logo
A stain on Britain: Sewage contaminates its waterways and seas

A stain on Britain: Sewage contaminates its waterways and seas

Japan Times15-03-2025
Beneath the gloomy seas off southern England, 400 million mussels encrust ropes hanging from buoys dotted over an area the size of the country's biggest airport.
Almost 5 kilometers from shore at its nearest point, Europe's largest offshore mussel farm was built by the Holmyard family in Lyme Bay, where they believed it would be free of the millions of gallons of sewage pumped into U.K. waters each year.
But even this far offshore, harmful bacteria such as E.coli can pollute the water, blocking exports to continental Europe for weeks and damaging the prospects of a business producing sustainable food.
"It's criminal that they're allowed to dump what they dump in the seas and get away with it," sales manager Sarah Holmyard said during a visit to the farm. "It's affecting all sorts of businesses, including us."
While Britain's shellfish industry is small, the problems faced by the Holmyards underscore how failings with the most basic services in British society such as water and sewage can harm the broader economy.
Interviews with 20 people and data analysis show how polluted water has also hit tourism and delayed construction projects, acting as a drag on the economy at a time when the new Labour government is trying to kick-start growth.
Trish Dominy, 49, and Rebecca Mole, 61, of the Bluetits Chill Swimmers, a cold water swimming group, prepare to brave a cold winter's day dip in the River Thames near Richmond, London, in January. |
Reuters
In the five years to October 2024, the Environment Agency intervened on 60 occasions to object to planning applications due to the pressures they would place on local sewerage systems, according to a Freedom of Information request.
Clean water campaigners have started to marshal opposition against planning applications, believing that's more likely to pressure the government into fixing the sewage system than current efforts focusing on the harm caused to biodiversity.
"Money talks," said Ash Smith at campaign group Windrush Against Sewage Pollution. Standing knee deep in gray, untreated sewage water in a local brook in Oxfordshire, he explained how they were objecting to house building to show how the water system had broken the country's infrastructure more broadly.
The pumping of sewage into rivers and seas has become a major scandal in Britain. Privatized water companies have been accused of prioritizing dividends over investment and dumping sewage in waterways when its ailing infrastructure cannot cope.
The pollution has deterred wild water swimmers, angered surfers, prompted warnings about toxic blue-green algal blooms in lakes and created an army of people who have become experts on water quality after they noticed changes in waterways.
In England, water companies discharged sewage for 3.6 million hours in 2023, polluting streams, rivers and coastlines, littering them with sanitary products and condoms, damaging ecosystems and habitats, and scaring away tourists.
Sewage spills
British sewers mostly combine rainwater with wastewater. During exceptional rainfalls, water companies can make "spills" into waterways to prevent sewers from becoming overwhelmed. But many have been fined for releasing sewage too regularly.
South West Water, which provides water and sewerage services in the county of Devon by the Holmyard's farm, discharged sewage for 530,737 hours in 2023 — an 83% jump on 2022 making it one of the worst performers in England, Environment Agency data show.
South West Water said it was looking for ways to improve water quality at Lyme Bay.
"We are making sure that every designated shellfish water in the region will meet the government's target of less than 10 spills per year — 10 years ahead of deadline — as we plan to nearly double investment to £2.5 billion pounds ($3.2 billion) 2025-30."
When John Holmyard and his wife Nicki started to plan their mussel farm, they had a lot to factor in.
Ash Smith, from the campaign group Windrush Against Sewage Pollution, wears waders as he tests water in a farmer's field by a storm overflow outlet near Witney in central England on Nov. 25 last year. |
Reuters
Having farmed mussels in colder waters off Scotland for years, they decided to find a site with warmer water, the right sea depth and abundance of nutrients they believed would help mussels grow faster. It had to be far enough offshore to avoid runoff, but with some protection to limit the swell of the sea.
They settled on Lyme Bay after visiting similar sites around Britain, Europe, China and New Zealand and spent seven years securing planning and regulatory approval — without knowing whether their hunch would pay off.
Eleven years on, the farm produces about 3,000 metric tons of mussels a year and the Holmyards hope to hit 10,000 to 12,000 metric tons once it is completed.
John Holmyard, who runs the business with Nicki, their daughter Sarah and son George, said they never expected sewage to affect their farm: "But it's not worked out like that."
For shellfish producers, dumped sewage has been toxic.
Before Britain left the European Union, mussels and oysters could be shipped to the continent prior to purification. Post Brexit, the EU only accepts purified goods or those from the cleanest British waters, rated Class A.
That change has all but destroyed mussel farming in north Wales on Britain's west coast. The region once produced the bulk of Britain's exports to Europe but now rarely sells to the continent due to poor water and a lack of bulk purification facilities in the country.
The Shellfish Association of Great Britain (SAGB) says British exports would double if the seas were cleaner.
James Green, who harvests and sells oysters in Whitstable, a town in southeast England famed for shellfish since Roman times, used to send about half of his produce to markets such as Hong Kong and Europe, but Brexit and water quality issues mean he now only sells purified oysters domestically.
His water supplier, Southern Water, was fined £90 million in 2021 for dumping sewage in the five years to 2015, disrupting harvests and exports. He did not get any compensation and says it is hard to wait for improvements.
"I've got a business," he said. "Can you wait for the changes to kick in, in five, six, seven years' time?"
To protect his oysters, Green monitors for E.coli, salmonella and Norovirus, and tracks rainfall and sewer overflows to assess risks before harvesting.
Southern Water said it was investing heavily to ensure the continued high quality of shellfish beds around its coast.
"The 2021 court case regarding events between 2010 and 2015 found no evidence of impact on shellfish beds, which are affected by many factors," it said.
Driven to despair
The Holmyards say their mussels are tested for E.coli in the Netherlands on an almost daily basis — and they have always been within the limits for a Class A designation.
But high numbers of E.coli have occasionally been reported by British authorities in similar monthly tests, designating parts of the farm Class B.
In the British system, negative readings can have different outcomes for future harvests. For the Holmyards, it stopped them from exporting mussels for several weeks from that part of the farm — and also designated the same area as Class B the same time the following year.
A sewage treatment works next to the River Thames in Slough, England, last December. |
Reuters
The family say they find it baffling, as bacteria coming from the shore should be heavily diluted by the time they reach the farm — and because the British readings don't tally with the more frequent Dutch tests.
John said they had been unable to raise fresh capital since Brexit due to the risk of export bans.
The British body responsible for classifying shellfish harvesting areas, the Food Standards Agency, said it had tried to be flexible, but it had to protect public health and classifications would only improve with better water.
As Sarah and George plucked predatory starfish off the mussels, they explained how an annual survey showed the farm had spawned an abundance of species, such as crab and lobster.
Their blue mussels, known for their rich, sweet flavor, are sold as a premium product in Europe. Notwithstanding the bans, the Holmyards still export about 95% of their mussels to the European Union, with the rest sold in Britain.
Tourism bosses say this is the kind of high-quality, locally produced food they need to promote to prospective holidaymakers.
Alistair Handyside, chairman of the South West Tourism Alliance, said while tourism was mainly affected by weather and cost, talk of sewage had damaged the appeal of many locations.
"It drives you to despair," he said.
Toxic output
The sight of sewage and litter on beaches and in rivers has also driven thousands of people to protest.
Sally Burtt-Jones was one of the founders of SOS Whitstable, part of a network of groups that stage protests, test local water and campaign for legislative change.
She said she was most proud of her campaigning work. "We care about the community and the sea," she said. "When we get together we can make change happen."
John Reeve, a Surfers Against Sewage representative in the northeastern seaside town of Saltburn, has worked with local officials and studied the geology to understand how to control rainwater as storms become heavier due to climate change.
"We are making a difference over time," he said.
The water industry says it has invested heavily in infrastructure since privatization in 1989, but population growth and climate change have imposed new pressures at a time when it says successive governments — and regulator Ofwat — were focused on keeping customer's bills low.
Ofwat said water companies in England and Wales had paid out £53 billion pounds in dividends since privatization — and had collective net debt of £69.5 billion in 2024.
It has proposed letting customer bills rise by an average of 36% before inflation over the next five years to fund infrastructure upgrades and has gained new powers to link dividends to performance. The government is also reviewing the sector.
An Ofwat spokesperson said customers wanted change: "We need to see a transformation in companies' culture and performance. We will monitor and hold companies to account."
Failures around sewage have also bedeviled construction, with the Environment Agency objecting to planning applications when it thinks existing systems will not cope.
The objections, for everything from housing to retail sites, offices, schools, a science business park and leisure center, are typically overcome with ways to mitigate the impact.
But the objections add time, cost and complexity to building projects, a serious challenge for the government as it seeks to trigger a boom in housing and infrastructure construction.
Water pollution has also damaged biodiversity.
Stocks of Atlantic salmon, which hatch in freshwater breeding grounds in Britain, have hit new lows.
The Environment Agency attributed the fall to pollution and sedimentation — just the type of environment the Holmyards had sought to avoid.
Sarah said the potential for the business being replicated elsewhere was huge. "But if you've got the same issues of not being able to export because of the water quality, then it's just not going to work."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jeju Air Jet Still Had a Working Engine When It Crashed, Investigation Update Says
Jeju Air Jet Still Had a Working Engine When It Crashed, Investigation Update Says

Yomiuri Shimbun

timea day ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Jeju Air Jet Still Had a Working Engine When It Crashed, Investigation Update Says

SEOUL, July 27 (Reuters) – A Jeju Air plane that crashed in December during an emergency landing after a bird strike could have kept flying on the damaged engine that was still working after pilots shut down the other one, according to an update from South Korean investigators. The Boeing BA.N 737-800 instead belly-landed at Muan airport without its landing gear down, overshot the runway and erupted into a fireball after slamming into an embankment, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. Investigators have not yet produced a final report into the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil, but information about the plane's two engines has begun to emerge. According to a July 19 update prepared by investigators and seen by Reuters but not publicly released following complaints from victims' family members, the left engine sustained less damage than the right following a bird strike, but the left engine was shut down 19 seconds after the bird strike. The right engine experienced a 'surge' and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it 'was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight,' in the five-page update, which included post-crash photos of both engines. No reason for the crew's actions was given and the probe is expected to last months as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. MORE QUESTIONS So far, public attention has focused on the possibility that the crew may have shut down the less-damaged engine, rekindling memories of a 1989 Boeing 737-400 crash in Kegworth, England, where pilots shut down a non-damaged engine by mistake. The disaster led to multiple changes in regulations including improvements in crew communication and emergency procedures. A source told Reuters on Monday that the South Korea-led probe had 'clear evidence' that pilots had shut off the less-damaged left engine after the bird strike, citing the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a switch found in the wreckage. But the latest update on the crash also raises the possibility that even the more heavily damaged engine that was still running could have kept the plane aloft for longer. It did not say what level of performance the operating engine still had, nor what extra options that might have given to the plane's emergency-focused crew before the jet doubled back and landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan with its landing gear up. Both engines contained bird strike damage and both experienced engine vibrations after the strike. The right engine showed significant internal damage, the Korean-language update from South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) said, but it did not describe the damage found in the left engine. The update did not say how the left engine was operating nor the state of systems connected to either engine, said former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigator Greg Feith when shown the document translated by Reuters. It contains some new facts but omits far more, resulting in a 'cryptic' document, he said. ARAIB, which plans to issue a final report next June, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Safety experts say it is common for early reports to contain sparse facts and limited analysis while investigations continue. A preliminary report released in January said feathers and blood stains from ducks were found in both engines. The engines – made by CFM International, jointly owned by GE GE.N and France's Safran – were examined in May and no defects or fault data were found beyond the bird and crash damage, the report said. Families of those who died in the disaster were briefed on the engine findings but asked investigators not to release the July 19 report, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other factors. The report was withheld but Reuters and South Korean media obtained copies. Boeing and GE referred questions about the crash to ARAIB. Safran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jeju Air has previously said it is cooperating with ARAIB and is awaiting publication of the investigation. Under global aviation rules, civil air investigations aim to discover crash causes without assigning blame or liability. The Jeju Air pilots' union said ARAIB was 'misleading the public' by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given that bird remains were found in both. A source who attended the briefing told Reuters that investigators told family members the left engine also experienced a disruptive 'surge,' citing black box data. The pilot union and representatives of bereaved families have asked that evidence be released to support any findings. Relatives say the investigation also needs to focus on the embankment containing navigation equipment, which safety experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll. Global aviation standards call for any navigation equipment in line with runways to be installed on structures that easily give way in case of impact with an aircraft. South Korea's transport ministry has identified seven domestic airports, including Muan, with structures made of concrete or steel, rather than materials that break apart on impact and has said it will improve them. Designs for the new structures are in progress, a ministry official told Reuters last week.

Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says
Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says

Japan Today

timea day ago

  • Japan Today

Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says

FILE PHOTO: The wreckage of the Jeju Air aircraft that went off the runway and crashed at Muan International Airport lies near a concrete structure it crashed into, in Muan, South Korea, December 30, 2024. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji/File Photo By Lisa Barrington, Heekyong Yang and Dan Catchpole A Jeju Air plane that crashed in December during an emergency landing after a bird strike could have kept flying on the damaged engine that was still working after pilots shut down the other one, according to an update from South Korean investigators. The Boeing 737-800 instead belly-landed at Muan airport without its landing gear down, overshot the runway and erupted into a fireball after slamming into an embankment, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. Investigators have not yet produced a final report into the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil, but information about the plane's two engines has begun to emerge. According to a July 19 update prepared by investigators and seen by Reuters but not publicly released following complaints from victims' family members, the left engine sustained less damage than the right following a bird strike, but the left engine was shut down 19 seconds after the bird strike. The right engine experienced a "surge" and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it "was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight," in the five-page update, which included post-crash photos of both engines. No reason for the crew's actions was given and the probe is expected to last months as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. MORE QUESTIONS So far, public attention has focused on the possibility that the crew may have shut down the less-damaged engine, rekindling memories of a 1989 Boeing 737-400 crash in Kegworth, England, where pilots shut down a non-damaged engine by mistake. The disaster led to multiple changes in regulations including improvements in crew communication and emergency procedures. A source told Reuters on Monday that the South Korea-led probe had "clear evidence" that pilots had shut off the less-damaged left engine after the bird strike, citing the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a switch found in the wreckage. But the latest update on the crash also raises the possibility that even the more heavily damaged engine that was still running could have kept the plane aloft for longer. It did not say what level of performance the operating engine still had, nor what extra options that might have given to the plane's emergency-focused crew before the jet doubled back and landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan with its landing gear up. Both engines contained bird strike damage and both experienced engine vibrations after the strike. The right engine showed significant internal damage, the Korean-language update from South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) said, but it did not describe the damage found in the left engine. The update did not say how the left engine was operating nor the state of systems connected to either engine, said former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigator Greg Feith when shown the document translated by Reuters. It contains some new facts but omits far more, resulting in a "cryptic" document, he said. ARAIB, which plans to issue a final report next June, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Safety experts say it is common for early reports to contain sparse facts and limited analysis while investigations continue. A preliminary report released in January said feathers and blood stains from ducks were found in both engines. The engines - made by CFM International, jointly owned by GE and France's Safran - were examined in May and no defects or fault data were found beyond the bird and crash damage, the report said. Families of those who died in the disaster were briefed on the engine findings but asked investigators not to release the July 19 report, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other factors. The report was withheld but Reuters and South Korean media obtained copies. Boeing and GE referred questions about the crash to ARAIB. Safran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jeju Air has previously said it is cooperating with ARAIB and is awaiting publication of the investigation. Under global aviation rules, civil air investigations aim to discover crash causes without assigning blame or liability. The Jeju Air pilots' union said ARAIB was "misleading the public" by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given that bird remains were found in both. A source who attended the briefing told Reuters that investigators told family members the left engine also experienced a disruptive "surge," citing black box data. The pilot union and representatives of bereaved families have asked that evidence be released to support any findings. Relatives say the investigation also needs to focus on the embankment containing navigation equipment, which safety experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll. Global aviation standards call for any navigation equipment in line with runways to be installed on structures that easily give way in case of impact with an aircraft. South Korea's transport ministry has identified seven domestic airports, including Muan, with structures made of concrete or steel, rather than materials that break apart on impact and has said it will improve them. Designs for the new structures are in progress, a ministry official told Reuters last week. © (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.

Science and local sleuthing identify a 250-year-old shipwreck on a Scottish island
Science and local sleuthing identify a 250-year-old shipwreck on a Scottish island

Japan Today

time5 days ago

  • Japan Today

Science and local sleuthing identify a 250-year-old shipwreck on a Scottish island

In this image provided by Wessex Archaeology, the Sanday Wreck is seen on the shores of Sanday on Orkney, Feb. 2024. (Wessex Archaeology via AP) By JILL LAWLESS When a schoolboy going for a run found the ribs of a wooden ship poking through the dunes of a remote Scottish beach, it sparked a hunt by archaeologists, scientists and local historians to uncover its story. Through a mix of high-tech science and community research, they have an answer. Researchers announced Wednesday that the vessel is very likely the Earl of Chatham, an 18th-century warship that saw action in the American War of Independence before a second life hunting whales in the Arctic — and then a stormy demise. 'I would regard it as a lucky ship, which is a strange thing to say about a ship that's wrecked,' said Ben Saunders, senior marine archaeologist at Wessex Archaeology, a charity that helped community researchers conduct the investigation. 'I think if it had been found in many other places, it wouldn't necessarily have had that community drive, that desire to recover and study that material, and also the community spirit to do it,' Saunders said. The wreck was discovered in February 2024 after a storm swept away sand covering it on Sanday, one of the rugged Orkney Islands that lie off Scotland's northern tip. It excited interest on the island of 500 people, whose history is bound up with the sea and its dangers. Around 270 shipwrecks have been recorded around the 20-square-mile (50-square-kilometer) island since the 15th century. Local farmers used their tractors and trailers to haul the 12 tons of oak timbers off the beach, before local researchers set to work trying to identify it. 'That was really good fun, and it was such a good feeling about the community – everybody pulling together to get it back,' said Sylvia Thorne, one of the island's community researchers. 'Quite a few people are really getting interested in it and becoming experts.' Dendrochronology — the science of dating wood from tree rings — showed the timber came from southern England in the middle of the 18th century. That was one bit of luck, Saunders said, because it coincides with 'the point where British bureaucracy's really starting to kick off' and detailed records were being kept. 'And so we can then start to look at the archive evidence that we have for the wrecks in Orkney,' Saunders said. 'It becomes a process of elimination. 'You remove ones that are Northern European as opposed to British, you remove wrecks that are too small or operating out of the north of England and you really are down to two or three … and Earl of Chatham is the last one left.' Further research found that before it was the Earl of Chatham, the ship was HMS Hind, a 24-gun Royal Navy frigate built in Chichester on England's south coast in 1749. Its military career saw it play a part in the expansion — and contraction — of the British Empire. It helped Britain wrest control of Canada from France during the sieges of Louisbourg and Quebec in the 1750s, and in the 1770s served as a convoy escort during Britain's failed effort to hold onto its American colonies. Sold off by the navy in 1784 and renamed, the vessel became a whaling ship, hunting the huge mammals in the Arctic waters off Greenland. Whale oil was an essential fuel of the Industrial Revolution, used to lubricate machinery, soften fabric and light city streets. Saunders said that in 1787 there were 120 London-based whaling ships in the Greenland Sea, the Earl of Chatham among them. A year later, while heading out to the whaling ground, it was wrecked in bad weather off Sanday. All 56 crew members survived — more evidence, Saunders says, that this was a vessel blessed with luck. The ship's timbers are being preserved in a freshwater tank at the Sanday Heritage Centre while plans are discussed to put it on permanent display. Saunders said that the project is a model of community involvement in archaeology. 'The community have been so keen, have been so desirous to be involved and to find out things to learn, and they're so proud of it. It's down to them it was discovered, it's down to them it was recovered and it's been stabilized and been protected,' he said. For locals, it's a link to the island's maritime past — and future. Finding long-buried wrecks could become more common as climate change alters the wind patterns around Britain and reshapes the coastline. 'One of the biggest things I've got out of this project is realizing how much the past in Sanday is just constantly with you — either visible or just under the surface,' said Ruth Peace, another community researcher. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store