Madras HC reverses discharge of T.N. Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam from two disproportionate assets cases
Justice P. Velmurugan allowed the criminal revision petitions filed by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) in 2013 and 2016 and directed a special court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases in Cuddalore to conduct a full-fledged trial in both cases.
The judge ordered the special court to frame charges against the accused and complete the trial within six months by conducting day-to-day proceedings, noting that the cases had been pending for decades and had not progressed due to the discharge orders.
The Minister's son P. Kathiravan was also an accused in the case pertaining to the check period between 2006 and 2011, and he too had been discharged from the case by the special court in 2016. Justice Velmurugan set aside his discharge order as well, and directed him to face trial.
Mr. Panneerselvam had served as Minister for Health during the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) regime between April 2006 and March 2011, when he had been accused of amassing wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income in his name as well as those of his wife and son.
The DVAC had filed a chargesheet against the trio under Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the PCA of 1988. It had also relied upon 60 witness and 111 documentary evidence to prove the case. However, on February 3, 2016, the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Cuddalore discharged all three accused.
Aggrieved over this, the investigating agency had filed the present revision petition after the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) assumed power in the State in 2016.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
IAS officer gets fresh interim protection from arrest
Cuttack: Senior IAS officer Bishnupada Sethi has once again been granted interim protection by Orissa high court against possible arrest in connection with a CBI investigation into alleged corruption. Sethi had earlier been granted interim protection on Feb 25 when he had filed a writ petition seeking to quash the CBI probe. The interim relief was extended from time to time and was in force till the petition was dismissed on June 20. Sethi had filed an anticipatory bail plea the same day. After a preliminary hearing on Thursday, Justice V Narasingh posted the matter to July 8 for further consideration and granted Sethi interim protection against arrest till then. Justice Narasingh also sought a report on the investigation status from the CBI. Sethi's name had cropped up during investigation into the arrest of the general manager of a PSU last Dec for allegedly accepting Rs 10 lakh bribe from a Bhubaneswar-based real estate firm. This prompted a CBI search at Sethi's residence on Feb 18.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC grants bail to accused in TTD ghee adulteration case
Vijayawada: The high court on Thursday granted bail to the directors of Bolebaba Dairy and the CEO of Vaishnavi Dairy in the case filed over alleged adulteration of ghee supplied to Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD). The directors of Bolebaba Dairy, Pomil Jain and Vipin Jain, were arraigned as A-3 and A-4 respectively by the CBI-led special investigation team. The CEO of Vaishnavi Dairy, Apurva Vinaykant Chavda, was named as A-5 in the case. All three accused moved the high court seeking regular bail on the grounds that the SIT had already filed a charge-sheet in the case and they have been in jail for many days. The CBI, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the grant of bail, stating that there was every possibility that the accused would tamper with evidence and influence witnesses. The CBI also submitted details of cases registered pursuant to the threatening of one of the witnesses by the alleged henchmen of Jain brothers. After a lengthy hearing involving arguments from both sides, the high court earlier reserved its orders. On Thursday, Justice K Srinivas Reddy granted bail to all three accused. The standing counsel for CBI, PSP Suresh Kumar, appealed to the bench to impose conditions in view of their antecedents. Considering his request, Justice Reddy directed the petitioners to cooperate with the investigation and be available for questioning whenever required.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Madras HC dismisses Xiaomi's petition against ED proceedings in FEMA violation case
Chennai: The Madras High Court has dismissed the petitions filed by Xiaomi Technology India Pvt Ltd and its Chief Financial Officer Sameer B.S. Rao, seeking to quash the proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with alleged violations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) involving royalty payments of Rs 5,551 crore. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, delivering the verdict recently, held that the court would not interfere at the "formation of opinion" stage of proceedings under FEMA adjudication rules, as it was only a preliminary step and not a final determination of liability. Xiaomi India is engaged in the procurement, distribution, and sale of Xiaomi-branded products across India. In this context, the company entered into royalty agreements with Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Technologies Inc. (both US-based entities), and Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd, a group company based in China. According to the ED, Xiaomi remitted Rs 5,551 crore between 2016 and 2022 to these foreign entities as royalty payments, allegedly without obtaining prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) -- a requirement under FEMA for certain types of foreign remittances, especially where third-party transactions are involved. Following its investigation, the ED filed a complaint, and a show-cause notice was issued by the Adjudicating Authority under FEMA, which Xiaomi challenged before the High Court in April 2024. Appearing for Xiaomi, senior advocate K.G. Raghavan contended that the royalty payments were legitimate current account transactions and therefore did not require the RBI's prior approval. He argued that the ED's initiation of adjudication proceedings was unwarranted. However, Additional Solicitor General L. Sundaresan, representing the ED, submitted that the writ petition was premature, as the adjudication process was still at the stage of forming an opinion. He argued that this stage only requires prima facie material suggesting a contravention of FEMA provisions, and need not be based on conclusive findings. Sundaresan also cited a communication from Qualcomm, wherein Xiaomi was referred to as a 'third party' remitting payments on behalf of foreign group entities -- an act which, according to the ED, constitutes a violation under the FEMA. Accepting the ED's submissions, the High Court held that interference at this stage was unwarranted and permitted the adjudication proceedings to continue. Consequently, Xiaomi's plea challenging the show-cause notice and the formation of opinion was dismissed. "In the considered view of this Court, the case has now reached the stage under Rule 4(4) of the FEMA Rules, which is the stage of defence and therefore, the petitioners will be entitled to all the documents sought by them, including the non-RUDs," the court said in its judgement delivered on June 26.
