Oklahoma lawmaker battling breast cancer ‘stunned' after Stitt vetoes bill requiring insurance to cover cancer screenings
The bill, House Bill 1389, had rare, unanimous bipartisan support in the Oklahoma House of Representatives, and near-unanimous support in the Senate.
'It was amazing,' said Rep. Melissa Provenzano (D-Tulsa).
Provenzano said her idea for the bill came about after she got a call from a single mom in her district.
She said the woman went in for a routine mammogram, but when her doctor saw something concerning and recommended a second diagnostic mammogram, her insurance wouldn't cover it.
'And it was $1,200,' Provenzano said.
Gov. Stitt vetoes bill that would extend Oklahoma eviction timeline
The woman told Provenzano something that stuck with her.
'I have to pay my electric after the food on the table, so I was just not going to get it,' Provenzano said the woman told her.After that, Provenzano teamed up with the Susan G. Komen Foundation to write the bill, which would require insurance companies to cover diagnostic mammograms at no cost to patients. Early detection, she said, could save countless lives.It was around the time she filed the bill that Provenzano got news of her own: She had breast cancer.'December 11th, I was diagnosed,' Provenzano said. 'And that just sort of rocks your world because it's fear of the unknown.'She has been undergoing chemotherapy, once a week, for the past 11 weeks, while the bill made its way through committees and onto the House floor, where it received unanimous approval on March 10.
'I turned around and it was just, you know, dots of pink,' Provenzano said. 'Everybody had something on. And it was moving and human. And it reminded me that we're humans first. And this is an apolitical thing at the end.'
Even Republican lawmakers voiced strong support.
'Representative Provenzano — regardless of party lines, I guarantee it, I can speak for everyone… we all care about you,' Rep. Steve Bashore (R-Miami) told Provenzano after the vote.
The bill sailed through the Senate and landed on Stitt's desk on Tuesday.
'I didn't expect a veto,' Provenzano said.
But Stitt vetoed the bill Tuesday.
'I was stunned, to say the least, you know, because one in eight women in the United States are diagnosed every year,' Provenzano said.
Stitt explained his decision in a video statement on Facebook Tuesday evening.
Senate committee rejects immigration rules for Oklahoma schools
'It would have imposed new and costly insurance mandates on private health plans, which would actually raise premiums on Oklahoma families and businesses,' Stitt said.
Provenzano said that reasoning is not backed by facts.
'When you have early detection, like I had access to, like all women deserve access to, you're saving dollars and saving money for the insurance companies on the back end,' Provenzano said.
For Provenzano, it's hard not to take it personally.
'It feels personal,' Provenzano said. 'But I have to separate myself from that. I just want to say, did you read the bill? Did you understand what it was we're trying to do, and why this will save lives? And I just want to be able to have that conversation.'
Provenzano said she still hasn't received a call from the governor.
As she heads into her final week of chemotherapy, Provenzano said she's confident the future will hold fewer vetoes—and more moments of unity.
'When we strip away the politics, really beautiful things happen,' Provenzano said. 'And I'll keep working on that.'
Stitt was scheduled to hold his weekly press conference on Wednesday, where News 4 planned to ask him about his decision, but it was postponed until Thursday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
It's a year of rapid change, except when it comes to Trump's approval numbers, poll finds
WASHINGTON — Eric Hildenbrand has noticed prices continue to rise this year with President Trump in the White House. The San Diego resident doesn't blame Trump, however, his choice for president in 2024, but says Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats who control the state are at fault. 'You can't compare California with the rest of the country,' said Hildenbrand, 76. 'I don't know what's going on in the rest of the country. It seems like prices are dropping. Things are getting better, but I don't necessarily see it here.' Voters like Hildenbrand, whose support of the Republican president is unwavering, help explain Trump's polling numbers and how they have differed from other presidents' polling trajectory in significant ways. An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in March found that 42% of U.S. adults approved of Trump's job performance. That is a lower rating than those of other recent presidents at the beginning of their second terms, including Democrat Barack Obama and Republican George W. Bush. The most recent AP-NORC poll, from July, puts Trump at 40% approval. While that is not a meaningful change from March, there is some evidence that Trump's support may be softening, at least on the margins. The July poll showed a slight decrease in approval of his handling of immigration since earlier in the year. Some other pollsters, such as Gallup, show a downward slide in overall approval since slightly earlier in his term, in January. But even those shifts are within a relatively narrow range, which is typical for Trump. The new AP-NORC polling tracker shows that Trump's favorability rating has remained largely steady since the end of his first term, with between 33% and 43% of U.S. adults saying they viewed him favorably across more than five years. Those long-term trends underscore that Trump has many steadfast opponents. But loyal supporters also help explain why views of the president are hard to change even as he pursues policies that most Americans do not support, using an approach that many find abrasive. Trump has not had a traditional honeymoon period in his second term. He did not in his first, either. An AP-NORC poll conducted in March 2017, two months into his first term, showed that 42% of Americans 'somewhat' or 'strongly' approved of his performance. That is largely where his approval rating stayed over the course of the next four years. The recent slippage on immigration is particularly significant because that issue was a major strength for Trump in the 2024 election. Earlier in his second term, it was also one of the few areas where he was outperforming his overall approval. In March, about half of U.S. adults approved of his handling of immigration. But the July AP-NORC poll found his approval on immigration at 43%, in line with his overall approval rating. Other recent polls show growing discontent with Trump's approach on immigration. A CNN/SSRS poll found that 55% of U.S. adults say the president has gone too far when it comes to deporting immigrants who are living in the United States illegally, an increase of 10 percentage points since February. 'I understand wanting to get rid of illegal immigrants, but the way that's being done is very aggressive,' said Donovan Baldwin, 18, of Asheboro, N.C., who did not vote in the 2024 election. 'And that's why people are protesting, because it comes off as aggression. It's not right.' Ratings of Trump's handling of the economy, which were more positive during his first term, have been persistently negative in his second term. The July poll found that few Americans think Trump's policies have benefited them so far. Even if he is not a fan of everything Trump has done so far, Brian Nichols, 58, of Albuquerque is giving him the benefit of the doubt. Nichols, who voted for Trump in 2024, likes what he is seeing from the president overall, though he has his concerns both on style and substance, particularly Trump's social media presence and his on-again, off-again tariffs. Nichols also does not like the push to eliminate federal agencies such as the Education Department. Despite his occasional disagreements with Trump, though, Nichols said he wants to give the president space to do his job, and he trusts the House and Senate, now run by Republicans, to act as a safeguard. 'We put him into office for a reason, and we should be trusting that he's doing the job for the best of America,' Nichols said. Trump has spent the last six months pushing far-reaching and often unpopular policies. Earlier this year, Americans were bracing themselves for higher prices as a result of his approach to tariffs. The July poll found that most people think Trump's tax and spending bill will benefit the wealthy, while few think it will pay dividends for the middle class or people like them. Discomfort with individual policies may not translate into wholesale changes in views of Trump, though. Those have largely been constant through years of turmoil, with his favorability rating staying within a 10-percentage point range through his widely panned handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, a felony conviction and an attempted assassination. To some of his supporters, the benefits of his presidency far outweigh the costs. Kim Schultz, 62, of Springhill, Fla., said she is thrilled with just about everything Trump is doing as president, particularly his aggressive moves to deport anyone living in the country illegally. Even if Trump's tariffs eventually take effect and push prices up, she said she will not be alarmed. 'I've always had the opinion that if the tariffs are going to cost me a little bit more here and there, I don't have a problem with that,' she said. Across the country, Hildenbrand dislikes Trump's personality and his penchant for insults, including those directed at foreign leaders. But he thinks Trump is making things happen. 'More or less, to me, he's showing that he's on the right track,' he said. 'I'm not in favor of Trump's personality, but I am in favor of what he's getting done.' Thomson-Deveaux and Cooper write for the Associated Press and reported from Washington and Phoenix, respectively.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Colorado lawmaker says Gabbard has become ‘weapon of mass destruction' for Trump
'There have been four investigations including a bipartisan Senate investigation led under the first Trump administration in part by Marco Rubio that is very clear on these findings,' he said, referencing Trump's secretary of state. 'These have been investigated and reinvestigated and reinvestigated and nothing has changed up until this past month.' Last week, Gabbard claimed newly declassified documents revealed 'irrefutable evidence' that Obama and his national security team created an intelligence community assessment 'that they knew was false' about Russian intervention in the 2016 presidential election. She and Trump said Obama's actions could amount to treason. All sides concede that Russia sought to undermine the election and that Vladimir Putin's government did not succeed in altering vote totals or actual results. The unresolved issue surrounds the question of whether an Obama administration report ignored contrary evidence in offering an intelligence assessment that the Russians preferred that Donald Trump win; Crow claimed that the conclusion was reasonable within the normal give-and-take of intelligence work. Obama officials have labeled the Gabbard claims of treason 'ridiculous,' while Democrats in Congress have accused the administration of trying to distract from the ongoing frustration around the withholding of information regarding the disgraced financier and convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'Let's be really clear again about what's happening here. This is being reinvigorated and concocted because Donald Trump doesn't want to talk about the Epstein files,' Crow said Sunday. Republicans have denied the accusations, instead calling for a full investigation into Obama and the intelligence community leaders under him. Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), who spoke to Bream on Sunday shortly after Crow, said the information Gabbard released had been hidden from Republicans for years.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
All work and no play: House heads out while Senate eyes skipping summer break
WASHINGTON – The House of Representatives has fled Washington for their annual August recess, but the Senate may be stuck sweltering at work. Both houses of Congress typically take a month off each summer, with many returning to their districts and visiting with constituents. This year, House members were sent home a day early, amid tensions over the Trump administration's refusal to release records from sex offender and former Trump friend Jeffrey Epstein's case. Meanwhile, senators have at least one more week before they go on break. But as legislative business hits a series of delays and major deadlines loom, President Donald Trump is pushing the upper chamber to stay in town. Either way, both chambers have a tall order waiting for them in September if they want to keep the government doors open. House heads home Following the Justice Department's announcement that they had found no evidence of an Epstein list of sex work clients or proof of other conspiracy theories such as the claim that the disgraced financier did not really commit suicide in 2019, Trump has been at odds with some of his high-profile supporters. Democrats and some Republican lawmakers have called for the release of documents related to Epstein's case. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, is spearheading bipartisan legislation to force the Justice Department's hand on the matter. Pressure to address the scandal prompted House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, to cut members loose a day early. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida, called it a 'chicken move.' 'And so irresponsible,' she told USA TODAY. 'We have a lot of work to do to take care of people.' 'Because they are afraid to buck Donald Trump, they cancel half of the session week and go home for six weeks?' she added. 'I don't (know) what the hell they ran for Congress for, but I ran for Congress to make people's lives better.' Now, lawmakers are heading home, where voters could press their representatives on the issue. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who said he'll be spending a good portion of his recess visiting and campaigning with colleagues in other areas, said he wouldn't be surprised if questions on Epstein come up. 'Constituents ask all of kinds of questions,' he said. 'But when I was back home a week or so ago, and we were at the pizza place in Urbana, Ohio, people were coming up to me just excited. 'President Trump's doing great. Thanks for the big, beautiful bill' ... It was all positive.' Senators could stick around Senators are set to wrap up their schedule in Washington on Aug. 1. But some would rather forego the break. 'I'm for staying and doing what we need to do,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Alabama, told USA TODAY. 'They pay us to work. They don't pay us to go home and sit for a month.' Congress has until Sept. 30 to pass a series of appropriations bills or a temporary funding extension in order to avoid a government shutdown. That major task, along with a backlog of nominations by Trump for the Senate to confirm, has the president calling for the chamber to keep working and Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, considering it. 'We're thinking about it,' Thune told Axios on Monday. The decision would be a tough sell to many senators, on both sides of the aisle, who have a fondness for their time back home. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, said that along with meeting voters, he will be spending the weeks away with his children in Georgia. Asked about the possibility of recess being canceled, Warnock said, 'That's above my pay grade.' Working hard or hardly working Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Nebraska, said she is doing what she usually does during recess, which is travel by car across the state, with her husband at the wheel, visiting communities and constituents. House members, who have since left the city, say they won't be slacking over August. Members of Congress will return to their district offices, often holding events, meeting with constituents and discussing legislative business from afar. Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-South Dakota, said when asked if he had any fun recess plans, 'Uh, no. Working.' Tennessee's Republican Rep. Tim Burchett offered a similar response. 'I'll do more work when I'm home than I do up here,' he said, adding jokingly, 'These two-hour work weeks up here wear me out.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: House leaves for summer recess, Senate could stick around
