logo
U.S. deports migrants from Jamaica, Cuba, and other countries to the small African kingdom of Eswatini

U.S. deports migrants from Jamaica, Cuba, and other countries to the small African kingdom of Eswatini

CAPE TOWN, South Africa — The United States sent five migrants it describes as 'barbaric' criminals to the African nation of Eswatini in an expansion of the Trump administration's largely secretive third-country deportation program, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said Tuesday.
The U.S. has already deported eight men to another African country, South Sudan, after the Supreme Court lifted restrictions on sending people to countries where they have no ties. The South Sudanese government has declined to say where those men, also described as violent criminals, are after it took custody of them nearly two weeks ago.
In a late-night post on X, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the five men sent to Eswatini, who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos, had arrived on a plane, but didn't say when or where.
She said they were all convicted criminals and 'individuals so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back.'
The men 'have been terrorizing American communities' but were now 'off of American soil,' McLaughlin added.
McLaughlin said they had been convicted of crimes including murder and child rape and one was a 'confirmed' gang member. Her social media posts included mug shots of the men and what she said were their criminal records and sentences. They were not named.
It was not clear if the men had been deported from prison or if they were detained in immigration operations, and the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to requests for clarification.
Four of the five countries where the men are from have historically been resistant to taking back some citizens when they're deported from the U.S. That issue has been a reoccurring problem for Homeland Security even before the Trump administration. Some countries refuse to take back any of their citizens, while others won't accept people who have committed crimes in the U.S.
Like in South Sudan, there was no immediate comment from Eswatini authorities over any deal to accept third-country deportees or what would happen to them in that country. Civic groups there raised concerns over the secrecy from a government long accused of clamping down on human rights.
'There has been a notable lack of official communication from the Eswatini government regarding any agreement or understanding with the U.S. to accept these deportees,' Ingiphile Dlamini, a spokesperson for the pro-democracy group SWALIMO, said in a statement sent to The Associated Press.
It wasn't clear if they were being held in a detention center, what their legal status was or what Eswatini's plans were for the deported men, he said.
Eswatini, previously called Swaziland, is a country of about 1.2 million people between South Africa and Mozambique. It is one of the world's last remaining absolute monarchies and the last in Africa. King Mswati III has ruled by decree since 1986.
Political parties are effectively banned and pro-democracy groups have said for years that Mswati III has crushed political dissent, sometimes violently.
Pro-democracy protests erupted in Eswatini in 2021, when dozens were killed, allegedly by security forces. Eswatini authorities have been accused of conducting political assassinations of pro-democracy activists and imprisoning others.
Because Eswatini is a poor country, it 'may face significant strain in accommodating and managing individuals with complex backgrounds, particularly those with serious criminal convictions,' Dlamini said.
While the U.S. administration has hailed deportations as a victory for the safety and security of the American people, Dlamini said his organization wanted to know the plans for the five men sent to Eswatini and 'any potential risks to the local population.'
The Trump administration has said it is seeking more deals with African nations to take deportees from the U.S. Leaders from some of the five West African nations who met last week with President Trump at the White House said the issue of migration and their countries possibly taking deportees from the U.S. was discussed.
Some nations have pushed back. Nigeria, which wasn't part of that White House summit, said it has rejected pressure from the U.S. to take deportees who are citizens of other countries.
The U.S. also has sent hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama, but has identified Africa as a continent where it might find more governments willing to strike deportation agreements.
Rwanda's foreign minister told the AP last month that talks were underway with the U.S. about a potential agreement to host deported migrants. A British government plan announced in 2022 to deport rejected asylum-seekers to Rwanda was ruled illegal by the U.K. Supreme Court last year.
The eight men deported by the U.S. to war-torn South Sudan, where they arrived early this month, previously spent weeks at a U.S. military base in nearby Djibouti, located on the northeast border of Ethiopia, as the case over the legality of sending them there played out.
The deportation flight to Eswatini is the first to a third country since the Supreme Court ruling cleared the way.
The South Sudanese government has not released details of its agreement with the U.S. to take deportees, nor has it said what will happen to the men. A prominent civil society leader there said South Sudan was 'not a dumping ground for criminals.'
Analysts say some African nations might be willing to take third-country deportees in return for more favorable terms from the U.S. in negotiations over tariffs, foreign aid and investment, and restrictions on travel visas.
Imray and Gumede write for the Associated Press. Gumede reported from Johannesburg. AP writer Rebecca Santana in Washington contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Colbert Blasts Trump's Lies About His Uncle John Trump
Stephen Colbert Blasts Trump's Lies About His Uncle John Trump

Buzz Feed

time12 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Stephen Colbert Blasts Trump's Lies About His Uncle John Trump

Late Show host Stephen Colbert on Wednesday said President Donald Trump 's event a day earlier 'went off the rails pretty darn quick.' Trump was supposed to discuss new investments in artificial intelligence and energy, but then derailed himself with a long, strange ramble about his uncle, John Trump, who was a professor at MIT. The president boasted that his uncle was 'one of the great professors, 51 years, whatever, longest-serving professor in the history of MIT, three degrees in nuclear, chemical, and math.' 'Brace yourself,' Colbert warned his audience after playing the clip. 'None of that was true.' Trump's uncle was not the longest-serving professor at MIT. His undergraduate and doctorate degrees were in electrical engineering and he had a master's degree in physics — not 'nuclear, chemical, and math.' Trump also said his uncle taught Ted Kaczynski, the 'Unabomber' terrorist who killed people via mail bombs. The president told a whole story about asking his uncle what kind of student Kaczynski was. His uncle, Trump claimed, told him that the future Unabomber was 'seriously good' and would correct the other students' work. Kaczynski went to Harvard, not MIT. 'Even more insane,' Colbert said, Trump's uncle died more than a decade before Kaczynski was identified as the person sending explosives and arrested. 'So why on Earth would Trump have asked his uncle about him?' Colbert wondered, then broke out his impression of the president to envision how it might have happened. 'Hey, Uncle John, Uncle Professor Dr. John Trump, professor, sir, uncle. You know that random guy who isn't famous at all and lives in the woods and machines his own screws?' Colbert asked in his Trump voice. 'What was it like when you didn't teach him?' CBS / Via

Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County
Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County

Los Angeles Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County

They came for abortion. But instead they took away your birth control, cancer screenings, and testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. Congress has passed Trump's budget bill and in doing so, they have jeopardized access to basic healthcare. The Trump administration and Congress have turned their backs on our communities, and the consequences of this bill will echo for generations in Southern California. One of the central provisions of this bill is 'defunding' Planned Parenthood, by excluding all Planned Parenthood health centers from any Medicaid reimbursement, simply because the organization provides abortion services. Far from being a 'handout' as some characterize it, Medicaid is actually a federal health insurance program that reimburses providers for medical services. By blocking Planned Parenthood from Medicaid, the Trump administration and its Republican allies have unjustly blocked the largest provider of reproductive healthcare in the country from accessing any federal reimbursement for all services, including birth control, STI testing/treatment and cancer screening. Here's the truth: the government has already prohibited federal funds from being used for abortion since 1977, thanks to the Hyde Amendment. But now, upset that they have not been able to ban abortion outright, Republican lawmakers have chosen to block access to more than 90% of the services we provide each year by excluding us from a major health insurance program enabling millions of low-income Americans to get healthcare. Republicans have turned misinformation into policy, traded facts for fear — and sacrificed lives for leverage. Defunding Planned Parenthood is not about balancing the country's budget. This is a blatant attack on healthcare access for people who need it the most, and a backdoor attempt to block people from accessing abortion, birth control, and other medical services that most Americans support and are legally protected in California. They may operate from hate, but we act from humanity. For Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties (PPOSBC), that means showing up, no matter what. At PPOSBC, we are exploring every possible budgetary solution to ensure that the more than 130,000 patients who rely on us for care each year can continue to access the medical services they need. Like any health care provider in this country that accepts Medicaid, we receive federal funding as reimbursement for the care we provide. Now we are being forced to make some tough decisions as a result of this targeted and unjust attack on the patients we serve. However, we refuse to let cancers go undetected or let STIs go untreated. We refuse to stand idly by while patients are blocked from accessing birth control, vasectomies, comprehensive sexual health education, and more basic and legally protected healthcare services. Even as the Trump administration tries to block people from accessing the health care they need, it cannot deter us from our mission. Our patients and communities are relying on us, and we will continue to show up for them with strength, courage, and dignity. Our compassion will always exceed their cruelty. This fight is not over, but we have difficult days ahead of us. If you're angry, heartbroken, believe in health care access for all, or have ever been to a Planned Parenthood for care, please channel that energy into action. We need everyone in our community to stand with us and help us fight back, because we will not stop fighting for our patients. With your support, we're not going anywhere, and neither is our care. Krista Hollinger is the President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Previously, she held leadership positions at UCI Health and St. Jude Heritage Health Care. She is a resident of Anaheim.

Justice Department requests lists of all non-citizen inmates being held in California jails
Justice Department requests lists of all non-citizen inmates being held in California jails

Los Angeles Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Justice Department requests lists of all non-citizen inmates being held in California jails

The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday asked California counties to provide it with lists of all inmates in their jails who are not American citizens, as well as the crimes they have been accused or convicted of and their scheduled release dates. The Justice Department said in a statement that its 'data requests' to the counties — including Los Angeles and San Francisco counties — were 'designed to assist federal immigration authorities in prioritizing the removal of illegal aliens who committed crimes after illegally entering the United States.' The requests add another layer to the Trump administration's already roiling turf war with California over immigration policy and state and local sanctuary laws. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been swarming the region making thousands of arrests as part of President Trump's call for mass deportations, and the Justice Department is already suing the city of Los Angeles over its sanctuary policy. State officials have long defended California's sanctuary policies, which generally forbid local authorities from enforcing civil immigration laws but provide for exceptions in cases involving criminal offenses. They have also criticized the administration and ICE agents for their recent arrest tactics in Southern California, including by citing figures that show that a majority of those arrested had no criminal convictions. What immediate impact the demands would have — and whether they would spark a legal challenge from the state or counties — was not immediately clear. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department recently resumed transferring some jail inmates to ICE for the first time in years, citing criminal exceptions to state and local sanctuary laws. A spokesperson for L.A. County referred questions about the request to the Sheriff's Department. Asked about the request during a Civilian Oversight Commission meeting Thursday morning, L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna said information about all county inmates is already publicly available on the department's website. 'The minute you get booked, processed and you get Livescanned, that's a national system, so agents of the federal government will know you're in custody,' he said. 'So it's not that we're notifying them, it's an automatic notification based on your fingerprints.' The Justice Department said that it hoped the counties would voluntarily comply with its requests. But if they do not, it said, it would 'pursue all available means of obtaining the data, including through subpoenas or other compulsory process.' It said that while 'every illegal alien by definition violates federal law, those who go on to commit crimes after doing so show that they pose a heightened risk to our Nation's safety and security.' Not every non-citizen in the U.S. is in the country illegally, given that there are non-citizen permanent residents and other visa holders. However, as part of its immigration crackdown, the Trump administration has given heightened scrutiny to people in those categories, as well. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi, in her own statement about the requests, said that removing 'criminal illegal aliens' from the county was the administration's 'highest priority.' 'I look forward to cooperating with California's county sheriffs to accomplish our shared duty of keeping Californians and all Americans safe and secure,' Bondi said. In May, Luna's department transferred inmates from its jails to ICE for the first time since early 2020. Between May and June, the department handed 20 inmates over to the federal agency. At Thursday's oversight meeting, Luna said the department received 995 civil detainer requests from ICE in 2024, and that it did not comply with any of them, which it is not legally required to do. But he said that the department had to turn over the 20 inmates because it received federal judicial warrants from federal authorities for each of them. He said he expected such warrants to increase, which would increase the number of inmates turned over. 'Those are legal documents signed by a judge. We cannot deny those,' he said. Max Huntsman, the county's inspector general, and other experts have said the sheriff's department is required by federal and state law to comply with the warrants, and the process is legal under state and local sanctuary policies. Times staff writers Rebecca Ellis and Rachel Uranga contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store