Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after Labour's £5billion welfare U-turn
Plans to shelve the rule have reportedly been binned because of Labour's £5 billion welfare U-turn.
3
3
3
Earlier this year Starmer told his cabinet he wanted to scrap the cap and asked the Treasury to identify ways to fund the plan.
However, a No 10 source has now told The Sunday Times: "My assessment is that is now dead in the water."
And a No 11 source warned MPs there has to be 'trade offs' for not introducing major welfare reforms, reports the outlet.
'Whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two child benefit cap,' they added.
Parents have only been able to claim child tax credit and for their first two children since 2017.
Imposed in April 2017, parents can not claim child tax credit or universal credit worth up to £3,455 per year for more than two children.
An exception is made for children born as a result of rape.
Lifting the cap would cost an estimated £3.5 billion and the Labour party has long been divided over the issue - with Sir Keir Starmer ruling out scrapping the cap in 2023.
He then said Labour wanted to remove it, but only when fiscal conditions allowed.
Following Labour's landslide victory last July, the prime minister refused to bow to pressure within his party, and suspended seven MPs for six months for voting with the SNP to scrap the cap.
Ministers have toed the party line for months, but the narrative started to shift in May, with Sir Keir reported to have asked the Treasury to see how scrapping it could be funded.
Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs
Labour MPs who forced Sir Keir Starmer into a U-turn last week had set their sights on lifting the benefit cap.
But it looks like that plan is now set to be scrapped once and for all with a decision on the cap set for the autumn.
Speculation has been mounting that ending the two-child benefits cap will be the third welfare U-turn after those relating to winter fuel payments and disability benefits, which have already cost Rachel Reeves billions.
Sir Keir recently suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to abandon a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament.
Just minutes before voting began, ministers announced that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments were being dropped.
Sir Keir had already been forced into a U-turn the week before when more than 130 Labour MPs turned rebels and signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the bill off.
Among the concessions announced then was a plan to impose tougher eligibility rules only on future PIP claimants, leaving existing recipients unaffected.
It comes after analysis of official figures previously revealed that ditching the child benefits cap would hand thousands of pounds a year in extra benefits to 180,000 large families in which no one goes out to work.
But critics of the cap claim it has worsened child poverty.
The hard-hitting rule, which slashes payments like Universal Credit and Child Tax Credit, is costing struggling households an average of £4,300 each, according to a recent report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Official figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show a staggering 450,000 families were stung by the cap last year.
Most of those hit - around 280,000 families – have three kids, while 120,000 have four, and 56,000 are raising five or more little ones.
The DWP doesn't reveal exactly how much the biggest families are missing out on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY: The SNP are spending taxpayers' money like a drunken sailor... and if things don't change they will sink us all
Scotland is living beyond its means. It's a harsh reality most politicians would rather not talk about, but avoidance of the truth does not make it any less truthful. The Scottish Government's medium-term financial strategy, recently published, does not avoid the subject entirely but it sugar-coats the problem to such an extent that a sickly sweet aftertaste is left behind. If you want the sugar-free version – bitter but at least honest – you could do worse than new analysis from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR). Its paper, 'Filling the Funding Gap', makes for a bracing read, but since it's summer and people are too busy having lives to take a deep-dive into think-tank fiscal wonkery, allow me to summarise: the Scottish Government is spending your money like a drunken sailor at an establishment of ill-repute. We're not talking about a couple of quid here and there. Within the next four years, the deficit between what Holyrood raises and what it spends will hit £2.6billion. However, this is not just a story of profligacy, it's one of consequences too. Holyrood is required to balance its budget every year: that gap will have to be plugged. £2.6billion will have to be found from somewhere. The IPPR paper is not a cheery beach read. It's more like a blood-curdling horror story. Take the Scottish Government's strategy, in particular the claim that we're a 'high growth country', which the IPPR says 'might be generously described as optimistic'. That's economist-speak for 'up there with leaving a molar under your pillow for the Tooth Fairy as a financial strategy'. The source of the problem is a public sector that does too much, costs too much, and is too hard to reform. As another independent think tank, the Fraser of Allander Institute, points out, public sector pay accounts for 55 per cent of Holyrood's resource spending. This is unsustainable. Either the public finances will have to be put in order or we are heading for economic calamity. There are no appetising options left. It's either the axeman or the taxman, and more likely a combination of both. The IPPR analysis dispels comforting myths about efficiencies. Efficiencies, like waste, are the first things reached for by those who know budgets need to be reined in but who want to pretend the process can be relatively pain-free. It cannot. There is fat to be trimmed around the peripheries, to be sure, but to make substantive improvements will require hacking away at core spending and core services. Ponder for a moment the Scottish Government's professed 'public sector workforce reduction target', which pledges a 'managed downward trajectory' of 0..5 per cent for each of the next five years. In plain English: ministers will cut staffing levels by half a percentage point. Yet ponder a little further and you might spot an issue. Ministers say 'frontline services' will be 'protected' from these cuts. The burden will therefore fall on backroom staff. But as the IPPR points out, the number of frontline workers is more than twice that of backroom staff, so we would be looking at 20,000 jobs going in that sector. For scale, that would mean more than one in every ten backroom posts vanishing before the end of the decade. That is a huge cutback. While there is often little sympathy for those who work in the back rooms of central and local government, with the assumption being that they just push paper around all day, remember how public bodies work. This isn't the private sector. There won't be an acknowledgement that the system was wrong and swift adaptation to more efficient organisation. Doing so in the public sector would be an admission that a phalanx of well-paid and even better-pensioned managers and consultants were wrong. No, what will happen is that the workloads of those dumped from the backroom will be transferred to those on the frontline, stretching them ever further and increasing the length of time it takes for frontline tasks to be completed. Any savings made in the backroom will be swallowed up by keeping frontline staff away from the frontline. That's not an argument for doing nothing, it's an argument for doing much more. Not merely tinkering around the edges of public sector workforce and performance but radically reforming the core purpose of that workforce. The public sector needs to do a lot less and, as a result, the private sector must do more. Among the ways to achieve this would be contracting out more NHS services to the market, privatising local government services like bin collections, and introducing or increasing fees in the education sector. The devolved welfare system would have to be significantly less generous, whether by the removal of the Scottish Child Payment or the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. If all this sounds too controversial to contemplate, there is always the alternative: tax rises. And not modest bumps for the highest earners. If we're facing a multi-billion pound resource deficit, and aren't prepared to go beyond annual 0.5 per cent cuts to backroom staff, the only other way to plug the fiscal gap would be with tax hikes across the board. Every income and council tax band would be looking at eye-watering surges. Pips would be squeezed until they not only squeaked but screamed for mercy. Of course, all this could be avoided if there was a sudden turnaround in the economy and we started recording sufficient growth to hose all these problems in a great downpour of public cash, but the IPPR is not optimistic that such a turnaround is coming any time soon. Nor am I, though I would be willing to stimulate the economy in ways that organisation could likely never countenance, not least by tearing up self-harming Net Zero policies and resuming large-scale oil and gas exploration in the North Sea. After almost two decades of economic glumness following the global financial crisis, it is scunnering that the future looks even glummer. A succession of governments have a sin or two to answer for, but recriminations, however well-deserved, will not fix the immediate problems. If we are not prepared to break the shackles weighing down our economy, we will have to take the axe to the state. It won't be easy, in fact it will be painful and miserable and frustrating, but it has to be done. As a proponent of agonising but necessary economic reforms told us more than four decades ago: there is no alternative. And there really isn't. Even if there was a way of convincing Rachel Reeves to plug the £2.6billion gap out of the goodness of her heart – good luck with that – we would soon be back in the same position. This is a structural problem and it must be attacked structurally. At times like these, there are often calls to cut unpopular expenditures, like free bus travel for asylum seekers, or international development, or spending on quasi-embassies overseas, or more money for Gaelic. These might all be prime candidates for cuts, but taken collectively they would barely equate to a rounding error on the sums under discussion. Scotland is living beyond its means – extravagantly, dangerously. If we don't want to keep paying more and more of our hard earned money to an incompetent and profligate Scottish Government, we will have to wean ourselves off big government and big spending and shrink the state back down to size.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Revolving door' of offenders as deported criminals return to Scotland
CONVICTED criminals including violent thugs are being freed from jail to be deported then returning to Scotland – creating a 'revolving door' of foreign offenders. Prisoners from overseas can be released after serving half of their sentences if they are earmarked to be sent back to their homelands. But the scheme has been abused, with some offenders coming back to the UK and then being locked up to serve the rest of their original terms. It comes amid concern over criminals from other countries contributing to overcrowding which has led to the early release of hundreds to free up space. Last night Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: 'Law-abiding people across the UK will be outraged at repeat foreign offenders being housed in our already overcrowded jails. 'With the SNP 's billion-pound replacement for Barlinnie prison in Glasgow still years away and Labour also being soft on crime, this revolving door situation cannot continue.' The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) said nine foreign criminals were sent back to Scottish jails after having been let out for deportation in the past ten years. It emerged in January that more than £1million of public cash had been handed to illegal immigrants in Scotland, including dangerous criminals, so they can fight deportation. The Mail previously revealed more than 630 people served with deportation orders after being convicted for crimes including sexual assault and violence had not been removed by the Home Office. The number of foreign criminals at large in the UK rocketed over the past year from 11,940 to 17,428 – a record high. The number in Scotland stands at 635. An Albanian criminal who was deported after serving a prison sentence for burglary successfully won the right to remain in the UK – after sneaking back into the country in defiance of a deportation order. Ardit Binaj, 32, was deported after serving just six months of a two-and-a-half-year sentence for burglary under a prisoner transfer agreement with Albania. He illegally entered the UK in 2014 and was arrested for burglary the following year. He was sentenced to 30 months, in addition to a six-month sentence for another burglary and 18 weeks for a separate theft. During Binaj's initial appeal hearing, he claimed he had sought early release to return to Albania to care for his ill grandmother, who later passed away. The judge rejected this, concluding he had returned to avoid serving his full sentence. In another case, an Albanian burglar who claimed asylum to avoid deportation taunted British taxpayers and the Home Office by filming himself cruising around London in a £300,000 Rolls-Royce Cullinan. Gucci-wearing Dorian Puka, 28, has previously been jailed and deported twice for a string of burglaries in the UK. Last year it emerged the Scottish Government was in talks with UK ministers over the deportation of criminals to serve sentences in their home countries to ease overcrowding. As of last October, there were 629 foreign nationals in Scotland's jails, 325 of whom had been convicted of a crime. Last November, an academic claimed Scottish jails resemble a 'mini UN conference'. Jim Watson, a criminal justice lecturer at the University of the West of Scotland, told the Daily Telegraph that during a visit to HMP Barlinnie he had met inmates from all over the world. An SPS spokesman said: 'We have been managing a rising and extremely complex population for more than a year now.' The Scottish Government said 'deportation is a matter for the UK Government'. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Since the election we've removed 4,436 foreign criminals, a 14 per cent increase on (the year before).'
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Zack Polanski: Greens should join forces with Jeremy Corbyn
The Green Party should be open to an alliance with Jeremy Corbyn and other former Labour MPs to emulate the populist success of Reform on the left, a frontrunner for the party's leadership has said. Zack Polanski is challenging Adrian Ramsay and Ellie Chowns to become the next leader of the Green Party in elections that will take place this summer. The London Assembly member, who defines himself as an 'eco-populist', has won more than 100 endorsements from Green councillors and is viewed as a powerful contender for leadership of the party. Polanski said he was open to a pact with anyone who could challenge the rise of Reform. 'We have an increasingly unpopular Labour government that not only doesn't know how to handle it, but is actively making the conditions that are spurring on Nigel Farage even worse. So I will ally myself with anyone who shares my and the Green Party's values,' he said.
