Major tax reform probably 'a bridge too far': CBA
At the same time Luke Yeaman has urged Treasurer Jim Chalmers to consider increasing means testing to raise more revenue.
Mr Yeaman, the former deputy Treasury secretary under Dr Chalmers who now leads the Commonwealth Bank's economics team, said a "grand bargain" between the federal and state governments on tax reform was unlikely, at least in the short term.
While the government could find some joy in improving areas like housing and energy infrastructure approvals and capital gains tax, large-scale reform around areas like the GST would likely prove too difficult.
"There's no doubt that Australia needs a bolder reform agenda," Mr Yeaman said as he released CBA's economics update for the 2026 financial year on Wednesday.
"We've had a successful economy, steady growth that has led to a feeling of complacency in the system."
With Labor holding a large majority in parliament and Labor governments in most states, expectations will be high for the government to deliver something substantial a the August roundtable, he said.
But given fiscal challenges faced by all levels of government and Dr Chalmers's requirement that reforms be at least budget neutral will likely make large-scale reform around GST "a bridge too far" in the short term, although it could lay the groundwork for reform down the track.
Governments have typically needed to "buy" reform by spending extra to compensate people who are made worse off.
Increasing means-testing on major spending programs should therefore be revisited to achieve the government's aims of fixing the budget deficit and help fund tax cuts elsewhere to boost work incentives and abolish inefficient taxes such as stamp duty and payroll tax.
Large outlays in recent years on energy rebates and Medicare spending have typically benefited everyone, even high-income earners with more capacity to pay.
"So I think there's an opportunity to look at some of the key spending programs and whether you can drive more means testing and user contributions through that," Mr Yeaman said.
Another potential area for reform was around planning and zoning, where Mr Yeaman said he saw a real appetite for change.
Senior government figures, including Housing Minister Clare O'Neil and Assistant Minister for Productivity Andrew Leigh, have called to slash red tape slowing approvals for important projects like residential construction and clean energy generation.
"If the government wants to achieve its goals in infrastructure, housing, net zero and future industries - without that, I don't think you'll achieve those objectives," Mr Yeaman said.
"I think there's been too much focus on new regulation to protect and manage risk. There's an opportunity to rebalance that towards a more growth-focused agenda on regulation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
8 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Billions locked in for 2032 Olympic Games with new Queensland and federal government deal
Brisbane 's Olympic dream is becoming a reality with an intergovernmental agreement securing a $1.2 billion federal fund for the new Brisbane stadium. Deputy Premier Jarrod Bleijie announced the funding partnership and the plans for the Games on Thursday. 'To deliver this once-in-a-generation event, you need to work with partners,' he said. 'What today's deal means is certainty for games infrastructure going forward.' Federal contributions for this project will total $3.4 billion and both governments will commit a combined $7.1 billion to deliver 17 new or upgraded sports venues, including the promised Victoria Park stadium. 'Despite being from different political persuasions, we have worked well together in the state and in the national interest,' the deputy premier said. Federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the deal will help the Olympics leave an 'incredible legacy for Queensland'. 'The Australian government's commitment of $3.4 billion towards the Games venues is the single largest contribution any Australian government has made towards sporting infrastructure in this country,' she said. At the heart of Brisbane 2032 is Victoria Park's proposed 63,000-seat stadium. It was confirmed on Thursday that the stadium will be used for the opening and closing ceremonies. Work has already begun, including soil sampling and geotechnical studies, to ensure the site will be fit to build on. The site, however, holds major cultural significance with First Nations people and the redevelopment plans have brought about cultural heritage controversy for the state government. The LNP ensured on Thursday that they acknowledge their obligation to reach an agreement with First Nations groups, 'but ultimately if an agreement can't be reached, then the laws have to override', Bleijie said. This controversy is yet another for the state government, which has continually been challenged by First Nations people since coming into office. Leeanne Enoch, Labor member for Algester in Queensland, commented in parliament last week that 'this LNP government is hell-bent on winding back any progress made regarding reconciliation in this state'. Enoch accused the LNP of attempting to 'erase' First Nations people from the QLD public sector. 'This government is determined to undermine the impact of years of cross-cultural training and agreed protocols designed to ensure government agencies are able to effectively serve some of the most vulnerable people in our community,' she said. Bleijie said that the LNP recognise Victoria Park is a significant issue, but was 'confident that we will secure the support (of First Nations people)'.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Youth crime crackdown promises 'no more free passes'
There will be "no more free passes" for serious youth offenders with those caught more likely to be locked up, under one jurisdiction's crackdown. The Northern Territory's chief minister expanded the list of serious offences ineligible for youth diversion under new measures announced in Alice Springs on Friday. Lia Finocchiaro said an additional 13 offences would be added, meaning offenders who commit them will no longer get the benefit from Labor's previous catch and release scheme. "No more free passes for serious youth offenders," she told reporters. Ms Finocchiaro said repeat offenders had been able to avoid any real consequences and were able to reoffend "days or even hours later". "We are taking strong action to break the cycle of youth crime and restore community safety," she added. "The days of police being a taxi service are over." Crime, and the perception the government was unable to control it, formed the main plank of her party's campaign to oust Labor. Growing crime rates and anti-social behaviour have been major issues in various Territory communities for some time but they drew national attention last year following a series of wild brawls in Alice Springs. The violence prompted multiple city lock downs and curfews. Tougher bail laws, targeting mainly youth offenders, were also introduced earlier this year. While delivering its first budget last month, the Country Liberal Party pledged a record $1.34 billion spend on police, corrections and justice. But the government has been criticised by the Labor opposition and justice reform groups for taking a punitive approach to crime rather than tackling its root causes. Social worker and former Northern Territory Australian of the Year Blair McFarland said the changes would not make any difference. "It's a really minor tweak in the legislation and it's not going to do anything to actually address the social problems that are creating all the crime," he told ABC News. "It doesn't address the chronic poverty that people live in and it doesn't give kids a future. "These are the kids who grew up with the state smashing Aboriginal legal systems to the best of their ability, and they grew up in a lawless sort of space and they get to an age where they realise that their life is going to be grinding poverty, chronic illness and early death and they have got nothing to lose." Under the latest changes, offences including serious harm offending, hit and runs, driving stolen vehicles, assaults on frontline workers and break-ins will no longer be eligible for youth diversion and will have a default position of proceeding to charge. "We're giving police the tools they need as we continue to roll out reforms aimed at reducing crime." Ms Finocchiaro said.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The inside story of how Australia's moment to shine in the arts world went horribly wrong
The historic grip of major galleries over Australia's representatives had been broken, and the newish selection process seemed to be serving Australia well. On December 16 last year, Collette and Creative Australia's head of visual arts, Mikala Tai, conferred and the pair's selection was confirmed, the decision tightly held in the organisation for weeks for fear it would leak. Among the select few with knowledge of the successful team, the decision was regarded as 'bold' or 'courageous' – Sabsabi's Lebanese heritage and public pro-Palestinian stance connected him to the Middle East at a time when conflict in that region was emotive and polarising. But a week before the planned February 7 announcement, police lobbed their own explosive device into this febrile mix, going public with their investigations into a caravan loaded with explosives in north-west Sydney. The incident was quickly labelled a 'terrorism threat', although later the Federal Police would describe it as 'a criminal con job'. By then, a federal election was imminent and polling showed voters were starting to turn against Labor. Loading Two days after the caravan discovery, Creative Australia briefed Minister for Arts Tony Burke on its upcoming announcement. Mention was made in the ministerial dispatch that Sabsabi, along with other artists, had withdrawn from the Sydney Festival in 2022 in protest after the festival accepted funding from the Israeli Embassy, 'out of solidarity with the Palestinian people and the Palestinian cause'. But the minister's office was not alerted to historical works which would later be raised in the Murdoch press and in parliament, including You (2007), a multichannel video and sound installation featuring imagery of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, in the collection of the Museum of Contemporary Art. 'That the work was seen as highly ambiguous, and already nearly 20 years old … appears to have given staff confidence that any controversy connected with the work could be managed,' the report says. A staff member later left a message with Burke's office alerting them to the work's existence but appears not to have followed that call up. A 'questionable' matter The board of Creative Australia was backgrounded on the winning team but played no direct role in the selection process. Members were not alerted to any potential controversies. Days after the team's announcement, as its sister tabloid paper defended allegations it tried to entrap a Sydney cafe in an antisemitic sting, The Australian described Sabsabi's use of imagery of Nasrallah as 'ambiguous' and 'questionable'. Collette and senior members of his team were unaware of a second sensitive work, Thank you very much (2006) featuring imagery of the 9/11 attacks and US President George W. Bush, until Senate question time two days later when the Coalition's then-shadow arts minster Claire Chandler rose to her feet. By all accounts, Chandler's questions sparked panic. Soon after, around 3pm, the CEO, chair and head of public affairs held a call with Creative Australia's external communications advisers, who concluded the negative media narrative around the artist and his prior artworks posed a significant risk to the reputation of Creative Australia if the stories continued to run. Burke then called Adrian Collette at 3.30pm asking why he was not alerted to the contentious artwork. He later insisted he did not demand Sabsabi's head. The report found that the minister's statement was consistent with the information received by the panel during its review. Loading Collette later recalled in testimony to Senate estimates: 'We anticipate always that the selection of the Venice artist will be controversial. It has been from time immemorial. 'Everyone has a view on the artist, on the art. We don't resile from any of those decisions; we haven't in the past. But what happened at that moment was a recognition by me and the board that this entire process was going to be mired in the worst kind of divisive debate.' At 6.05pm an emergency meeting of the board had been convened, and it was determined to offer the artistic team the opportunity to withdraw from the project under threat of sacking. The board did not seek the advice of the head of visual arts or its head of communications, and did not allow the artist to present his case. It was beyond the panel's terms of reference to judge the legitimacy of the board's decision, but it's clear the board acted hastily without drawing breath. The board could have announced a review of the team's selection. Instead, it brought a gun. 'Nobody except those involved can ever know how fraught and heartbreaking that meeting was,' board member and artist Lindy Lee later recalled. She resigned the next day. Officially, the board said it acted to avoid the unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community of a 'prolonged and divisive debate'. The panel found the board felt compelled by 'a strongly negative narrative [that] was expected in the media around the artworks and the artist, and the decision to select the artist had become a matter of political debate'. Another factor that may have been weighing on some board members was the potential for the controversy to be used as a battering ram to reduce the funding and independence of Creative Australia. With an election imminent, Creative Australia faced an existential threat from cuts, real or imagined, as conservatives made every noise they would follow the playbook of Donald Trump in stirring up the culture wars. Notably, it is in a more benign political environment with Labor securing a thumping majority that Sabsabi and Dagostino have now been reinstated. In any event, at 7.41pm on February 13, Collette contacted the artistic team and advised them of the board's decision. Sabsabi and Dagostino refused to resign. Forty minutes later, after the board's statement was prepared, Collette made three unsuccessful attempts to contact them. Sabsabi and Dagostino later recalled being stunned by the turn of events: 'The Venice Biennale is one of the biggest platforms in Australian art,' Sabsabi told this masthead. 'To be selected and then have it withdrawn was devastating. It was heartbreaking and has caused ongoing anxiety. It's had a serious impact on my career, my wellbeing and my family's wellbeing.' By 6pm the following day the Herald had broken the news that philanthropist Simon Mordant had resigned, along with Mikala Tai and program manager Tahmina Maskinyar. Petitions and protests followed, the outrage lasting four months until the board voted two weeks ago to rescind its decision. Had Creative Australia been as well-prepared for the public announcement as it should have been, it is possible that its senior leadership and board may have reached a conclusion that any controversy around both works could be sensibly managed, the report concluded. The organisation was caught between its conflicting desire to do right by the artists and political realities. Ultimately, the entire mess could have been avoided if cooler heads had prevailed and due processes were followed. Changes afoot Former publisher Louise Adler is not the only commentator to draw parallels between the Sabsabi debacle and Antoinette Lattouf, the radio broadcaster who was last week awarded $70,000 after a Federal Court found she was unfairly sacked by the ABC for her political opinions concerning the war in Gaza. Like Lattouf, Sabsabi's pro-Palestinian views were well known at the time of his appointment, and complaints flooded Creative Australia as soon as the appointment was publicised, cheered on by the Murdoch media. Holding or expressing a political opinion was held by the federal court as not a valid reason for terminating Lattouf's employment, even at the national broadcaster. Sabsabi and Dagostino had been selected by an open expression of interest process, by an organisation founded on the principle of artistic independence. Both stand as an abject lesson to the dangers of knee-jerk reactions to pressure tactics. Sabsabi and Dagostino speak of a sense of renewed confidence that allows them to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant and collective hardship. The arts world feels vindicated by their intervention. Loading It's likely there will be changes to the Venice selection process, and there is every indication that Collette, an experienced arts administrator, will seek to make things right, and then make a diplomatic exit. 'At the end of the day, Adrian became the kingmaker,' said one campaigner. 'He brought the recommendation to the board. The buck stops with him.' Mikala Tai made a rare statement via social media after a period of media silence in which she said she had come to learn why she wanted to work in the arts industry. 'I have also learnt a lot about cultural leadership. That we have conferred leadership on administrators and that this is a distraction from the fact that artists remain the heart of the industry and that the moment we forget the artist, we sacrifice the industry.'
