
Violence is coming to define American political life
Nobody, apparently, had considered the lyrics: 'Some folks are born, made to wave the flag, they're red, white and blue, and when the band plays Hail to the Chief, they point the cannon at you.' If this was some kind of surreptitious protest by the musicians, I salute them, but given the time and the place, sheer obliviousness is a better explanation. The crowd, pretty thin, did their best imitation of a cheer.
The US clearly does not know how to do an authoritarian military parade. To be fair, they are just getting started. Authoritarian military parades are supposed to project invincible strength. They are supposed to make your own people impressed with the inhuman discipline of your troops, and to strike fear into your enemies at the capacity of your organization. In Trump's parade, the soldiers resembled children forced to participate in a half-assed school play, trying to figure out how to avoid embarrassment as far as possible, and the military itself looked better suited to running a Kid Rock tour than a country's defence.
But do not confuse Trump's debased parade with a joke or an innocent piece of entertainment. The Trump parade took place in the immediate aftermath of the assassination of Melissa Hortman, a Minnesota state representative. While it was under way, security forces were firing teargas on protesters in Los Angeles.
Violence is coming to define American political life – spectacular violence including the parade and real violence like the assassination of Hortman. Political destabilization is arriving far too quickly to be perceived in its entirety. So much is happening so fast that it's impossible to keep track of the decline. Increasingly, the question is becoming: when are we going to start calling this what it is?
When I published my book The Next Civil War in 2022, the US was very far from the threshold of what the experts at the Peace Research Institute Oslo defined as civil war, which is 1,000 combatant deaths a year. They defined civil conflict as a 1,000 combatant deaths a year, so the US already fit comfortably in that category. But the definitions of war and conflict never applied perfectly to the American reality, because it is so much bigger and so much more geographically diverse than other countries. As we start to see violence overtaking American political life, the transition is more like a sunset than a light switch. Every day violence becomes more and more settled as the means of US politics.
The parade, and the 'No Kings' counter-protests, were both distractions from the fact that American political life is moving away from discourse altogether. Don't like what the senators of the other party are saying? Handcuff them. Don't like protestors? Send in the marines. Don't like the makeup of the House of Representatives in Minnesota? Kill the top Democrat. The political purpose of the parade, from Trump's point of view, was to demonstrate his mastery of the means of violence. He needed to show, to the military and to the American people both, that he can make the army do what he tells it, and established traditions and the rule of law will not alter his will.
But the primary effect of the parade was to demonstrate an immense weakness, in Trump and in the American people. It was a parade reminiscent of the most vacuous regimes in history. In 1977, Jean-Bédel Bokassa, the leader of the Central African Republic, declared himself emperor and indulged in a coronation that imitated the coronation of Napoleon I in immaculate detail. He even went so far as to use eight white Norman horses to pull the carriage, but the French horses were not used to the climate and several died. Trump's parade felt like a lazier version of that.
The spectre of defeat hovered over the entire celebration of supposed strength. The last time the US military threw a parade was 1991, which was the last time they triumphed over an opponent, the last time their war machine produced the results they had been attempting. The US has not won a war since then. But hey, if you can't win a war, at least you can throw a parade.
Except they couldn't even throw a parade! The end of the show was almost too perfect. A frail Lee Greenwood, a country singer long past his 'best before' date, sang God Bless America raggedly, lousily. 'Our flag still stands for freedom,' he sang. 'They can't take that away.' O can't they? Trump at the center fidgeted like a rich kid bored with his servants and toys. The whole business was like watching some sordid fairy tale: the unloved boy who everybody hated grew up to force the American people to throw him a birthday party and give him a flag. And then almost nobody came.
What's true of men is also true of countries: the more they need to show off how strong they are, the weaker they are. The weakness, rather than the strength, is terrifying. Whoever is so scared and so needy as to need that parade is capable of anything. That goes for Trump, and that goes for his country.
Stephen Marche is the author of The Next Civil War
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tesla sales hit three-year low as Musk feuds with Trump
Sales at Elon Musk's Tesla have fallen to a three-year low amid the billionaire's public spat with Donald Trump. The electric carmaker said customer deliveries fell by 13.5pc in the second quarter of the year, a period in which Mr Musk left his role in the White House and publicly fell out with the US president over his tax and spending bill. Sales were 384,122 between April and June, down from 443,956 compared to the same quarter a year ago. It is the second straight double-digit drop in quarterly deliveries for Tesla, meaning sales for the year so far are at their lowest since 2022. The figures put Tesla on track for a second successive year of declining sales. Falling demand in recent months has been blamed partially on a political backlash against Mr Musk over his support for Mr Trump. However, growing competition from low-cost Chinese manufacturers has also threatened Tesla's grip on the electric vehicle (EV) market, with Shenzhen-based BYD overtaking Tesla in sales across Britain and Europe in recent months. Driverless taxis Meanwhile, Mr Musk has also increasingly focused on Tesla's efforts on his Robotaxi project. The company last week started offering driverless taxi rides in Texas, and Mr Musk has said Tesla will begin production of a Cybercab next year. The decline in Tesla's sales led to heightened scrutiny of Mr Musk's work at the White House, where he sat in on cabinet meetings and spearheaded the department of government efficiency (Doge). This prompted some Tesla investors to raise concerns that Mr Musk was not focused enough on running the company. In April, Tesla revealed that quarterly sales had fallen by 13pc – its biggest drop since 2012. Investors had hoped that an upgrade to its best-selling Model Y would revive sales, but the drop in the second quarter was almost as severe. 'Disgusting abomination' Tensions between Mr Musk and Mr Trump exploded in the last month, shortly after the South African-born businessman stepped down from the White House. The Tesla boss, who described Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination', previously claimed the president should be impeached. Mr Trump hit back by threatening to cancel federal contracts for Mr Musk's rocket company, SpaceX. The two briefly held a truce, but the row was reignited this week when Mr Musk threatened to start a new political party and Mr Trump suggested he could deport him. Mr Musk has publicly criticised Mr Trump's bill for adding to the ballooning US deficit, but the legislation also cuts incentives for electric cars and renewable energy, which have boosted Tesla sales. The company's shares fell by 5pc on Tuesday amid the widening rift between the pair, although they rose on Wednesday because the sales drop was less severe than some analysts had feared. Mr Musk has predicted that Tesla will have millions of robotaxis in operation this year.


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump blasts 'ridiculous' holdout Republicans as clock ticks on July 4 deadline for Big Beautiful Bill
President Donald Trump was left infuriated as the day began on Thursday and five Republican congressmen refused to advance his One Big Beautiful Bill. The massive spending bill narrowly passed the Senate on Tuesday, and House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson worked throughout the night on Wednesday to convert members of his party who opposed the measure. His goal was to get the landmark legislation passed and on Trump's desk before the Independence Day holiday on Friday. But five Republicans have held up the measure to simply advance the bill. They include Rep. Andrew Clyde, of Georgia; Rep. Victoria Spartz, of Indiana; Rep. Keith Self, of Texas; Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, of Pennsylvania; and Rep. Thomas Massie, of Kentucky. As the bill remained stalled, President Trump took to his Truth Social page to hit out at the 'ridiculous' holdouts. He declared that 'THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE' for Republicans. In another post he asked what the five Republicans who voted against advancing the bill were 'waiting for' and what they were 'trying to prove.' In another post he asked what the five Republicans who voted against advancing the bill were 'waiting for' and what they were 'trying to prove' 'MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' he warned the holdouts as he touted the provisions of his massive spending bill. He claimed it would bring the 'largest tax cuts in history and a booming economy' and that the alternative is the 'biggest tax increase in history and a failed economy.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also hit out at the Republicans who voted 'no' on advancing the Big Beautiful Bill. 'Anyone who votes AGAINST the One Big Beautiful Bill is voting AGAINST: No Tax on Tips No Tax on Overtime No Tax on Social Security,' she wrote on social media. But the Republicans who voted against the measure have disagreed, with members of the House Freedom Caucus expressing concerns about the bill's increased spending levels, provisions allowing government benefits for some illegal immigrants and funding for Biden-era renewable energy policies. They seemed to have been bolstered by Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who signaled he would stand by their efforts 'to add 'real savings' to Big Not So Beautiful Bill.' He also wrote on social media that he assured his colleagues in the House 'that I can vote to allow a larger increase in debt ceiling if House attaches immediate REAL spending cuts.' Trump had tried to smooth the matter over with some House Republicans ahead of the vote on Wednesday, hosting groups of lawmakers at the White House so that he could convince them to support his policy package. The president specifically met with some moderate Republicans and some far-right conservatives and was able to get some to commit to backing his bill. With that in mind, Trump seemed hopeful about the bill advancing. He wrote on his Truth Social page Wednesday that he 'had GREAT conversations all day, and the Republican House Majority is UNITED, for the Good of our Country, delivering the Biggest Tax Cuts in History and MASSIVE Growth. 'Let's go Republicans, and everyone else - MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,' the president wrote at the time. But Trump and House Speaker Johnson's efforts apparently hit a snag when the House Freedom Caucus began circulating a three-page memo highlighting their gripes with the Senate version of the bill. In effect, the memo was a laundry list of complaints about how the Senate watered down the House's more conservative bill.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now Donald Trump turns to alligators to terrorise migrants
'[If] people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide,' said Uthmeier, probably hoping to slither his way to Donald Trump's notice. Trump did notice: earlier this week he jeered that people would have to 'know how to run away from an alligator' to escape it. The Dade-Collier Airstrip isn't so very far from Palm Beach and Mar a Lago, home to Trump and the wealthy elites. Welcome to Florida's version of the Hunger Games. Read more The demise of empathy on one side of US politics is stark and shocking. Undocumented migrants who have lived and worked in the United States for decades – childcare providers, waiting staff, tradespeople, small business owners – supporting the voracious US economy and paying taxes, are going into hiding in fear of deportation raids; in fear of places like Alligator Alcatraz. People who have committed no crime don't go into hiding from the government in healthy democracies. Last month, Donald Trump enacted the next part of the authoritarian playbook by ordering the National Guard into California to crush street demonstrations against his deportations. It was hardly a surprise: he has spoken of dissenters as 'the enemy from within'. Trump's callousness appears to be exactly what a lot of voters love about him. His wall on the southern border, and a much tougher stance against migrants, were key 2016 election pledges. The wall was an expensive failure but potent as a symbol of hostility towards the 'other'. That first presidency resulted in thousands of children of migrants being separated from their families and caged, sometimes with inadequate food, cleaning facilities or care, an image of American disgrace. Children cared for lone toddlers. After a torrent of criticism, the policy was supposedly ended, but last year, six years on, Human Rights Watch reported that more than 1,300 children had still to be reunited with their families. The word 'cruel' isn't working hard here. This is the dictionary definition. It is not just a MAGA phenomenon. There are no borders around ideas and we have seen cruel behaviour playing out here in the UK too. Riot police hold back protesters after disorder broke out on July 30, 2024 in Southport, England (Image: Chris Furlong) Last summer's riots in several English towns, and the vicious attacks on hotels housing asylum seekers, should rid us of any complacency on that score. Last month, an outbreak of violent rioting in Northern Ireland resulted in racially-motivated attacks. A man, woman and their four young children had to escape after their home was targeted in a fire attack. Often unrest is whipped up, sometimes by politicians, sometimes by social media. Social media has provided platform, validation and community for the hate-mongerers. Feel furious about women? Transgender people? Ethnic minorities? There's a place for you in cyberspace. There have always been instances of callous politics here in the UK – remember Theresa May's 'Go Home' vans in 2013 – but the shameless divisiveness really took hold under Boris Johnson. His political rise was fuelled by it and he seemed often to glory in it. It was Boris Johnson who appointed Priti Patel as Home Secretary, the originator of a scheme to turn precarious, overcrowded migrant boats back in the middle of the English Channel, putting lives in very real danger (it was never enacted after Patel seemed finally to accept it was plain illegal). Migrant boats accounted for a tiny proportion of immigrants (three per cent), with ever-rising net migration numbers down to the issuing of visas by the Conservatives themselves, but it was a classic example of scapegoating by a government that was failing on most metrics. The worry is that the more politicians promote inhumane policies, the less shocked we are by them and the more they are tempted to ramp them up further. Suella Braverman shamelessly cranked up the hysteria around those migrant boats, describing them as an 'invasion' and suggesting the answer was to deport all migrants to Rwanda – at enormous expense – a country that the UK's own parliament had declared unsafe. Labour thankfully put paid to that. None of this, by the way, is to suggest that having concerns about immigration is in any way inhumane. Read more The issue is the demonisation of migrants themselves and the promotion of ruthless policy responses. Addressing immigration levels is something politicians must do; characterising migrants and immigrants as the root cause of the deep, broad and thorny social and economic problems facing countries like the US and UK is grotesquely dishonest. We can debate where this is all coming from, but the worrying question is where is it taking us? Down a dangerous path – that much is clear. Cruelty begets cruelty. All this is taking place against a backdrop of a self-confidence crisis among moderate political figures, particularly in the US. They must find their voice, extending empathy to those, like some disillusioned white men, who feel blamed for society's ills and frozen out of the compassion matrix, but at the same time standing absolutely firm against a narrative in which small groups are blamed and demonised. 'Don't run in a straight line, run like this...' Trump said to reporters, zig-zagging his hand, demonstrating how to escape alligators. 'And, you know what? Your chances go up about one per cent.' Mirthless jokes about vulnerable othered minorities trying to escape man-eating animals. This is what happens when empathy dies. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ