Mum-of-two wants to find stranger who 'saved her life' in work meeting
Emma Hawke was at a work meeting when a dermatologist she had never met before spotted a suspicious mole on her arm and urged her to get it checked.
She was subsequently diagnosed with melanoma - the most serious form of skin cancer.
Cancer researcher Emma Hawke was at a work meeting when a doctor spotted a suspicious mole on her arm (Image: Cancer Research UK)
Emma, a 42-year-old mother-of-two from Eastleigh, said: "I was watching TV when the phone rang. I thought it was going to be a family member calling, but it was the hospital.
"My melanoma diagnosis was a huge shock and I immediately expected to need chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
"My sons were just five and eight at the time and I feared they were going to see me becoming really poorly.
'Thankfully it was caught early enough to be managed with surgery and it hadn't spread to my lymph nodes.
"I do have a scar on my arm where they had to take a large enough area of skin to safely remove all the cancerous cells, but I would have gone through so much more treatment or worse had I left it.
"I would love to find the doctor who spotted it and say thanks for saving my life."
Former skin cancer patient Emma Hawke is urging people to stay safe by using plenty of sun cream (Image: Getty Images)
Emma is also working to raise awareness of skin cancer. She has joined forces with Cancer Research UK and NIVEA Sun to encourage people across the south to seek shade, cover up, and apply sunscreen regularly.
"Awareness of the risks of UV radiation was low when I was younger, and I'd put oil on try to look tanned like the popstars of the 90s," she said.
'Now, I make sure I'm covered up and take some time out of the sun in the middle of the day as well as always being prepared with a hat, sunglasses, and sunscreen.
"Sun safety doesn't mean missing out, just being careful whether you're at home or abroad.'
READ MORE: Southampton cancer vaccine trial expands for melanoma patients
Cancer Research UK health information manager Beth Vincent added: "Getting sunburnt just once every two years can triple the risk of developing skin cancer compared to never being burnt.
"Even on a cloudy day, the sun can be strong enough to burn between mid-March and mid-October."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Burnout: It's A Systemic Signal And A Call To Lead Differently
Dr. Sunil Kumar, Lifestyle Medicine Physician, Executive Health Coach & Burnout Reset Expert. Creator of the PREP™ Protocol. Burnout is often misunderstood as a personal weakness. It's a predictable response to sustained, unmanaged stress in environments that deplete more than they replenish. It is not a sign of incompetence, but a signal, a flashing warning light on the dashboard of modern professional life. As a physician, executive health coach and founder of the PREP Protocol, I've witnessed the toll burnout takes on brilliant, committed individuals. From hospital corridors to corporate boardrooms, high achievers are quietly burning out while systems mistake performance for well-being, until it's too late. The solution is not just resilience training or time off. It's a shift in how we define health, leadership and productivity. It starts with recognizing burnout for what it is: a systemic issue, not a personal flaw. The Scale Of The Problem The World Health Organization defines burnout as an occupational phenomenon, marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced professional efficacy. It's not just a healthcare problem. Gallup research from 2020 shows that 76% of employees experience burnout at least sometimes, with 28% reporting it 'very often' or 'always.' In the U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS), burnout is a leading cause of long-term sickness absence, with stress-related leave costing billions annually. Globally, it's linked to rising turnover, lower engagement and increased medical errors. Yet despite the data, most responses remain surface-level: wellness webinars, gym discounts or mindfulness apps—all useful but insufficient when the root cause lies deeper. The Burnout Fallacy: Blaming The Individual Too often, burnout is framed as an individual failure: a time-management issue, a lack of gratitude or poor emotional regulation. The truth? People aren't burning out because they're weak—they're burning out because they're doing too much, with too little recovery, in systems that reward overextension. We don't need to fix the people. We need to fix the culture. That means addressing the deeper drivers: • Chronic overwork and poor boundaries • Lack of autonomy and misaligned values • Toxic leadership and unspoken expectations • Emotional suppression and disconnection from purpose A New Model: The PREP Protocol In response, I created the PREP Protocol—a four-phase system designed to prevent, navigate and recover from burnout. It integrates the science of lifestyle medicine, behavioral psychology, neuroscience and coaching. This phase is about early detection and proactive resilience. We use validated tools to assess energy levels, stress response and signs of overload. Micro-habits such as sleep hygiene, circadian rhythm alignment, breathwork and digital boundaries are introduced to build a personal "energy bank." Burnout affects the nervous system, not just the mind. In this phase, we address maladaptive coping mechanisms (like overworking, emotional detachment or addictive behaviours) and introduce cognitive restructuring, somatic regulation and trauma-informed strategies. Tools like heart rate variability tracking and polyvagal practices support nervous system healing. This phase focuses on rediscovering purpose, meaning and identity. Often, burnout disconnects us from why we started. We use coaching techniques to realign personal values, strengthen emotional intelligence and rebuild healthy relationships. Reflection, storytelling and journaling tools help clients reconnect with their deeper 'why.' Burnout recovery isn't just about rest—it's about redesign. This final phase is about creating rhythms that support long-term, sustainable performance. Techniques include energy mapping, time-blocking and redefining success beyond metrics. Clients learn to live and lead in alignment with their values, not just their to-do lists. The Science Behind It The PREP model is rooted in evidence. For example: • Sleep And Stress: Chronic sleep deprivation is linked to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, a key factor in burnout. • Purpose And Longevity: Studies show that having a strong sense of purpose is associated with a lower risk of stroke, depression and mortality. • Autonomic Recovery: Somatic practices like diaphragmatic breathing, grounding and heart-focused meditation have been shown to restore vagal tone and reduce cortisol levels. The integration of lifestyle medicine principles such as nutrition, movement, social connection, stress mastery and restorative sleep is no longer optional. It's essential to recovering health and sustaining performance. Leadership's Role: Culture Is The Cure Leaders often ask: What can I do to prevent burnout on my team? Start here: • Model Boundaries: Don't glorify overwork. Celebrate recovery. • Encourage Psychological Safety: Create space for difficult conversations. • Align Work With Values: People need meaning, not just tasks. • Prioritize Well-Being Infrastructure: Build it into the workflow, not after-hours. Burnout-proofing isn't a luxury. It's a strategic imperative for retention, creativity and trust. From Burnout To Balance: A New Definition Of Success We need to move from hustle to health. From output to impact. From burnout to balance. True success isn't constant productivity—it's aligned contribution. It's when your work sustains you instead of draining you. When your calendar reflects your values and your energy matches your mission. That's the future we're building, one professional, one organization, one reset at a time. Final Thoughts If you're burned out, know this: You are not broken. You are responding intelligently to a system that was never designed for your well-being. Burnout is not your identity. It's your feedback. And feedback is the beginning of change. Let's stop asking people to be more resilient in toxic systems. Let's create systems that no longer make people sick. Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
Vogue
an hour ago
- Vogue
Why 'Blue Space' Might Be the Secret to Health and Happiness
It's 3 p.m. and I am lying on my belly in the powder-soft sand on East Runton beach in Norfolk, England. A few steps away lie the rock pools—clusters of stone slick with neon-green seaweed, translucent shrimp darting between oily bladder wrack and ice-clear water reflecting the sun. Beyond that is the main event: the big blue sea, which is making great crunching sounds as the waves stretch and yawn. Later, I submerge myself, the water lukewarm and aqua-colored, salt and magnesium clinging to my skin. Wait, maybe this is how I should be living, I think dozily, just like every other Londoner as soon as they experience the good life for a fraction of a second. Maybe I've been getting it all wrong? It's no secret that the sea—being in it, by it, near it—has long been considered beneficial for our overall health. There's a reason that, in the 18th century, before things like SSRIs and therapy, women suffering from 'hysteria', a catch-all phrase for 'feeling bad', would be sent to coastal locales as a remedy. And we also just know anecdotally, don't we? After my recent weekend by the sea, I felt happier and healthier than I had done in months. My cortisol levels lowered, my skin cleared up, and I actually caught up on sleep without bolting awake at 7 a.m. with an unspecific feeling of unease. But why is the sea so healthy for us? And what does it say about how we should be living? The mental health benefits of being by water are well-documented. One extensive 2013 study on the effects of nature on happiness found that those living on the coast, or near bodies of water, otherwise known as 'blue spaces', were the happiest of all. Another 2016 study found that living near blue spaces lowered psychological distress. A more recent 2019 study found that, among low-earning households, those living in close proximity to the coast experienced better mental health than those who didn't. In fact, every study on the subject has pointed to the idea that even just seeing water—that brilliant blue, spread out and glistening—can make us feel less stressed. Sometimes even less stressed than green spaces—forests, etc—alone. The actual why is a little more complicated and multi-layered. One 2013 study found that the sound of waves relaxed people more than soothing music, so perhaps that is what's having an effect. On the flip-side, the World Health Organization cites traffic noise such as road, rail and air traffic as the second most important cause of ill health in western Europe behind air pollution. So it would make sense that the reverse—the absence of traffic noise—would have a favorable impact. And let's not forget that something as simple as fresh air, naturally high in oxygen and in abundance by the sea, has long been linked to better mental health more generally.
Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Multiomics Platform May Guide Melanoma Treatment
TOPLINE: The novel Tumor Profiler (TuPro) project, which analyzed melanoma samples using nine independent technologies, demonstrated feasibility in guiding treatment decisions. Molecular tumor board recommendations on the basis of TuPro were deemed useful in 75% of cases. METHODOLOGY: Despite advances in melanoma therapy, many patients experience relapse and lack effective treatment options. Multiomics and single-cell profiling promise comprehensive tumor insights but require evaluation for feasibility and clinical utility in guiding treatment decisions. Researchers conducted a prospective, multicentric observational project (TuPro) enrolling 116 patients with any subtype of melanoma, from whom 126 biopsy samples were collected at three Swiss hospitals from January 2019 to November 2020. The TuPro application cohort included 93 patients (103 biopsy samples). The biopsies were analyzed using nine independent technologies, including single-cell genomics, transcriptomics (single-cell RNA sequencing [scRNA-seq]), targeted proteomics (imaging mass cytometry [IMC]), drug phenotyping (Pharmacoscopy), and digital pathology, which generated up to 500 Gb of data per sample within a 4-week turnaround time. The molecular tumor board evaluated data from all technologies to inform treatment recommendations across three patient groups: adjuvant setting (n = 13), palliative standard of care (n = 45), and palliative beyond standard of care (n = 37). The median follow-up duration was 20.5 months. TAKEAWAY: Patients in the palliative standard-of-care group achieved an objective response rate of 60% and a disease control rate of 62%, whereas those in the palliative beyond standard-of-care group achieved an objective response rate of 38% and a disease control rate of 54%. In a matched analysis of patients who received at least three treatment lines, the median progression-free survival reached 8.34 months in the TuPro cohort vs 2.0 months in the non-TuPro cohort (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.79; adjusted P = .0201), suggesting benefit in heavily pretreated patients. Molecular data from TuPro were considered useful by the multidisciplinary molecular tumor board in 75% of evaluated cases, representing a 39% and 33% increase in concordance vs standard clinical workup alone (diagnostic levels 1 and 2, respectively). The TuPro workflow led to actual therapies in 87% of cases. A minimal set of four technologies (next-generation DNA sequencing [NGS], IMC, Pharmacoscopy, and scRNA-seq) could cover all 54 markers used for treatment decision-making at 1.15-fold higher costs than those for the standard NGS for adjuvant or palliative standard-of-care settings and 1.8-fold higher costs than those for the palliative beyond standard-of-care setting. IN PRACTICE: 'This study demonstrates the feasibility of using advanced multiomics approaches, including spatial proteomics, to guide therapy decisions in late-stage melanoma — one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant cancers — with a reproducible patient benefit,' said Stéphane Chevrier, PhD, CSO, and cofounder of Navignostics and contributor to the TuPro study, in a press release. 'This is a major step toward pan-cancer diagnostics. By providing a comprehensive view of the tumor biology, the approach could eventually identify features that are predictive for treatments across cancer indications.' SOURCE: The study, led by Nicola Miglino, the University of Zurich and University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, was published online in Nature Medicine. LIMITATIONS: The current approach of selecting markers for treatment decisions by human experts did not capture all potentially relevant information. The retrospective comparison between TuPro and non-TuPro cohorts limited extrapolation and generalizability of the results. Additionally, definitive conclusions about the clinical value of serial sampling cannot be drawn owing to heterogeneous results and a small sample size. DISCLOSURES: The study received an open-access funding from the University of Zurich. Several authors reported having advisory roles or receiving research funding and having other ties with various pharmaceutical companies. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
