'I nearly cancelled smear test out of embarrassment, but something made me go'
A 36-year-old woman who almost didn't go to her cervical screening because she was embarrassed about being examined says the decision to go saved her life after abnormal cells were discovered by the doctors, and she was diagnosed with stage 1 cervical cancer. Anna Millington, a mum of one from London who works in HR, then underwent a gruelling treatment process.
Anna says in June, 2021 she wanted to avoid her cervical screening as she was at the end of her period and was worried about being examined. But Anna had the gut instinct that something wasn't right and eventually went for the test. Her screening detected a positive HPV result and identified the abnormal cells.
Anna says at the time, her main worry was the possibility of not being able to have any more children. The thought of cancer hadn't even crossed Anna's mind. She went through a colonoscopy and LLETZ treatment, the burning of cervical cells, which she describes as being a traumatic experience.
It was a six-week wait following Anna's additional tests and although not experiencing any cervical cancer symptoms and having a clean bill of health, she had a call from Queen's Hospital, Romford, requesting she came in the following day to discuss her results.
Anna was diagnosed with stage 1 cervical cancer. With children still on her mind, she had asked about her options and the possibility of freezing her eggs but was told that she had an aggressive form of cancer and was encouraged to begin treatment immediately.
'Before cervical cancer, life was full of hope and dreams for the future,' Anna says. 'I was planning to extend my family, to have more children, to grow into the next chapter of motherhood with excitement.
'But all that was taken from me - in a single moment. One diagnosis. One conversation. And just like that my fertility was gone. It's hard to put into words what it feels like to lose something so deeply personal, something I never even had a chance to have. I felt numb. Everything around me just stopped. I was scared but almost instantly something inside me shifted. I knew I had to fight this. I had my daughter, Penelope, 10, to live for. She was and is my anchor, my reason, my everything. Yes, I was afraid but more than that I was ready for battle.'
During the period from July to September 2021, Anna's diagnosis had gone from Stage 1 to Stage 3 and the cancer had spread to her lymph nodes, meaning further treatment. On September 28, the day after her birthday, she underwent a radical hysterectomy. Anna endured 25 rounds of radiotherapy, five rounds of chemotherapy, and brachytherapy – a procedure involving the insertion of a device to kill cancer cells.
Eight months after her cervical screenings on February 12, 2022, Anna received the all-clear. However, the aftermath left her with fertility issues, early menopause, lymphedema and fatigue as well as her experience taking a huge toll on her mental wellbeing.
'Treatment was exhausting,' says Anna, who was treated at St Bartholomew's Hospital, London and had surgery at the Royal London Hospital. "It pushes you to your physical and emotional limits in ways you can't fully prepare for. Anyone going through cancer treatment is a warrior. There's no other word for it. It's tough, relentless and it takes everything out of you.
'My whole body felt drained - like I was running on empty but still had to keep going. Chemotherapy made me feel cold to the bone, a chill no blanket could fix. And radiotherapy was intense - this was five days a week for five weeks straight. It became my full-time life, and yet it was also a fight for my very life. It's a journey that strips you down, but also shows you how much strength you carry inside.'
But despite her brutal experience, her diagnosis has given Anna a whole new lease of life and she's determined to go on as many adventures as possible whilst offering her support to others that are on their own cervical cancer journeys. She does this via her Instagram page, @cervical_cancer_and_me, where she raises awareness and inspires others going through similar journeys.
'I started my Instagram page because, when I was first diagnosed, I searched everywhere for someone like me. Someone real and honest about what going through cervical cancer actually feels like,' Anna says. 'But there weren't many platforms that showed the truth behind the diagnosis - the grief, the strength, the unknowns, the impact on fertility, identity, relationships… all of it.
'So I created a space not just to share my journey, but to connect with others going through the same or similar. I wanted to help people feel less alone, and to start the conversations I wish had been there for me. This page is about awareness, yes - but it's also about community, honesty and hope. Because none of us should have to walk this path in silence.'
From an HR perspective, Anna believes that employers can play a crucial role in supporting employees through health challenges such as cervical cancer. She advocates for companies to provide comprehensive health services, including full body MOT checks, and to allow an additional half-day on top of allocated annual leave to attend cervical screening appointments given the lack of after-hours options.
Anna wants to call on employers to support their employees to attend their potentially life-saving screenings. Anna's encouragement comes following research ahead for Cervical Screening Awareness Week last month, where it was revealed that over a third of women (35%) said they've put off attending their cervical screenings due to work commitments.
The research, conducted by gynaecological cancer charity, the Lady Garden Foundation, also found that half (50%) of the women polled said they had felt pressured to prioritise work over personal health appointments, including cervical screenings. Nearly a third (31%) of women admitted to having booked annual leave for their screenings, whilst shockingly, 16% said their boss or workplace had insisted they book time off to attend their appointments.
Nearly a third (31%) also claimed that their boss or workplace would not see their cervical screening as a good reason to be off work.
'Companies should try to create compassionate, flexible sick leave policies,' Anna explains. 'People going through cancer treatment need time — not just to survive, but to recover. Flexibility around appointments, phased returns, and realistic expectations are essential. Employers have a legal duty of care to protect their employees' health and wellbeing.'
Anna also believes employers should offer paid health checks, payroll giving, support fertility and menopause conversations, offer emotional and mental health support and be inclusive of carers and loved ones. 'Companies should also run internal campaigns about cancer prevention, early detection, like cervical screening, and what support is available,' she adds.
'Awareness can save lives. You can also implement cancer champions to support this. Another good idea is to raise money for charity – getting the whole team involved and talking. Supporting employees who are caring for someone with cancer is just as important. Flexibility and empathy make a big difference during what is often an emotionally and logistically challenging time.'
Anna's personal journey through cervical cancer during lockdown has inspired her to advocate for better awareness on the screening process, de-stigmatise HPV and help other women break down the barriers they may face in the workplace when it comes to attending their potentially lifesaving cervical screening appointments.
'I was fortunate that my employers were supportive during my cervical cancer journey, however, I have friends and family where that hasn't been the case,' Anna adds. 'As a HR specialist myself, I urge those who don't feel comfortable talking to their line manager to seek guidance from their Human Resources team who are there for support.'
Anna wants to raise awareness of cervical cancer and to point out that while she's not the same person she was before, she's stronger than ever. 'I wish people knew that I am not the same person I was before I had cancer - and that's not a bad thing,' Anna says.
'I've carried pain, fear and loss most people never see. I've had to rebuild not just my body but my sense of self. I've grieved the future I thought I had and leaned to love the life I'm now creating. I wish people understood that even though I smile and show strength, there are still days I'm processing what I've been through - the trauma, the scars, the body changes, the fertility loss, the emotional weight of it all.
'But most of all, I wish people knew that I'm still me - Just more aware, more present and more determined than ever to live with honesty and an open heart. Cervical cancer changed me - but it didn't break me. It made me softer in some ways but fiercer in others. And I'm still here.
'I'm living each day as it comes by making the best memories for me and my daughter and living every day to the fullest.'
Find out more about gynaecological cancer charity, the Lady Garden Foundation and their 'Encourage Your Team to Screen' campaign at https://www.ladygardenfoundation.com/encourageyourteamtoscreen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
9 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Charity backs new drive to get everyone vaccinated against cancer
Health officials have urged hundreds of thousands of people to get a vaccine that protects against certain cancers. It comes amid warnings that more than 418,000 children have left school with no protection against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the last three years. The HPV vaccine is offered to boys and girls when they are in Year 8 and is key to wiping out cervical cancer in the UK. Around 13 high-risk types of HPV are known to cause 99.7% of cervical cancers. The jab also protects against genital warts and head and neck cancers, such as those in the mouth or throat. Now, GP practices in England will invite 16 to 25-year-olds to have the vaccine if records show they did not have it in school. According to NHS England, more than 418,000 children left school without having the jab in the last three years, with concerns there are many more people aged 16 to 25 who are not protected. Data shows that in the 2023/24 academic year, some 76.7% of girls and 71.2% of boys aged 14 to 15 were vaccinated against HPV by Year 10. Uptake in Year 8 increased to 72.9% among girls and 67.7% among boys, from 71.3% and 65.2% respectively a year earlier. The health service will aim to boost uptake among girls to 90% as part of plans to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040. It will also aim to increase the number of women attending cervical cancer screening appointments. John Butler, Consultant Gynaecological Oncology Surgeon at The Royal Marsden and Medical Director at the Lady Garden, said: "Cervical cancer - and other HPV related cancers - are often devastating diseases — but we have the power to eliminate them, through vaccination and screening. It's heartbreaking that so many young people are missing out on the protection the HPV vaccine offers, simply because uptake remains below NHS targets. Over 400,000 young people have left school unvaccinated in the last three years. That's why this new move to remind those who missed out at school is not just welcome - it could be lifesaving." Jenny Halpern Prince MBE, CEO & Co-Founder, The Lady Garden Foundation said: 'Everyone under 25 needs to have the HPV vaccine - not just females. The shocking figures released by the NHS today, revealing that over 400,000 children left school unvaccinated in the last three years alone, mean that so many young people are putting themselves at risk of cancers that they can protect themselves against. "The HPV vaccine protects against the human papillomavirus (HPV), a widespread virus that can cause cervical, vulval, vaginal, mouth, anal & penile cancers (plus genital warts). This safe and highly effective vaccine is given in schools in Year 8 and is available free on the NHS to anyone under the age of 25 from their GP (and pharmacies from 2026). "We urge all unvaccinated young people to book in as soon as possible with their GP. You don't have to wait to be invited. At The Lady Garden Foundation we are working to ensure that all young people (and their parents) understand the many benefits of the HPV vaccine in protecting against six different types of cancer - visiting Freshers' Fairs around the UK and delivering PHSE resources."
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
People born between 2000 and 2009 urged to get lifesaving jab
Experts have expressed concern as uptake of the vaccine has declined People born between certain years are being urged to come forward for a 'lifesaving' vaccine. The NHS is appealing to hundreds of thousands of young people who have yet to receive the crucial human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. This jab can protect you against cervical and other forms of cancer. GP surgeries throughout England will be dispatching vaccine invitations to patients born between 2000 and 2009 (meaning they are aged 16 to 25) whose records indicate they missed their HPV vaccination at school. The vaccine is routinely administered annually to boys and girls in year 8 (aged 12 to 13) to safeguard them from contracting the HPV infection - which is responsible for nearly all cervical cancers and is associated with cancers of the mouth, throat, anus, penis and vagina. If anyone misses the jab, NHS teams conduct school catch-up visits and organise community clinics for home-schooled children. However, over the past three years alone, more than 418,000 children left school without receiving the HPV vaccination. It's believed there are many others now aged 16 to 25 who were not vaccinated at school. Therefore, NHS leaders aim to reach as many of these individuals as possible. That is in line with plans to eradicate cervical cancer by 2040 as outlined in the recently published 10 Year Health Plan. The NHS intends to increase uptake among girls to 90 per cent by 2040, whilst also boosting the number of women undergoing cervical screening. During the 2023/24 academic year, vaccination rates for 14 to 15-year-olds reached 76.7 per cent for girls and 71.2 per cent for boys by year 10. There was also a rise in uptake among year 8 pupils compared to the previous year, with 72.9 per cent of girls and 67.7 per cent of boys receiving the vaccine in 2023/24, up from 71.3 per cent and 65.2 per cent respectively for the first dose in 2022/23. Prior to 2023, two doses were necessary. Dr Amanda Doyle, national director of primary care and community services, said: "This vaccine is hugely important in our fight to eradicate cervical cancer but it isn't just for girls and women – it's also vital for boys and men to get vaccinated to protect themselves against cancers of the mouth, throat or genitals, while preventing spreading the HPV infection to sexual partners who could then develop cervical cancer. "Too many lives are lost to cervical cancer so the hard work of NHS staff across the country in vaccinating and screening as many people as possible will help us to meet our ambition of wiping out this disease. Encouraging progress has been made recently in increasing uptake but we know there is much more to do. "So if you're eligible for a HPV vaccination or are the parent of a child who is eligible, but didn't get the vaccine at school when they had the chance, I would urge you to come forward when your GP contacts you. Only a single dose is required and it could save you or your child's life." Public Health and Prevention Minister Ashley Dalton added: "The HPV vaccine is our most powerful tool in our fight to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040. But we've got a long way to go. Thousands of young people are still unvaccinated and vulnerable to this disease – which is so easily prevented. "If you missed your vaccination at school, it's not too late. Don't hesitate to make an appointment with your GP. One jab could save your life." The vaccine is also available to people up to the age of 45 with compromised immune systems and men who engage in sexual activity with other men. The most recent HPV vaccine, launched in England in 2021, has demonstrated increased effectiveness. It's projected to decrease instances of women's cancer by 16 per cent and HPV-related fatalities by nine per cent, compared to its predecessor. Research conducted in England indicates that the HPV vaccine prevents 90 per cent of cervical cancer cases. Just last month, the NHS initiated a new 'ping and book' service, sending digital invitations and reminders for cervical screenings via the NHS App.
New Statesman
a day ago
- New Statesman
Schools need more sex education, not less
Illustration by Chris Rogers / Getty Images The grand total of my sex education when I was at school in the Noughties went like this: in Year 6, the girls and boys were split up, and the girls were made to watch a graphic birth video; in Year 8, we carried 'flour babies' around school for a week; in Year 9, we received a self-defence lesson in which the male instructor told us not to wear our hair in a ponytail because an attacker could grab it; and in Year 10, the school nurse demonstrated how to use a condom while we all giggled hysterically. It was entirely focused on the mechanics of sex and the risks it posed to our life outcomes and health. There was no discussion of consent, no suggestion that sex could or should be pleasurable. And there was no mention of the internet and the ways it was already shaping our early, faltering romances. My peers and I learned far more about sex outside the classroom – from playground gossip, chat rooms, TV and porn – than we ever did within it. And yet this is the sort of sex education the last government wanted to return to. In May last year, the then education secretary, Gillian Keegan, published draft revised guidance for Relationship, Sex and Health Education (RSHE), which proposed age limits on what children could be taught. Children, it said, would not be informed about puberty before Year 4 (when they are aged eight to nine), sex before Year 5 (nine to ten), sexual harassment or pornography before Year 7 (11-12) or STIs before Year 9 (aged 13-14). There are basic biological problems with this chronology: girls could start their periods before learning what it is (one in four girls already reports that this is the case); pupils could be offered the HPV vaccine before learning what an STI is. But setting all this aside, it is deluded to believe that children are not exposed to everything Keegan wished to protect them from, and much more, beyond the school gates. So, the new RSHE guidance, released by Bridget Phillipson's Department for Education on 15 July, is a welcome relief. While it incorporates some sensible Tory proposals, such as teaching children about the prevalence of deepfakes, age restrictions have been removed. There is greater emphasis on tackling misogyny and incel culture, which Phillipson described, in the aftermath of the Netflix drama Adolescence, as 'a defining issue of our time'. To the previously planned content on stalking, revenge porn and upskirting, Labour added financial sexual exploitation, strangulation, and 'personal safety in public spaces, recognising that sexual harassment and abuse are never the fault of the victim'. Schools will have the flexibility to teach in late primary about sexual imagery online 'where this is an issue in their school'. Keegan's ban on sex education for children aged nine and under received much media attention at the time, thanks largely to the efforts of Miriam Cates, then the Tory MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, who coordinated a letter to Rishi Sunak raising concerns about the appropriateness of RSHE content. Cates, who lost her seat last July, has since said the subject should be 'scrapped' altogether. Children, she told the Commons, employing some bad-faith hyperbole, were being taught 'graphic lessons on oral sex, how to choke your partner safely and 72 genders'. (This last was a reference to news reports about a school on the Isle of Man, which is not part of England and therefore falls outside the Department for Education's remit.) It may indeed seem inappropriate to teach children about strangulation during sex. We instinctively feel that they should not have to know about such things – not yet, not ever. And yet it is necessary that they do. No one wants to have to prepare a small child for the possibility that another child or an adult might try to touch their genitals, but they should know that such an act would be wrong and that they should report it. If a child brings to their teacher a question about, say, a pornographic video that has been shared with them, that teacher should be allowed to sensitively discuss with them what they have seen. Children must be prepared for the world as it is, not as we might wish it to be. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This is the world as it is: one in ten children has seen pornography by the age of nine, according to the Children's Commissioner, Rachel de Souza. The same research found that nearly half of 18- to 21-year-olds have experienced a violent sex act. More than a third of girls at mixed-sex schools have experienced sexual harassment at school, and, according to the teacher survey app Teacher Tapp, one in eight secondary-school teachers say a student in their school sexually assaulted another pupil in the last autumn term. Pornographic deepfakes are a growing problem; in June 2024 a girls' school alerted authorities that deepfake images and videos depicting its pupils were circulating a nearby boys' school. Despite the UK's overall falling birthrate, pregnancy rates among the under-20s are rising; so too is the prevalence of STIs. 'All children,' as Baroness Strange put it in a debate in the Lords on sex education in 2000, 'have a right to their childhood and their innocence.' Yet it is not schools that threaten their innocence, but technology, which moves at such a pace legislation cannot keep up. Children should be given every opportunity to bring to a trusted adult – whether a teacher or a parent – what they hear and see in the dark corners of the playground or the internet. The alternative is not that they are protected from inappropriate content, but that they are left to process and navigate it alone. [See also: Kemi Badenoch isn't working] Related
