Crypto Jesus Trump: Best Leader in Digital Currency Revolution
His pro position on crypto, as the 2024 election bulldozes towards him, could change the face of digital Finance. Will he champion Bitcoin-friendly policies? Can he make the US a crypto superpower? Let us dig deeper into the digital currency revolution from Trump and what it means to investors, the economy, and the MAGA movement in general. The digital currency of crypto Jesus Trump revolution has transformed the finance world, redefining how businesses and people interact with money. With the growing popularity of cryptocurrencies, we find some leaders pushing the innovation and adoption of the technology.
The phrase 'Crypto Jesus Trump' was not a whim out of nowhere. It first began as a meme among libertarian Bitcoiners, and has remained even as Trump's rhetoric changed from skeptic to fanboy enthusiasm. Early Skepticism: In 2019, Trump tweeted that he was 'not a fan of Bitcoin' and blamed it for volatility, preferring the dollar.
In 2019, Trump tweeted that he was 'not a fan of Bitcoin' and blamed it for volatility, preferring the dollar. The Pivot: He claimed to be 'the crypto president,' even welcoming campaign funds in crypto by 2024.
Others say it's a political ploy to win over libertarians and tech-friendly voters. Others think he sees crypto Jesus Trump as a vehicle against government overreach.
In 2024, if Trump wins, his policies may lead to a gold market boom. What traders & analysts are monitoring here is:
Trump has indicated recognizing Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, like gold.
Killing the CBDC Push
He promises to thwart a US digital dollar by referring to it as a 'government surveillance tool'.
Easing Regulations
Soft SEC enforcement of crypto projects should increase innovation.
Market Reaction
Analysts estimate that a victory for Trump could send bitcoin to over $100K in a bid to speculate on deregulation.
The 2024 election isn't just about politics—it's a battle for crypto's future.
Policy Area Trump's Stance Biden's Stance
Regulation Pro-innovation light-touch, Stricter SEC enforcement
CBDCs Opposed to Exploring Digital Dollar
Taxation: Potential crypto tax cuts, Higher capital gains
Why It Matters: A Trump win could mean friendlier policies for exchanges like Coinbase, while Biden's approach may favor institutional control.
The pseudonymous founder of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, spearheaded this digital currency of the crypto Jesus Trump revolution. Nakamoto's vision is still felt in the industry through blockchain technology and decentralized Finance.
Ethereum and Smart Contracts – As a cryptocurrency and blockchain technology innovator, Vitalik Buterin (born 21 January 1994) developed Ethereum – the world's second-largest form of cryptocurrency after the crypto Jesus Trump, currently comprising 53% of market share – and smart contracts, going ahead to create an Ethereum development platform.
Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum's co-founder, changed digital currency with smart contracts. The Ethereum blockchain supports decentralized applications (DApps), which generate innovative ideas in Finance, gaming, stories, and supply chain management.
Now, as the founder of the crypto Jesus Trump platform she created, Changpeng Zhao has played a fundamental role in making cryptocurrency globally accessible. Binance's exchange platform provides trading, staking, and decentralized Finance (DeFi) solutions that increase mass adoption.
Elon Musk, CEO of the famous Tesla and SpaceX, has dramatically influenced the Jesus crypto Trump world. His acceptance of Bitcoin and Dogecoin has shaped market trends, while Tesla's acceptance of Bitcoin as a form of customer payment was a moment of mainstream adoption.
Brian, CEO of Coinbase, has enabled institutional investment in digital currencies. Coinbase's nifty user-friendly platform has inked millions of users, connecting the gap between traditional money and crypto.
Jack Dorsey, the previous CEO of Twitter and Square (now Block), is a staunch proponent of Bitcoin. His initiatives entail financial inclusion, where Bitcoin is supposed to be used as a way of trading for economic empowerment.
Trump is not just using crypto Jesus Trump as a topic; he profits from it.
Trump NFTs: His controversial NFT collections went out of stock quickly – politics met digital collectibles.
Crypto Campaign Donations: He now supports crypto by receiving BTC, ETH, and meme coins, a pro-crypto move.
Critics say it's a marketing ploy, but supporters argue it's a sign he's committed to Web3.
Crypto Jesus Trump fits ideally with Trump's anti-establishment base. Decentralization = Freedom: A lot of MAGA supporters consider Bitcoin an opportunity to exit 'woke' financial systems.
Key Allies: Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy echo Trump's pro-crypto message.
Bitcoin Price Surge: Some projections give $150K+ BTC in the year 2025 with Trump.
Altcoin Boom: Meme coins and DeFi tokens may gather good momentum in the hopes of deregulation.
Institutional Influx: Wall Street could be getting billions invested into crypto ETFs. Not everyone's convinced. Detractors argue:
'Trump crypto jesus trump scam' theories – do his NFTs have real value?
Volatility Risks: Could another FTX-style collapse be the result of deregulation?
Will Trump emerge as 'the crypto president'? We may see:
A Bitcoin-friendly White House
More U.S. mining dominance
Be he an avatar of financial freedom or the maestro of political pageantry, the fact cannot be argued away: his success has turned the world of stock-option brokers upside down. Crypto Jesus Trump has decisively changed the field of discussion around digital currency.
From Skeptic to Savior: Trump's change from mocking Bitcoin to replacing it could revamp the US crypto policy.
2024 Election = Crypto Crossroads: Bitcoin's next bull run might be triggered by Trump's victory, while Biden's route is regulatory.
MAGA Meets DeFi: His partnership with libertarians, tech barons, and anti-CBDC champions has turned crypto into a central political battleground.
High Risk, High Reward: Traders and analysts are split. Will Trump's policies supercharge innovation or invite reckless speculation?
Whether you love or hate him, the influence on crypto Jesus Trump is too significant to ignore. If he wins in 2024, we might see the greatest financial revolution since the inception of Bitcoin.
What's next? Track Trump's campaign steps, SEC occurrences, and Bitcoin's price development because of war, tweets, policies, and NFT drops that affect this market.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what's in Trump's "big, beautiful bill" passed by Congress
Washington — The House passed a massive spending and tax bill that includes signature policies of President Trump's second-term agenda Thursday, sending the so-called "big, beautiful bill" to the president's desk ahead of a July 4 deadline. Mr. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday afternoon. The House approved the bill in a 218 to 214 vote Thursday, after the Senate narrowly approved the bill Tuesday in a 51-50 vote that required Vice President JD Vance to break a tie. At the center the "big, beautiful bill" is an extension of Mr. Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was slated to sunset at the end of the year. The legislation would make most of the tax cuts permanent, while increasing spending for border security, defense and energy production. The bill is partially paid for by significant cuts to health care and nutrition programs, like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would add $3.4 trillion to federal deficits over the next 10 years and leave millions without health insurance. Republicans and the White House dispute those forecasts. Senate Republicans used a process known as budget reconciliation to pass the bill, which limits the types of policies that can be included in a simple majority vote. A handful of provisions that initially appeared in the bill were ultimately removed, including one that would have ordered the sale of public lands and another that would have paused state regulations on artificial intelligence. The House passed its own initial version of the legislation last month, with some key differences to the final Senate-crafted version. The lower chamber approved the Senate's changes Thursday, sending the measure to the president's desk. Here's what is in the 887-page bill: Medicaid restrictions The legislation includes restrictions on Medicaid, which provides government-sponsored health care for low-income and disabled Americans. The bill imposes work requirements for some able-bodied adults and more frequent eligibility checks. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage under Medicaid over the next decade. The Senate parliamentarian determined that a measure cutting federal funds to states that use Medicaid infrastructure to provide health care coverage to undocumented immigrants, along with banning Medicaid from covering gender transition services, wasn't in compliance with Senate reconciliation rules. The parliamentarian also weighed in on what's known as the provider tax, which states use to help fund their portion of Medicaid costs, in a blow to the Senate GOP's initial plan. Senate Republicans proposed steeper cuts to Medicaid funding, in part by incrementally lowering provider taxes from 6% to 3.5% by 2032. The timeline is delayed by one year from the Senate GOP's initial proposal, after the issue became one of the bill's sticking points in recent weeks. It's a departure from the initial House-passed bill, which sought to lower federal costs by freezing states' provider taxes at current rates and prohibiting them from establishing new provider taxes. The bill also includes a rural hospital stabilization fund after some GOP senators expressed concern over how rural hospitals could be impacted by the Medicaid restrictions, allocating $50 billion for rural hospitals over the same period that the provider taxes would be lowered. Homeland security and immigration The legislation includes more than $46.5 billion for border wall construction and related expenses, $45 billion to expand detention capacity for immigrants in custody and about $30 billion in funding for hiring, training and other resources for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It also includes a minimum $100 fee for those seeking asylum, down from the $1,000 fee outlined in the initial House bill. The Senate parliamentarian ruled out the $1,000 fee for anyone applying for asylum. Increasing the state and local tax deduction, or SALT The package also includes an increase to the cap on the state and local tax deduction, raising it from $10,000 to $40,000. After five years, it would return to $10,000, a departure from the initial House-passed bill. The issue was a major sticking point in the House, where blue-state Republicans threatened to withhold their support without the increase to the deduction. But with no Republicans hailing from blue states in the Senate, the upper chamber has been contending with its own dynamics. Before the rule, taxpayers could deduct all their state and local taxes from their federal taxes, which some policymakers have said mainly benefits wealthy homeowners in states with high taxes, such as New York and California. But advocates for increasing the caps argue that the $10,000 cap is increasingly impacting middle-class homeowners who live in regions where property taxes are rising. Green energy policies The final bill passed by the Senate would largely terminate numerous tax incentives from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act for clean energy, electric vehicles and energy efficiency programs that benefited consumers. It would end tax credits for new and used electric vehicles, installation of home EV charging equipment and insulation or energy efficient heating and cooling systems. The bill also ends the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which gives funding to nonprofit organizations providing financing for projects that reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions in communities. Existing contracts and grants under the program are not affected. Restrictions on food stamps The bill still shifts the costs of SNAP, or food stamps, to some states. The program is currently fully funded by the federal government. The federal government would continue to fully fund the benefits for states that have an error payment rate below 6%, beginning in 2028. States with error rates above 6% would be on the hook for 5% to 15% of the costs. States are also given some flexibility in calculating their share. The package also aligns with the initial House version on age requirements for able-bodied adults to qualify for SNAP benefits. Currently, in order to qualify, able-bodied adults between 18 and 54 must meet work requirements. Both the Senate and House bills would update the age requirement to 18 and 64, with some exemptions for parents. Alaska and Hawaii could receive waivers for the work requirements if it's determined that they're making a "good faith effort" to comply. Addressing the debt limit The legislation would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, going beyond the $4 trillion outlined in the initial House-passed bill. Congress faces a deadline to address the debt limit later this summer. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Congress to address the debt limit by mid-July, saying that the U.S. could be unable to pay its bills as early as August, when Congress is on recess. By addressing the debt ceiling as part of the larger package, Republicans in Congress aimed to bypass negotiating with Democrats on the issue. Unlike most other legislation in the Senate, the budget reconciliation process that governs the package requires a simple majority, rather than the 60-vote threshold to move forward with a bill. Child tax credit The current $2,000 child tax credit is set to return to the pre-2017 level of $1,000 in 2026. The tax credit would permanently increase to $2,200 under the bill, $300 less than the initial House-passed hike. Limits on overtime and tips deductions The bill would allow individuals to deduct a certain amount of tip wages and overtime from their taxes. The provisions would expire in 2028. The "no tax on tips" provision in the spending bill would create a new deduction for tipped workers, eliminating what they owe in federal income tax. Tipped workers would still have to pay state and local income tax and payroll taxes. The Senate version varies from the initial House-passed provisions on a few key points, including how much a worker could claim in deductions. The Senate proposal limits that deduction to $25,000, while the early House version was uncapped. Under the initial House measure, meanwhile, only people with annual income of $160,000 or less would have qualified for the tipping tax break, while the Senate version phases out benefits for individuals whose income exceeds $150,000 or couples whose income exceeds $300,000. Changes to standard deduction The bill seeks to permanently expand the basic standard deduction, which was nearly doubled in 2017. The increases will expire at the end of the year. What a new DOJ memo could mean for naturalized U.S. citizens July 4 holiday week expected to set record for travelers Group meets to handwrite the U.S. Constitution
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does the "big, beautiful bill" eliminate taxes on Social Security?
As Congress was approving President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" on Thursday, the Social Security Administration touted the legislation by stating that it "eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries." That claim, which echoes previous promises by Mr. Trump to remove taxes on Social Security, may have come as welcome news for the millions of older and disabled people who depend on the program for income. So does the bill deliver? Not entirely. In a press release, SSA said that the tax and spending package, which the president is set to sign into law on Friday, "ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits." That figure draws on a June analysis by the White House's Council of Economic Advisers that said 88% of seniors — or 51.4 million people — on Social Security will pay no tax on their payments under the measure because their deductions would exceed their taxable benefits. The bill "includes the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," CEA said, adding that "the deductions ensure that seniors who earned their Social Security through years of hard work get more money back in their pockets." Yet while it's true that the bill offers fresh tax relief for some people on Social Security, it is misleading to suggest that the measure does away with taxes on Social Security benefits, policy experts told CBS MoneyWatch. Rather, the bill offers relief by creating a new "bonus" tax deduction for beneficiaries. "While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits," Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C., think tank, told The Associated Press this week ahead of Congress approving the bill. The Social Security Administration did not respond to a request for comment. The White House declined to comment. How does the "big, beautiful bill" impact Social Security? The bill doesn't eliminate taxes on Social Security, but rather introduces a temporary deduction that beneficiaries can claim to lower their federal income tax. Notably, that deduction applies to all of a senior's income — not just to Social Security benefits. Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.C., told CBS MoneyWatch the bill doesn't change the taxation of Social Security benefits. Eliminating taxes on Social Security under the bill was impossible because of a congressional restriction (dubbed the Byrd Rule after late West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd) that limits what the Senate can include in a reconciliation bill like the Republican budget measure. What the bill does do is provide a temporary tax deduction of up to $6,000 for seniors aged 65 and older. The tax break is available to people with an adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less and $150,000 or less for couples filing jointly. The deduction is set to expire at the end of 2028. "Each spouse can take the deduction, for a total of $12,000, if both are 65-plus," AARP explains in its analysis of the budget bill. The deduction phases out for people who earn above those amounts. Social Security recipients under 65 and people above the specified income thresholds are ineligible to claim the new tax deduction. It also won't benefit the many low-income seniors who already pay no federal income tax because they earn too little. "Boosting the amount that you get to write off when you already get to write off everything does not help you at all," Kogan said. The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan policy research group, said in a June report that exempting Social Security benefits from taxation would not change the after-tax income for the bottom 20% of taxpayers, noting that "those taxpayers are already exempt from taxation on their Social Security benefits." The biggest beneficiaries of the bill will be higher-income seniors, said Martha Shedden, president and co-founder of the National Association of Registered Social Security Analysts, which focuses on Social Security education. "The people who benefit by definition have to be richer, and people who benefit the most are the richest people," Kogan added. More pressure on Social Security? Providing a temporary tax deduction is likely to help some Social Security recipients, but it could also worsen the retirement program's fragile financial state, Kogan said. Social Security is on track to deplete its trust fund by 2034 if Congress does not take action. "We already have a problem of not enough money going into the trust fund. This bill makes even less money go into the trust fund," he said. The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a University of Pennsylvania think tank that studies fiscal issues, estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits would lower federal revenue by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase the federal debt by 7% by 2054. As the debate continues over how to shore up Social Security while offering tax relief to older Americans, one thing is clear, and perhaps politically unpalatable: cutting benefits. According to a AARP-funded survey from the National Academy of Social Insurance released in January, 85% of Americans think benefits should not be reduced, or that they should be increased, even if it means raising taxes on some or all Americans. "Virtually all Americans want their Social Security benefits to be preserved and are willing to do what it takes to ensure the program continues to provide meaningful support for future generations," said AARP Chief Public Policy Officer Deb Whitman in a statement after the survey was released. What a new DOJ memo could mean for naturalized U.S. citizens July 4 holiday week expected to set record for travelers Group meets to handwrite the U.S. Constitution
Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump Eyes AI Chip Restrictions on Malaysia and Thailand
The Trump administration is planning AI chip restrictions on Malaysia and Thailand in an attempt to halt chip shipments from the two countries to China, according to Bloomberg. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. The U.S. has banned the sale of advanced Nvidia (NVDA) chips to China, although President Trump seeks to further quell the smuggling of these chips from Southeast Asian countries to Beijing. This move would represent Trump's first step in implementing a new AI chip export policy after he decided to revoke former President Biden's AI Diffusion rule. New AI Chip Restrictions Likely to Hike Tensions The curbs will likely stir tensions with China after the two sides sealed a trade agreement last month. They also mark a stark change in U.S. sentiment after lifting export curbs on domestic chip-design software companies to China earlier this week, benefiting Synopsys (SNPS) and Cadence Design Systems (CDNS). Head over to TipRanks' for your daily dose of trade developments.
