CCLA launches Charter challenge against bubble zone protest bylaw in Vaughan, Ont.
Social Sharing
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) is launching a constitutional challenge against Vaughan's bubble zone protest bylaw — one of several in Ontario that restricts protests around places of worship, schools and child-care centres.
The bylaw, which passed in June last year, bans organizing or participating in a "nuisance demonstration" within 100 metres of the property line of any vulnerable social infrastructure, which also includes hospitals and care facilities.
"Vaughan's bylaw punitively prohibits an extremely wide range of peaceful protests," said Anaïs Bussières McNicoll, director of the CCLA's fundamental freedoms program, at a news conference Tuesday.
"It severely infringes upon freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association in a manner that is not justified in a free and democratic society."
CBC Toronto has reached out to the Vaughan mayor's office for comment.
The bylaw defines a nuisance demonstration as one or more people "protesting against something or expressing views on any issue … whether it is intended or not, that is likely, on an objective standard, to cause a reasonable person to be intimidated."
This means the person is either concerned for their safety or security, or they are unable to access vulnerable social infrastructure, the bylaw reads.
'This is not a narrow limit on free speech'
Toronto, Brampton and Oakville have passed similar bylaws in recent months. In May, Ottawa city council directed its staff to develop its own bubble zone bylaw.
But the CCLA chose to launch its challenge against Vaughan because it was the first municipality in Ontario to pass such a bylaw, and it also has "extremely broad prohibitions," said Daniel Goudge, lawyer at Stockwoods LLP, who is representing the association.
WATCH | Toronto passed bubble zone bylaw in May after hours of debate in city council:
Toronto passes bylaw to restrict protests around places of worship, schools
1 month ago
Duration 3:55
Under Toronto's bylaw, vulnerable institutions can apply for a 50-metre buffer zone around them, which will last for a year. But Vaughan's bylaw does not have an application-based system and its buffer zone is double the size.
Vaughan also imposes a maximum fine of $100,000 for anyone found guilty of an offence under the bylaw, while Toronto is imposing a maximum $5,000 fine for people who refuse to leave a protected area.
"This is not a narrow limit on free speech," Goudge said.
He said Vaughan's bylaw gives enforcement officers — which include municipal enforcement officers and police — the power to decide what is considered acceptable protest speech.
Protests outside a school opposing education system cuts, for example, could now be prohibited, he said.
Bylaw passed after protests outside synagogue
Vaughan's bubble zone bylaw was passed following several demonstrations that took place in Thornhill outside a synagogue. Demonstrators said they gathered to decry a real estate event that marketed occupied land in the West Bank, and counter-protesters showed up in response to a call-out from leaders of the synagogue.
Vaughan Mayor Steven Del Duca proposed the bylaw in March 2024, saying at the time that "large, ugly protests" near synagogues and schools in Thornhill were "deeply, deeply concerning to our residents."
McNicoll said everyone in Canada is entitled to physical safety, and police can and should intervene to protect public safety. But she said police already have broad powers to fulfill their mandate and did not need an additional bylaw.
"We know too well how punitive laws initially passed in the name of protecting vulnerable communities can easily be co-opted to suppress marginalized voices striving to challenge the status quo," she said.
Stodge said the CCLA filed a notice of application with the court on Monday, and it is now in the process of being issued. He said the notice will be delivered to the City of Vaughan on Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Michael Higgins: Hamilton's ban of a 'Woman: An Adult Female' billboard is irrational
Article content However, an Ontario divisional court agreed that in rejecting the ad, Hamilton had followed proper procedure and been reasonable. The CHP is now raising funds to challenge the ruling, and the Appeal Court has agreed to hear the case. Article content The City of Hamilton did not answer a request for comment by press time. Article content A central issue, of course, is whether freedom of expression, as enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is as sacrosanct as many believe it to be. Too often, our expected right to freedom of speech is being overthrown by courts or institutions because of someone's 'superior' right not to be harmed or offended. Article content The City of Hamilton didn't even wait for a complaint. The city, so sensitive to our cultural times, actively sought out people who might be offended and then based their rejection on the feedback. Article content When you are in a position of power, it is easier to censor the side you disagree with. Article content 'This is not a case where this was hate speech, or calling for violence, or causing any kind of danger,' says Milousis in an interview with the National Post. 'There is no reason why having this advertisement would make the transit system unsafe or unwelcoming.' Article content Article content She argues that the divisional court judgement appears to suggest that there is a right not to be offended or at least shielded from views that you disagree with. 'And that's not a constitutionally protected right.' Article content 'The expectation is that people in a democracy will be capable of handling robust discussion even on issues that they have strong opinions about,' says Milousis. Article content 'To be clear, this is not a debate about the existence of transgender people. It's just about how we define woman and how we define man and that is a very live political discussion,' she says. Article content Another concern is that if Hamilton bans a political message on an important public issue because it's too conservative, why can't another city ban something because it's too Liberal? We could have a patchwork of different political bans all over the country. Article content 'It raises deep concern about the democratic freedom of Canada,' she says. Article content Milousis also sees, 'a level of intolerance at the institutional and particularly the administrative level that is concerning.' Article content She cites the Saskatchewan student who faced a misconduct hearing for questioning diversity, equity and inclusion provisions. As well as the Manitoba medical student who was suspended for making pro-life comments. Article content
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Amid calls for separation, Alberta's new referendum rules set to formally take effect
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announcing the "New North America Initiative", led by the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy in Calgary, Alta., Friday, May 16, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh EDMONTON — As Canada prepares Tuesday to blow out 158 birthday candles, Alberta plans three days later to formalize rules making it easier to have an independence celebration of its own. Beginning Friday, Premier Danielle Smith's United Conservative government is officially lowering the required threshold for citizens to initiate a provincewide referendum, including on separation. Mitch Sylvestre, CEO of the Alberta Prosperity Project, a non-profit group touring Alberta promoting independence, says he plans to apply to Elections Alberta that same day to start a petition under the new rules. The group aims to gather 177,000 signatures within 120 days to put the question on a ballot to voters: Do you agree the province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada? 'I would not be surprised if that referendum was held right now that we could possibly even win it,' Sylvestre told The Canadian Press. He said many Albertans are skeptical Prime Minister Mark Carney will be able to restore trust after federal policies for years siphoned Alberta's resource riches elsewhere. At the same time, Thomas Lukaszuk, a former Progressive Conservative deputy premier in Alberta, is working to thwart that separatist effort. Lukaszuk, now out of politics, argues that Alberta's rules do not allow for two competing petitions on the same issue. 'There's only one petition at a time, so mine precludes theirs,' he said. Lukaszuk has already applied to start a petition under the existing law, which would require 600,000 signatures. If his application to Elections Alberta is approved, he's confident that enough Albertans would sign their name to have the provincial government declare its official policy is to remain within Canada. Sylvestre said he will be submitting papers for the second time on Friday. He said he believes Lukaszuk's petition effort might delay the push for Alberta independence but believes it will fail to gather so many signatures within the old threshold of 90 days. Recent polls have suggested that support for separatism in Alberta hasn't reached majority territory. But, Sylvestre said, interest in holding an independence referendum is growing with each speaking event they organize. 'The more people that hear what the message is, the more people that will be in favour,' he said. Elections Alberta has said each application is evaluated in the order received but cannot comment on the applications submitted so far. Legal experts say a vote to sever ties with Canada would toss the country into uncharted waters, potentially prompting complex negotiations among governments and First Nations. Smith's government introduced the bill quickly after Carney's election victory earlier this year but said it would have been proposed regardless of the outcome. In defending her legislation, Smith said the growing number of Albertans unhappy with Confederation are right to be frustrated, and she wants to see more opportunities for direct democracy. She has long said she wants her province to be sovereign within a united Canada. That's a phrase Lukaszuk calls meaningless. 'That's like me saying, 'I am single within the confines of my marriage,'' he said. Asked earlier this week what her government could do to quell separatist aspirations, Smith said it was Ottawa's responsibility to reverse policies she said stifle energy production and investment in Alberta. In recent months, she has called for Carney to abolish several federal policies and programs, including a proposed greenhouse gas emissions cap, net-zero electricity grid regulations and the West Coast tanker ban. 'This is really in Ottawa's hands,' Smith said Thursday. While Lukaszuk said Smith is entitled to negotiate with the federal government, she shouldn't use the threat of secession as leverage. He said the UCP's referendum legislation is dangerous and could open a Pandora's box of ballot questions, including some that may backfire on Smith's government. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025. Lisa Johnson, The Canadian Press
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Retiring government rep Marc Gold calls Senate ‘greatest privilege' of his life
Government Representative in the Senate Sen. Marc Gold, right, poses with Sen. Scott Tannas, left, and Daryl S. Fridhandler in Ottawa on Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld OTTAWA — Sen. Marc Gold's career as the government's representative in the Senate is ending, closing a chapter he called 'the greatest privilege' of his life. Gold reaches the Senate's mandatory retirement age of 75 on Monday. He was first appointed in 2016. He said he sought out the role because he wanted to help bring a sense of legitimacy back to the Senate after an expense scandal rocked the chamber of sober second thought. 'I wanted to be part of the modernization of and revitalization of an institution that, rightly or wrongly, had slipped,' Gold told The Canadian Press, adding that the 'legitimacy and integrity' of the Senate, 'rightly or wrongly, had been sullied in the minds of Canadians.' Gold said he saw establishing a climate of non-partisanship in the Senate as a key factor in restoring the institution's legitimacy. The Independent Senators Group formed after Justin Trudeau, as the leader of the Liberal party, removed senators from the Liberal caucus in 2014. That move, which came before Trudeau became prime minister, was done as the Senate was still reeling from an expense scandal involving Senators Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and others. Trudeau said he did it to try and reduce partisanship in the upper chamber. The Independent Senators Group was not formally recognized in the Senate until 2016, the year Gold was first appointed. 'The Senate was at risk of being either an echo chamber of the partisanship that you see in the House of Commons, or simply a rubber stamp when the same party controlled both houses,' he said. 'So I think the changes that were introduced in 2016 rebalance the relationship between the House and the Senate in an important way, but not in a revolutionary way. The Senate was always intended to be an institution that took a longer-range view of policy.' Gold became an unaffiliated senator in 2020 after Trudeau asked him to serve as the government's representative in the Senate, tasking him with guiding government legislation through the upper chamber. Gold said he hasn't seen a 'marked change' in the relationship between the House of Commons and the Senate relationship under either Trudeau or Prime Minister Mark Carney. Gold said he experienced 'all kinds of mixed and powerful feelings' when the Senate passed C-5, the government's major projects bill, on Thursday — his final day in the Senate chamber. Gold said that he can't speak to Carney's plans for the Senate but he hopes the upper chamber will continue to operate in its current form. 'I do believe the Senate's transformation into a more independent and less partisan institution over the past decade has been a major success in democratic reform,' he said. 'The Senate is now more closely aligned to its original and true constitutional purpose. And I do hope that this progress will continue.' Gold said that while it might sound clichéd, he really is looking forward to spending more time with two things he loves — his family and music. 'One of my great passions in life is music. I still play in a few bands. I'm starting a new band in my hometown, in Sutton, Quebec. And I can't wait to be working on that in the weeks to come,' Gold said. While his new 'bluesy' band does not yet have a name, Gold said he will continue playing guitar in his other two bands, Hard Knocks and The Steamfitters. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025. David Baxter, The Canadian Press
