CDL sets new benchmark for EC land with S$782 psf ppr bid for Woodlands plot
Both plots drew firm interest from five bidders, with CDL's bids also setting new benchmarks for EC land.
A Woodlands Drive 17 parcel for 420 units saw a top bid of S$360.9 million or S$782 per square foot per plot ratio, slightly over the previous high set by Sim Lian's S$768 psf ppr bid for a Tampines EC tendered in October 2024.
The other EC parcel tendered, a plot in Senja Close in Bukit Panjang that can yield 295 units, was also topped by CDL at S$252.9 million or S$771 psf ppr.
Three out of five bids for the Woodlands plot came in above the previous high.
CDL's bid for the Woodlands site was a mere S$1 psf ppr (0.2 per cent) higher than the second-highest of S$360.3 million (S$781 psf ppr) placed by a partnership between Sim Lian Land and Sim Lian Development. The next highest offer of S$355.2 million, or S$770 psf ppr, came from Intrepid Investments and TID Residential.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
This was followed by a tie-up between Hoi Hup Realty and Sunway Developments, with a bid of S$352 million, or S$763 psf ppr. Coming in last was EL Development, which placed a bid of S$328.1 million or S$711 psf ppr.
Bids were at the higher end of analysts' expectations of S$700 to S$770 psf ppr.
Consultants predicted firm demand for the 25,207 square metre (sq m) site, and had anticipated four to eight bids, given the pent-up demand for new ECs in the area.
Located next to Singapore Sports School, the land parcel has a maximum gross floor area (GFA) of 42,853 sq m and is expected to yield some 420 new units.
The last EC parcel awarded in the Woodlands area was in 2015 to Hao Yuan Investment for S$103.8 million or S$278 psf ppr. The project, Northwave EC, was launched for sale in 2016 and has a median new sale price of S$779 psf.
For the Senja Close site, CDL also beat four other bidders with its offer of S$252.9 million or S$771 psf ppr from CDL. This was followed by TID Residential, with a bid of S$238 million or S$725 psf ppr.
Oriental Pacific Development came third with a bid of S$234.9 million or S$716 psf ppr. Next was was Wee Hur Development at S$231.4 million or S$705 psf ppr. The lowest bid was by a tie-up between ABR Holdings, RP Ventures and LWH Holdings, with a bid of S$230.9 million or S$704 psf ppr.
Consultants had expected the Senja Close site to draw two to six bids, with land rates ranging from S$600 to S$750 psf ppr.
Located along the Kranji Expressway, the site has a maximum GFA of 30,478 sq m, of which at least 500 sq m will be for an early childhood development centre that can in up to 100 children.
The last EC parcel awarded in the Bukit Panjang area was in 2010 to Grand Isle Holdings, a CDL unit, for S$182 million or S$271 psf ppr. The project, Blossom Residences, was launched for sale later in 2011, and has a median new sale price of S$704 psf, according to caveats lodged.
Prices of EC projects have trended upwards over the last few years, held up by limited supply and strong demand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
SG60: Property valuation amid growing real estate sophistication
THE SG60 Singapore real estate market is a mature one, marked by a large number of buyers and sellers, landlords and tenants, financiers, lawyers, appraisers and brokers; considerable data transparency; and a breadth of options across all real estate types. Reflecting growing sophistication, public housing now includes standard, plus and prime, and the public-private hybrid executive condo. Similarly, private housing covers apartments and condominiums, landed terrace, semi-detached, detached, bungalows and the hybrid strata landed. New asset types emerge from time to time: real estate investment trusts (Reits) where real estate and financial markets intersect, fractionalised real estate using cryptocurrency, data centres to support the new economy, high-specification buildings for biotech companies, student housing, foreign workers dormitories, co-living, co-working spaces, and so on. Against such a backdrop, valuing this array of real estate assets becomes increasingly complex. Property valuations underpin many household and commercial transactions, such as how much banks lend money for a house purchase and the extent to which CPF Ordinary Account balances can be used. They are the basis for gauging a chunk of a company's net asset value (NAV). Valuations also act as a 'check' against overpaying for corporate real estate acquisitions. For example, a Reit buying an asset often uses the formal valuation of the asset as the benchmark to determine the acquisition price and secure shareholder approval. Likewise, a valuation provides a guide to the 'right' price for the disposal of an asset in the books. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up 'Open source' policy Singapore has an 'open source' policy when it comes to property transactions. There is a free public database of prices from public agencies such as the Housing and Development Board (HDB) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). For the past three years from 2022 to 2024, the total volume of both HDB and private homes sold averaged well over 40,000 units per annum. It is not difficult to interpolate or extrapolate from this rich data set to gauge what a typical property might be worth. Portals such as Edge or SRX also offer free property 'valuations' driven by artificial intelligence (AI). But these 'lay' approaches to valuation typically work well with what are often called 'conventional' properties – HDB resale flats, apartments and condominiums – where the drivers of value are generally well understood, the market is sizeable and data is plentiful. But, there are a host of properties that characterise the SG60 real estate market that will not be easily analysed in the same way. Take a simple example: The value of strata shops in a mall is a function of its micro location (what level is it on, and what direction does it face?), its neighbours (is it near a popular supermarket?), its size (there is such a thing as a discount for large units), and its shape (regular shaped shop units are easier to fit out with little wastage). For such a property, there are generally fewer comparable transactions. Whatever data exists will not easily yield insights into its 'correct' value because of the varied factors that can influence how market participants perceive their worth. The more specialised the property – think a cement plant in Jurong, your neighbourhood petrol station or the Singapore Flyer – the more difficult the valuation assignment. Enter the property valuer. Laymen can claim to be 'experts', especially in residential property valuation – since most of us own or live in one and will inevitably hold an opinion on its value. But, the property valuer is licensed by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) and undergoes formal tertiary training comprising a three or four-year university course in real estate or its equivalent. Such a course typically covers four pillars of foundational real estate knowledge – law, building technology, urban planning and economics – that collectively underpin the theory and practice of valuation. Beyond academics, the aspiring valuer must be a member of the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV), the sole body representing valuation professionals with a history spanning 40 years, before being eligible for licensing. SISV members are subject to the institute's regulations and disciplinary protocols to act professionally and ethically, in accordance with its practice standards. Because the value of a property is often the subject of ubiquitous coffee-shop talk, the true importance and complexity of valuation is often underappreciated, more so in the context of the growing sophistication of the SG60 property market. Here are some examples. In October 2024, a 60-year leasehold site tender at Media Circle in one-north was not awarded because the sole bid of S$461 per square foot per gross floor area (psf GFA), by a Frasers-led consortium, was deemed too low. Media reports had indicated that analysts preliminarily assessed the land at between S$650 and S$1,100 psf GFA. The gap is significant but, arguably, a big part of the divergence can be explained by the zoning of this parcel for long-stay service apartments (or 'SA2' in URA's parlance), a 'pilot housing typology for occupants seeking long-term rental accommodation' of three months or more. Strata subdivision for individual unit sale – which would enable the developer to get his money back earlier – is also not permitted. The valuation challenge in this case is the novel nature of this typology that currently has no direct benchmarks to go by, and that requires perhaps a different operating model compared to conventional service apartments and hotels. Such cases can only be properly analysed by experienced professional valuers, although the level of the final bid vests solely in the developer who, for whatever reason, may prefer to bid at a premium or discount to the value arrived at by the valuer. It is commonly asserted that valuers interpret the market and do not make the market. In other words, they are price takers, and not price setters. Underlying this assertion is the premise that markets are generally efficient, and that buyers and sellers, taken as a collective, behave rationally. So, if there is a large body of bona fide transactions supporting, say, property prices at a particular level, the valuer's role is to 'let the market speak'. Take another example. Commercial properties are being transacted at a gross rental yield of 3 per cent (that is, gross rent as a percentage of value) – which may just about cover interest cost, including spreads, and, therefore, appear low, considering the risks that accompany real estate investment. Why then do market participants accept this level of yield? They are certainly not uninformed or ignorant. There could be various reasons, including the 'Singapore premium' arising from all the oft-cited strengths of Singapore's economy, the robust local currency, the history of upward trending prices over the long term, and so on. Whatever the reasons, that 3 per cent yield is widely believed to be the appropriate 'market' rate and sets the benchmark for how similar properties ought to be valued. But to be defensible, valuations need to be grounded on 'comparables', which are past transactions of similar properties. This process often gives rise to the divergence between what is known as the 'private' market and 'public' market. This is perhaps best illustrated by the hefty discount that asset-heavy listed property companies are trading as a percentage of the company's NAV. The property company's NAV itself is often assessed by the valuation of that company's real estate. The idea is that if the NAV is, say, $1 billion, then the market capitalisation of that company should not deviate sharply from the NAV. This is because rather than trading in the company's shares at undervalued prices, shareholders can be better served by winding up the company, selling off the assets (at or close to valuation) and distributing the net sales proceeds – that is, effectively the NAV – to them. In practice, private and public markets sometimes diverge quite significantly, again for a host of reasons, such as management's (in)ability to grow the business, shareholder fights, high debt levels which may raise the risk of default, and a lack of liquidity. But one main reason is that NAV is anchored historically, that is, valuation is based on past transactions, and is typically done once or twice a year for financial reporting purposes, and therefore tend to adjust much more slowly. By contrast, stock prices are forward-looking and public markets are generally far more efficient, rapidly reacting (or some might say, overreacting) to market 'noise'. Valuation extends not just to capital values or prices, but also to rentals. There's been some public discussion of high rentals for clinics and beloved food and beverage stores. These rentals have been blamed for retail closures and driving costs higher for ordinary people. One executive from a very large landlord has responded recently with a very thoughtful LinkedIn piece on why such perceptions may not do justice to the reality on the ground. For public rental tenders, the routine use of price-quality (PQ) criteria in tender evaluation helps to mitigate the effects of pure price competition. To bring in a valuation perspective to this matter, in the case of clinics, a single high rental bid does not represent the market as a whole. These 'outliers' do occur from time to time and could represent a wide range of possibilities: temporary exuberance, some commercial advantage accruing to the winning bid not recognised by the rest of the market, enormous competitive pressures, and so on. A valuer asked to appraise such properties would arrive at values which are more aligned with the general market, rather than figures which deviate hugely from investor expectations. Of course, for parties transacting a deal, the valuation of the property – be it for sale or purchase, taxation, or an initial public offering – is best seen as a guide rather than the correct 'answer' to how much the property is worth. Breathtaking technological advances in large language models raise the question if valuers will be collateral damage from the all-conquering AI wave. Even complexity cannot be a bulwark against the AI tsunami. Deep implications But for now, the licensed property valuer's training, nous, and judgement set him apart. Just as important, his affiliation with SISV – with its standards of professional practice and ethical conduct – enables him to extend his role beyond the layman's approach of interpolating or extrapolating publicly available data on property prices. He applies his knowledge and experience to a wide variety of situations – increasingly novel and challenging – that have implications on marital choices, childbearing, household wealth, business decisions and public policy options. The writer is first vice-president, valuation & general practice division, Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
SG60: Reading between the lines of the Draft Master Plan 2025
SINGAPORE'S urban and economic planning has long been pragmatic, but the Draft Master Plan 2025 signals something new: boldness. In response to shifting global and domestic fundamentals, the plan reframes land use through emerging tools such as polycentric gateway corridors, and a more agile, layered approach to decentralisation. This isn't a wholesale reinvention, but a quiet recalibration, adapting Singapore's planning ethos to meet an era of slower growth, more complex trade-offs, and heightened geopolitical uncertainty. Decentralisation under pressure The once-ambitious model of decentralising offices beyond the Central Business District (CBD) is slowing. As companies right-size and consolidate their operations, many are returning to the city core, drawn by cost-efficiency, branding visibility, and a concentration of talent and services. The traditional rental premium once commanded by the CBD has eroded, narrowing the cost differential and weakening the incentive to decentralise – unless firms are tightly woven into local supply chains or talent pools. This trend is not entirely new, but Covid-19 accelerated it. Hybrid work has reduced the average office footprint per firm. Large tenants are less willing to anchor fringe locations unless there are compelling ecosystem advantages. Meanwhile, commercial confidence has been tempered by global uncertainty, from US-China tensions to regional trade realignments. In this context, even flagship decentralisation projects are evolving. Jurong Lake District, once envisioned as a major commercial node, saw the planned commercial quantum of the white site on the reserve list reduced by 30 per cent. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up While the long-term vision remains, near-term market sentiment is clearly influencing land release strategies. The return – and repositioning – of industrial land Beyond the commercial office market, Singapore's industrial landscape is entering a new chapter. Since 2022, roughly 36 hectares of industrial land have been returned to the state annually, a scale not seen since the 2015-2017 wave that preceded the last Master Plan. Then, as now, this land return reflects deeper structural shifts. Manufacturing is becoming less land-hungry. As companies digitalise and relocate lower-value operations to neighbouring countries, plots once allocated for logistics, clean tech or light manufacturing are being reassessed. The Draft Master Plan 2025 aims to stay ahead of this curve. While there are no radical rezoning moves in the downtown, the government is signalling flexibility. Incentives such as the CBD Incentive Scheme and the Strategic Development Incentive Scheme make it easier for older office buildings to be converted into mixed-use formats, shrinking pure office space while boosting residential and lifestyle offerings. The shift is also evident in the Government Land Sales (GLS) programme. There are no new confirmed downtown office sites, and only three white sites remain on the reserve list. This absence is likely intentional – a quiet nudge for landlords to explore adaptive reuse and a cue to the market that office decentralisation will now take a more tempered, organic form. Bishan returns to the spotlight One of the most intriguing updates is the re-designation of Bishan as a sub-regional centre, a role proposed initially in the 1991 Concept Plan. Back then, the idea was radical: decentralise Singapore's economic core and anchor new business activity in the heartlands. Today, Bishan already boasts strong transport connectivity, public agencies and community infrastructure that serve the broader Toa Payoh-Ang Mo Kio region. Its central location and direct access to Raffles Place via MRT make it an ideal candidate for polycentric growth. Together with Novena, Serangoon, and Toa Payoh, Bishan helps form a north-east arc of business activity – a 'string of pearls' that mirrors the southern belt stretching from Alexandra to one-north. Beyond convenience, this distributed model reflects a future in which live-work-play ecosystems are embedded into the islandwide urban fabric, rather than concentrated in a single hub. Vertical zoning: The next planning frontier Among the more speculative but intriguing concepts to emerge from the 2022 Long-Term Plan Review is the idea of 'vertical zoning'. The notion, layering light industry on the lower floors, offices above that, and residences at the top, was not formally proposed in the Draft Master Plan 2025. Still, it offers a glimpse of how Singapore might evolve its planning logic in response to changing economic and spatial realities. Seen in this light, vertical zoning is a conceptual provocation that asks whether future urban productivity might come not from expanding outwards, but from layering uses in smarter, more synergistic ways. If Singapore is serious about remaining spatially efficient and economically agile, this could be a frontier worth exploring further. While no specific developments have been announced, the pilot in Woodlands, which raises the allowable proportion of non-industrial uses from 40 to 70 per cent, may be an early signal of willingness to experiment. It echoes previous 'Business White' trials, which allowed greater flexibility in land use within designated business zones. If taken seriously, vertical zoning could represent a significant shift away from the traditional horizontal separation of uses that has long defined Singapore's land planning. It reflects a recognition that manufacturing today is cleaner and quieter, and that modern services are increasingly mobile and less reliant on sprawling floor plates. Sustainable and inclusive urban living In line with Singapore's push for environmental sustainability, new housing areas are being explored across the island, with a strong emphasis on reusing existing brownfield sites. Spaces such as Bukit Timah Turf Club, the old Keppel Golf Course, and the soon-to-be-vacated Paya Lebar Airbase are being considered for redevelopment into vibrant residential neighbourhoods. Besides building homes, these plans also aim to create active, socially connected communities, with shared amenities that support everyday life and bring people together. Many of these developments reflect a move towards vertical zoning, where housing is thoughtfully layered with community spaces and lifestyle facilities. A key planning principle is accessibility: Most residents will be within a 10-minute walk of parks, shops, schools, and essential services. As part of the broader 'live-work-play' vision, new opportunities for city and fringe-city living are also being introduced. Areas around Newton MRT station, Paterson Road near Orchard, and Dover-Medway near one-north have been earmarked for mixed-use development that balances inclusivity, sustainability and a strong sense of community. These well-connected neighbourhoods offer a good mix of amenities and entertainment, making them ideal for both families and working professionals. For instance, the idea of a new Village Square at Newton and a vibrant mixed-use hub at Paterson would help bridge luxury housing with the retail and activity of Orchard Road. The Draft Master Plan 2025 also puts greater emphasis on senior-friendly housing, including more assisted-living options and active-ageing centres to support older residents in living independently and meaningfully. Whether you're young or old, working or retired, the evolving urban plan seeks to make neighbourhoods more livable, connected and future-ready for everyone. Softer touch Even as it tackles hard economic questions, the Draft Master Plan 2025 doesn't lose sight of softer, human-scale priorities. Included among the proposals are plans for green connectors, heritage trails, repurposed viaducts, and playful public spaces. These aren't decorative add-ons; they are essential components of a livable, imageable city. Such spaces encourage social connection, promote mental well-being, and help Singapore remain globally competitive as a place to live, not just work. The Draft Master Plan 2025: A vision in transition More than a technical update, the Draft Master Plan 2025 reflects a society in flux, one that is learning from past successes, adapting to a slower-growth environment, and daring to imagine a more resilient, layered future. It is not a call to transform everything, but an invitation to reimagine selectively. To rethink what should be intensified, repurposed, or left open-ended. In that spirit, it strikes a balance: between continuity and change, between pragmatism and vision. The writer is head of research and consultancy, South-east Asia, at JLL
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Hong Leong grows with the nation
GROWING with the nation in the past 60 years, Hong Leong Group is a household name and a home-grown conglomerate with a sprawling global portfolio. Real estate, hospitality, finance and industrials are key sectors where it makes its mark. Amid fast-paced economic transformation, Hong Leong's diversified companies are investing in their Singaporean core, even as they compete on the world stage. 'Much like Singapore, Hong Leong Group stands as a testament to what vision, resilience, and innovation can achieve over time,' Hong Leong Group executive chairman Kwek Leng Beng tells The Business Times, pointing to a legacy and record 'shaped by performance, adaptability, and trust'. Pioneering success The Singapore River has undergone a massive evolution since independence, with shophouses and godowns making room for scores of modern skyscrapers. Crucially, 'the 1970s and 80s saw a frenzy of private sector building construction in the Golden Shoe area', National Library Board publication BiblioAsia has reported. One example that the article cites: Hong Leong Holdings' redevelopment of 28 shophouses in the Raffles Quay area into a new office tower. Today, Hong Leong Building is a landmark in the central business district (CBD), and among the flagship projects in property developer Hong Leong Holdings' commercial stable, while its sister company City Developments Limited (CDL) counts nearby Republic Plaza – one of Singapore's tallest skyscrapers – as a jewel in the crown of its Grade A office portfolio. Listed on the Singapore Exchange, CDL – a pioneering Singapore developer established in 1963 – has grown alongside the nation, shaping the city's skyline with numerous residential, commercial, hotel and retail properties. CDL has been part of the Hong Leong Group since 1972, after the group became its controlling shareholder. Since then, the company has developed more than 53,000 homes and owns around 23 million square feet of gross floor area in residential for lease, commercial and hospitality assets globally. The 280-metre, 66-storey Republic Plaza, which was completed in 1996 and refurbished in 2019, has been honoured by architecture's prestigious FIABCI Prix d'Excellence, and has also racked up accolades for sustainability and eco-friendliness. Republic Plaza. Hong Leong Holdings' 80 Robinson Road and CDL's The Sail @ Marina Bay – launched in 2004 as Singapore's tallest residential project – are some other downtown gems. In fact, 80 Robinson Road is home to a co-working hub set up with the Monetary Authority of Singapore and Singapore Fintech Association to promote collaboration among fintech firms. These edifices are just some of the contributions to the skyline made over the decades by Hong Leong companies, including sister developers Hong Realty and TID Pte Ltd. Founded by the late Kwek Hong Png as a building materials trading company in 1941, the Hong Leong Group still counts the real estate industry as central to its corporate portfolio. Incorporated in 1963, urban solutions provider Hong Leong Asia grew in tandem with Singapore's public housing in the post-independence years. Today, Housing and Development Board (HDB) projects are the mainstay for Hong Leong Asia's pre-cast concrete business, which specialises in the design and manufacture of prefabricated building components. The business counts the 50-storey public housing landmark Pinnacle@Duxton as a signature build. Meanwhile, ready-mix concrete supplier Island Concrete has also been integral to several major public infrastructure works since its formation in 1970. These include Changi Airport Terminal 1 in the 1970s, the first Mass Rapid Transit line in the 1980s, the iconic Marina Bay Sands in 2010, and the Marina Coastal Expressway, which opened in 2013 and is Singapore's first highway to include an undersea road along its route. In fact, Hong Leong Group has provided not just the raw materials for nation building, through Hong Leong Asia, but also the capital needed to get local entrepreneurs off the ground. Hong Leong Finance – founded in 1961 and listed on the Singapore bourse in 1974 – is Singapore's largest finance company. Hong Leong Finance. It serves individuals and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) alike, offering deposits, savings, loans, and advisory services at its 28 branches and 12 SME Centres islandwide. SMEs make up a strategic segment of the clientele for the financial services firm, which is also the only finance company in Singapore with full sponsorship status for the Singapore Exchange's Catalist board. Representing the nation Beyond forging local partnerships, Hong Leong Group has also cast a wide net in international waters. Significant overseas investments include Hong Leong Asia's acquisition of Malaysia's cement producer Tasek Corporation Berhad in the 1970s. The company also entered powertrain solutions manufacturing and distribution in the 1990s with its 48.7 per cent stake in New York-listed China Yuchai International. This powertrain solutions business contributed almost S$3.6 billion in revenue in 2024, or more than four-fifths of Hong Leong Asia's top line. Similarly, Hong Leong Group's private developer arm, Hong Leong Holdings, entered the mainland Chinese market early, launching the Beijing Riviera luxury residential project in 1993. The developer is still active in China, where its joint ventures have built mixed-use developments in major hubs such as Chengdu and Chongqing. CDL's China arm has likewise built a strong portfolio across key Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities, including Shanghai, Suzhou, Chongqing and Shenzhen, since its setup in 2010. CDL has expanded its property development and asset management operations in major overseas markets, like Britain, Japan and Australia, and a sizeable living sector portfolio. Hong Leong Group's international reach also comes on the back of its vibrant hospitality arm, which has helped to fly the Singapore flag in global cities like New York and London. The group's strategic hotel expansion took off in the 1990s, when an earlier CDL hotel unit built on its Asian footprint to begin a string of acquisitions in the West. One watershed transaction was the purchase of the Plaza Hotel in New York for S$455 million. Those deals paved the way for the London listing of Millennium & Copthorne Hotels plc (M&C) in 1996 – which made M&C the first Singapore-controlled company to trade on the London Stock Exchange. 'The listing opened doors to opportunities and built investor confidence. It gave us access to global capital, enhanced governance standards, and strengthened our brand positioning in international markets,' Kwek muses. M&C was privatised into a wholly owned CDL subsidiary in 2019 and its role as a hotel operator and long-term asset owner is 'still selling' the Singapore brand, Kwek notes. Today, CDL operates a stable of global properties under its Millennium Hotels and Resorts (MHR) brand. Kwek has touted MHR's hotel ownership model as a deliberate decision to 'ensure control over the guest experience and protect long-term value'. MHR serves both business and leisure travellers with 145 properties in 80 locations – including London, New York, Paris, Dubai, Beijing, Tokyo, Auckland and, of course, Singapore. The youngest of the group's 12 brands is trendy M Social, which debuted in 2016 to woo a new generation of tech-savvy, design-conscious guests with its smart tech-enabled rooms. M Social Resort Penang. Some MHR hotels are owned by mainboard-listed CDL Hospitality Trusts (CDLHT), a stapled group which comprises the first hotel real estate investment trust on the Singapore Exchange and had about S$3.5 billion in assets under management as at end-March. CDLHT has more than 4,900 hotel rooms worldwide, with its portfolio anchored by strategic locations in gateway cities. A substantial portion of its portfolio value is concentrated in central Singapore, with the upcoming Moxy Singapore Clarke Quay slated to add 475 keys to CDLHT's presence in Singapore. The trust also marked its foray into the living asset class in 2021 and achieved two milestones in 2024 with the opening of its build-to-rent residential project, The Castings in Manchester, and the acquisition of a purpose-built student accommodation building, Benson Yard in Liverpool. The Castings in Manchester. The addition of these longer-stay assets is expected to enhance CDLHT's income resilience and reinforce the benefits of a diversified lodging portfolio. Charting new paths Having been part of the national backbone for six decades, Hong Leong Group continues to make its mark in Singapore and the world. In fact, the group is actively pursuing environmental sustainability goals across the board, with business units working to reduce greenhouse gas and carbon emissions by 2030. For example, CDL has been pioneering green buildings and sustainable development over the past 30 years and has gained global recognition for its leadership in sustainability and climate action. It has consistently been ranked among the Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World by media and research firm Corporate Knights since 2010 and continues to invest in green and innovative building methods. In Singapore, CDL is rejuvenating the skyline with new-generation mixed-use and integrated developments in the Singapore River precinct and CBD. The upcoming CanningHill Piers and CanningHill Square, at the former Liang Court; Newport Plaza, at the former Fuji Xerox Towers; and Union Square, where Central Mall and Central Square used to be, will all transform the cityscape and infuse their neighbourhoods with new energy when completed. Hong Leong Holdings has been moving to finance projects with green loans, starting with the nature-centric private mixed-use residential project in Tengah, while Hong Leong Asia is revolutionising its core industries with lower-carbon and circular economy solutions. MHR and CDLHT hotels have adopted digital practices to streamline the guest experience, and tapping technology also delivers eco-friendly operational efficiency for the business. For instance, MHR is the first hotel company to enter the Metaverse and install voice-enabled technology. It also utilises analytics to optimise energy consumption and resources. MHR and CDLHT have also introduced waste reduction programmes in their properties, including cutting single-use plastics and deploying food waste digestors where possible. On the industrial front, Hong Leong Asia has made significant investments in recent years to transform construction processes. Notably, it developed the HL-Sunway Prefab Hub, a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility that streamlines the production of precast building components. The company also established a fully automated batching plant at the Ready-Mixed Concrete Ecosystem at Jurong Port, enhancing operational efficiency and productivity. HL-Sunway Prefab Hub. Meanwhile, Hong Leong Finance's transformation and digitalisation efforts have enhanced customer experience, operational efficiency and business growth. Its digital platform for vehicle loans saw over 300 per cent increase in new electric vehicle (EV) loans to S$314 million in 2024 – up from S$73 million in the year before – as Singapore guns for EV adoption. The HLF Digital App also enables customers to manage a range of services including fund transfers and placing of fixed deposits. Across all these business divisions, Hong Leong Group continues to strive for excellence. 'In the face of global challenges, market shifts, and even a pandemic, we have remained steadfast,' Kwek tells BT. 'Our true strength lies not only in solid foundations, but in our ability to reinvent, adapt, and lead with purpose.' In the years to come, 'we remain firmly committed to shaping a smarter, greener, and more sustainable Singapore, and building a future worthy of our past', he adds.
