Trade deals offer limited value to Singapore manufacturing firms: Study
This is according to a study by a group of researchers led by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) released on Tuesday (Jul 22).
The study surveyed 2,356 firms across seven Asean countries for their sentiments on four areas: regulation and governance; automation and digitalisation; sustainability; and regional outlook.
Sentiments on FTAs were gathered as part of issues under regulation and governance.
The survey found that just 29.7 per cent of Singapore firms surveyed have secured a rules of origin (ROO) certificate under at least one trade agreement.
An ROO certificate is a document that verifies a product's origin, determining whether it qualifies for preferential tariffs under an FTA.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Another 40.5 per cent of firms reported not knowing whether they have the certificate, while the remaining one third of firms do not have a ROO certificate.
This suggests that there is an information gap that may suppress effective FTA usage, said the survey authors. Singapore has a network for 28 implemented FTAs.
In contrast, the uptake rate was higher among manufacturing firms in Laos (49.2 per cent), Indonesia (47.8 per cent) and the Philippines (58 per cent). Meanwhile no Cambodian companies reported having an ROO certificate.
Soo Yeon Kim, the study's principal investigator, suggested raising the minimum threshold requirements as well as consolidating trade agreements to encourage higher FTA utilisation.
Singapore firms which did not pursue ROO certification identified a lack of relevant FTAs for their goods as their primary barrier. 'This is particularly salient for firms in the tertiary and quaternary sectors, where existing FTAs may not apply or are perceived to offer limited value,' said the researchers.
Export volumes falling short of minimum thresholds emerged as the second most significant obstacle to ROO certification. The Asean Free Trade Area requires a minimum export value of US$200, while the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership sets the bar at US$1,000.
Additional deterrents included insufficient client demand for FTA benefits, uncertainty surrounding application procedures, and concerns about procedural complexity and costs.
The challenges facing Singapore companies mirror those experienced elsewhere in the region, though with varying degrees of emphasis, said the researchers.
Indonesian and Vietnamese firms, for instance, were worried about complicated procedures and low export volumes.
Regional collaboration
Firms were also asked about their experience with the Asean Economic Community (AEC), a 2015 initiative aimed at creating a single integrated market across the bloc's member states.
While respondents generally reported positive outcomes from the AEC, they called for reforms to keep the framework relevant in today's rapidly evolving economic landscape.
Singapore firms were the most vocal among companies across seven countries in suggesting that the AEC better address private sector needs, with 89 per cent agreeing that this reform is needed.
Other suggestions included additional tax incentives for regional trade, greater opportunities for collaboration between firms within the same industry or of similar scale, and improved mobility for skilled workers across the region.
On automation and digitalisation, the study found that 'the integration of automation is widespread but remains largely low-level' in Singapore.
A majority of Singapore firms have automated just a quarter of their business processes, while none have achieved full automation.
Most firms across other Asean countries similarly automated less than half of their business processes. Indonesia stands out as an outlier, boasting both the region's highest proportion of fully automated companies (13.1 per cent) and the largest share operating without any automation (36.2 per cent).
Digital adoption
On the digital front, just over half of Singapore companies have embraced digitalised service delivery through mobile applications, online ordering platforms and similar technologies. This reflects a 'clear preference for customer-facing technological upgrades,' the authors observed.
The pattern holds across the region, with Vietnam recording a 50.5 per cent adoption rate for digitalised services and Malaysia close behind at 47 per cent.
Advanced technologies such as robotics and artificial intelligence see more cautious uptake. Around 21 per cent of Singapore firms deploy industrial robots while 19 per cent have adopted Artificial Intelligence or machine learning tools – but both figures still lead the regional pack.
When it comes to sustainability initiatives, the study revealed that regulatory requirements and customer demands drive Singapore companies more than civil society pressure to adopt green practices.
This trend appears consistent regionwide, with government-led regulation emerging as the most trusted and effective catalyst for promoting sustainable business practices.
Singapore Manufacturing Federation president Lennon Tan noted that having a 'queen bee' customer – a major or influential client – is a significant motivation for companies to adopt environment, social and governance practices.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
26 minutes ago
- Business Times
Brics currencies are no realistic alternative to the US dollar
During our lifetimes, we have taken financial governance somewhat for granted. The US dollar has provided the global unit of account, means of payment and store of value, fulfilling all requirements of money. The benign attitude of the US authorities towards the rest of the world using the currency as the sole international money has made this possible. This system has its advantages but also many well-known drawbacks, including control by one government and the need to convert twice, into the vehicle currency and out again, creating costs and risks. Emerging economies have become more assertive in recent years, while the US apparently has reneged on its role as provider of such global currency. The outcome is the discussion about de-dollarisation, driven by academics as well as politicians, while financial markets sit on the fence waiting for a viable alternative to the US dollar. The state of de-dollarisation Presently, the US dollar is used for global denomination, enacting cross-border transactions for current as well as financial accounts. The currency is used as a store of value for small individual investors as well as larger investors looking for safe havens. The denomination function is used for convenience of comparability. This can easily be replaced by artificial intelligence, which could convert national currencies into a weighted unit, such as a basket of currencies from countries including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The use of multiple national currencies to settle cross-border payments is beginning to happen in the Brics bloc. The renminbi is reportedly already used in 50 per cent of intra-Brics trade, whereas it made up only 2 per cent of global payments in May 2025, according to Swift. The Brics cross-border payments system is still under discussion. The major issue is the settlement of imbalances, as no mechanism has been devised and no vehicle currency has been mandated. The previous Brics Pay initiative turned out to be a hoax and the present suggestion of XRP is a cryptocurrency, abhorred by countries like China. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China on its own is neither willing nor ready to play the role of a Brics vehicle currency. A clearing institution like the European Payments Union after World War II is called for. However, this mechanism would circumvent the need for the US dollar in only a small share of cross-border transactions – the trade in goods and services, which totalled some US$33 trillion in 2024, about one-third of global gross domestic product. The lion's share of cross-border financial transactions is still conducted in major currencies, such as the US dollar. Greenback still dominates foreign exchange According to the Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) latest triennial survey, the global foreign exchange market is worth US$7.5 trillion a day, matching a year's trade in goods and services in only five days. This is made up of spot, futures and swaps, where the US dollar was still counterpart in 88 per cent of all transactions in 2022. In comparison, the renminbi made up 7 per cent, well below its share in the special drawing rights basket of close to 12 per cent. The next BIS triennial survey was conducted in April 2025, with results to be published later in the year. Other global financial markets, such as interbank and money markets, stock and bond markets plus derivatives markets, show a similar story. The major players trading in these markets are also the ones looking for store of value, hedging positions in the short as well as long term. These are the global banks, corporations and investors. There has been little evidence of them abandoning major currencies in favour of Brics national currencies, which are at the whim of political leaders. As the US administration is neglecting its responsibility for providing a global currency, the search is on for alternatives. Brics currencies have been mentioned, but a common Brics currency backed by gold was off the agenda at the July Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro. This leaves the national currencies, ranging from the renminbi to the Ethiopian birr. As Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum contributors Gary Smith and Udaibir Das have argued, a new Brics financial governance is highly unlikely. In the absence of such a political agreement, a trustworthy vehicle currency might emerge for settlement of Brics trades that is a far cry from replacing the US dollar. OMFIF The writer is a senior research fellow at Zhejiang University

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Australian court rules women can sue over Qatar strip-search ordeal
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Australia's government cited the incident as a reason to block Qatar Airways from operating more flights into Australia. SYDNEY – A group of Australian women strip-searched after boarding a Qatar Airways flight in Doha won a court victory on July 24 that paves the way for them to sue the airline. In an incident that sparked international outrage, the Qatari authorities pulled women off 10 planes in Doha in 2020 and forced them to take invasive gynaecological exams. The authorities were hunting for the mother of a newborn found abandoned in an airport toilet. Five Australian women caught up in the ordeal lodged legal action against Qatar Airways, claiming they were assaulted and falsely imprisoned. Australia's Federal Court ruled in 2024 that they could not directly sue the airline. But that decision was reversed on appeal on July 24, with three Federal Court judges stating the case should be heard at trial. Australia's government cited the incident as a reason to block Qatar Airways from operating more flights into Australia. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Live: Thailand, Cambodia clash with jets, rockets, artillery in deadly border row Asia 9 Thai civilians killed as Thai and Cambodian militaries clash at disputed border: Reports Singapore Boy, 15, charged after being caught with vapes 5 times; ordered to stay 2 years in S'pore Boys' Home Business MOM probing work injury claim flagged by late Sumo Salad boss Jane Lee: MOS Dinesh Business Marina Bay Sands sees record second quarter with revenue up 37% to $1.77 billion Singapore What's key to a good life? Most Singapore residents choose emotional and mental well-being Singapore Over 2 years' jail for man who worked with wife to cheat her then boyfriend of $220k Asia South Korea police raid offices of BTS' agency Hybe over share probe Qatar's then Prime Minister Khalid bin Khalifa bin Abdulaziz Al Thani offered his 'sincerest apologies for what some female travellers went through'. AFP


AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Indian firm shipped explosives to Russia despite US warnings, World News
WASHINGTON/KYIV/NEW DELHI — An Indian company shipped US$1.4 million (S$1.78 million) worth of an explosive compound with military uses to Russia in December, according to Indian customs data seen by Reuters, despite US threats to impose sanctions on any entity supporting Russia's Ukraine war effort. One of the Russian companies listed as receiving the compound, known as HMX or octogen, is the explosives manufacturer Promsintez, which an official at Ukraine's SBU security service said has ties to the country's military. The official said that Ukraine launched a drone attack in April against a Promsintez-owned factory. According to the Pentagon's Defence Technical Information Centre and related defence research programmes, HMX is widely used in missile and torpedo warheads, rocket motors, exploding projectiles and plastic-bonded explosives for advanced military systems. The US government has identified HMX as "critical for Russia's war effort" and has warned financial institutions against facilitating any sales of the substance to Moscow. The HMX sale to Russian firms has not been previously reported. Russian defence manufacturers have been working around the clock for the past several years to sustain President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine, which intensified with Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbour in 2022. India, which has recently forged closer ties with the United States in an effort to counterbalance China's growing influence, has not abandoned its longstanding military and economic ties with Moscow. India's trade with Russia — especially its purchases of Russian oil — has remained robust, even as Western nations have tried to cripple Russia's war economy with sanctions. US President Donald Trump threatened earlier in July to hit nations with a 100 per cent tariff if they continued purchasing Russian crude. The US Treasury Department has the authority to sanction those who sell HMX and similar substances to Russia, according to three sanctions lawyers. HMX is known as a "high explosive," meaning it detonates rapidly and is designed for maximum destruction. Reuters has no indication that the HMX shipments violated Indian government policy. One Indian official with knowledge of the shipments said that the compound has some limited civilian applications, in addition to its better-known military uses. India's foreign ministry said in a statement: "India has been carrying out exports of dual-use items taking into account its international obligations on non-proliferation, and based on its robust legal and regulatory framework that includes a holistic assessment of relevant criteria on such exports." The US State Department did not comment on the specific shipments identified by Reuters but said it had repeatedly communicated to India that companies doing military-related business are at risk of sanctions. "India is a strategic partner with whom we engage in full and frank dialogue, including on India's relationship with Russia," a spokesperson said. "We have repeatedly made clear to all our partners, including India, that any foreign company or financial institution that does business with Russia's military industrial base are at risk of US sanctions." Russia's defence ministry did not respond to a request for comment. "While India has not typically been among the primary jurisdictions used for circumventing sanctions, we are aware that isolated cases can occur," Ukrainian presidential adviser Vladyslav Vlasiuk told Reuters. "We can confirm that the Russian company Promsintez has appeared on our radar in the past, including in connection with co-operation involving Indian counterparts," added Vlasiuk, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's top sanctions official. Washington woos New Delhi Reuters identified two HMX shipments sent in December by Indian firm Ideal Detonators Private Limited, both of which were unloaded in St. Petersburg, according to the Indian customs data. An Indian government official with direct knowledge of the shipments confirmed them. [[nid:720553]] One shipment, worth US$405,200, was purchased by a Russian company called High Technology Initiation Systems, the data show. The other shipment, worth more than US$1 million was purchased by Promsintez. Both purchasers are based in Samara Oblast, near the border of Kazakhstan in southern Russia, according to the data. Ideal Detonators Private Limited, based in the Indian state of Telangana, did not respond to a request for comment. Promsintez and High Technology Initiation Systems also did not respond to requests for comment. While several Indian entities were sanctioned during the administration of former US President Joe Biden for supporting Russia's war effort, sanctions were applied sparingly due to geopolitical considerations, according to two US officials who worked on sanctions under Biden. Under Trump, Russia-related sanctions work has slowed to a trickle, and it is not clear if the United States will take further action against Indian companies doing business with Russia's defence industry. Washington has long sought closer relations with India to pull the South Asian country away from China. Eric Prince, a partner at Washington-based law firm Akin, said the US government often prefers to communicate its concerns privately to allies and only take punitive actions as a last resort. [[nid:720550]]