£2.1bn north Wales rail overhaul plans unveiled
The proposals include more services, the introduction of pay-as-you-go "tap in tap out" technology, electrification of lines and a Metro-style service linking Wrexham and Liverpool.
Promising the plans would mean "better stations and more trains", Welsh ministers have committed an initial £13m, with substantial UK government cash needed to realise the proposals.
The UK government has been asked to comment.
Welsh railways underfunded, UK government admits
Level crossings close so more trains can run
The plans for an "integrated, high-frequency public transport network" were announced at a "Public Transport Summit", in Wrexham.
Speaking at the event, Skates said: "Working together, we'll deliver our ambitious plans that take us to 2035 and beyond."
The Welsh government is working with partnerships across "governments and borders across the north", he said, to "turn dreams into a reality".
The plans include work on the Wrexham to Liverpool line as the first phase of introducing direct Metro services between the two cities.
There are also proposals to double services between Wrexham and Chester by next May.
As well as a 50% increase in north Wales mainline services, the proposals include the introduction of a new Llandudno to Liverpool route and extending the Manchester Airport service to Holyhead.
Previous rail plans and funding promises for north Wales have been marked by plenty of stops and starts by both Welsh and UK governments.
In 2023, former prime minister Rishi Sunak promised electrification for the north Wales mainline at a cost of around £1bn, a commitment that never came to fruition.
Currently it is not clear if previous requests for rail funding will be granted by the UK government.
Eluned Morgan has said the UK government is talking to Cardiff ministers about "significant investment" on a "long list of projects", which would "probably be in the shape of new stations".
In a letter in January UK government Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander appeared to endorse a range of schemes in north and south Wales, including £335m worth of new stations between Cardiff and Magor.
More recently, with Labour governments now at both ends of the line in Cardiff and London, there is still no promised funding from HS2 consequentials, with rail investment central to Morgan's lobbying of the UK governments through her Red Welsh Way approach.
"Funding is the key issue," said Professor of Transport Stuart Cole.
"£2.1bn is a reasonable figure, £1bn for the north Wales line and £1bn for the rest. Is it a political attempt to get more money? To get more votes?
"There's an election coming in a year's time, and I have no doubt the Labour government in Cardiff would want to show they are getting strong support from London."
The Welsh government says that the programme will be "similar in scale and ambition" to that of the South Wales Metro.
"With the core valley lines the vast majority of money, some £750m of the £1.1bn to electrify the valley lines, came from the Welsh government and some £125m from the UK government," Prof Cole added.
"The vision is great. But the funding is a difficulty. Where is the £2.1bn coming from?"
"I'm sure Ken Skates is hoping to get more out of the UK government but there has to be something written down which says you're going to get it. HM Treasury in London has never been a giver of money to railways in Wales."
Responding to that concern, Skates told BBC Wales "we must await the CSR", referring to next month's spending review in which UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will outline her plans for the years ahead.
"I'm very, very confident that Wales will do well from the Comprehensive Spending Review," he said.
"But, first and foremost, you have to put the business case together to get the money and that's what we've been doing.
The Welsh government had been working "incredibly closely with the UK government and colleagues", he said, to make sure key projects contained in the plans were "agreed as priorities" with the UK Department for Transport.
This North Wales Network is a plan aimed at improving connectivity between North Wales and the "Northern Arc", an economic corridor in the north of England with focus on connecting cities and regions within England.
Over the border similar ambitions have been expressed by Manchester Labour Mayor Andy Burnham.
Following Labour's poor performance, and Reform UK's gain in the local elections in England, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and Liverpool City Region Metro Mayor Steve Rotheram have renewed calls for UK government ministers to support a Liverpool to Manchester railway line.
Burnham said the line was promised a decade ago and that it was no surprise many voters in the north of England "feel so alienated from the system".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cosmopolitan
38 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
No, Rachel Reeves crying during Prime Minister's Questions isn't the political win you think it is
Look, I'll be honest – I've cried at work before. At one of my old jobs I even had a particular cubicle in the ladies' toilets where I'd go for a silent weep before re-emerging, head down, and slinking back to my desk. Thankfully, the times I have bawled until my face was a red-streaked and swollen mess have not been caught on camera for the world to see (I am a particularly ugly and colourful crier). So I genuinely felt for Rachel Reeves, who today was spotted puffy-eyed with a single tear rolling down her cheek, while sat behind Prime Minister Keir Starmer during today's Prime Minister's Questions, the day after the controversial welfare system reforms vote. Reeves, the country's first female Chancellor, has recently been on the receiving end of criticism from colleagues, opposition parties and the public over a proposal to cut benefits and Personal Independence Payments (PIP) which help disabled people live a more independent life, as part of a much-needed benefits system overhaul. Elements of said plan is something the government has since been forced to u-turn on following backlash and the threat of a Labour rebellion. Much furore has been made of Reeves's clear upset when Starmer sidestepped a question about her future during PMQs – and it's something the financial markets have apparently picked up on, too. At around midday (when PMQ's are broadcast) the value of the pound declined sharply against the dollar (though whether that's entirely down to Reeves's tears, or more linked to the suggestion that unpopular tax rises or a new Chancellor with a whole new economical plan could be waiting in the wings, is unclear). What is clear, however, is the whiff of misogyny accompanying a lot of the commentary about Reeves online right now. There's a lot I find indefensible about this current Labour government – remember the halcyon days of last July when we actually thought change was afoot and things were going to get better? – but a politician showing emotion is not one. It's a tired and well-worn (not to mention chauvinistic) trope that women are often 'too emotional' in the workplace, and that showing any sign of upset is to be considered weak and feeble. It's a reductive take – and we don't know with certainty what has upset her (a spokesperson for the Chancellor said it was 'a personal matter' and that Reeves will be 'working out of Downing Street this afternoon', implying she has not been ousted or used as a scapegoat). Frankly, a few tears are far less embarrassing than some of the frequent, angry outbursts we see from other politicians. Donald Trump, for instance, regularly takes to his own social media platform, Truth Social, to get involved in spats with whoever has irked him that day, using language akin to an angry eight-year-old who has been told he's had enough screentime for the day, labelling former colleagues as 'losers' or any vaguely unflattering (and oftentimes honest) commentary about himself as 'fake news'. Or take his Vice President, JD Vance, and his petulant outburst against Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the White House earlier this year, during which he berated a man whose country is at war for his lack of wearing a suit. These are treated as popcorn-worthy entertainment, meme-ified and held up as the embodiment of 'power' and strongman politics – when really, it's just a tantrum for all to see. Somehow, though, I reckon Reeves will be judged more harshly. I'm not saying crying at work is necessarily a good thing – if you find yourself dissolving into tears frequently and publicly, maybe it's time to accept that perhaps the job isn't for you. But what I am saying is, sure, there's plenty to attack Reeves over politically (seriously, those welfare reform plans and the threat to remove PIP payments were a mess) – but visibly showing emotion should not be one of them. If the markets are affected by a woman crying, then it's the markets that need to get a grip, not Rachel Reeves. Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How your MP voted in Wales on Keir Starmer's cut to winter fuel allowance for pensioners
MPs have today voted on controversial cuts to the winter fuel allowance. Under the plans, the winter fuel allowance for pensioners will be limited to only those claiming pension credit or other means-tested benefits. It is expected to cut the number of people receiving the payment of up to £300 from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. The Labour administration says it will save about £1.4 billion this year. Ahead of the vote, Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds said the UK Government had "no choice" but to make the change. He rejected suggestions that the Government's decision to strip all but the country's poorest pensioners of the allowance could see some die of cold this winter. Asked whether ministers accepted this was a possibility, he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "No. We are making sure that we can reassure people by saying the state pension is higher than last winter and energy bills are lower than last winter." READ MORE: Woman dies after family of four's car collides with two lorries in horror crash READ MORE: 'Grotesque' man secretly filmed woman performing sex act then showed people Pressed on why the Government was pursuing the policy, he told Sky News: "We have no choice." The Tories accused Labour of having failed to "properly examine" the implications of the policy. For the latest politics news in Wales sign up to our newsletter here. "This has been completely rushed. There's no need to do this as quickly as the Government has done, other than for purely political reasons," shadow work and pensions secretary and Conservative leadership candidate Mel Stride told Times Radio. "And it means that the implications of this, of course, have not been properly examined in the normal way that they would be, and which is why even trade unions such as Unite has described this as picking the pockets of pensioners." MPs voted on a bid to block the government's cut to winter fuel allowance in the House of Commons today. 23 Labour MPs supported the cut by voting against the amendment Four Labour MPs did not vote All four Plaid MPs tried to block the change Wales' sole Lib Dem MP also tried to block the cut Opposition MPs have failed to block government plans with 348 MPs backing the government and 228 supporting the opposition motion. Wales has 32 MPs with 27 representing Labour, four for Plaid Cymru and one Lib Dem. Stephen Kinnock - Labour Against Mark Tami - Labour Against Claire Hughes - Labour Against Nick Smith - Labour Against David Chadwick - Liberal Democrat For Chris Elmore - Labour Against Chris Evans - Labour Against Jo Stevens - Labour Against Anna McMorrin - Labour Did not vote (teller) Stephen Doughty - Labour Did not vote Alex Barros-Curtis - Labour Against Ann Davies - Plaid Cymru For Ben Lake - Plaid Cymru For Becky Gittins - Labour Against Gill German - Labour Against Liz Savile Roberts - Plaid Cymru For Tonia Antoniazzi - Labour Did not vote Nia Griffith - Labour Against Gerald Jones - Labour Against Catherine Fookes - Labour Against Steve Witherden - Labour Against Carolyn Harris - Labour Against Jessica Morden - Labour Against Ruth Jones - Labour Against Henry Tufnell - Labour Against Alex Davies-Jones - Labour Against Chris Bryant - Labour Against Torsten Bell - Labour Against Nick Thomas-Symonds: Labour Did not vote Kanishka Narayan - Labour Against Andrew Ranger - Labour Against Llinos Medi - Plaid Cymru For
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Coast-to-Coast High-Speed Rail Route Proposed Between Los Angeles and New York
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A private rail venture in Delaware has proposed a high-speed rail project that would stretch from one side of the U.S. to the other. AmeriStarRail, a startup specializing in high-speed and intermodal passenger rail, pitched a partnership with Amtrak to launch the "Transcontinental Chief," a high-speed rail route that would run between Los Angeles and New York in under 72 hours. The Context Work on high-speed rail projects across the U.S. remains stagnant. Only a few networks are underway, and they face increasing local and federal opposition. The largest high-speed rail project being worked on is in California, where 500 miles of track are planned to connect San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles and San Diego. What To Know In an open letter to Roger Harris, the president of Amtrak, AmeriStarRail proposed a joint venture with the goal of making Amtrak generate a profit. "The Transcontinental Chief will be a great opportunity for Amtrak to team up with the private sector to confront the challenges of its money-losing long-distance trains and create opportunities to usher in a profitable Golden Age of rail travel for passengers and truckers, with the ingenuity of free enterprise, as we celebrate our great nation's 250th birthday next year," Scott Spencer, AmeriStarRail's chief operating officer, wrote in the letter. The proposed service would blend elements of Europe's truck transport trains with U.S. passenger rail operations, offering vehicle-boarding for truckers and travelers alongside Amtrak-style accommodations and amenities. A map of the proposed coast-to-coast high-speed rail route from New York to Los Angeles. A map of the proposed coast-to-coast high-speed rail route from New York to Los Angeles. AmeriStarRail AmeriStarRail pitched the initiative to launch by May 10, 2026, timed to coincide with the United States' 250th anniversary celebrations and the FIFA World Cup. The startup, which previously advocated for upgrading Amtrak's Northeast Corridor with private investment, said the new long-distance service could be launched without additional federal spending or congressional action thanks to private investment. The plan includes major stops at Harrisburg, Chicago and the Grand Canyon before reaching Los Angeles. The new route would replace Amtrak's Southwest Chief and Pennsylvanian lines and rely on existing infrastructure from host railroads, including BNSF, Norfolk Southern and New Jersey Transit. Unlike past rail startups that have required federal funding, AmeriStarRail says its model is entirely privately funded. The company has presented the proposal to President Donald Trump, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy and members of Congress. What People Are Saying A spokesperson for AmeriStarRail told Newsweek: "AmeriStarRail's proposal to turn Amtrak's money-losing long-distance trains into profit makers has also been shared with President Trump, DOGE, USDOT Secretary Sean Duffy, the FRA and Members of Congress. "Subject to operating agreements with the host railroads (BNSF, Norfolk Southern and New Jersey Transit) the Transcontinental Chief can start operations on National Train Day, Sunday, May 10, 2026 to begin serving tourists for America 250 celebrations and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. "The Transcontinental Chief can be privately operated and funded, without new congressional legislation or additional federal spending." What Happens Next Amtrak has yet to respond to the pitch from AmeriStarRail and has not acted on previous pitches made by the company.
