win the 2022 election and was resoundingly re-elected in May. But now a grassroots organisation within the Prime Minister's own party – Labor for Housing – wants the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount scrapped entirely, not just diluted. That meant someone who made a $100,000 capital gain on their investment property would be taxed on the entire increase, not just $50,000 of it. Labor for Housing co-convener Julijana Todorovic (pictured) told Daily Mail Australia the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for selling residential properties introduced in September 1999, needed to be dismantled. 'We think it should be removed entirely, so not immediately,' she said. 'Property should not be an investment for which you can claim the discount.' Ms Todorovic, a land rights lawyer, said the Albanese government should change policy before the next election campaign. 'Our view is that the Labor government now has a mandate to rectify inequity in Australian society,' she said. 'While it's clear from the election results that we can't be too radical, we must do something to stem the flow of generational inequity.' She argued the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount should be grandfathered for existing investors but scrapped for future purchases - a position the Greens took to the May election. 'We are proposing that residential property is removed as a category for which the discount can be claimed,' Ms Todorovic said. 'But we're proposing that this change is grandfathered to a certain date – so if people have structured their finances based on the discount, then they will have time to restructure – they won't be left high and dry.' Labor for Housing argued that scrapping the discount would encourage investors to invest in technology and businesses, rather than putting all their funds into real estate and thereby driving up the country's massive house prices. 'Australia's capital resources have become landlocked by a CGT discount on property,' it said in a submission to the government's August Economic Reform Roundtable. 'As Australia electrifies, transitions to renewables and increases our data capacity, businesses are struggling to find adequate capital. By incentivising investment in the productive powers of the market, the government can increase the circular flow of capital in the economy, creating jobs and additional economic activity.' The Greens went to the last election with a plan to scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for future purchases of investment properties, and grandfather it to one property for those who already owned an investment property. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it needs the Greens or other Senate crossbenchers to get its legislation passed by the Upper House. The Labor-aligned McKell Institute has called for the federal government to reduce the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 35 per cent for existing investment properties with a backyard. This means $65,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed, up from $50,000 now. But it has also called for the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to be increased to 70 per cent for newly-built apartments, arguing this kind of policy would boost housing supply and encourage more off-the-plan unit developments. That means only $30,000 of a $100,000 capital gain would be taxed - and force more Aussies into apartments rather than homes with a backyard as Labor aims to build 1.2million homes over five years. The McKell Institute's Harnessing Aspiration report argued the existing 50 per cent capital gains tax discount encouraged investor speculators to buy up houses at a time when there is a shortage. 'There is a unique incentive for investors to speculate on existing detached houses rather than non-existing off-the -plan attached dwellings or established attached dwellings,' he said. 'The blanket tax treatment of each of these asset types means an investor is much more attracted to high-growth existing detached dwellings than moderate-growth attached dwellings, especially new builds.' The average, full-time worker earning $102,742 a year is priced out of buying the median-priced house in every state and territory capital city except Darwin.
