logo
China Issues Warning Over Trump Farmland Ban

China Issues Warning Over Trump Farmland Ban

Miami Herald09-07-2025
China warned the Trump Administration that the move to ban it and other foreign adversaries from purchasing farmland in the U.S. "will only backfire".
"The United States overstretched the concept of national security in restraining other countries' and entities' rights to purchase land," Mao Ning, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, said at a press briefing on Wednesday, July 9.
Mao said the ban, part of the "National Farm Security Action Plan" unveiled by U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on Tuesday, July 8, is "against international trade rules".
"We urge the United States to stop politicizing economic and trade affairs," Mao said.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Related Articles
Donald Trump Threatened Putin and Xi He Would Bomb Moscow, Beijing: AudioChina Reacts to Laser Accusation by US's NATO AllyChinese Man Accused of Hacking and Stealing Covid Research Arrested-FBIVietnam Intercepts China Research Ship Near Coast
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT): A Bull Case Theory
BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT): A Bull Case Theory

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT): A Bull Case Theory

We came across a bullish thesis on BWX Technologies, Inc. on Stock Analysis Compilation's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on BWXT. BWX Technologies, Inc.'s share was trading at $143.37 as of July 23rd. BWXT's trailing and forward P/E were 45.66 and 44.44 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. Copyright: vencavolrab78 / 123RF Stock Photo BWX Technologies holds a uniquely dominant position in the nuclear reactor market, underpinned by its exclusive Nuclear Regulatory Commission Category 1 licensing that allows it to handle, store, and process highly enriched uranium in the U.S. This exclusivity secures BWX's monopoly on nuclear reactors and fuel for U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers, making it an indispensable supplier to the defense sector. The company's portfolio extends beyond defense, offering a differentiated range of heavy nuclear components for commercial markets, further diversifying its growth avenues. Its long-term growth trajectory is strongly supported by a visible build schedule for U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers, providing stable, recurring demand for its highly specialized nuclear technologies. Additional upside comes from Canada's planned investments into refurbishing, expanding, and constructing nuclear power plants, which could significantly expand BWX's addressable market. Moreover, the Trump administration's stated commitment to accelerating U.S. nuclear energy development presents a potential catalyst, positioning BWX to benefit from increased public and private sector investment in nuclear energy infrastructure. Together, these factors reinforce BWX's entrenched competitive advantages, predictable growth, and strategic importance in both defense and commercial nuclear markets. With its unparalleled licensing position, resilient demand base, and multiple structural tailwinds, BWX Technologies represents a compelling long-term investment case with limited competitive threats and considerable upside potential as the global nuclear renaissance gains momentum. Previously, we covered a bullish thesis on AeroVironment, Inc. by Stock Picker's Corner in January 2025, which highlighted rising global demand for UAVs amid heightened geopolitical tensions. The company's stock price has appreciated by approximately 69.43% since our coverage. This is because the thesis played out. The thesis still stands as defense budgets stay elevated. Stock Analysis Compilation shares a similar but emphasizes on BWX Technologies' monopoly-like nuclear defense position. BWX Technologies, Inc. is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 52 hedge fund portfolios held BWXT at the end of the first quarter which was 55 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of BWXT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

Federal judge dismisses Trump administration's lawsuit against Chicago over its sanctuary city policies
Federal judge dismisses Trump administration's lawsuit against Chicago over its sanctuary city policies

NBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Federal judge dismisses Trump administration's lawsuit against Chicago over its sanctuary city policies

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the Trump administration that sought to block the enforcement of several "sanctuary policies" in Illinois that restricted the ability of local officials to aid federal immigration authorities in detainment operations. In a 64-page decision, District Court Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, a Biden appointee, granted a motion by the state of Illinois to dismiss the case after determining the United States lacks standing to sue over the sanctuary policies. The judge noted in the ruling that Illinois' decision to enact the sanctuary laws are protected by the 10th amendment, which declares that any powers not specifically given to the federal government, or denied to the states, by the Constitution, are retained by the states. 'The Sanctuary Policies reflect Defendants' decision to not participate in enforcing civil immigration law—a decision protected by the Tenth Amendment and not preempted by the [Immigration and Nationality Act],' the judge wrote. 'Because the Tenth Amendment protects Defendants' Sanctuary Policies, those Policies cannot be found to discriminate against or regulate the federal government.' The federal judge wrote that granting the administration's request would create an "end-run around the Tenth Amendment." 'It would allow the federal government to commandeer States under the guise of intergovernmental immunity—the exact type of direct regulation of states barred by the Tenth Amendment.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker praised the dismissal, which he said will ensure state law enforcement is "not carrying out the Trump administration's unlawful policies or troubling tactics." "As state law allows, Illinois will assist the federal government when they follow the law and present warrants to hold violent criminals accountable. But what Illinois will not do is participate in the Trump administration's violations of the law and abuses of power," Pritzker said in a statement. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Trump Justice Department sued the state of Illinois and Cook County, the home of Chicago, in February for policies it argued infringed on the ability of federal authorities to enforce immigration laws, the first lawsuit by the administration aimed specifically at targeting "sanctuary jurisdictions," a label applied to states, cities, counties or municipalities that establish laws to prevent or limit local officials from cooperating with federal immigration authorities. In the 22-page lawsuit, filed days after Attorney General Pam Bondi was confirmed by the Senate, the Justice Department sought to block state, city and county ordinances that prohibit local law enforcement from assisting the federal government with civil immigration enforcement absent a criminal warrant. Bondi said the policies "obstruct" the federal government. 'The challenged provisions of Illinois, Chicago, and Cook County law reflect their intentional effort to obstruct the Federal Government's enforcement of federal immigration law and to impede consultation and communication between federal, state, and local law enforcement officials that is necessary for federal officials to carry out federal immigration law and keep Americans safe,' the lawsuit indicates. The administration has taken similar action to target sanctuary jurisdictions across the country, including a lawsuit this week against New York City, which was described by the Justice Department as 'the vanguard of interfering with enforcing this country's immigration laws' in a complaint filed on Thursday. The administration filed a separate lawsuit targeting New York state in February over it's 'Green Light Law,' which enables undocumented immigrants to apply for noncommercial driver's licenses and bars state officials from turning over that data to federal immigration authorities. The Justice Department in June filed a complaint against Los Angeles for immigration policies it argued interfere and discriminate against federal immigration agents by treating them differently from other law enforcement agents in the state. The suit came as Trump administration officials increasingly sparred with California Democratic leaders after immigration detainment efforts in the state led to clashes between protesters and federal authorities, and resulted in the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops. In January, Trump signed an executive order directing Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to ensure sanctuary jurisdictions 'do not receive access to federal funds' and to consider pursuing criminal or civil penalties if localities 'interfere with the enforcement of Federal law.' A federal judge in April blocked the effort to withhold federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions, finding that Trump's order violated the Constitution's separation of powers principles. That judge blocked an earlier effort by Trump in 2017.

Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia
Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia

NBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia

WASHINGTON/CANBERRA/CHICAGO, July 25 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said the sell 'so much' beef to Australia after Canberra relaxed import restrictions on Thursday, but economists and traders said high prices and tight supplies make major American exports unlikely. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for U.S. beef. The move will not significantly increase U.S. shipments, though, because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower, analysts said. U.S. companies export small quantities of beef to Australian buyers. They import much more in the form of lean beef used to make hamburgers, particularly as U.S. production has declined because of tight cattle supplies. U.S. beef prices set records this year after ranchers slashed their herds due to drought that burned up pasturelands used for grazing. The total herd size fell to 94.2 million head as of July 1, a record low for that date, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data on Friday. A ban on cattle imports from Mexico because of New World screwworm, a devastating livestock pest, and steep tariffs on Brazilian beef that are set to take effect on Aug. 1 could further tighten meat supplies, and require additional imports of Australian beef. 'We can't get enough beef in the U.S. right now, so we're bringing it in from Australia and Brazil,' said Dan Norcini, an independent U.S. livestock trader. 'We're not going to be selling anything significant to anyone.' Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tons of U.S. product moving the other way. 'They have more cattle than people,' said David Anderson, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M University. 'That's why they export so much.' Different taste U.S. and Australian beef also taste different. Many Australians like the grass-fed beef raised there, not marbled beef from U.S.-raised cattle that are generally fed with grain, said Jerry Klassen, chief analyst for Resilient Capital in Winnipeg. He predicted the United States will not export substantial amounts of beef to Australia in the next five years. 'We just aren't in a position to export much beef to anyone, and the reality is Australia doesn't really have much need for U.S. beef,' said Karl Setzer, partner at Consus Ag. The barriers that remain to exporting significant volumes of U.S. beef to Australia appeared to be lost on Trump this week. 'We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE.' Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States, a characterisation many economists dispute. 'For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on U.S. beef,' U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a 'major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for U.S. farmers and ranchers.' Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of U.S. biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted U.S. beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. The U.S. sources some of its feeder cattle from the two neighboring countries. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said U.S. cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. 'We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump,' shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia faces a 10% across-the-board U.S. tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: 'I'm not too sure.' 'We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement,' he said. 'We think that they should do that anyway.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store