logo
Devanahalli land acquisition row: Farmers' meeting with Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah inconclusive, new meeting on July 15

Devanahalli land acquisition row: Farmers' meeting with Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah inconclusive, new meeting on July 15

Indian Express6 hours ago
The meeting between farmers opposing the Karnataka Government's plan to acquire 1,777 acres in the Bengaluru Rural district for a defence and aerospace park and Chief Minister Siddaramaiah at the Vidhana Soudha in Bengaluru ended inconclusively Friday.
During the meeting, several farmer unions, including the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) and the Kisan Sangharsh Samiti, and actor-turned-politician Prakash Raj, are said to have urged Siddaramaiah to cancel the land acquisition notification issued by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB), but no decision was reached.
According to sources privy to the meeting, Siddaramaiah has called for another round of talks, scheduled for 11 am on July 15. The farmers said the government has informed them that the final notification cannot be withdrawn due to legal constraints.
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act, 2013) outlines a multi-stage process for land acquisition, including preliminary notification (Section 11), public consultation, social impact assessment (SIA), and final notification (Section 19). Once the final notification is issued, the process becomes legally binding, and withdrawal is complex unless specific conditions are met, such as procedural irregularities or failure to comply with the Act.
Raghu, one of the protesting farmers, told The Indian Express, 'We are not at all convinced with today's meeting. We expected the chief minister to take a pro-farmer stand, but we got nothing. Whenever there are issues related to farmers, the state government comes up with excuses such as legal constraints. We had hopes that the chief minister would stand by us, but all hopes were dashed.'
The farmers also did not agree to any negotiations linked to seeking more compensation.
'We had decided before the meeting that talks on compensation should be off the table. If they spoke about compensation, we had decided to stage a walkout. Our only demand is to stop the land acquisition process. If the government still goes ahead, bloodshed will follow in our villages,' said Raghu.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Siddaramaiah said experts have informed them that there are certain legal hurdles associated with dropping the land acquisition process. 'Since the final notification has already been issued in April, it is necessary to deliberate on its pros and cons. The government requires a 10-day time frame to arrive at a clear decision,' he said.
'The government cannot take any steps against the law. As the final notification has been issued in accordance with the law, its legal aspects must be thoroughly examined. A preliminary meeting regarding this was held (with legal experts) yesterday (Thursday),' the Karnataka chief minister added.
Siddaramaiah also stated that it was not possible to announce the government's stand immediately, and another meeting would be held in 10 days, during which the government is expected to clarify its position.
'We believe in democracy and dialogue. We have not obstructed any protest. The government has not attempted to suppress the protests. I, too, have been part of farmers' unions,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nikhil Asks for white paper on KK region development
Nikhil Asks for white paper on KK region development

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Nikhil Asks for white paper on KK region development

Kalaburagi: In response to CM Siddaramaiah's claims about providing 13 thousand crores for Kalyana Karnataka's development, JD(S) youth unit state president Nikhil Kumaraswamy has called for the state govt to release a white paper detailing the specific development projects. Speaking at a press conference at the district JD(S) office in Kalaburagi, he emphasised the importance of the Karnataka govt's commitment to welfare programmes. He questioned Siddaramaiah's statements in Yadgir regarding KKRDB expenditure, requesting clarification on fund allocation. He highlighted the extensive sand mafia operations in Sedam and Chittapura regions of Kalaburagi district, noting illegal sand mining worth approximately Rs 165 crore. While the deputy commissioner is monitoring the situation, he criticised the state govt's lack of action and urged immediate attention to this issue. Addressing education concerns, he pointed out the declining ESL results in Kalaburagi district and called for swift govt action to fill vacant teaching positions. Regarding party activities, he reported that the 'Janata Dal with the People of JD(S) Party' campaign has successfully registered 4 lakh members through missed calls, with over 1 lakh active participants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo He explained that the Janata Dal tour aims to strengthen JD(S) at the grassroots level. The registration drive will continue across north and south regions, with senior leaders planning major conferences in Old Mysore and Kalaburagi (Kalyana Karnataka region) after Aug 20.

Action taken against 13 PIOs by Information Commission
Action taken against 13 PIOs by Information Commission

The Hindu

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Action taken against 13 PIOs by Information Commission

Karnataka Information Commission has penalised and taken disciplinary action against 13 public information officers (PIO) for not discharging their duties in the right manner to provide information under the Right To Information (RTI) Act. A penalty of ₹25,000 each has been levied on 13 PIOs including the tahasildars, Assistant Executive Engineers and others working under Bench - 2 of the commission. 'PIOs play a significant role in the implementation of RTI Act. Negligence of officials in providing information leads to the public not getting to know about government schemes in timely manner. RTI Act is an important tool that helps in public welfare and these actions have been taken to ensure that the officers are not negligent,' said a note from the commission.

HC imposes ₹50,000 costs on Competent Officer (Evacuee Properties)
HC imposes ₹50,000 costs on Competent Officer (Evacuee Properties)

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

HC imposes ₹50,000 costs on Competent Officer (Evacuee Properties)

Telangana High Court imposed costs of ₹50,000 on Mohan Rao, the Competent Officer appointed under section of Evacuee Interest Separation Act-1951, for failing 'to settle a land dispute even after a period of 25 years'. Justice C.V. Bhaskar Reddy of the HC, pronouncing verdict in a writ petition filed by legal heirs of one Saleha Fatima Begum, directed the Competent Officer to dispose of the application filed by them within three months. Observing that facts of the case shook the conscience of the HC, the judge said the competent officer failed to adjudicate the matter even after lapse of 25 years. Saleh Fatima owned lands in different parts of Jangaon district. Since her family members and siblings migrated to Pakistan after Partition of the country, their properties were classified as Evacuee Properties under the provision of the Evacuee Interest (Separation) Act-1951. Saleha Begum secured registered sale certificate of the properties in 1967 by paying ₹38,415 to the government. She passed away in 1987 without asserting any representation or claim for the properties. Her legal heirs in 1988 approached the government to allot the lands to them and secured an order in their favour in 1989. Challenging this, a third party approached the HC claiming rights over the property. After a prolonged legal battle, the HC in 2000 directed them to approach the Competent Officer who directed both the parties to maintain status quo. The petitioners approached the HC stating that the CO kept their application pending for the past 25 years, and meanwhile the 1951 Act was repealed. 'It is very unfortunate that the petitioner and his predecessors are contesting the litigations for issuance of sale certificate since more than seven decades,' the judge observed in the verdict.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store