James McMurdock says ‘business dealings' compliant after he resigns Reform whip
The Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to Mr McMurdock took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic.
A statement from Lee Anderson, Chief Whip Reform UK. pic.twitter.com/hsT4cm5SsN
— Reform UK (@reformparty_uk) July 5, 2025
In a statement posted on X on Saturday afternoon, Mr McMurdock said he had been contacted by a reporter.
'I confirmed to the journalist that all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same.'
He added: 'As a precautionary measure, and for the protection of Reform UK, I have asked to have the whip suspended temporarily.'
According to Companies House, Mr McMurdock is listed as the current director of Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, and a former director of J A M Financial Limited, a position he resigned in 2021.
Both firms are shown to have overdue accounts and confirmation statements, and both have an 'active proposal to strike off'.
Reform's chief whip Lee Anderson had earlier said that the allegations against Mr McMurdock which led to him removing the whip 'relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP'.
Mr Anderson said Mr McMurdock has 'agreed to co-operate in full with any investigation'.
In a statement published on Reform's X account on Saturday afternoon, Mr Anderson said: 'I have today received a call from James McMurdock who has advised me, as chief whip, that he has removed the party whip from himself pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations that are likely to be published by a national newspaper.
'The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP,' Mr Anderson said.
The statement said Reform would not be commenting further for the moment.
Mr McMurdock has represented South Basildon and East Thurrock since last July's general election.
He won the seat by 98 votes, beating Labour into second place, and taking the seat from the Conservatives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
SNP have morphed into a shadow of the party they should be
I say 'repeat' as in the immediate post-World War Two period the then Labour secretary of state for Scotland, the commendable Tom Johnston, had a vision to build hydro dams in both the Highlands and south-west Scotland to provide cheap local energy which could be harnessed to create industrial activities and well-paid jobs in both regions, addressing the scourge of depopulation. The dams were built but the promise of cheap local electricity was never delivered. Once his plan was known to London, he was told 'oh no dear boy, it must all go into the National Grid'. No competitive advantage could be delivered to these areas of Scotland – what a naive plan. Scots – well nearly 50% of them, as yet – have still not woken up to the new post-Brexit regime in Westminster. It matters not whether that regime is Labour, Tory, Liberal or very soon likely Reform UK. There is no 'UK' in any of their thinking. This is the new 'Little England' post-Brexit nation. Starmer, when he agreed – well I should say 'accepted' – the recent trade terms with 'The Donald', announced on camera 'this is an important agreement for both our countries, England and America'. This was no slip of the tongue, that is their collective thinking, post-Brexit. They, meaning our southern neighbour, didn't just vote to leave Europe, their utopia is in the green and pleasant lands of England where, if Scotland exists at all, she is their colony to be exploited for all her resources and 'free gratis'. At the end of her informative article 'Why have the SNP consistently missed an opportunity with zonal energy pricing' (Jul 10), Lesley Riddoch asks: 'Who is making this political argument? Not the SNP, why the heck not?' The answer is surely 'ineptitude'. The SNP leadership appear to be ignorant of the benefits that zonal pricing would bring, not just to domestic users, but in helping Scotland rebuild an industrial capability. This, with zonal pricing, could be implemented now under devolution. Similarly, where was the outcry over Grangemouth? Why did the SNP not walk out of Westminster en masse after Brexit? Our friends in Europe expected us to, but no, and then the long list of unpopular English prime ministers, from the liar Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, 'now is not the time' Theresa May, Sunak, Sir Keir Starmer and waiting in the wings Nigel Farage. No opportunities were developed during these periods of great opportunity for the independence movement; the leadership of the SNP wasted every one of them. It is perhaps summed up best by Edwin Morgan, our great poet laureate who wrote, on the opening of the Scottish Parliament with such great promise, on October 9 2004: 'What do the people want of this place? They want it to be filled with thinking persons as open and adventurous as its architecture. 'A nest of fearties is what they do not want. 'A symposium of procrastinators is what they do not want. 'A phalanx of forelock-tuggers is what they do not want. And perhaps above all the droopy mantra of 'it wizny me' is what they do not want.' Well Lesley, there is your answer. It is exactly where we are with the current SNP leadership, exactly what Edwin cautioned us and our parliament to avoid, with John Swinney as the Chief Feartie in charge. Congratulations, John. A leadership with no vision for independence, no ambition to get us there, and not even a whimper at the ongoing, and deliberate, deindustrialisation of Scotland. 'Grangemouth no more, Falkirk no more!' The SNP have morphed into a shadow of the party they should be. People see through it. Shameful. We need radicalism, outrage, passion, and most of all new leadership. Ian Stewart Uig, Isle of Skye I AGREE with a lot of what Nick Cole said in his letter on Thursday, July 10, but he had at least two major omissions. Alex Salmond was in fact stitched up by SNP, so had a right to speak out against them. The SNP pushing gender recognition reform when they knew fine well it would split the indy vote was deliberate, as proven by them getting rid of those who would push for independence. Tim Rideout and Joanna Cherry spring to mind, but there were others. So the current version of SNP did nothing for a decade, and still does nothing except get rid of indy folk. The fact the party doesn't support the case at UN or adopting the UN charter on self-determination says it all. The real SNP that wanted independence has been hijacked by devolutionists. They likely supported indy at some point, but the salary and perks are too good to risk now. So although I'm desperate for independence, I'm not going to vote for the SNP to do nowt for another decade. If they don't get concrete plans on the board to go ahead without Westminster agreement if necessary, many Scots won't vote for them. Nick would do better for cause and party if he focused on why the SNP are not keen to proceed, and helped get them out of the party. A new NEC, and out with those who never mention independence. That's the cure for all SNP's woes, so what's stopping them? Grangemouth shows the long game is no longer a viable option so the best way to secure the party's future is to push ahead with indy. Voters who trusted them to act won't let them just be a devolution party. The biggest dividers of the indy vote in my opinion are gender recognition reform and SNP inaction on the supposed main goal. Heartbreaking, so it is. Bill Robertson via email
Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Rupert Lowe cleared of breaching MPs' rules over grooming gang inquiry donations
An investigation was opened into the independent MP after a member of the public raised concerns about the donations he had received through a crowdfunder launched in March to support a national inquiry into the scandal of children being groomed and abused by gangs across the UK. Mr Lowe claimed the complainant had a 'clear and evidenced connection to Reform', his former political party. The MP for Great Yarmouth set up his investigation before Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced there would be a new Government-backed inquiry in June. The fundraiser has so far raised more than £600,000, and the standards commissioner launched the investigation over concerns that Mr Lowe was yet to declare the money on his register of interests. MPs are required to update their register of interests within 28 days once they receive a donation from a single source of more than £1,500, or more than £300 in gifts or earnings. Concluding his investigation, Daniel Greenberg, Parliament's standards commissioner, wrote: 'Following a complaint from a member of the public that Mr Rupert Lowe MP had failed to register donations made to a crowdfunder organised by him in connection with his parliamentary activities, I opened a formal inquiry on 10 July 2025. 'My inquiry sought to confirm whether these donations qualified as registrable interests and whether Mr Lowe had failed to register them within the 28-day window set by the House.' Mr Lowe 'provided evidence that a number of donations made to the crowdfunder did cross the threshold for registration' the commissioner said. But the MP also provided evidence they were not accepted until June 23, which is within the 28-day window. Mr Greenberg added: 'As such, the 28-day window set by the House for the registration of those interests has not passed and no breach of the Rules has occurred.' Writing on social media site X after the conclusion of the investigation, Mr Lowe said: 'This complaint was a malicious attempt to shut me down and undermine our inquiry. 'The complainant, who held the leaked details of the 'confidential' investigation, has a clear and evidenced connection to Reform – you can draw your own conclusions about how this information reached the media.' The MP said he had 'immediately provided undeniable proof that all was done within the rules' when asked by the parliamentary watchdog. The complaint against me and our Rape Gang Inquiry has been cleared by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. This complaint was a malicious attempt to shut me down and undermine our inquiry. The complainant, who held the leaked details of the 'confidential'… — Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) July 11, 2025 Mr Lowe added: 'It's a hit job. Another hit job. 'I do not think that it is a coincidence that this complaint has come just a few days before we are welcoming 40 rape gang survivors to Parliament.' Mr Lowe plans to welcome a group of women, who experienced abuse at the hands of grooming gangs, to Westminster next week. 'Every MP will be invited to come and speak individually with survivors. Hear their stories, understand what actually happened – and what is still happening,' the MP said on X. Mr Lowe was elected as a Reform UK MP, but was suspended by the party in March amid claims he had threatened then-party chairman Zia Yusuf. He denied the allegations, and the Crown Prosecution Service said no criminal charges would be brought against him in relation to alleged threats towards Mr Yusuf. Mr Lowe has since accused his ex-colleagues of engaging in a 'sinister' attempt to use the police to silence him, and called Reform's leader Nigel Farage a 'coward and a viper'. Not long after he was suspended, Mr Lowe launched his private investigation into the grooming gang scandal, amid pressure from the Government's opponents for a new inquiry.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Reform warns it wouldn't take Liz Truss or Suella Braverman if they decided to leave the Tories amid concerns they would damage the party's image
After a string of recent defections, it turns out there are some Tories Reform still wouldn't take. Nigel Farage is set to reject any bids to jump ship from Suella Braverman or Liz Truss amid concerns they would damage Reform's image, the Mail has learnt. Speculation is rife that Mrs Braverman could switch allegiance while Ms Truss has been tipped as a potential defector. Despite the huge publicity value of attracting a former home secretary or prime minister, Reform sources said neither would be welcome. One well-placed insider claimed Mrs Braverman was 'not a team player', adding: 'Her record shows she is just too disruptive.' And the source said Ms Truss joining would be a 'non-starter' as she has 'far too much baggage in the public's mind'. Mr Farage said this week a defection bid by Ms Truss would trigger 'a lot of internal debate'. Reform has brought in senior Tories such as former Cabinet ministers Sir Jake Berry and David Jones this week, as well as ex-MP Dame Andrea Jenkyns – now the party's Greater Lincolnshire mayor. And the source said Ms Truss joining would be a 'non-starter' as she has 'far too much baggage in the public's mind' Mr Farage also confirmed Reform has spoken to serving Conservative MPs but played down the prospect of imminent defections, saying candidates were 'watching and waiting'. The Reform leader warned he would be 'picky' about which Tories to accept, saying: 'We are not the Conservatives 2.0 and we don't want to look like them.' Mrs Braverman has refused to rule out switching to Reform. Last year, her husband Rael defected to the party. After Reform's surge in May's local elections, she said she understood why voters were 'flocking' to the party. But her period in government was marked by controversy. In 2022, she announced her bid to succeed Boris Johnson as Tory leader while still serving as his attorney general. She was forced to quit as Home Secretary by Liz Truss and sacked from the same role a year later by Rishi Sunak. Kemi Badenoch yesterday said Tories who have defected were 'never Conservatives to begin with', adding: 'These are former MPs who do not like the direction the party is going, because we are becoming more Conservative.'
