logo
US could collect US$300bil in tariff revenue this year, Treasury chief says

US could collect US$300bil in tariff revenue this year, Treasury chief says

New Straits Times20 hours ago
WASHINGTON: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday said the US has taken in about US$100 billion in tariff income so far this year, and this could grow to US$300 billion by the end of 2025 as collections accelerate from President Donald Trump's trade campaign.
Bessent, speaking to a White House cabinet meeting, said the major collections from Trump's new tariffs only started during the second quarter, when Trump implemented a near universal 10 per cent duty on US imports and boosted duties on steel, aluminum and autos.
"So we could expect that that could be well over US$300 billion by the end of the year," Bessent said.
A Treasury spokesperson said the US$300 billion target corresponds to the December 31 end of calendar 2025, not the end of the government's fiscal year on September 30.
Reaching US$300 billion in tariff collections this year would imply an exponential increase in collections in coming months and steep and broad tariff increases from current levels.
Bessent added that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated tariff income will total about US$2.8 trillion over 10 years, "which we think is probably low."
The Treasury reported record gross customs duties of US$22.8 billion in May, a nearly fourfold increase from the US$6.2 billion total a year earlier.
That brought customs duty collections for the first eight months of fiscal 2025 to US$86.1 billion. Collections for the first five months of calendar 2025 totaled US$63.4 billion.
The Treasury is due to report June budget results on Friday, which are expected to show another substantial increase in tariff collections. As of June 30, combined customs and excise tax collections topped US$122 billion for the fiscal year to date, according to the Daily Treasury Statement of accounts.
Trump has set a new August 1 deadline for higher "reciprocal" tariff rates set to kick in on nearly all trading partners, with room for negotiations with some countries in the next three weeks for deals to bring them lower.
"The big money will start coming in on August 1. I think it was made clear today by the letters that were sent out yesterday and today," Trump said.
Trump also announced during the same cabinet meeting that he would impose a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports, a metal used in everything from housing to consumer electronics, vehicles, the power grid and military hardware. He also said further tariffs were coming on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says US will charge Brazil with 50% tariff
Trump says US will charge Brazil with 50% tariff

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Trump says US will charge Brazil with 50% tariff

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Wednesday his administration will charge Brazil with a 50% tariff on products sent to the U.S. starting August 1 while the Republican leader also expressed support for former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Trump made his comments in a letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The U.S. president has also been critical of the BRICS countries, of which Brazil is a key part. Trump's letter said the 50% tariff will be separate from all sectoral tariffs. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh And Ismail Shakil)

US, Israel diverge on Iran endgame after strikes
US, Israel diverge on Iran endgame after strikes

New Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

US, Israel diverge on Iran endgame after strikes

WHEN they met on Monday, US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu basked in the glow of their triumph over Iran. But the show of unity masked a divergence over their endgames in Iran, Gaza and the wider Middle East. Both leaders have touted the success of last month's strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, declaring they had set back a programme they say is aimed at acquiring a nuclear bomb. Yet, with intelligence assessments suggesting that Iran retains a hidden stockpile of enriched uranium and the technical capacity to rebuild, both Trump and Netanyahu know that their victory is more short-term than strategic, two diplomats say. Where they diverge is on how to further pressure Iran, the diplomats say. Trump says his priority is to lean on diplomacy, pursuing a limited objective of ensuring Iran never develops a nuclear weapon — a goal Teheran has always denied pursuing. In contrast, Netanyahu wants to use more force, a source familiar with the Israeli leader's thinking said, compelling Teheran — to the point of government collapse if necessary — into fundamental concessions on quitting a nuclear enrichment programme seen by Israel as an existential threat. The divide over Iran echoes the situation in the Gaza Strip. Trump, eager to cast himself as a global peacemaker, is pushing for a new ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in the Palestinian territory, but the contours of any post-war deal remain undefined and the endgame uncertain. Netanyahu, while publicly endorsing ceasefire talks, says he is committed to the total dismantling of Hamas, a strategic ally of Iran. The Israeli prime minister wants the remaining Hamas leadership deported, possibly to Algeria — a demand Hamas flatly rejects. The gap between a temporary pause and a lasting resolution remains wide, two Middle East officials say. On Iran, Netanyahu was displeased to see Washington revive nuclear talks with Teheran expected in Norway this week, the first diplomatic overture since the strikes, said the person familiar with his thinking. He opposes any move that could give the Iranian authorities an economic and political lifeline. Netanyahu wants nothing less than the Libya model for Iran, the source said. That means Iran fully dismantling its nuclear and missile facilities under strict oversight, and renouncing uranium enrichment on its soil even for civilian needs. Israel is seeking not diplomacy but regime change, Western and regional officials have said. And Netanyahu knows he needs at least a green light from the White House — if not direct backing — to carry out further operations if Teheran refuses to relinquish its nuclear ambitions, they say. But Trump has different objectives, the diplomats say. After the June strikes, he sees an opportunity to press Iran to cut a deal and seize a grand diplomatic feat of restoring ties with Iran that has long eluded him. On Monday, Trump said he would like to lift sanctions on Iran at some point. And in an eye-catching post on X suggesting Teheran sees economic ties as a potential element in any deal, President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Monday that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei believed American investors can come to Iran with "no obstacles to their activities". Iranian rulers, however, face two unpalatable options: renewed strikes if they do not surrender their nuclear ambitions and humiliation at home if they do. That means they may try to make talks drag out, unwilling to fully quit their nuclear project and presenting a difficulty for a US president impatient for a deal and its economic benefits for the US, Western and regional officials say. For Israel, the fallback option is clear, the person familiar with Netanyahu's thinking said: a policy of sustained containment through periodic strikes to prevent any nuclear resurgence. Washington, meanwhile, is hedging its bets. While Israeli and US hawks still hope for regime change in Teheran, Trump appears unwilling to shoulder the huge military, political and economic costs that such a project would demand. His repeated declarations that Iran's programme has been "obliterated" are less triumph than warning: don't ask for more — a signal that he's done enough and won't be drawn further in, says Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute think-tank in Washington.

Women's rights face 'full-on assault' due to UN and aid funding cuts
Women's rights face 'full-on assault' due to UN and aid funding cuts

The Star

time6 hours ago

  • The Star

Women's rights face 'full-on assault' due to UN and aid funding cuts

FILE PHOTO: A woman takes part in a protest to mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, in Santiago, Chile, November 25, 2024. REUTERS/Sofía Yanjarí/File Photo GENEVA (Reuters) -Four major international reports on women's rights, including recommendations on how to prevent domestic violence and discrimination, will not be published this year, a U.N. document showed, part of what rights groups describe as a broader backlash against gender equality. Voluntary funding for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is down $60 million this year due to unpaid contributions and major U.S. foreign aid cuts under President Trump, around 14% of its total income last year. An OHCHR document circulated to member states and reviewed by Reuters shows that 13 human rights reports have been delayed, four of them specifically concerning women, putting off both investigations and discussions on how policies can be improved. "We're silencing policy dialogue," Pooja Patel, Programme Director at the International Service for Human Rights in Geneva, told Reuters. One in four countries reported a backlash on women's rights last year, a U.N. report in March said, something rights groups said made monitoring and recommendations all the more important. "It really does affect the everyday lives of women and girls when these reports and mechanisms are not functioning," said Claire Somerville, a lecturer and Executive Director of the Gender Centre at the Geneva Graduate Institute. Several countries raised concerns at the 59th Session of the Human Rights Council on Tuesday, where the resolution to pause the mandates was passed by consensus. Ecuador warned in a informal HRC meeting in Geneva in June the decision could send the wrong message amidst a "huge backlash" against the rights of women and girls. The OHCHR faced new calls on Tuesday to increase transparency regarding the criteria behind its funding decisions after earlier criticism of its choice to halt the launch of a U.N.-mandated commission investigating suspected human rights violations and war crimes in the Democratic Republic of Congo. U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Volker Turk and his office would provide a comprehensive update on the feasibility of implementing the paused mandates before the next session in September, according to the U.N. document. In a letter seen by Reuters, Turk told Council members the situation was "deeply regrettable" and expressed concern about the impact funding cuts would have on the protection of human rights. In May the leading U.N. agency for gender equality, U.N. Women, reported that 90% of women's rights organizations in crisis-affected countries have been hit by cuts. "They signal a broader de-prioritisation of gender equality at a global level," said Laura Somoggi, Co-CEO of Womanity, a private foundation in Geneva for advancing gender equality. The OHCHR announced on Friday that the next meeting of the Commission on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, ongoing since 1979, would not take place due to liquidity issues with future ones "to be confirmed". Somerville called it a "huge setback" among many others. "We can describe this as a full-on assault on gender and the rights of women and girls," she said. (Reporting by Olivia Le Poidevin and Emma Farge in Geneva, editing by Philippa Fletcher)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store