logo
EXCLUSIVE My mother was murdered by a migrant in cold blood. A liberal 'coward' with White House ambitions set him free

EXCLUSIVE My mother was murdered by a migrant in cold blood. A liberal 'coward' with White House ambitions set him free

Daily Mail​30-05-2025
A 'barbaric' killer controversially deported to East Africa by President Donald Trump 's ICE agents should still be in locked up behind bars, insists the victim's daughter.
'He should have never been paroled,' Birte Pfleger told Daily Mail of Thongxay Nilakout, 48, a native of Laos in Southeast Asia. 'It was devastating.'
College professor Pfleger, 57, spoke hauntingly of the searing grief over her 64-year-old mother Gisela's heinous assassination-style murder in 1994 and how the pain is just as raw 31 years later.
She also condemned California Governor Gavin Newsom as a 'coward' for his role in the convict's shocking release from Solana State Prison two years ago.
Pfleger said Newsom, who is believed to be positioning himself for a 2028 White House run amid continuing leadership chaos in the Democrat party, passed the buck 'rather than do the right thing' when he had an opportunity to overturn a 2023 parole board decision to release the brutal killer.
Rather than reverse the board's contentious ruling - one of his executive powers as governor - he instead praised Nilakout and chose to have an 'en banc' hearing instead, meaning a larger group of parole board members would have the final say.
The group, thanks to Newsom, affirmed the original parole board decision and allowed Nilakout to leave prison.
'He's a coward for not doing what is right,' said Pfleger of governor, who has been repeatedly criticized for his soft stance on crime. 'In the end, he took the easy way out.
'I knew he wasn't going to do it. The political will wasn't there.
'He was following the general consensus of Democrats in Sacramento - that the days of long sentences were over; there's prison overcrowding and prisons needed to be closed.
'As long as offenders did not kill law enforcement officials or [had] sexually assaulted children, the inmates should be released.'
Nilakout emptied all five bullets from his weapon into Gisela and her husband.
The couple were visiting from their native Germany when they were set upon by him and two associates who were also convicted and sent to prison.
He used his first two bullets to shoot her in the head as she lay helpless on the ground.
And the three remaining shells he pumped into Klaus, Pfleger's father, now 93, who miraculously survived.
Surgeons were unable to remove one of the bullets, however, as it was lodged near an artery and it remains in his body, behind his shoulder, as a painful reminder of the savage attack.
Today, he remains tortured from losing his beloved wife. 'This never ends,' admits his daughter. 'There is no closure.'
Pfleger was contacted by Newsom's Deputy Legal Affairs Secretary, Jasmin Turner-Bond, via a May 10, 2023 email with the subject line: 'The Governor has made a decision in the Nilakout case.'
She wrote: 'Dear Ms. Pfleger, The Governor has decided to refer inmate Nilakout's grant for an en banc review.'
'He's a coward for not doing what is right,' said Birte Pfleger of Governor Newsom. 'In the end, he took the easy way out
In a signed statement dated the same day, Newsom wrote: 'I acknowledge that Mr. Nilakout committed this crime when he was 17 years old and that he has since been incarcerated for 28 years.
'The psychologist who evaluated Mr. Nilakout found that, at the time of the crime, Mr. Nilakout demonstrated hallmark features of youth, which diminished his culpability under youth offender laws.
'I also acknowledge that Mr. Nilakout has made efforts to improve himself in prison. He has participated in self-help programming, earned a GED, and taken college courses.
'I commend him for his efforts in rehabilitation and encourage him to continue on this positive path.
'However, I find this case warrants the consideration of the full Board of Parole Hearings to determine whether Mr. Nilakout can be safely released at this time.
'The psychologist who evaluated Mr. Nilakout identified current areas of concern that include the 'life crime involving extreme violence against unknown and vulnerable victims, [his] participation in documented negative behavior through 2014, and some ongoing deficits in awareness or understanding related to life crime or subsequent negative behavior.'
'The psychologist found that Mr. Nilakout's 'deficits in awareness and understanding related to the life crime and other more recent negative behavior remain present, [but] seem to be decreasing.'
'While this is an encouraging sign that Mr. Nilakout has made progress in rehabilitation, I ask the full Board to assess whether Mr. Nilakout has sufficiently mitigated his risk factors, and whether his release on parole is consistent with public safety.
'For these reasons, I refer the decision to parole Mr. Nilakout back to the Board for en banc consideration.'
Nilakout is one of eight violent immigrant criminals ejected from the country last week and flown by a government Gulfstream jet to East Africa headed to landlocked South Sudan.
The men are currently under guard at an American military base in the Republic of Djibouti on the Horn of Africa at the southern tip of the Red Sea amid a fierce legal brawl between an 'activist' federal judge and Trump's administration.
Critics and attorneys for the men assert Trump's administration is brazenly attempting to skirt legal proceedings in order to permanently banish them.
In April, Massachusetts U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy ordered the government to give deportees at least 15 days notice before sending them to a third-country - one where they had previously lived or where they were born.
They should also be allowed to tell a court if they fear persecution or torture at their final destinations.
But the men were deported anyway with Trump's backing. Other than Nilakout, the men are from countries including Vietnam, Cuba and Mexico. One of them is from South Sudan.
So on May 20, an irate Judge Murphy held an emergency hearing and stated U.S. officials must retain custody and control of the migrants while he determines if their removal from the States was unlawful.
This in turn prompted swift and fierce pushback from the Department of Homeland Security which controls the Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
A DHS statement called the men 'some of the most barbaric, violent individuals illegally in the United States'
Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, called the judge's ruling 'deranged.'
She added: 'These depraved individuals have all had their day in court and been given final deportation orders.
'A reminder of who was on this plane: murderers, child rapists, an individual who raped a mentally & physically disabled person.
'The message this activist judge is sending to victims and their families is we don't care.'
President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem 'are working every day to get vicious criminals out of our country while activist judges are fighting to bring them back onto American soil.' The Supreme Court has now taken up the case.
Nilakout was 17 at the time of the slaying near the mountain town of Idyllwild, 110 miles east of Los Angeles.
He was found guilty of first-degree murder and robbery and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. However, a ruling in 2012 meant that juveniles convicted a violent crime must be given a chance for parole and freedom.
Against Pfleger's hopes that he remained in jail, Nilakout was granted parole and he received a final order of removal in July 2023.
'He's no different,' she said. 'He doesn't take full responsibility for shooting my mom when she was lying face down. The only reason my dad is still alive is because he [Nilakout] had run out of bullets.'
A former Green Card holder, he then spent five months in ICE custody immediately following his release from prison before being set fully free.
He was picked up again by ICE agents on January 26 this year - five days after Trump's second inauguration.
Pfleger, who teaches history at California State University, Los Angeles, described all eight men sent to Africa as 'criminals convicted of heinous crimes.'
Over the years, the mother-of-two was determined to attend parole hearings for her mother's killers which she described as a 'traumatic' experience.
She recalled long drives to be in person for Nilakout's hearings. 'I had two small children at the time, but I took time off from work and time away from my family,' she said.
'I'm this very normal law abiding person. I'd never been close to a prison. That was all very weird.'
When one of Nilakout's two accomplices was granted parole 'there was nothing I could do. The parole officers actually said, 'Our hands are tied.''
Pfleger criticized the parole process as 'entirely meaningless when it comes to the victim's input.
'They've now changed things to the point where you can't even talk about the actual crime. It's all about what has the inmate done since being incarcerated. No one asks about the permanent consequences, pain, suffering of the victims.'
Despite the deep frustration and disappointment, she has 'made peace' with Nilakout's release from prison.
But she has not revealed to her father the updates regarding the three men convicted of his wife's murder as it would be too upsetting for him. 'He has has social anxiety,' she said. 'He's never recovered.'
She added: 'When it came to the parole hearings, I knew that I owed this to my dad. I owe it to the memory of my mom. I owe this to my kids who never got to meet their grandmother. I did everything I could for them not to get out.'
Judge Murphy, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, said the U.S. government must 'maintain custody and control of class members currently being removed to South Sudan or to any other third country, to ensure the practical feasibility of return if the Court finds that such removals were unlawful.'
He sensationally warned that the administration officials who enabled the deportations to South Sudan of Nilakout and the seven others could potentially face criminal penalties.
Federal law specifically prohibits the government from deporting people to countries where their lives or freedom would be threatened because of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion or where they fear they would face torture.
'I wasn't jumping for joy when I heard that he was on that plane to go to South Sudan,' admitted Pfleger.
'It's a problem when someone's due process rights are violated. Either we have these rights and they apply to everyone - or we don't.
'It's dangerous when we don't have them and there are somehow these exceptions. Everyone who is in this country due process rights regardless of immigration status.
'When a judge says you cannot be deported right now, you have the right to object. You have the right to consult with an attorney. When that doesn't happen then that's a problem.'
'Do I care if he gets released to South Sudan and something happens to him in terms of violence. No, not really. But it's a problem when basic rights are violated by the government.
'Nothing brings my mother back. Nothing eases my dad's pain. He thinks that they're all still in prison.
'Where do you draw the line? Here's a convicted murderer but there's a legal process. Now there's an administration that says, "Screw those laws, screw any orders - we're getting rid of them."'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazen thieves use stun gun to rob man of $560,000 worth of jewelry
Brazen thieves use stun gun to rob man of $560,000 worth of jewelry

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Brazen thieves use stun gun to rob man of $560,000 worth of jewelry

A man was robbed of over $500,000 in jewelry after being attacked two robbers with a stun gun in New York City, according to police. The victim, a 39-year-old man, was walking near 73rd Avenue and 180th Street in Fresh Meadows, Queens when he was approached by a masked man wearing a distinctive orange and yellow reflective vest. The suspect used a stun gun to shock the man and then knocked him to the ground. A second man, also wearing a reflective vest, then 'joined in to forcefully remove the victim's jewelry,' which was valued at $559,000, Gothamist reports. The two robbers then fled the scene in a silver Mercedes-Benz SUV driven by a third person. The NYPD stated the investigation is ongoing and has released descriptions of the two suspects. The first man was described as wearing an orange-and-yellow-striped reflective vest, a bucket hat, brown pants, black shoes, a white mask, and black gloves. The second was described as wearing a yellow-striped reflective vest, a black hat, black pants, black shoes, and black gloves. Police did not comment on whether they believe the robbery was targeted or part of a larger pattern of similar crimes. The Queens robbery shares similarities with an attempted smash-and-grab heist that occurred in Midtown Manhattan this past May, according to NBC 4 New York. In that incident, two men disguised as construction workers entered a jewelry store on East 53rd Street and Madison Avenue. Surveillance video showed one man holding the door while the other, wearing a yellow construction vest, used a hammer to try and smash a display case containing high-end watches. A security guard quickly intervened, however, forcing the would-be robbers to flee empty-handed. No one was injured in the attempted robbery. Both the NYPD's Major Case Squad and local precincts are currently investigating these incidents.

Lifeguard, 23, arrested at airport over allegation of rape at idyllic summer camp
Lifeguard, 23, arrested at airport over allegation of rape at idyllic summer camp

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lifeguard, 23, arrested at airport over allegation of rape at idyllic summer camp

A foreign lifeguard at a religious summer camp in New York has been arrested over an alleged rape. Manuel Escalera Ibanez, a native of Madrid, Spain, was dramatically apprehended while waiting to board an international flight on Monday night, The Shelter Island Reporter reported. The 23-year-old was on a J-1 work visa with Camp Quintent, a summer camp owned and operated by New York Conference of The United Methodist Church. He was arrested this week after he was accused of rape at the Shelter Island camp. The alleged attack was reported a day before his July 21 arrest. It is unclear who reported the crime to police, but camp officials stressed the alleged victim is not a camper. Escalara Ibanez was taken into custody at 10.22pm at Kennedy Airport as he waited to board an international flight by Shelter Island Police detectives, officers from the Suffolk County District Attorney's office and Homeland Security Investigations. He was charged with Felony Rape in the First Degree, and Criminal Obstruction of Breathing or Blood Circulation, a misdemeanor. Police said an order of protection was issued on behalf of the alleged victim, Newsday reported. He was also ordered by the court to surrender his passport. If released, he must remain in New York State under the further direction of the court. Police said an order of protection was issued on behalf of the alleged victim, Newsday reported. He was also ordered by the court to surrender his passport. If released, he must remain in New York State under the further direction of the court. Currently, he is being held at the Suffolk County Correctional Facility in lieu of $150,000 cash bail, $200,000 bond or a $500,000 partially secured bond. Escalara Ibanez traveled from his native Spain to the United States for work. He was on a J-1 visa, a non-immigrant visa that allows for participation in work- and study-based programs in the country. Other jobs include, a part-time referee for indoor soccer matches in schools throughout the community of Madrid. He is also a senior technician in sales and commercial space Management and transportation and logistics, and works, as per his Linkedin profile. The camp issued a letter to 'Quinipet Families' informing them of the alleged disturbing event. 'We are genuinely saddened about a recent incident. The incident occurred between camp sessions when no children were on-site and did not involve any campers.' 'This matter is the subject of a criminal investigation, and we are cooperating with local law enforcement in this regard.' 'At Quinipet Camp & Retreat Center, the safety, care, and enrichment of every child and staff member are central to our mission. 'We uphold rigorous, longstanding safety protocols and regularly review our policies to ensure that all staff meet or exceed national standards and have met with our staff to once again remind them of our safeguards and compliance practices.' 'We understand that families and members of our community may have questions. However, out of respect for the integrity of the ongoing investigation, we will not be providing further comment at this time. 'We remain firmly committed to providing a safe, nurturing, and enriching environment for all who come to Quinipet. 'Thank you for your continued trust and support as we navigate this difficult time with transparency, compassion, and full resolve.' The camp and retreat center celebrated its 75th anniversary this year. Located on 25-acres in the northwest shore of Shelter Island and is approximately 3.5 hours away from New York City.

California's minimum wage hike may have cost thousands of jobs
California's minimum wage hike may have cost thousands of jobs

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

California's minimum wage hike may have cost thousands of jobs

According to the economists behind the study, fast food employment in California dropped by 3.2 percent, while jobs in the same sector grew slightly across the rest of the U.S. 'Our median estimate translates into a loss of 18,000 jobs in California's fast–food sector relative to the counterfactual,' wrote researchers Jeffrey Clemens, Olivia Edwards, and Jonathan Meer. Before the law took effect, California's fast food industry was tracking the same employment trend as the rest of the country, the study found. But after AB 1228 was passed, the sector began to shrink. 'Following AB 1228's enactment, employment in the fast food sector in California fell substantially,' the paper states, citing declines 'even as employment in other sectors of the California economy tracked national trends'. Critics say the figures confirm what many feared: that a massive one–size–fits–all pay hike would push jobs out of reach for the workers it was meant to help. 'When it comes to central planning, history keeps the receipts: Wage controls never work,' wrote Heritage Foundation economist Rachel Greszler in a column reacting to the findings. 'That's because policymakers can set wage laws, but they can't outlaw the consequences.' She warned the law should serve as a wake–up call for other cities – especially Los Angeles, which recently voted to raise wages for hotel and airport workers to $30 an hour by 2028. 'The consequences of that wage hike on the fast–food industry should be a warning sign,' she said. The Wall Street Journal editorial board echoed that message, slamming politicians for 'magical thinking' around wage hikes. 'The Democratic Party's socialist nominee for New York mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has called for increasing the city's minimum wage to $30. Andrew Cuomo, his supposedly more moderate competitor, wants a $20 minimum,' the board wrote. 'These guys will never learn because they don't want to see the world as it really is.' But Governor Gavin Newsom's office has pushed back hard – questioning the integrity of the NBER paper and insisting California's wage law is working as intended. Tara Gallegos, Newsom's deputy director of communications, dismissed the study as politically motivated, telling Fox News Digital that it was 'linked to the Hoover Institution,' which she claimed had previously published 'false or misleading information' about the state's wage policies. She pointed to an October 2024 report in the San Francisco Chronicle, which said the early effects of AB 1228 'defy a lot of the doom–and–gloom predictions' made when the bill was signed. Gallegos also cited a February 2025 study by a UC Berkeley professor, which looked at fast food employment trends through December and found 'no negative effects.' 'Workers covered by the policy saw wage increases of 8 to 9 percent, with no negative wage or employment effects on non–covered workers,' she said. 'No negative effects on fast–food employment.' She added: 'The number of fast–food establishments grew faster in California than in the rest of the U.S.' As for prices, the Berkeley study claimed menu costs rose by only 1.5 percent – about six cents on a $4 hamburger. The NBER paper also looked at whether the law had a knock-on effect in full-service restaurants, which weren't subject to the $20 mandate but compete for the same workers. The authors found smaller but still negative employment effects – a median drop of 2.12 percent. And while critics were quick to blame the law for economic pain, the researchers warned against cherry-picking isolated data. They used placebo inference methods to compare California's job trends with other states – and in most cases, California showed the steepest employment drop.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store