British families sue TikTok in U.S. over Blackout Challenge children deaths
The U.S.-based Social Media Victims Law Center filed the suit in Delaware Superior Court. on behalf of the families of Isaac Kenevan, 13; Archie Battersbee, 12; Julian "Jools" Sweeney,14; and Maia Walsh, 13.
"TikTok's algorithm purposely targeted these children with dangerous content to increase their engagement time on the platform and drive revenue. It was a clear and deliberate business decision by TikTok that cost these four children their lives," the SMVLC said in a statement.
The suit alleges the deaths were "the forseeable result of ByteDance's engineered addiction-by-design and programming decisions" that pushed children to maximize their TikTok engagement "by any means necessary."
Sweeney's mother Ellen Roome told the BBC a law debated in Parliament dubbed "Jools' Law" should be passed so parents are allowed to access their children's social media accounts if they die.
She had to sue in the United States before obtaining her son's TikTok data. She said she believed that was morally wrong and TikTok could have simply handed over the data.
"It's no coincidence that three of the four children who died from self-suffocation after being exposed to the dangerous and deadly TikTok Blackout Challenge lived in the same city and that all fit a similar demographic," SMVLC attorney Matthew P. Bergman said in a statement.
He added that TikTok's algorithm "purposely targeted these children with dangerous content to increase their engagement time on the platform and drive revenue."
According to the lawsuit, Maia Walsh's father Liam was able to access her TikTok data after months of trying and said he found TikTok had targeted the 13 year-old with "dangerous challenges and self-harm videos."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
UK to hold inquiry into violent clash between police and miners during 1984 strike
LONDON -- The British government said Monday that it will hold a public inquiry into the 'Battle of Orgreave,' a violent confrontation between police and striking coal miners that became a defining moment in the conflict between unions and then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government. Some 120 miners and police were hurt when officers clashed with miners trying to stop trucks entering the Orgreave Coking Plant in northern England on June 18, 1984. It came three months into a nationwide strike over plans to close two dozen coal pits and lay of 20,000 miners. The bitter dispute between the National Union of Mineworkers and the government was a decisive moment in Thatcher's bid to break the power of trade unions and remake the U.K. economy along free-market lines. The strike ended in defeat for the miners after a year and hastened the end of British coal mining, which employed 180,000 people at the start of the strike. Today, no coal mines remain. Campaigners have long called for an inquiry into why police from across the country were sent to Orgreave and what their orders were. Images of mounted police in riot gear charging stone-throwing miners with truncheons and dogs shocked and divided the nation. Some 95 picketers were arrested and charged with riot and violent disorder, but all charges were later dropped after evidence from the police was discredited. The Home Office said the inquiry will be led by Pete Wilcox, the bishop of Sheffield, and start in the fall. It will have the power to compel witnesses to testify under oath. Kate Flannery, secretary of the Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign, said the announcement of an inquiry was 'really positive news.' She said it must be given 'unrestricted access to all relevant information including government, police and media documents, photos and films.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the events at Orgreave 'cast a shadow over communities in Yorkshire and other mining areas. 'The violent scenes and subsequent prosecutions raised concerns that have been left unanswered for decades, and we must now establish what happened,' she said.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman Placed Daughter for Adoption—10 Years on Shares 'Unbearable Struggle'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ten years after signing away her parental rights, Aspen Rawson is using her voice to shed light on what she describes as the complex and often painful truths of the American adoption system. In a video shared to TikTok on July 3—which has since garnered more than 700,000 views—Rawson, 27, of Denver, Colorado, marked the anniversary of placing her daughter for adoption with a deeply personal reflection that has resonated with tens of thousands of viewers. Speaking directly to the camera, she said: "Ten years ago today, I signed away my parental rights placing my newborn daughter up for adoption in the state of Texas...I was 17, basically homeless...I think about my daughter every single day." She added: "A piece of my heart lives outside of me, I do not get to contribute to how she is raised and that is an unbearable struggle." The video sparked discussion among viewers, with many reflecting on the emotions, logistics and lasting consequences of adoption in the U.S. Rawson spoke with Newsweek about the chain of events that led her, at 17, to make a decision that still shapes her life. "When I was 16, in 2014, I left my parents' home and became homeless," Rawson said. "For a few months, I was living in my then-boyfriend's car, and during that time, I got pregnant." Though Roe v. Wade was still in effect at the time; Rawson said the restrictive abortion laws already in place in Texas created insurmountable barriers. "To access abortion, I would have needed either parental consent or a judge's approval," she said. "I didn't believe my parents would approve of me making that choice, or that I would be able to get in front of a judge quickly enough." She eventually made her decision while sitting in a mall bathroom. "I saw the test say 'positive' and I knew what I needed to do," she said. "I went straight up to my boyfriend, and told him we were placing our baby for adoption." Despite her determination, Rawson said it was weeks before any agency responded to her outreach. Most would not engage until she was through her first trimester. Eventually, a family friend of her boyfriend's mother helped connect her to prospective adoptive parents. Their first meeting took place at a Starbucks in early 2015. Aspen Rawson speaks in a TikTok video; and smiles for a photo outdoors. Aspen Rawson speaks in a TikTok video; and smiles for a photo outdoors. @that1gorl From there, Rawson said she was matched with a social worker who helped her access food and medical care through her pregnancy. She described the adoptive parents—the two men she chose—as "loving, kind, compassionate, and smart people who will do anything for their baby girl." At the hospital, Rawson chose not to hold her daughter first, hoping to minimize the emotional weight of the impending separation. "But it turns out that no amount of safeguarding will protect you from the post-birth hormonal crash and physical pain that comes with placing a deeply loved child," she said. In the decade since, Rawson has remained in contact with her daughter, a rarity in open adoptions. "Most birth parents are cut off when their child turns 7," she had said in the video. "I still have contact with my daughter at 10 years old. I am one of the lucky ones." Now based in Colorado, Rawson took to social media to share her experience with her growing audience. She began speaking online in 2020 and in the last year alone more than a million people have heard her story. She hopes that her newfound platform is seen not just a personal journal—but as a form of advocacy. Rawson now uses her voice to challenge widely held narratives about the adoption system, and to highlight how the profitable state of the adoption industry can incentivize it to lobby against abortions. "I learned that the industry brings in over $1 billion per year and that there are no legal protections for birth parents," she said. "Many people place wanted children simply because they cannot afford to raise another child." As abortion access has narrowed in many parts of the country, Rawson believes the national conversation about adoption has failed to keep pace. "I share my story to bring attention to the complex and traumatic reality of the U.S. private adoption industry," she said. "Especially as abortion access is being continually restricted and penalized. "I think the conversation around adoption is more important than ever." Rawson emphasized that her intent is not to seek praise or to raise eyebrows, but to encourage a dialogue that many people are keen to sweep under the rug. "I don't believe strangers should be proud of me for a choice I made under duress," she said. "I don't believe I am brave for sharing my story, I am just doing what needs to be done." With each post and video, Rawson said she aims to provoke thought, not sympathy. She added: "I share my story as a birth parent not to center my experience, but to encourage people to think about the impacts of a system we were all taught was beautiful and good." Since Rawson's daughter was born, more than 100,000 private adoptions have occurred—impacting at least three times that many people. "This is not a small issue," Rawson said. "We need comprehensive reform in our country that works to keep families together, educates teenagers about pregnancy prevention, and ensures that promises made to birth parents before placement are legally enforceable." If you have a family dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
4 hours ago
UK police arrest 6 after protesters descend on a hotel housing asylum seekers
LONDON -- A town on the outskirts of London was rocked by protesters who descended on a hotel housing asylum seekers for the second time in four days on Sunday night, amid anger about a migrant accused of sexual assault. Police in the town of Epping said they arrested six people on Sunday, including four suspected of involvement in 'violent disorder' during the previous demonstration on Thursday. Officers patrolled the area around the Bell Hotel throughout the night after issuing an order for the crowds to disperse. Chanting 'Save our kids' and 'Send them home,' more than 100 demonstrators, some brandishing British flags, gathered outside the hotel Sunday evening. The protests escalated as night fell, with flares and projectiles thrown toward police vans blocking the entrance. Police escorted a counter-protester from the area after demonstrators surrounded her. 'Disappointingly we have seen yet another protest, which begun peacefully, escalate into mindless thuggery with individuals again hurting one of our officers and damaging a police vehicle,″ Chief Superintendent Simon Anslow of the Essex Police said in a statement. 'For anyone who thinks we will tolerate their thuggery — think again.'' The protests come amid escalating tensions over the rising number of asylum seekers who are being housed at government expense in hotels around the country. Those pressures flared into days of rioting last month in Northern Ireland after two teenagers were arrested on charges of sexual assault. Violent anti-immigrant protests spread throughout the U.K. last summer after social media users spread misinformation about the identity of the person who attacked a dance class in the northwestern town of Southport, killing three young girls. The attacker was a 17-year-old who was born in the U.K. born in the U.K. to parents from Rwanda, not an asylum seeker as had been rumored. Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned last year's riots as 'far-right thuggery' as police intervened to stop the violence and expedited the sentencing of those convicted of taking part. Before Sunday's protests in Epping, local police issued an order that allowed them to force demonstrators to remove face coverings. The later issued an order for the demonstrators to leave the area around the hotel. That dispersal order remained in effect until 4 a.m. Monday. The demonstration came after eight police officers were injured on Thursday after a peaceful protest outside the hotel escalated into violence. Police blamed the violence on people from outside the community who 'arrived at the scene intent on causing trouble.' Four of those detained on Sunday were arrested in connection with events that happened during the initial protest, police said. A fifth was arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage to a police car, while the sixth was arrested for being equipped to cause criminal damage. The protests began after a 38-year-old asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault after allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. The man is being held without bail after he had his first court appearance on July 10. He denies the charges. 'We don't take sides, we arrest criminals and we have a duty to ensure no-one is hurt — plain and simple,″ Anslow said. 'I know the people of Essex know what we're about so I know they won't believe the rubbish circulating online that is designed to do nothing more than inflame tensions and trouble.'' Epping Forest District Council, which provides local government services in the area, condemned the violence but said it had long opposed the central government's decision to use the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers. 'We have consistently shared concerns with the Home Office that the Bell Hotel is an entirely unsuitable location for this facility and should close,' council Leader Chris Whitbread said in a statement last week. 'We continue to press Home Office officials for the immediate closure of the site and are encouraged that our local MPs are now actively supporting our call.'
