Greek PM vows to investigate €290m ‘fake' farmer fraud scandal
Faced with revelations that 'fake' farmers had been scamming designated agricultural funds to the tune of a reputed €290m (£249m), Kyriakos Mitsotakis said on Monday a special taskforce would be set up to 'immediately and exhaustively' investigate the illegal payments.
The far-reaching scandal has already prompted the resignation of five senior government officials. One was the migration minister, Makis Voridis, a former far-right activist and prominent figure in the governing New Democracy party who was agriculture minister when the fraudulent scheme is alleged to have operated.
In a rare display of damage control, Mitsotakis acknowledged the failings of a state apparatus that ought to have changed. 'The state's inadequacy is obvious,' he said. 'Clientelism [political patronage] cannot govern the way we conduct business.'
The scheme, which allegedly saw hundreds of applications being made by nonexistent owners of pasture and grazing land over a five-year period beginning in 2017, was brought to light by the European public prosecutor's office (EPPO). The Luxembourg-based office launched its inquiry in 2021.
The funds were distributed by the state subsidy agency, OPEKEPE, which has since been dissolved.
On Monday the centre-right prime minister told his cabinet that the new taskforce would be expected to act speedily. 'I await results quickly. We will investigate the incidents immediately and exhaustively in line with internal and European legislation. Since OPEKEPE didn't manage to do its work the state will do it centrally.'
The scandal has been described as 'one of the biggest farming frauds of recent years' according to Politico, which said the illegally siphoned funds could amount to €45m (£38.6m) a year. The misuse was such that citizens with no known links to the agriculture sector, including a lawyer based in Athens, had applied for the aid. Some had posed as the owners of fictitious plots and others making claims as fake livestock breeders.
Officials who had tried to alert authorities after uncovering irregularities were either discredited, demoted or removed from top posts. OPEKEPE has had six presidents over the past five years.
The revelations have fuelled public anger and come against a backdrop of disaffection with a political elite seen as inefficient, out of touch and corrupt. An MRB poll last week revealed a stunning 74.5% of Greeks believed ministers had a hand in the scandal.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
'While it is very positive that at long last this abscess has been lanced it does not honour the country that [it] is being cleaned up at the initiative of the European prosecutor,' said Maximos Charakopoulos, a governing party MP from the farming region of Larissa.
For Mitsotakis, a leading figure of the European centre-right who led his party to a landslide victory and second term in 2023, the scandal is as embarrassing as it is potentially damaging.
A significant number of the false claims were made in his native Crete, where the prime minister's prominent political family have long held sway.
EU diplomats in Athens said Mitsotakis was at risk of losing the high moral ground needed to govern effectively if he was not seen to act fast. 'This scandal is so big that he has to act decisively,' one said. 'His language and actions show us that he is aware the rot needs to be exposed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Sir Keir Starmer has lost control of the Labour Party
Once you pay the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane. As Kipling observed in 1911, it's tempting to 'a rich and lazy nation' to try to spend its way out of trouble rather than deal with the fundamental problem. In surrendering to his rebellious backbenchers on his flagship benefit reforms, Sir Keir Starmer has followed exactly that path. There are, however, two problems with this approach. The first is that Britain, after decades of wasteful spending, and with a sky-high tax burden, is rapidly running out of fiscal road with which to buy out future opposition. The second is that Labour rebels will now smell blood in the water and they will undoubtedly turn their attention to thwarting the Government's attempts to make savings elsewhere. The bill for health and disability benefits is expected to reach £70 billion a year by the end of the decade. These measures were expected to cut them by just £5 billion. A previous climbdown this week had reduced that to £2.5 billion. Now what's left of the Bill has been gutted, with the Government withdrawing elements in a panic. That Sir Keir, who won a majority of 174 just a year ago, has found that he cannot make even a small change to a welfare system that is spiralling out of control without meeting mutiny from his Labour colleagues, speaks poorly of Britain's ability to change course before it is forced to by circumstances beyond its control. In the short run, the Government has a £5 billion hole to fix in its fiscal plans, and a blow to its credibility in the eyes of the bond markets. In the long run, its concession has made it significantly more tempting for Commons rebels to engage in games of chicken in the belief that Sir Keir will back down. The Prime Minister's track record is already littered with U-turns and backtracks but this latest reverse has shown that he may simply be unable to manage his party, let alone govern this country. Indeed, even after this chaotic concession, 49 of his own MPs still voted against the Bill. What prospect is there of Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves now getting to grips with the sort of large scale welfare reform that Britain really needs? The pressure, if anything, seems to be from an ascendant Left which demands more spending, more taxation, more state intervention in the economy: the scrapping of the two child benefit cap is already in the sights for some rebels. It is a bleak thought that Sir Keir's response to this may be to tack Left. Once you pay the Danegeld ...
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Germany foils Iranian plot to attack Jews
Germany has foiled an Iranian plot to attack Israelis and Jewish community leaders. Jens Rommel, the federal prosecutor, said police had arrested 'Ali S', a Danish citizen of Afghan origin, on suspicion of carrying out surveillance of potential targets. Ali S is accused of taking photographs of buildings, including the German-Israeli Society and a house linked to Josef Schuster, the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. According to Der Spiegel, the German magazine, Ali S was recruited by the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the elite Iranian military unit formerly led by Qassim Soleimani and now by Esmail Ghaani. Soleimani was assassinated by the United States in 2020. Ghaani is understood be alive, despite reports that he was killed last month during the Iran-Israel missile exchanges. The Quds Force reports directly to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran. Mr Schuster said he was shocked by the news of an apparent attempt on his life. 'The arrest of a suspected spy for the Iranian terror regime, who is said to have spied on Jewish and Israeli facilities in Germany, is a clear alarm signal,' he said. 'This successful interception must be a final signal, to all those who underestimate the hatred and destruction fantasies held by the Mullah regime towards Israel and Jews across the world.' Volker Beck, the president of the German-Israeli Society, said he wished to thank the German security services for their vigilance. He added: 'That Iran prepares and plans these attacks on Jewish representatives and pro-Israel activists is a clear sign of the terrorist nature of this regime.' The arrest came after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire last week, ending a 12-day conflict that killed an estimated 1,000 Iranians and at least 29 Israelis. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, launched a salvo of airstrikes on key Iranian military facilities and its nuclear programme, which Israel regards as an existential threat. The conflict ended when Donald Trump, the US president, struck three Iranian nuclear facilities on the ninth day of the war and secured a ceasefire.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Only the Conservatives will do what's needed on welfare
The UK is in a welfare crisis. About 23 per cent of the working-age population are on welfare and more than half of all households receive more in benefits than they pay in taxes. Keir Starmer is too weak to make even minor cuts to Britain's ballooning welfare bill. And, as the Prime Minister's reputation continues to nosedive, Nigel Farage smells blood and is attacking Labour from the Left, promising to scrap the two-child benefit cap. Both Labour and Reform are more interested in the politics than the enormous amounts of taxpayers' money involved, and neither is serious about doing what's necessary to get Britain back to work. Only the Conservatives are prepared to take the tough decisions to bring a rampant welfare budget under control. And we need to. By 2030, one in every four pounds raised through income tax will be spent on health and disability benefits – more than the entire UK defence budget – and that's excluding all the other benefits. We need a totally different approach. One that ensures things are easier for the makers – the people who work hard, create wealth and jobs, and deliver frontline public services. Currently this country has too many people who are taking – from those who sit at home with the curtains drawn while others go to work; to those who skip the queue and arrive here illegally, only to be given privileged access to social housing, the NHS and our generous benefits system. This isn't fair on those who are working hard to pay their taxes, and it isn't fair on those with serious disabilities who understandably rely on government support. Britain needs real welfare reform if we're to incentivise takers to become makers, and stop the takers taking from the disabled. We need a fundamental rethink about which conditions should qualify for long-term financial support. The majority of new disability claims in this country are now for mental health conditions – and more often than not for less severe conditions like anxiety. There has been a 70 per cent rise in the number of people in contact with mental health services in England over the last eight years. In 2023, the shadow chancellor Mel Stride, then work and pensions secretary, announced changes to the Work Capability Assessment – the test that determines if people are able to work – that would have saved around £5 billion from the welfare budget. Labour scrapped that reform, meaning 450,000 more people will now be left on long-term sickness benefits. Research published last week by the Centre for Social Justice think tank showed that by narrowing eligibility for certain benefits – focusing support on those with more severe mental health conditions – we could save up to £7.4 billion a year from the welfare bill. And new findings by the Taxpayers' Alliance highlight the enormous sums of money spent on the motability scheme, including for conditions such as acne and food intolerances. The Labour government's original welfare proposals were only forecast to save £4.8 billion by 2029/30, from a health and disability benefits bill that is set to exceed £100 billion. Starmer's humiliating concessions to bring his rebellious party back in line haven't only removed any savings – in fact they might end up actually costing us – they also tell us that his Government is structurally incapable of making the changes we desperately need to bring the ballooning welfare bill under control. The country cannot afford Starmer's concessions. Alongside the winter fuel U-turn, rising unemployment, and the slowdown in economic growth after the high tax, high borrowing budget, Rachel Reeves is staring at an enormous black hole in the public finances. Any responsible party would be looking at the welfare budget for savings. But Labour and Reform are not responsible parties. Indeed, Labour has already spent the savings it has now abandoned – meaning tax rises this Autumn seem inevitable. The Conservative Party is under new leadership, my leadership, and we will now push our own amendments to Labour's welfare bill that make it clear the Government are not going far enough, that their approach of tinkering around the edges of welfare is not grasping the scale of the problem or the costs involved, and that with every concession and U-turn they're dooming more and more people to a life stuck on benefits. This is not just the responsible thing to do, it is the right thing to do. We need to rebalance our welfare system so that it works for the most vulnerable and stops those who seek to exploit our generosity, whether knowingly or otherwise. The Conservatives will not stand idly by while Labour and Reform engage in a race to the bottom on benefits. We will show the country that we are on the side of the makers, not the takers.
