SF fountain that divides public opinion to be fenced off
A representative with the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department told KRON4.com that a recent report had made it clear that the fountain, in its current state, is a potential hazard.
'The Vaillancourt Fountain was designed for people to interact with,' an official said. 'This report made it clear that is no longer safe.'
Two Bay Area restaurants named among 'world's best' by prestigious global ranking
According to a Rec and Parks official, parts of the fountain are 'cracked, corroded, or missing,' including a key support rod in one of the structure's arms. The fountain also contains hazardous materials like lead and asbestos.
'As a result, we are fencing it off,' a parks official said.
People will still be able to view the fountain, but not to walk through it or get close to it.
Installed in 1971, the Vaillancourt Fountain divides public opinion. Fans of brutalist architecture and preservationists have defended the 710-ton sculpture, which has been inactive as a fountain for the past year due to a pump failure.
Recently, plans were unveiled for a $30-million renovation of the Embarcadero Plaza and adjoining Sue Bierman Park. The fountain was not pictured in renderings for the planned renovations.
Armand Vaillancourt, the Canadian artist behind the fountain, visited SF last month to try and urge city officials to preserve the structure. Parks officials maintain that the report will have no impact on long-term plans for the future of Vaillancourt Fountain.
'This step is strictly about ensuring public safety,' officials told KRON4. 'It doesn't impact the timeline or scope of the broader Embarcadero Plaza and Sue Bierman Park Renovation Project.'
Parks officials maintain that long-term decisions regarding the fountain's future will follow public process established by the San Francisco Arts Commission, including review from the Visual Arts Committee, and will include opportunities for community impact.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
The Coast Guard wants to remove hundreds of buoys. Local boaters say: Don't take mine!
But we no longer need to navigate the way our ancestors did, and so the US Coast Guard says it's time to update it for the present, launching a massive review of nearly each buoy along the New England coast to determine how many can be removed. 'We're several decades into the GPS era,' said Matt Stuck, the Coast Guard's chief of waterways management for the Northeast district, who explained that the buoy system has never undergone a wholesale review in the turn-by-turn-world. Advertisement In May, the Coast Guard put out a proposal to review 4,700 buoys, which it classifies as 'Aids to Navigation,' that dot the coastline from New Jersey to the Canadian border in Maine. That proposal listed all buoys under consideration for potential removal, and it was shockingly long, sparing no corner of the Northeast district in the first round of discussion. Big-boy ocean buoys — there are 1,700 of them in the district, serviced by a fleet of just six buoy tenders — are certainly on the list, but so are a surprisingly high number of buoys in recreational areas. Advertisement 'To get good feedback, you have to give the public something good to chew on,' said Stuck, whose agency received 2,800 comments — from yachts and paddleboarders, jet skis and sailboats, aluminum Lunds and skipping Boston Whalers. 'It's fair to say that few to none said this is a great idea,' he said. The first round of nominees made news first in the boating world, with everyone agreeing: Don't take mine. But it's happening, and so a smaller list will be released later this summer, with the Coast Guard getting more specific about what it is thinking and why. 'It's a fair question by the Coast Guard to ask,' said David Kennedy, the manager of governmental affairs for the 700,000-member Boat Owners Association of the United States. 'What do we have out there, what do people need? They are resource-constrained like everyone else.' Kennedy said there are some that make sense to eliminate, like the 10 deep-sea buoys lining the straight-line channel into New York City, primarily used by giant boats that just crossed an ocean with sophisticated electronics. We can get rid of some of those. But so many of the nominees were in smaller harbors that are primarily used by recreational boaters, including notoriously rocky entrances like Woods Hole. 'We are not there yet. You really need to be in the channel,' Kennedy said. 'It's a challenging place based on the tide.' Nine of the Woods Hole buoys that currently allow for that to happen safely did not escape the first list. But it doesn't mean all or any of them will go, just that this is a Northeast-wide conversation, the Coast Guard insists. Advertisement 'We need to right-size the system for the way people are navigating,' Stuck said. 'This is not a cost-cutting measure. This is the first time we've looked at it from a wholesale perspective. The buoy system will never go away. This is about targeting the resources to the buoys that reduce the most risk for mariners.' On the elbow of Cape Ann, there are six in a row along the coast connecting Rockport to Gloucester, whose harbormaster, Christopher Lucido, rallied local input with an email that argued good seamanship emphasizes avoiding reliance on one system, and that there is still significant value and reassurance to confirm a vessel's proximity to underwater hazards such as ledges and rock piles. The Coast Guard has emphasized that it's not interested in getting rid of buoys that mark a danger hidden beneath. 'Eighty-five percent of the buoys we have do the highest-level risk reduction for mariners,' Stuck said, 'like directly mark a rock or shoal, or the inside of a channel so people don't cut a corner.' There are some hazards that GPS already navigates better, and this, he said, is a conversation about those. But for some boaters, it's a conversation about erasing parts of a map across our oceans and into our harbors, built over the centuries. About undoing a system that's a gift from the past, whispering to just remember 'red, right, returning,' and all will be safe. An interactive map showing all the buoys under consideration can be found at: Advertisement Billy Baker can be reached at
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Toronto Zoo to become home of Cedar, a blind baby moose rescued near Ottawa
The Toronto Zoo will soon become home to a blind baby moose who was rescued near Ottawa earlier this month. The two-month-old baby moose, now named Cedar, was found by an animal rescue group on a rural road in Hawkesbury, Ont. Cedar was brought to Holly's Haven Wildlife Rescue, where he spent the last three weeks getting professional veterinary aid and care. 'The moose calf was blind and wandering on its own with no sight of a mother,' said Lynne Rowe, the rescue organization's director of operations. Rowe said staff immediately set up a room to assess Cedar's health, and found he has partial sight in one eye. By the next day, a small outdoor enclosure was created for him to move into. While Rowe said they would usually turn to Aspen Valley Wildlife Sanctuary in Rosseau, Ont., to secure permanent shelter for rescued animals, they were told the sanctuary was at capacity with moose. So Rowe shifted gears and reached out to the Toronto Zoo, which they said felt like a 'fantastic alternative.' In order to get Cedar to the zoo, Rowe had to obtain approval from the provincial Ministry of Natural Resources. It came in within a day of applying. 'Moose cannot be taken out of the wild to be put in a zoo,' Rowe explained. The only way a native Canadian animal like a moose can end up in an enclosure is if it is deemed unfit to be released back into the wild. Dolf DeJong, CEO of the Toronto Zoo, said the zoo has a suitable moose enclosure and would be happy to welcome Cedar. A full zoonotic disease scan and other risk assessment steps will be taken before the move. 'Anytime you're moving ungulates around the province, that's really important,' DeJong said. 'Our veterinarians will connect with their veterinarians now so we can get a full understanding of Cedar's condition and make sure we're able to provide that support he needs for him to thrive.' DeJong said the best-case scenario would have been for the animal to be healthy and released back into the wild. But there are upsides to this alternative solution. 'Many Canadians don't have the chance to see a moose, have never realized that they are massive, incredible animals with really fun diets and some really unique adaptations,' he said. 'And if he needs a forever home, we're excited to be able to share that story and to provide that care for him.' At this time, DeJong said there is no set date for when Cedar will be moved to the zoo or when visitors can see him. The priority is making sure Cedar is in good health, he said. 'This is a visually impaired moose who will have his list of challenges. So our team will be doing their homework to make sure he's got the highest probability of success possible,' he said. 'He's certainly been through a lot,' DeJong said. 'It's an honour and a duty we don't take lightly.' Cedar will continue living at Holly's Haven until he is cleared by vets to be in good shape to travel and all required paperwork at the zoo's end is complete, Rowe said. 'I'm very eager to see him settled into his new place,' Rowe said. 'I will definitely visit him at some point in the future.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 25, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
‘They didn't discover this land, there were people that lived here,': Shoshone Tribal Elder tells the untold side of the Pioneer Day story
SALT LAKE CITY () — As Pioneer Day celebrations take place across the Beehive State, a Shoshone Tribe elder spoke out about the untold history of pioneers settling in native lands in Utah. Darren Parry, former Chairman of the Shoshone Tribe and devout member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, spoke to in an exclusive interview Thursday about the complexities of one of Utah's most popular holidays. 'On one hand, I'm Shoshone… and on the other hand, I'm a sixth-generation Latter-day Saint,' Parry said. 'I absolutely love and honor the pioneers who came, but they didn't discover this land. There were people that lived here.' Two sides to the pioneer story According to the LDS church, as many as 70,000 Saints migrated to Utah and the surrounding areas between 1847 and 1868. 'The records of those who made this trek describe… episode[s] of disease, danger, bravery, and miracles,' the church's website reads. 'You have this state holiday when only one side is celebrated and told,' Parry told Parry says telling the Indigenous people's story is not to replace Pioneer heritage and history, but to be a companion to it. He strongly discourages harboring hard feelings of anger towards anyone based on history, but rather encourages people to ask, 'Is there another side to the story?' In a National Park Service historic resource study, the Mormon Pioneers were part of the idea and the realization of the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, and that they 'contributed to the growth of white supremacy in the west.' 'I cannot separate that story from the broader one. The story of Manifest Destiny, a belief that drove expansion across this continent at the cost of Indigenous lives, lands, and cultures,' Parry said. 'I think a lot of people don't look at the… problematic side of their ancestors coming here because it was never taught,' he said. The Bear River Massacre According to Parry, before the arrival of Mormon Pioneers, the Shoshone Tribe's home base was centered in Cache Valley, or 'Sihiviogoi' in the Shoshone language, meaning 'Willow River.' Over time, more and more pioneers came and settled in the valley. By 1856, thousands of Pioneers had settled there and had already begun to deplete its natural resources. The late BYU historian, Harold Schindler, wrote in 2012 that tensions began to grow between settlers and the Shoshone, who, 'faced with dwindling lands and food sources, had resorted to theft in order to survive.' 'The saints began writing letters to Salt Lake for somebody to come take care of the 'Indian Problem,'' Parry told adding that the letters eventually made it to U.S. Soldiers at Fort Douglas. According to Schindler, on January 29, 1863, soldiers from Fort Douglas attacked a Shoshoni camp on the Bear River near modern-day Preston, Idaho, killing nearly 300 men, women, and children. However, many Shoshone believe the number to be closer to 400, making it the largest massacre of Indigenous people in the history of the U.S. Healing from 'generational trauma' In an LDS Church history essay, historians detail that while Indigenous peoples in some instances captured horses and burned prairie grass to divert bison away from Latter-day Saint hunters, they were often hospitable and sometimes offered to push handcarts or help the migrants ford rivers. Within 10 years of the Bear River Massacre, Shoshone and Pioneers began to interact with one another, Parry said. 'In May of 1873, 102 Shoshones were baptized members of the LDS Church in the Bear River. The same river that, 10 years earlier, saw the destruction of our people.' According to Shoshone oral history, tribal leaders began having visions and manifestations about a god among the Mormon Church, leading many to join the faith; However, Parry acknowledges that material benefits and security may have been a factor in so many Shoshone joining the church. He concluded, saying, 'We just want to acknowledge the past and allow us to heal from this generational trauma that's existed from 1847 on.' Latest headlines: Two fires ignite near freeway in Salt Lake City, fireworks 'unlikely' cause Trump targets disaster mitigation funds, raising risks in future crises Trump and Powell feud explodes in public White House mulling a rare tool to block spending without Congress: What to know GOP leaders submarined by Epstein uproar Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
