Arvin Mayor calls out members of city council absent from Tuesday meeting
'The two members, Reyes and Horton, who are part of the previous administration that was investigated by the Grand Jury,' said Arvin Mayor Olivia Calderon. 'We've inherited now all of these issues that were caused because of the poor decisions that were made in the previous administration…both of those members failed to show up.'
Mayor Pro Tem, Susana Reyes, was unavailable for an interview, but shared an email sent to City Manager Jeff Jones Monday afternoon, saying she would not make it to the meeting. She said the mayor and current councilmembers seem to constantly seek the spotlight in ways that undermine her and councilmember Donny Horton.
Mr. Horton was not available for an interview either. City staff was informed about his absence due to a family emergency with enough time to cancel the meeting, but they failed to do so.
Horton also issued his disappointment in Mayor Calderon and Councilmember Perez for weaponizing his family emergency against him.
Kern High School District announces 'Take Flight' aviation program
Newly elected councilmember Jaime Perez said usually the City Manager will let other councilmembers know if officials will be absent, but in this instance they were not made aware.
'There is a lot of tension there, but, people need to take that to the side and treat is as this is not personal, it's a business,' said Councilmember Jaime Perez.
Pressing issues that were scheduled to be discussed in the meeting included the contract of interim City Attorney Nathan Hodges, a special election to fill the vacant council seat left by Juan Murillo, and quality of the roads, among others.
Applications are open for a permanent city attorney and the deadline is March 5.
Click here to learn more.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Maxwell Opposes Release Of Epstein Grand Jury Transcripts - The Arena with Kasie Hunt - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Maxwell Opposes Release Of Epstein Grand Jury Transcripts The Arena with Kasie Hunt 46 mins The panel talks to Kasie Hunt about a new letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney arguing against the release of the Epstein grand jury transcripts. President Trump's former attorney weighs in. Plus, the Texas governor says he's working to find ways to arrest absent Democrats.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Epstein accomplice Maxwell opposes unsealing grand jury transcripts
Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, asked a judge on Tuesday to reject a US Justice Department request to unseal the grand jury transcripts in her criminal case and that of the late notorious sex offender. "Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not," Maxwell's lawyers said in a filing with the federal judge in New York who is considering the government request. "Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain," the attorneys said. Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of recruiting underage girls for Epstein, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. President Donald Trump's supporters have been obsessed with the Epstein case for years and have been up in arms since the FBI and Justice Department said last month that the wealthy financier had committed suicide while in jail, did not blackmail any prominent figures, and did not keep a "client list." In a bid to calm the furor, the Justice Department is seeking the release of the grand jury transcripts from the cases against Epstein and Maxwell. US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, also met recently with Maxwell but has not revealed what was discussed. Trump was asked on Tuesday about the meeting and said it was "not an uncommon thing" and was "totally above board." "I think (Blanche) probably wants to make sure that, you know, people that should not be involved, or aren't involved, are not hurt by something that would be very, very unfortunate, very unfair to a lot of people," he said. Trump also told reporters that he was not aware of Maxwell's recent move from a prison in Florida to a minimum security facility in Texas until after it happened. - 'Firestorm of false reporting' - Trump, 79, was once a close friend of Epstein, and The Wall Street Journal reported last month that the president's name was among hundreds found during a Justice Department review of the so-called "Epstein files," though there has not been evidence of wrongdoing. Trump filed a $10 billion defamation suit against the newspaper after it reported that he had penned a sexually suggestive letter to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003. Maxwell is the only former Epstein associate convicted in connection with his activities, which right-wing conspiracy theorists allege included trafficking young girls for VIPs and other elites. In their filing with Judge Paul Engelmayer, Maxwell's lawyers said she was "convicted in a media firestorm of false reporting" and noted that she has appealed her conviction to the Supreme Court. "The government seeks to unseal the grand jury transcripts, citing 'historical interest' without regard for how that release will affect Maxwell's privacy interests, her pending (Supreme Court) Petition, and any future litigation," they said. Her lawyers also said Maxwell has not been been allowed to review the transcripts even though the government has not opposed her request to do so. cl/jgc
CBS News
7 hours ago
- CBS News
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue against unsealing grand jury testimony
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell are arguing against the Justice Department's attempt to unseal grand jury testimony against her, writing in a court filing Tuesday that their client "has no choice but to respectfully oppose" the potential release. "Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not," Maxwell's attorney David Markus wrote in a nine-page filing. "Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain." Maxwell — who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting, grooming and sexually abusing minors — is challenging her conviction, arguing she should've been covered by a non-prosecution deal that federal prosecutors in Florida offered to Epstein and any co-conspirators almost two decades ago. The Supreme Court indicated it will consider whether to hear Maxwell's case in September. Her attorneys also wrote that Maxwell has not been given the opportunity to review the grand jury material to assess the documents. "When Epstein died, prosecutors from the Southern District of New York pivoted and made Maxwell the face of his crimes. She became the scapegoat and the only person the government could put on trial. She was convicted in a media firestorm of false reporting and mischaracterization of evidence," Markus wrote. "Now, with her case pending before the Supreme Court, the government seeks to unseal untested, hearsay-laden grand jury transcripts, which contain statements presented in secret and never challenged by the adversarial process. Maxwell has never been allowed to review those transcripts even though the government did not oppose her recent request to do so." In a court filing last week, the Justice Department admitted that the grand jury transcripts that it is attempting to unseal from the investigations into the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his former associate Ghislaine Maxwell contain testimony from only two law enforcement officers. The grand juries that indicted Epstein and Maxwell did not hear direct testimony from any alleged victims, Attorney General Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told a judge in the Southern District of New York in their attempts to unseal the testimony. In a filing earlier Tuesday, the Justice Department said that the grand jury transcripts it is hoping are unsealed were mostly already made public during Epstein and Maxwell's court proceedings. "The enclosed, annotated transcripts show that much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony—with the exception of the identities of certain victims and witnesses—was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses," the Justice Department wrote. The government also has asked for until Aug. 8 to decide whether or not they are going to ask for the grand jury exhibits to be unsealed as well, as those "substantive" exhibits that are not currently in the public record. Before a different judge in New York this week, two of Epstein's victims asked for restrictions to be put in place to protect the couple's victims, but were unopposed to the transcripts being unsealed. One victim asked for the judge to "show us all the files with only the necessary redactions!" and "be done with it and allow me/us to heal." They asked that their attorney be able to review the suggested redactions "as they are the ones who also know the victims, their names, their truths and their stories unlike the United States Government who did not and does not even care to know our truth. They would rather ask a convicted imprisoned sex trafficker/ abuser for information," referring to the Justice Department's two-day interview last month with Maxwell. Another victim asked for a third-party review of the files before their release, to "ensure that NO victims names or likenesses are revealed through this release. It is imperative with the scrutiny over this media frenzy that the victims are completely and entirely protected." Last month, a federal judge in Florida denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury material stemming from investigations in 2005 and 2007 into Epstein in the state. That ruling only applied to transcripts of proceedings by federal grand juries that were convened in Florida, and did not apply to the transcripts in New York.
