The Trump Trade has changed. Here are the 6 big themes for investors to watch.
Analysts at NDR updated their Trump Trade index, a group of investments tied to Trump's agenda.
Strategists identified six themes for investors to monitor.
Investors in the early days of Donald Trump's second term thought they had identified the clearest winners from the president's agenda, but more than halfway through his first year in office, the playbook has shifted.
Analysts at Ned Davis Research this week said they recently revised their Trump Trade Index — an index of investment themes they believe will benefit from Trump's agenda.
The firm's original Trump Trade Index included investment themes like space and reshoring, as well as bitcoin and Trump Media & Technology Group, the parent company of Trump's social media network.
"When we created our initial Trump Trade index prior to the 2024 election, we had only a general idea of Trump's agenda and key themes impacted," strategists wrote in a report on Wednesday. "However, after reviewing 170 executive orders, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), and an ever-changing foray into tariffs, we have a much better indication of agenda priorities."
Markets have been surprised by how Trump's policy agenda has shifted so far this year. US stocks soared after Trump secured his second term in office, before embarking on a wild roller coaster ride as Trump announced his worldwide tariff package and negotiations dragged into this summer.
Here's an update on what investment themes investors should add to the Trump-era playbook.
Defense
Thesis:
Trump signed a slew of executive orders supporting aerospace innovation and the drone, cybersecurity, and shipbuilding industries in the US.
The GOP tax and spending bill has also earmarked around $150 billion for overall defense spending, $29 billion to shipbuilding, and $170 billion for border enforcement. The bill also has a $24 billion budget to help build the Golden Dome, an ambitious defense system that aims to put American anti-missile weapons into space.
Factors like China's military advancement and the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine also raise the risk that the US could become more involved in geopolitical conflict, strategists suggested.
"While several themes look overbought, some are sure to have staying power over Trump's term. Unfortunately, we believe Defense could have staying power," the report said.
Relevant ETFs: SHLD
Metals & Mining
Thesis:
Trump has also signed executive orders supporting the copper and rare minerals industry in the US. Meanwhile, the Big Beautiful bill includes tax incentives that support energy exploration in the US, which could also boost the metals and mining industries.
The president has also proposed steep tariffs on key commodities, like steel, copper, and aluminum.
The metals and mining theme was on display already in the last week, when the Department of Defense announced a large stake in rare earth miner MP Materials. The stock surged on the news that the Pentagon would become the company's largest shareholder as it tries to strengthen America's position in a critical supply chain.
Relevant ETFs: XME, REMX
Traditional, Nuclear, and Hydrogen Energy
Thesis:
Energy was a cornerstone of Trump's campaign, and the president quickly declared a National Energy Emergency at the start of his term.
"While Biden's agenda promoted Clean Energy, Trump clearly favors Traditional Energy, evidenced by orders to tap Alaska resources, remove production barriers, and promote Coal," strategists wrote.
Uranium and Hydrogen energy are also in focus, the strategists added, pointing to "massive datacenter electricity demands."
Trump has also proposed various tariffs that could raise energy prices, like tariffs on Canadian and Venezuelan energy, a 7.5% tariff on Uranium, and a 10% tariff on hydrogen-related goods.
Relevant ETFs: IEO, URA, HYDR
Bitcoin & Digital Assets
Thesis:
Trump, who branded himself as the "crypto president" on the campaign trail, has made a series of pushes into digital assets this year.
Early in his second term, he signed an executive order that aimed to support the US's dominance in digital finance, and another that established a strategic bitcoin reserve.
Lawmakers are also set to pass a slew of new crypto-related legislation this week, like the Senate's landmark stablecoin bill, the CLARITY Act, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act.
Relevant ETFs: IBIT, ARKF
Artificial Intelligence
Thesis:
Trump's executive orders and a handful of provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act are aimed at bolstering AI development in the US, The GOP tax and spending bill includes a $250 million budget for AI-driven cyber defense, as well as tax incentives for chipmakers to build their tech in the US.
Trump also announced a $500 billion AI infrastructure project in January, which involves Softbank, OpenAI, and Oracle building more data centers in the US. This week, Trump announced another $90 billion in AI and energy investments at an event in Pennsylvania.
Relevant ETFs: MAGS
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Trump's War With Powell Throws a Little-Known Planning Board Into Scrutiny
The emails from Trent Morse, the deputy director of the White House's personnel office, arrived in the inboxes of three Biden-appointed commissioners at the National Capital Planning Commission on July 9. They were terse and came without warning. 'On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as commissioner of the National Capital Planning Commission is terminated, effective immediately,' Mr. Morse wrote. 'Thank you for your service.' The little-known board, which has the relatively mundane task of reviewing the impact of development projects on the capital's urban landscape, was barely on President Trump's radar during his first term. But the panel, which does not oversee projects or consider their cost, has since become pivotal in the administration's campaign to discredit Jerome H. Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, whose departure the president is trying to accelerate. Mr. Trump has become increasingly angry with Mr. Powell for being too slow to cut interest rates, and his advisers have been weighing whether to try firing him, a legally precarious escalation. In recent weeks, White House officials have focused their attention on the cost of renovating the central bank's headquarters in Washington, suggesting that Mr. Powell's handling of the $2.5 billion makeover could be grounds for sacking him before his term ends next year. The controversy over the cost of the renovations has thrust the National Capital Planning Commission, a 12-person panel that was created by Congress in 1924, into a rare political spotlight. The White House's sudden interest in the commission has turned it into a cudgel that could potentially alter the makeup of the Fed at an important moment for the U.S. economy, which is facing a new bout of inflation from Mr. Trump's tariffs. The president has made clear he wants to install a chair who will cut rates despite concerns that import taxes could lead to higher prices, a position that could result in even more inflation if low borrowing costs overheat the economy. Mr. Morse's letters were sent to Teri Hawks Goodmann, Bryan C. Green and Elizabeth M. Hewlett. The former commissioners, who have backgrounds in urban planning and architecture and serve on the commission on a part-time basis, were appointed to six-year terms under the Biden administration. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
UPI
a few seconds ago
- UPI
New $250 visa fee goes into effect for travelers, foreign workers
Travelers wait to check in at Newark Liberty International Airport on in May in Newark, N.J. The Big Beautiful Bill Act created a $250 "visa integrity fee" for nonimmigrant visas, which could impact tourism. File photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo July 18 (UPI) -- Many visitors to the United States will soon have to pay a $250 "visa integrity fee" to enter the country. The fee was in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and applies to people from countries who need a nonimmigrant visa to enter. The fee will be added to any other visa application fees. There are few details, which creates "significant challenges and unanswered questions regarding implementation," a spokesperson from the U.S. Travel Association told CNBC Travel. The new law includes fee hikes for those using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization, or ESTA, and new charges for migrants arrested at the border. It creates a $13 ESTA fee, and goes up to $5,000 for the arrests of undocumented people. The visa integrity fee is set at $250 from Oct. 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025, but after that, the Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, is free to raise the fee. The applicant will pay the fee when the visa is issued. If the visa is denied, the applicant doesn't have to pay. Steven A. Brown, a partner at immigration law firm Reddy Neumann Brown in Houston, said in a post on his firm's website that it significantly raises prices for those coming into the United states to work. "For example, an H-1B worker already paying a $205 application fee may now expect to pay a total of $455 once this fee is in place," he said. There is also an I-94 form fee that the bill raised from $6 to $24. He added that the law allows the government to give refunds of the visa integrity fee if the person follows all provisions of the visa. But it is unclear how, when and who decides that the refund will be issued. "Until those procedures are announced, employers and foreign nationals should treat the $250 Visa Integrity Fee as a non-refundable upfront cost and plan accordingly," Brown said. Critics say the effect on tourism and workers coming to the United States could be heavy. "Attaching an additional $250 fee has the very real potential to significantly reduce the number of people that can afford to do that," Jorge Loweree, managing director of programs and strategy at the American Immigration Council, told USA Today. "There are hundreds of thousands of people who receive visas and permission from the Department of State to come to the U.S. every single month temporarily." Tourism has already dipped this year, and travel experts call the fee a further detriment. "Raising fees on lawful international visitors amounts to a self-imposed tariff on one of our nation's largest exports: international travel spending," Geoff Freeman, president and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association, told Yahoo. "These fees are not reinvested in improving the travel experience and do nothing but discourage visitation at a time when foreign travelers are already concerned about the welcome experience and high prices."
Washington Post
a few seconds ago
- Washington Post
Trump's firing of 2 Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission was unconstitutional, judge rules
A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump illegally fired two Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission earlier this year in his efforts to exert control over independent agencies across the government. One of the commissioners, Alvaro Bedoya, resigned after suing to challenge the firings. The other plaintiff, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, can now resume her duties as commissioner because Trump lacks the constitutional authority to remove her, the judge ruled Thursday. Attorneys for the Trump administration almost immediately declared their intent to appeal. U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan cited decades of legal precedent in her written opinion, including a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that found a similar attempt by President Franklin D. Roosevelt was unlawful because commissioners could be removed only for cause, not at the president's whim. She said her ruling would uphold 'clearly established law that has been enacted by a coequal branch of government, reaffirmed by another coequal branch, and acquiesced to by thirteen executives over the course of ninety years.' Trump fired the commission's two Democratic members in March. The FTC is a regulator created by Congress that enforces consumer protection measures and antitrust legislation. Its seats typically include three members of the president's party and two from the opposing party. Commissioners Bedoya and Slaughter said they'd been dismissed illegally and immediately promised to sue. Bedoya later submitted his resignation in June. Slaughter has four years left in her term as commissioner. 'As the Court recognized today, the law is clear, and I look forward to getting back to work,' Slaughter said in a statement Thursday. During a May court hearing in federal court in Washington, D.C., plaintiffs' attorneys warned against granting the president 'absolute removal power over any executive officer,' saying it would effectively eliminate an important check on his power. 'That has never been the case in this country,' said attorney Aaron Crowell. 'That's not the law. That has never been the law.' But attorneys for the Trump administration argued that the FTC's role has expanded since the 1930s, and as such, its members should answer directly to the president. 'The president should be able to remove someone who is actively blocking his policies, for example,' Department of Justice attorney Emily Hall said during the hearing. AliKhan, who was nominated to the federal bench by President Joe Biden in 2023, noted the long line of presidents before Trump who didn't try to push the limits. Commissioners are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They serve seven-year terms that are staggered to prevent multiple vacancies at once. They can be fired for displaying specific bad behaviors, including inefficiency, neglect of duty and malfeasance in office. Trump told Bedoya and Slaughter that he was dismissing them because their service on the commission was inconsistent with his administration's priorities, according to the lawsuit. In its 1935 decision, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the president couldn't fire leaders of independent agencies without cause. Otherwise, the agencies would become more political and less independent. While that restriction was eroded in a subsequent decision that came in 2020, it has largely remained in place. The case, known as Humphrey's Executor has been central to a number of court challenges against the Trump administration's personnel moves targeting boards and government executives. The legal fight over the firings could have consequences for other independent agencies, including the Federal Reserve, an institution that has long sought to protect its independence. Economists and financial markets broadly support an independent Fed because they worry a politicized version would be more reluctant to take unpopular steps to fight inflation, such as raise interest rates. Plaintiffs argue that a politicized FTC could also favor powerful corporations while driving up prices for consumers. Attorney Amit Agarwal said the case isn't just about his clients keeping their jobs. He said it's about protecting 'the will of the American people' and their right to have independent agencies working on their behalf. 'America is already suffering from an excess of executive power, and the last thing we need is to hand vast new powers to the president over Congress's explicit and longstanding objection,' Agarwal said in a statement responding to the ruling, adding that 'if Trump wants even more power, he should ask the people's elected representatives in Congress, not unelected and politically unaccountable courts.'
