&w=3840&q=100)
Online RMGs tell SC bet money is not taxable income under Income Tax Act
As per the Income Tax Act, a consideration is defined by law as any sum or value that is either received or recoverable from a user or a client in return for a service that has either been provided or will be provided. Since online RMGs do not accrue or receive the monies deposited by users for themselves, it cannot be considered taxable income, the counsel for the companies told the Court.
He further explained that when people play against the casinos, they settle with the winners and losers and then take whatever is left as surplus.
"We are not valuing the bet but the right to win. It's a different concept from bet value....As far as the face value of the bet is concerned, it belongs to the winner," he said. The court will continue hearing online RMGs' arguments until Friday.
In the last hearing, the companies had argued that the GST provisions before October 2023 were inadequate to impose a 28 per cent tax on online gaming operators in the manner attempted by the authorities. The government's reliance on Rule 31A of the GST Rules (value of supply in case of lottery, betting, gambling, and horse racing), introduced in 2018, was challenged because it lacked statutory authority under the Central GST (CGST) Act, the companies had said.
On Tuesday, online RMGs also contended that attempts to tax actionable claims like betting and gambling as 'goods' by amending the Goods Rate Notification were flawed. Until October 1, 2023, there was no entry for actionable claims in the Customs Tariff Schedule, making their classification as goods unsustainable under GST.
The petitioners (online gaming companies) explained to the court the distinction between platform fees, on which GST is already paid, and prize pool contributions made by players, which are held in trust and returned to winners. They claimed that prize pool contributions do not constitute consideration and thus cannot be taxed under GST.
In the case of online games, they argued that these games are played against each player, with the online gaming operator merely providing platform services, and that the platform operator, as the supplier of platform services, has discharged GST during the relevant period at the specified rate.
The division bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan is hearing the case, which deals with the absence of clear taxing provisions to enforce tax collection before the October 2023 overhaul. The case, with an estimated financial impact of Rs 2.5 trillion, is one of the biggest tax battles in India's history. The matter will continue on Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
40 minutes ago
- India Today
There's still hope: Delhi's old vehicle ban to be reviewed by Supreme court
In a major development that could reshape how Delhi balances clean-air mandates with evolving vehicle technology, the Supreme Court will hear a crucial plea on July 28 regarding the absurd ban on older petrol and diesel vehicles in the Delhi-NCR region. The hearing comes in light of a petition filed by the Delhi government seeking a review of the court's 2018 order enforcing end-of-life restrictions, particularly on Bharat Stage VI (BS VI)-compliant matter will be heard by a bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, and is expected to explore whether the existing rules, originally designed for older, more so-called polluting vehicles, are still justified in an era of advanced emission norms.A ban rooted in air quality emergencyThe ban traces back to a 2015 order by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which prohibited diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years from operating in Delhi-NCR. The Supreme Court upheld this directive in 2018, citing public health and environmental protection. Recently, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) sought to enforce a related measure by halting fuel supply to these 'end-of-life' vehicles from July 1, an order that has now been deferred to November due to public backlash and logistical petition: Science over age In its application, the Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government argues that the blanket age-based restriction is 'no longer scientifically or technically justified' in light of significant advancements in vehicle emissions technology, especially with the implementation of BS-VI norms in April 2020. These vehicles emit up to 80% less particulate matter and 70% less nitrogen oxides than BS IV the ban 'disproportionate and impractical,' the government emphasises that many well-maintained BS-IV and BS-VI vehicles with up-to-date Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificates and limited usage patterns contribute negligibly to overall pollution. The petition stresses that roadworthiness and emissions should be evaluated scientifically, through regular testing mechanisms under the Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules, rather than being dictated by arbitrary age on the publicThe Delhi government warns that the current ban disproportionately affects middle- and lower-income groups who rely on used vehicles for essential mobility. For many, these vehicles remain roadworthy and compliant with emissions standards, yet face de-registration and denied access to fuel purely due to Minister Majinder Singh Sirsa underlined the government's position, stating, 'We need data-backed policy, not blanket bans. Pollution needs to be tackled, yes, but in a way that is fair and scientifically accurate.'Call for a scientific reviewadvertisementThe Delhi government has urged the Supreme Court to direct either the Centre or the CAQM to conduct a comprehensive scientific study to assess the actual environmental benefits of the age-based ban. The petition also highlights that vehicular emissions are only one of many contributors to Delhi's hazardous air quality, alongside stubble burning, industrial pollution, construction dust, and unfavourable weather lies ahead?If the Supreme Court acknowledges the merits of this review plea, it could pave the way for a landmark shift from age-based scrappage policies to more nuanced, emission-centric regulations. Such a move would not only protect cleaner vehicles from premature "death" but also bring India closer to adopting international best practices in pollution control and sustainable outcome of the July 28 hearing will be closely watched by policymakers, environmentalists, automakers, and millions of vehicle owners across Delhi-NCR, potentially setting a national precedent for the future of vehicle regulation in to Auto Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch


Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Higher pension: These central government employees to get pension hike due to minor salary increase
ET Online Pension The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has issued an official clarification regarding the provision of notional increments to employees who retired a day prior to their due date, i.e. June 30 or December 31. This clarification follows previous orders and is issued subsequent to the Supreme Court's final directives given on February 20, 2025. This move will significantly impact pension calculations for eligible retired employees and serve as a welcome relief to many who have been awaiting clarity following court interventions. The notional increment is for the purpose of calculating pensionary benefits. Although monetary increments are not paid during service, they are taken into account when calculating pensions. The benefit of a notional increment for pension purposes will be available to officials retiring or who have retired on June 30 or December 31 on or after January 1, 2006, contingent upon meeting the conditions outlined in the DoPT's Office Memorandum dated February 20, 2025. Read more: Central govt employees will get notional increment if they are retiring a day before annual pay hike On February 20, 2025, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) issued a detailed clarification regarding the granting of notional increments on July 1 or January 1 to central government employees who retire on June 30 or December 31, respectively, and have completed the required qualifying service with good conduct and satisfactory performance by the date of their retirement, specifically for the calculation of their pension. This increment will be considered only for pension calculation, not for any other pensionary benefits. Effective date for monetary benefit Effective May 1, 2023, all eligible pensioners who retire on or before April 30, 2023, will receive the actual financial benefits resulting from the increased pension (due to the notional increment). The specific instructions from the court will be applicable to individuals who currently hold court orders in their favour. 8th Pay Commission: Has govt received any suggestions on Terms of Reference for 8th Pay Commission? Check the Parliament statement, suggestions According to the DoP order on July 17, 2025, 'The actual monetary benefit of higher pension based on this notional increment will be paid with effect from 01.05.2023 to all eligible employees who retired on or before 30.04.2023, except those who already have a court order in their favour. In such cases, the specific directions of the court shall apply.' Special cases with legal proceedings The Department of Posts order issued on July 17, 2025, stated, 'If an eligible retired employee has filed an application for intervention, impleadment, writ petition, or original application before a CAT, High Court, or the Supreme Court, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable for the period of three years prior to the month in which the application for intervention/impleadment/writ petition/original application was filed.' Conflicting lower court orders to be challenged If any lower court orders contradict the Supreme Court's February 20, 2025, decision or violate the conditions mentioned, they shall be challenged before the higher judiciary to maintain consistency. Re-opening of cases decided in the past The cases which have already been implemented need not be re-opened, the DoP order said. N.R. Narayana Murthy Founder, Infosys Watch Now Harsh Mariwala Chairman & Founder, Marico Watch Now Adar Poonawalla CEO, Serum Institute of India Watch Now Ronnie Screwvala Chairperson & Co-founder, upGrad Watch Now Puneet Dalmia Managing Director, Dalmia Bharat group Watch Now Martin Schwenk Former President & CEO, Mercedes-Benz, Thailand Watch Now Nadir Godrej Managing Director, of Godrej Industries Watch Now Manu Jain Former- Global Vice President, Xiaomi Watch Now Nithin Kamath Founder, CEO, Zerodha Watch Now Anil Agarwal Executive Chairman, Vedanta Resources Watch Now Dr. Prathap C. Reddy Founder Chairman, Apollo Hospitals Watch Now Vikram Kirloskar Former Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Watch Now Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Executive Chairperson, Biocon Limited Watch Now Shashi Kiran Shetty Chairman of Allcargo Logistics, ECU Worldwide and Gati Ltd Watch Now Samir K Modi Managing Director, Modi Enterprises Watch Now R Gopalakrishnan Former Director Tata Sons, Former Vice Chairman, HUL Watch Now Sanjiv Mehta Former Chairman / CEO, Hindustan Unilever Watch Now Dr Ajai Chowdhry Co-Founder, HCL, Chairman EPIC Foundation, Author, Just Aspire Watch Now Shiv Khera Author, Business Consultant, Motivational Speaker Watch Now Nakul Anand Executive Director, ITC Limited Watch Now RS Sodhi Former MD, Amul & President, Indian Dairy Association Watch Now Anil Rai Gupta Managing Director & Chairman, Havells Watch Now Zia Mody Co-Founder & Managing Partner, AZB & Partners Watch Now Arundhati Bhattacharya Chairperson & CEO, Salesforce India Watch Now


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh GST dept busts Rs 1 crore tax evasion by medical supplier in Rs 48 crore govt supply scam
Representational image RAIPUR: Chhattisgarh GST department has exposed one of the biggest crackdowns of Rs 1 crore tax evasion scam linked to inflated medical supply contracts worth Rs 48 crore by a Raigarh-based firm accused of allegedly manipulating invoices and routed transactions through shell companies to dodge taxes and secure massive profits from govt health contracts. According to a press release issued by govt, 'The audit of the allegedly accused firm, M/s Shyam Surgical, which supplies surgical and medical equipment to govt hospitals across Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, and Odisha, is accused of evading over Rs 1 crore. The investigation, launched after a detailed audit of the firm's dealings with the state health department, revealed that M/s Shyam Surgical supplied medical goods worth Rs 48 crore over the last 4–5 years. The actual purchase value of these goods was just around Rs 10 crore. Authorities say the company inflated prices by up to five times, pocketing illegitimate profits between 400–500% on critical health supplies.' To mask the price inflation and evade taxes, the company reportedly set up three shell entities- Rahul Enterprises, Narayani Healthcare, and P R Enterprises, in the names of family members. These firms were allegedly used for internal circular transactions to simulate market-rate purchases and justify overpricing, thereby siphoning off profits while evading tax dues. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Acting on instructions from Finance Minister O P Choudhary, state GST department initiated the probe as part of a wider review of public procurement contracts. The enforcement action was part of a broader directive issued by Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai who pushes for transparent governance and accountability, especially in welfare-related departments like health, the release stated. A senior GST official familiar with the investigation said, 'Such unethical profiteering on health supplies directly affects hospitals and patients who rely on the govt for affordable care.' Chief Minister, while commenting briefly on the development, said the govt views any corruption in essential sectors like health as a betrayal of public trust, and warned of severe consequences for violators. 'We will ensure that those exploiting the system for profit are held accountable,' CM said. State officials have issued fresh warnings to all suppliers involved in govt procurement, stressing that manipulating tenders, invoices, or tax filings will invite the harshest legal consequences.