logo
Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview

Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview

Perth Now3 days ago
CBS parent company Paramount has settled a lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump over an interview broadcast in October, the latest concession by a media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage.
Paramount said it would pay $US16 million ($A24 million) to settle the suit with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, and not paid to Trump "directly or indirectly".
"The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret," the company statement on Wednesday said.
Trump filed a $US10 billion lawsuit against CBS in October, alleging the network deceptively edited an interview that aired on its 60 Minutes news program with then-vice-president and presidential candidate Kamala Harris to "tip the scales in favour of the Democratic Party" in the election.
In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to $US20 billion.
CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appears to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Hamas war, according to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas.
CBS previously said the lawsuit was "completely without merit" and had asked a judge to dismiss the case.
The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comment.
Paramount said it also agreed that 60 Minutes would release transcripts of interviews with future US presidential candidates after they aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns.
The case entered mediation in April.
Trump alleged CBS's editing of the interview violated the consumer protection laws that make it illegal to use false, misleading or deceptive acts in commerce.
Media advocacy groups said Trump's novel use of such laws against news outlets could be a way of circumventing legal protections for the media, which can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they say something they knew or should have known was false.
The settlement comes as Paramount prepares for an $US8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, which will require approval from the US Federal Communications Commission.
On the campaign trail in 2024, Trump threatened to revoke CBS's broadcasting licence if elected.
He has repeatedly lashed out against the news media, often casting unfavourable coverage as "fake news".
The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump.
As part of that settlement, which was made public in December, the network donated $US15 million to Trump's presidential library and publicly apologised for comments by anchor George Stephanopoulos, who inaccurately said Trump had been found liable for rape.
It also follows a settlement by Facebook and Instagram parent company Meta Platforms, which in January said it would pay about $US25 million to settle a lawsuit by Trump over the company's suspension of his accounts after the January 6, 2021, attack at the US Capitol.
Trump has vowed to pursue more claims against the media.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump says TikTok sale is 'pretty much' finalised, only needing China's sign off
Donald Trump says TikTok sale is 'pretty much' finalised, only needing China's sign off

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

Donald Trump says TikTok sale is 'pretty much' finalised, only needing China's sign off

President Donald Trump says the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of popular short-video app TikTok. Trump told reporters on Saturday (AEST) that he would start talking to Chinese President Xi Jinping "or one of his representatives" early next week. When asked how confident he was that China would agree to the deal, he said: "I'm not confident, but I think so." "I think the deal is good for China, and it's good for us" Trump said. "And for us, it's money ... we make a lot of money if the deal goes through." The TikTok saga started after bipartisan legislation to ban the app on national security grounds unless it was sold to American buyers was signed early last year under the Biden administration. What do we know about the potenial buyers? ByteDance has previously confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law". For the deal to comply with US law, ByteDance cannot own more than 20 per cent of TikTok. Late last month, Trump told Fox News a buyer had been found and could be disclosed in about two weeks. He didn't name the potential buyers, but said they are "very wealthy people". In May, Trump also mentioned that a group of buyers was prepared to pay "a lot of money" for TikTok. The previous month he said China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over Trump's tariffs on Beijing . Several US media outlets reported earlier this year that TikTok's US technology partner, Oracle, could take over in a deal that would potentially include the app's American investors. And there have also been reports that a group called The People's Bid for TikTok might also be a potential buyer. The group is owned by billionaire Frank McCourt, who is known as the former owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team. With reporting by the Reuters and Agence France-Presse news agencies.

For the children, the system must change
For the children, the system must change

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

For the children, the system must change

Just meaningless As much as I admire Kate Halfpenny, this time she is just plain wrong. The wedding was hyper meaningless and gross. Frank Flynn, Cape Paterson Racialised hate Friday night's events in Melbourne mark a terrifying turning point. An Israeli restaurant was targeted. A synagogue was set alight. This is racialised hate. It does nothing to help Palestine. In fact, it makes Palestinian dignity more elusive. Some on the terminally-online far left will claim it's 'anti-Zionism', not antisemitism. But when Jewish businesses are attacked and houses of worship are burning, that excuse collapses. 'Zionist' has become a socially acceptable slur – a veil for bigotry. The far right plays the same game: when Donald Trump said 'Shylocks and bad people,' he claimed it was just a literary reference. Elements of the far left now launder hatred with the same trick. This is what happens when politicians aren't censured for saying Jews have 'tentacles,' when parties like the Greens scapegoat entire populations, when people get their news from TikTok, when unrepresentative fringe groups are given a megaphone again and again, and when even legacy media platforms platform the same predictable polemics, afraid to break ranks or admit moral complexity. What begins with euphemism ends with fire. This isn't about Israel. It's about whether Jews in Australia can walk the streets and live without fear. Say it, and say it clearly: this is racism. Simon Tedeschi, Newtown, NSW The deeper currents The article ″⁣ Radical Israeli settlers fan the flames of hatred in West Bank ″⁣ (5/7) is deeply disturbing. We are told these settlers are 'radical,' 'extremist,' 'fanatical.' But what if they are not? A recent Penn State University poll, reported in Haaretz, revealed that 82 per cent of Jewish Israelis support the forced expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and 56 per cent support their expulsion from all of historical Palestine. Two-thirds believe Palestinians are a modern-day incarnation of Amalek – an ancient enemy God commanded to be 'blotted out' – and most of those believe that command still applies today. Given these findings, one is forced to consider that when settlers torch olive groves, shoot at farmers, , they may no longer be outliers, but echoes of a deeper current. It is not enough to be horrified. We must speak, act, withdraw support, and refuse to take part in the machinery that allows this to continue. Fernanda Trecenti, Fitzroy A big ugly bill There is nothing beautiful about Donald Trump's big beautiful bill. It is a disgraceful and inhumane outcome for the nation and most of its citizens. Mary Fenelon, Doncaster East The Wright stuff Tony Wright's piece (″⁣ Why a treaty is key to better future ″⁣, 5/7), illustrated by the beautiful images of Justin McManus, should be read by all, not just those of us with a conscience and a heart. Vikki O'Neill, Ashburton History's echoes Eva-Jo Edwards' recollection of her and her siblings' forced removal from their Swan Hill family struck an uncomfortable chord with me. In 1969, I visited Burwood Boys' Home and observed the presence there of some Aboriginal children. Without a doubt two of them would have been Eva-Jo's brothers; not for one moment did I wonder why they were there. Now we all know that trauma for our First Peoples isn't just something from centuries-old history, but has occurred, and continues to occur in our own lifetimes. If white children were legislated to be taken from their families, if young white people died in disproportionate numbers in, and out of custody, if blue-eyed people like me had to endure constant enmity and discrimination, heaven and earth would be moved to redress the inequity, and the iniquity. The Yoorrook Justice Commission's recommendations must be supported in full. David Johnston, Healesville Negative profit Private enterprises are supposed to be more efficient than government-run organisations but, how often does the pursuit of profits result in poorer services? Michael Brinkman, Ventnor A sinking feeling I am afraid the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal will go the way of all our sub deals – binned just like the Japanese and French plans.

Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks ‘immediately' ahead of Trump and Netanyahu meeting
Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks ‘immediately' ahead of Trump and Netanyahu meeting

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Hamas says ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks ‘immediately' ahead of Trump and Netanyahu meeting

Hamas says it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza. The announcement on Friday (local time) came after it held consultations with other Palestinian factions and before a visit on Monday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Washington, where US President Donald Trump is pushing for an end to the war, now in its 21st month. 'The movement is ready to engage immediately and seriously in a cycle of negotiations on the mechanism to put in place' the terms of a draft US-backed truce proposal received from mediators, the militant group said in a statement. Hamas ally Islamic Jihad said it supported ceasefire talks, but demanded 'guarantees' that Israel 'will not resume its aggression' once hostages held in Gaza are freed. Mr Trump, when asked about Hamas' response aboard Air Force One on Friday, said: 'That's good. They haven't briefed me on it. We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza.' The conflict in Gaza began with Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which sparked a massive Israeli offensive aimed at destroying Hamas and bringing home all the hostages seized by militants. Two previous ceasefires brokered by Qatar, Egypt and the United States have seen temporary halts in fighting, coupled with the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Mr Netanyahu earlier on Friday vowed to bring home all the hostages held in Gaza, after coming under massive domestic pressure over their fate. 'I feel a deep commitment, first and foremost, to ensure the return of all our abductees, all of them,' he said. Mr Trump said on Thursday he wanted 'safety for the people of Gaza'. 'They've gone through hell,' he said. 60-day truce proposal A Palestinian source familiar with the negotiations told AFP earlier this week that the latest proposals included 'a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release half of the living Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip' – thought to number 22 – 'in exchange for Israel releasing a number of Palestinian prisoners and detainees'. Out of 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants during the October 2023 attack, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Nearly 21 months of war have created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people in the Gaza Strip, where Israel has recently expanded its military operations. The military said in a statement it had been striking suspected Hamas targets across the territory, including around Gaza City in the north and Khan Yunis and Rafah in the south. Civil defence says aid-seekers killed Gaza civil defence official Mohammad al-Mughayyir said Israeli strikes and gunfire killed at least 52 people on Friday. The Israeli military said it was looking into reports, except for a handful of incidents for which it requested coordinates and timeframes. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency. In a separate statement, the Israeli military said a 19-year-old sergeant 'fell during combat in the southern Gaza Strip'. Mr Mughayyir said the Palestinians killed included five shot while waiting for aid near a US-run site near Rafah in southern Gaza and several who were waiting for aid near the Wadi Gaza Bridge in the centre of the territory. They were the latest in a spate of deaths near aid distribution centres in the devastated territory, which UN agencies have warned is on the brink of famine. The US- and Israeli-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has distanced itself from reports of deadly incidents near its sites. Displaced civilians Mr Mughayyir told AFP that eight people, including a child, were killed in an Israeli air strike on the tents of displaced civilians near Khan Yunis on Thursday. The civil defence official said eight more people were killed in two other strikes on camps on the coast, including one that killed two children early Friday. The Israeli military said it was operating throughout Gaza 'to dismantle Hamas military capabilities'. The Hamas attack of October 2023 resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 57,268 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers the figures reliable.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store