NBA draft: Here are the guards to watch for, including Kasparas Jakučionis and Dylan Harper
Rutgers point guard Dylan Harper is positioned to be the first name called after projected No. 1 pick Cooper Flagg, while Baylor's VJ Edgecombe, Texas' Tre Johnson, Oklahoma's Jeremiah Fears and Illinois' Kasparas Jakučionis are possible top-10 picks as one-and-done prospects.
Here's a look at the guards entering Wednesday's first round.
Strengths: Jakučionis brings size (6-5, 205) and an all-around floor game to the perimeter. He averaged 15 points, 5.7 rebounds and 4.7 assists with four double-digit rebounding games and eight games with at least seven assists.
He was also one of the nation's best freshmen at getting to the foul line (5.1 attempts per game).
Concerns: Jakučionis shot just 31.8% on 3s, including 5 of 22 (22.7%) in four bright-spotlight games during the Big Ten and NCAA tournaments. He averaged 3.7 turnovers — sixth-most in Division I, most among freshmen — and had 13 games with at least five turnovers.
Strengths: The 6-foot-5, 213-pound son of former NBA guard Ron Harper has size at the point and two-way potential. The lefty thrived as a scorer (19.4 points) with athleticism to finish at the rim, score on stepbacks and hit catch-and-shoot looks. Notably, he went for 36 points in an overtime win against Notre Dame, then 37 more a day later in a loss to then-No. 9 Alabama during the Players Era Festival in November.
Harper is a playmaker with good court vision, averaging 4.0 assists. He also averaged 1.4 steals, including six against Southern California and four more against a ranked Illinois team in February.
Concerns: He shot 33.3% on 3-pointers while launching 5.2 per game, though shot selection against contested looks didn't always help. There's also the optics of being the NBA-bound floor leader on a team that finished with a losing record despite featuring a second one-and-done talent in forward Ace Bailey.
Strengths: Explosive athleticism stands out at both ends, notably as an above-the-rim finisher who creates highlight-reel moments. The 6-4, 193-pound Edgecombe finished in the combine's top 10 with a 38.5-inch max vertical leap, had seven games with at least three made 3s and 11 games with three-plus steals.
'I think for freshmen, the universal (issue) is just being able to sustain the level of intensity required as long as they're on the court,' Baylor coach Scott Drew said recently. 'The size, length, speed is one thing, but just to be able to compete each and every play, it's a different level. And VJ has that.'
Concerns: Edgecombe shot just 34% on 3s, though Drew said Edgecombe could see gains after refining his shot mechanics. He could also improve in shot creation, such making just 25% (13 of 59) in off-dribble jumpers, according to Synergy's analytics rankings.
Strengths: The 6-5, 190-pound Johnson averaged 19.9 points to lead all Division I freshmen, as well as being the Southeastern Conference's overall scoring leader. The highlight was Johnson going for 39 points against Arkansas in February to break Kevin Durant's Longhorns freshman single-game record.
He thrived off screens (shot 52.1% in those scenarios to rate in the 91st percentile in Synergy) and shot 39.7% from 3-point range, including 12 games with at least four made 3s. He also shot 87.1% at the foul line.
Concerns: The 19-year-old could use some bulk on a slender frame to help him hold up against bigger and stronger opponents at both ends.
Strengths: The combo guard pressures defenders with his ball-handling and space creation, averaging 17.1 points, 4.1 rebounds and 4.1 assists. He got to the line 6.3 times per game and ranked tied for 11th among all Division I players by making 183 free throws.
Fears also had a knack for clutch plays, including a four-point play to beat a ranked Michigan team along with a tough late scoring drive for the lead in the SEC Tournament loss to Kentucky.
Concerns: He needs to get stronger (6-3, 180) and improve his outside shot. He made 28.4% of his 3s, including nine games of going 0 for 3 or worse. Reducing turnovers (3.4) would help, too.
Egor Demin: The BYU freshman from Russia is a possible lottery prospect as a playmaker with size (6-8, 199), known for elite passing and vision. He averaged 5.5 assists to rank second among all Division I freshmen.
Jase Richardson: The Michigan State freshman and son of former NBA guard Jason Richardson is small (6-1, 178), though the first-round prospect is a 41.2% 3-point shooter.
Nolan Traore: The 6-5, 175-pounder is a scoring playmaker from France. The first-round prospect had previously drawn interest from programs like Duke, Alabama and Gonzaga.
Nique Clifford: The 6-5, 202-pound Clifford spent three years at Colorado then two at Colorado State. The first-round prospect is older (23) but had career-best numbers last year (18.9 points, 9.6 rebounds, 4.4 assists, 37.7% on 3s).
NBA mock draft: Guards — including Illinois' Kasparas Jakučionis — could be big in Round 1Ben Saraf: The 6-6, 201-pound lefty from Israel is a scoring playmaker and first-round prospect. He averaged 12.8 points and 4.6 assists last season with Ratiopharm Ulm in Germany.
Cedric Coward: The 6-5, 213-pound senior started at Division III Willamette, spent two years at Eastern Washington, had an injury-shortened season at Washington State and was set to transfer to Duke. Now he's a first-round prospect after testing well at the combine.
Walter Clayton Jr.: The 6-2, 199-pound combo guard was a first-team Associated Press All-American and Final Four's most outstanding player in Florida's national title run. He's a first-round prospect and gamer who thrived in pressure moments.
Drake Powell: The North Carolina freshman wing has perimeter size (6-6, 195), athleticism, 3-point range and defensive potential to be a possible first-round pick. He has a 7-foot wingspan and had combine-best marks in standing and max vertical leap.
Kam Jones: The Marquette senior and potential first-rounder was a finalist for the Cousy Award presented to the nation's top point guard after averaging 19.2 points and 5.9 assists. He missed two games in his career.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dominion Post
17 minutes ago
- Dominion Post
COLUMN: Expanding the NCAA basketball tournaments is an awful idea, but the NCAA just may be a genius for doing it
MORGANTOWN — We are on the doorstep of what may possibly be the dumbest decision since Coca-Cola came out with New Coke in 1985, which just happens to be the year the NCAA basketball tournament was first expanded to 64 teams. What was such a great move then by the NCAA — it officially created bracketmania and March Madness — is now about to be thumped over the head by sheer ignorance. The Division I men's basketball committee is currently meeting in Savannah, Ga. to discuss a number of topics, none more pressing than the expansion of the men's and women's NCAA tournaments to an expected 76 teams. That's from the current 68-team field. We could go for days as to why this move is unnecessary, beginning with the overall dilution of the tournaments that would now include Power Five Conference teams — if expanded to 76 — that are barely above .500 and may not have been good enough to qualify for their own conference tournaments. You might say the expansion would allow more Cinderella teams into the tournament and isn't the tournament supposed to be about the little guys? Just stop that right now. Adding eight more teams is nothing more than a power move by the power leagues for more money. The guess here is, on average, at least six of those eight schools every year would be from the Big 12, SEC, ACC, Big Ten and Big East. True, WVU would not have been snubbed last season if 76 teams were invited to play. Here's who else from the men's side wouldn't have been snubbed: Ohio State, which finished 17-15. Indiana, which fired its head coach midway through the season. Nebraska, which went 7-13 in Big Ten play. Pitt, which finished 13th in the ACC. Yeah, those additions would have made March Madness 'really' special. As to why the NCAA, university presidents and the Division I men's basketball committee is even considering expansion can be answered with one word: money. By adding more games, the NCAA can drive up the asking price to CBS and Turner Networks for the broadcasting rights. That's all this expansion talk is about. Here's the part I could never understand: Why would CBS and Turner ever agree to pay more if all it meant was televising games that featured bad teams? That answer came to me today, and the NCAA just may be a genius. The original thought is there was no way TV ratings would improve for the NCAA tournament by adding more subpar teams to the field, at least not to the point to justify asking for a few million more dollars. But, here's the thing about college basketball, and this is what maybe the NCAA understands that the rest of us don't, the sport is strictly regionally interesting with those regions spreading across the entire country. Meaning you have 50 states that make up roughly 70 — give or take — regional pockets of interest only in specific teams. Are there absolute college basketball die-hards? Yes, but not enough to drive up TV ratings. Example: With WVU getting snubbed from the tournament last season, doesn't it make sense that TV ratings for the NCAA tournament were down in the state of West Virginia? Now, I don't have those exact numbers, but I would bet every penny I own that the NCAA has its eyes on expansion based on that exact theory. If Pitt and Villanova don't make the tournament, you lose the TV viewers from Pennsylvania. If Oklahoma and Oklahoma State don't make it, you lose the Sooner State's viewership. If Ohio State doesn't make it, you lose the bulk of Ohio viewers and so on. That's millions of people every year who only care about their team, and if their team isn't in, the hell with watching the NCAA tournament. How do you fix it? By making sure those teams make it in by expanding the tournament. By allowing eight more teams in, that's eight more regional pockets of population that now have a rooting interest in the tournament. That's more viewers. That equals higher TV ratings, even if those eight teams have no business being in the tournament to begin with. This isn't about adding eight more deserving teams into the field. It is strictly about adding eight more brands into the field. Does that make it the right thing to do? Of course not, but when has the NCAA ever really sat down and thought about doing the right thing? In fact, the NCAA has a track record recently of spending millions in legal fees fighting the right thing to do when it came to revenue sharing with the student-athletes and eligibility issues. The odds that the men's and women's NCAA tournaments expand, honestly, it's likely 50-50 right now. A final decision for the 2026 tournaments is expected, possibly, before the end of July. From a competitive standpoint, the NCAA tournaments would become a major joke if they were expanded. The NCAA, and in turn its member schools, just may take that joke and laugh all the way to the bank, because this may just be a genius move.
USA Today
37 minutes ago
- USA Today
Ayton: Getting to play with Luka Doncic 'feels like a video game'
Deandre Ayton is now officially a member of the Los Angeles Lakers. He signed a two-year, $16.6 million contract with them on Sunday, and he could be an outstanding solution to their massive problem at the center position. The team introduced him at a press conference on Tuesday, and he seemed enthused to join forces with Luka Doncic and LeBron James. He praised Doncic, who has gotten in noticeably better shape so far this offseason, and said he's "truly excited" to play alongside the Slovenian native. "It feels like a video game, like somebody set it up," Ayton said. "I think somebody set this up. But, honestly, this is an opportunity I won't take for granted. Luka is a once-in-a-generation player. Hearing the shape he's in, he's super ripped. I'm finally glad to be on this side while he's doing all of that. I'm truly excited." Ayton was the No. 1 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft, while Doncic was the No. 3 pick in that same draft. The two were reportedly motivated to play together, and they should be able to thrive together, given Ayton's history of being a rim-running lob threat. While plenty feel Ayton hasn't lived up to his potential since coming out of the University of Arizona, he does have career averages of 16.4 points and 10.5 rebounds a game. He will give Los Angeles another legitimate offensive threat while also upgrading the team in terms of rebounding, size, speed and athleticism.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Golden State Warriors vs. Miami Heat
Why Norman Powell, John Collins trade is a win-win for Heat & Clippers Yahoo Sports senior NBA reporter Vince Goodwill and James Edwards III discuss the three-team trade between the Miami Heat, Los Angeles Clippers and Utah Jazz and explain how Norman Powell and John Collins can elevate their respective new NBA teams. Hear the full conversation on 'Good Word with Goodwill' and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen. 2:57 Now Playing Paused Ad Playing
