logo
4 takeaways from Tesla's latest sales report

4 takeaways from Tesla's latest sales report

Tesla just experienced its steepest drop in quarterly vehicle deliveries to date, but you wouldn't know it looking at its stock price.
Wall Street appears to believe that the numbers could've been worse, and the stock was up 4.86% at market close on Wednesday.
The electric automaker delivered about 384,000 EVs in the second quarter, marking a 13.5% decrease from the 444,000 vehicles it delivered in the same period of 2024.
The new report comes after a challenging first quarter for Tesla's vehicle deliveries, which the company attributed to an assembly line overhaul for the refreshed Model Y and anti-Tesla sentiment in certain markets. The two rough quarters also follow Tesla's first annual delivery decline in 2024.
The automaker is facing multiple challenges, including a slowing EV environment, rising competition, the looming removal of consumer EV tax credits, and potential brand damage tied to Elon Musk's political stint.
Despite the latest setback, Wall Street doesn't appear spooked by the numbers. Analysts explained why.
1. The numbers are bad, but not that bad
Tesla's delivery report fell in line with analysts' average estimates, and the numbers were better than the most pessimistic of Wall Street forecasts.
"We consider the release a modest disappointment, although vehicle sales weren't as weak as many had feared," CFRA analyst Garrett Nelson wrote in an analyst note on Wednesday.
On average, analysts expected 389,400 vehicles delivered in the second quarter, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. However, some forecasts, like RBC Capital Markets, were as low as 366,000, and Tesla landed about 5% above that, with 384,000 deliveries.
Thomas Monteiro, senior analyst at Investing.com, told BI that given the automaker's aging lineup, increasing competition, and political competition, Tesla showed its ability to stay relevant, which in and of itself could be viewed as a win for the automaker.
Tesla bull Dan Ives told BI that "Rome wasn't built in a day," and he expects the automaker to take six to nine months to come back from its recent challenges, like the Model Y assembly line changeover.
Monteiro said that if this is "the bottom for Tesla," the struggles of late 2024 and early 2025 could turn out to be a "temporary setback in the company's broader trajectory."
2. Tesla has a steep hill to climb
After back-to-back quarters of declining sales, Tesla is looking to return to growth.
The trouble is, the bigger the deliveries miss, the steeper the hill it has to climb to get there.
In the first half of the year, Tesla delivered a total of roughly 720,700 EVs. To exceed its 2024 deliveries of 1,789,226 vehicles, Tesla would need to deliver well over a million EVs across the next two quarters.
It's possible, but an ambitious feat for the EV maker. In the third quarter last year, Tesla delivered 462,890 vehicles, and in the fourth quarter, it hit about 495,000.
A more affordable model could spur sales, but Tesla hasn't given an updated timeline for its cheaper EV, which it had previously said was on track to begin production in the first half of the year.
3. The stock is up
Tesla stock popped immediately following the results and ended the day up over 4.8%.
In addition to staying above the lowest of Wall Street's estimates, another factor could also be China's Passenger Car Association releasing data indicating Tesla saw its first increase in 2025 vehicle deliveries from its Shanghai factory, a key production plant for global exports.
In June, Tesla delivered 71,599 units from the factory, marking a 0.8% year-over-year increase and a 16% monthly increase, according to the data. That could indicate a bright spot for Tesla's China growth prospects, a market where the automaker is facing increasing competition and just lost its top manufacturing executive.
4. Tesla isn't out of the woods
Not all analysts had an optimistic take on Tesla's numbers.
Gadjo Sevilla, a senior tech and AI analyst for EMARKETER, a sister company to BI, said that Tesla's headwinds contributed to the sales decline and the automaker may be "stretching itself thin" with the robotaxi rollout and Optimus humanoid robot development. Those projects "divert time, talent, and resources from EVs," Sevilla said.
Musk has said that solving autonomy and developing related technology that utilizes the technology, such as Optimus, are key to Tesla's future growth.
"Increased EV competition, especially in growth markets like China, and the continued slowdown in global EV adoption will continue to compound Tesla's losses," Sevilla said.
While Musk has returned his focus to Tesla, his favorability has taken a hit from many on both the political right and the left, according to recent polls. Shortly after leaving his position in DOGE, the billionaire sparked an ongoing public feud with President Donald Trump regarding his Big Beautiful Bill. As the two take turns exchanging insults on social media, Tesla has seen sharp swings in its share price.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Magnificent 7 Diverge as Peak Earnings Season Puts Spotlight on Big Tech
Magnificent 7 Diverge as Peak Earnings Season Puts Spotlight on Big Tech

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Magnificent 7 Diverge as Peak Earnings Season Puts Spotlight on Big Tech

Peak earnings season for the second quarter begins this week and lasts through the second week of August. This is when roughly 75% of S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report. Thus far 34% of companies from the index have reported, and the early results bode well for the rest of the season. Last week investors focused on results from the first two Magnificent 7 constituents, Tesla and Alphabet, which both reported on Wednesday and had differing results. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with REG. Not surprisingly, Tesla continued to report waning demand. This was expected after the EV maker released disappointing results in their Second Quarter 2025 Production, Deliveries & Deployments on July 2. That report showed that second quarter vehicle deliveries declined 14%, the second straight quarterly decline.[1] In their second quarter earnings report, Tesla missed expectations on the top and bottom-line due to automotive revenue which was down 16% YoY, in part due to competition from Chinese EV makers which are producing more affordable models.[2] The stock is down ~16% YTD. On the flipside, Google parent, Alphabet, was a bright spot. Alphabet beat expectations on the top and bottom-line, driven by robust revenue from YouTube advertising and Google Cloud. The company also offered 2025 CapEx estimates that were higher than Wall Street's expectations for the second time this year. In February, Alphabet said it expected to spend $75B in capital expenditures (CAPEX) mainly due to the expansion in its AI capabilities, which was higher than the $58.84B analysts had expected. Last week that number rose to $85B, this time due to strong and growing demand for our Cloud products and services. Alphabet CFO, Anat Ashkenazi, told investors to expect further increases to CAPEX in 2026.[3] Alphabet stock is up ~2% YTD. With the results from those names as well as the 110 other S&P 500 constituents that reported last week, Q2 growth propelled to 6.4% from 5.6% the prior week. Revenues also increased to 5.1% from 4.4% the week prior. Beat rates remain impressive with 80% of S&P 500 companies surpassing expectations on the top and bottom-line, better than the 1, 5, and 10-year beat rate averages according to FactSet.[4] On Deck this Week - More Big Tech Results This week all eyes will be on four more Magnificent 7 reports from Meta and Microsoft on Wednesday, and Apple and Amazon on Thursday. Nvidia is the final of the group to report on August 27. Source: Wall Street Horizon Outlier Earnings Dates This Week Academic research shows that, when a company confirms a quarterly earnings date that is later than when they have historically reported, it's typically a sign that the company will share negative news on their upcoming call, while moving a release date earlier suggests the opposite.[5] This week we get results from a number of large companies on major indexes that have pushed their Q2 2025 earnings dates outside of their historical norms. Eight companies within the S&P 500 confirmed outlier earnings dates for this week, four of which are earlier than usual and therefore have positive DateBreaks Factors*. Those names are Regency Centers Corp (NASDAQ:REG), Booking Holdings (NASDAQ:BKNG), AES Corp (NYSE:AES) and CVS Health Corp (NYSE:CVS). The four companies with negative DateBreak Factors for this week are Teradyne Inc (NASDAQ:TER), PPG Industries (NYSE:PPG), UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH), and Kimberly Clark Corp (NASDAQ:KMB). * Wall Street Horizon DateBreaks Factor: statistical measurement of how an earnings date (confirmed or revised) compares to the reporting company's 5-year trend for the same quarter. Negative means the earnings date is confirmed to be later than historical average while Positive is earlier. Q2 Earnings Wave The peak weeks of the Q2 earnings season are expected to fall between July 28 - August 15, with each week expected to see over 2,000 reports. Currently, August 7 is predicted to be the most active day with 1,291 companies anticipated to report. Thus far, 71% of companies have confirmed their earnings date, and 14% have reported (out of our universe of 11,000+ global names), so this is subject to change. The remaining dates are estimated based on historical reporting data. Source: Wall Street Horizon 1 Tesla Second Quarter 2025 Production, Deliveries & Deployments, July 2, 2025, Tesla Q2 2025 Quarterly Earnings Update, July 23, 2025, Alphabet Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results, July 23, 2025, FactSet Earnings Insight, John Butters, July 25, 2025, Time Will Tell: Information in the Timing of Scheduled Earnings News, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Eric C. So, Travis L. Johnson, Dec, 2018, Copyright 2025 Wall Street Horizon, Inc. All rights reserved. Do not copy, distribute, sell or modify this document without Wall Street Horizon's prior written consent. This information is provided for information purposes only. Neither TMX Group Limited nor any of its affiliated companies guarantees the completeness of the information contained in this publication, and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in or your use of, or reliance on, the information. This publication is not intended to provide legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial or other advice and should not be relied upon for such advice. The information provided is not an invitation to purchase securities, including any listed on Toronto Stock Exchange and/or TSX Venture Exchange. TMX Group and its affiliated companies do not endorse or recommend any securities referenced in this publication. This publication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor may there be any sale of any securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. TMX, the TMX design, TMX Group, Toronto Stock Exchange, TSX, and TSX Venture Exchange are the trademarks of TSX Inc. and are used under license. Wall Street Horizon is the trademark of Wall Street Horizon, Inc. All other trademarks used in this publication are the property of their respective owners. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

A self-made millionaire says he doesn't believe in index funds — and explains why he doesn't see options as higher risk
A self-made millionaire says he doesn't believe in index funds — and explains why he doesn't see options as higher risk

Business Insider

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

A self-made millionaire says he doesn't believe in index funds — and explains why he doesn't see options as higher risk

Jason Brown built wealth his own way. After a disappointing early experience handing over his money to professionals — he took $2,000 worth of high school graduation money to the bank to invest and, two years later, his account had dropped to $700 — he decided if he was going to lose money, at least it would be on his own terms. As a college student, he started buying stocks and grew his modest savings to six figures before losing it all on one trade. After selling his car, moving back home, and taking a job at Verizon selling cellphones, he started trading again — this time, with a set of investing principles that would prevent him from going broke again. Brown, 43, gradually rebuilt his portfolio and hit the seven-figure mark by trading options. Business Insider confirmed his net worth by reviewing an account summary that shows his 2024 investment activity. An option is a type of financial contract giving you the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset at a specific price before a specific date. Options are generally more complex than traditional investing, such as buying and holding stocks or index funds, but Brown's adamant that traditional investing doesn't cut it. "I don't really believe in index funds," he told BI. He became skeptical after digging into his 401(k) plan when he worked for Verizon. Specifically, he looked at the fund his 401(k) money was invested in. It was comprised of about five major companies like Apple and Google that he knew and trusted, but "the rest of it was junk," he said. "That's when I was like, I want to move it over to a self-directed IRA, and I just want to pick these five companies. Why are they forcing me to buy all this other stuff?" Index fund investing has helped many regular investors build wealth, but for Brown, who prefers to be more hands-on with his investments, options trading made more sense. 'Options are not risky. The way people use them is risky.' Brown, who trades full-time, runs a financial education company, and is the author of " Five-Year Millionaire," believes there is a lot of misunderstanding around options trading. "When people don't understand options, they'll say, 'That's risky what he's doing.' The reality is, it's risky not knowing how to use options," he said. Stock options can be compared to renters' or car insurance, depending on whether you're buying or selling options and whether you're using calls or puts. For example, buying a put is like buying car insurance. You pay a premium (the cost of the put), and hope nothing bad happens (the stock doesn't crash), but if it does, you're protected: You can sell the stock at the agreed-upon price (the strike price), just like insurance would reimburse you if your car gets totaled. "If options are so risky, then stop paying your homeowner's insurance or your car insurance, because that's what you're doing every month when you cut a check: You are buying a put option to protect yourself in case something happens," said Brown. "Why don't we buy protection for our investment accounts when a COVID-19 happens, when an '08 real estate market crash happens, when a tariffs situation happens, and the market tanks?" Options can require careful timing and market-watching, and Brown knows he won't make money on every trade. "You cannot be right on every trade," he said, which is why he has a robust emergency fund, multiple revenue streams, and follows investing principles, including: Know your "I'm wrong level." When he lost everything in his early 20s, he never considered his "I'm wrong level," he explained. "I only thought, 'What would happen if this goes right? I'm getting a condo.' I never stopped to think, 'If I'm wrong, I'll lose it all and I have to move back home.'" Now, he knows exactly when he needs to cut his losses and shut down a trade. "Options are not risky. The way people use them is risky," said Brown. "You can use them to gamble and treat it like a casino, or you can use them to protect some of your most valuable assets — protect your accounts and grow your accounts."

Palantir salaries revealed: Here's how much the defense tech giant pays software engineers, researchers, and more
Palantir salaries revealed: Here's how much the defense tech giant pays software engineers, researchers, and more

Business Insider

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Palantir salaries revealed: Here's how much the defense tech giant pays software engineers, researchers, and more

Palantir is having a moment. The software and defense tech company has been on a tear in 2025; its stock is up over 100% this year, as of Tuesday's close. As shares soar, what about their employees' paychecks? Palantir is gaining ground with early-career talent — including some recruits who haven't even started college — thanks to cushy software engineering salaries and a growing appetite among younger techies for defense tech work. The company is also riding a tone shift in Silicon Valley, where working with the government is no longer taboo. Google, for instance, quietly dropped its ban on using its technology to build weapons in February. At elite universities like Stanford, a coding job at a defense tech company like Palantir or a drone startup is becoming as coveted as a traditional tech job, according to the San Francisco Standard. Palantir builds software that helps institutions — both government agencies and commercial companies — manage and analyze their data. In addition to building defense software for the US and allied militaries, the company also makes AI tools for health systems like Mount Sinai and HCA Healthcare. The company appears to be hiring across the board, with open roles ranging from entry-level software engineers to government-focused business development staff, according to its job listings. While compensation information isn't publicized by most tech companies, including Palantir, public records from US work visa applications give some insight into pay for specific positions. The data comes from filings from the first quarter of 2025 that companies submit to the US Department of Labor when hiring foreign workers on H-1B visas. Business Insider analyzed Palantir's filings to see where it's hiring — and what it's paying. The figures only refer to foreign hires and only account for base pay, not the bonuses and stock awards that employees receive. Unlike tech giants such as Microsoft, Google, and Meta, which each filed thousands of H-1B applications during the same period, Palantir submitted far fewer. That may be in part due to the nature of its government work; some of these roles at Palantir could require US security clearance, according to Palantir job postings reviewed by BI. Security clearance can only typically be granted to American citizens, according to the State Department. Palantir didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from BI. Here's what Palantir is paying across key roles, from Forward Deployed Engineers to Machine Learning Researchers. Deployment roles: Forward Deployed Engineers can make as much as $200,000 in base pay. Forward Deployed Engineer: $143,000 to $200,000 Deployment Strategist: $120,000 to $160,000 Software Engineers can make up to $240,000 in base pay. Software Engineer: $155,000 to $240,000

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store