Paras Chadha to lead Microsoft & AI strategy for Logicalis ANZ
Logicalis has expanded the remit of Paras Chadha to lead its Microsoft and artificial intelligence (AI) business in Australia and New Zealand.
Paras Chadha, previously responsible for Microsoft and AI operations across Asia Pacific, will now oversee the Australia and New Zealand region as part of a unified strategy for Microsoft and AI solutions in APAC. Based in Australia, Chadha's expanded role is intended to align regional initiatives with global objectives and accelerate the adoption of Microsoft technologies in the region.
The appointment reflects Logicalis's strategy to strengthen its local and regional presence, with growth in AI integration, cybersecurity, cloud and business solutions forming key priorities. The company aims to drive secure innovation and customer-centric digital transformation by leveraging its existing suite of services and ongoing collaboration with Microsoft. These services include advanced analytics, AI-powered insights, data management and application platform modernisation using Microsoft technologies.
Collaborative focus
Logicalis regards its collaboration with Microsoft as central to its APAC strategy. The company is active in the development and deployment of Microsoft solutions designed to modernise data and application platforms, targeting increased efficiency and agility for its client base. Key focus areas include using Microsoft's emerging solutions, such as Fabric and Copilot, to help customers extract value from data, enhance decision-making, and securely scale AI across hybrid environments.
Lisa Fortey, General Manager of Logicalis Australia, highlighted the increasing demand for AI and automation capabilities across multiple sectors. She said, "Paras's appointment comes at a time when demand for AI integration and intelligent automation is surging across industries. Organisations are increasingly seeking expert partners who can guide secure deployment, mitigate risk, and align AI investments to business outcomes. Paras's experience in scaling Microsoft-led transformation across complex markets equips Logicalis to meet this growing demand with deep technical insight and strategic foresight."
Local insights and unified strategy
Chadha's presence in Australia is expected to enhance Logicalis's understanding of regional market dynamics, enabling the company to better address local priorities in sectors including healthcare and local government while applying this knowledge to wider APAC and global strategies. His expanded role supports the aim to create a more unified approach, integrating the Australia and New Zealand region into broader APAC operations for customers and partners.
Paras Chadha commented, "I'm energised by the opportunity to lead the Microsoft and AI business for Logicalis across ANZ and APAC. Logicalis is entering a period of exciting growth as we scale our capabilities, offerings, and comprehensive services for Microsoft and AI. There is enormous potential to help businesses in the region adopt and transform into AI-driven organisations with a secure, scalable foundation. Being based in Australia will allow me to leverage my deep understanding of local customer priorities, from healthcare to local councils, and apply these ANZ insights to both APAC and global strategy. "I'm looking forward to further incorporating the ANZ region into the broader APAC strategy to create a more unified and connected approach for our customers and partners like Microsoft. This move strengthens Logicalis's ability to deliver consistent, high-impact outcomes across borders while reinforcing its leadership in security, which remains a core pillar of every engagement. Bringing these functions together under a single regional strategy will be the key for Logicalis to co-drive innovation, security, and business outcomes through mission critical transformations for our customers."
Regional investment
The move to expand Chadha's remit follows Logicalis's ongoing investment in customer-focused digital transformation across the Asia Pacific region. Logicalis's range of services is designed to help clients use technology to unlock value from their data and drive operational improvements across various industries.
Logicalis operates across 30 countries, serving over 10,000 clients, and reports annualised revenue of USD $1.63 billion from its global operations. The company's continued focus is on providing digital managed services, improving the reliability, user experience, and security of clients' digital ecosystems, and enabling strategic decision-making for sustainable business outcomes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
an hour ago
- Techday NZ
Twilio appoints Howard Fyffe as Director of Sales for ANZ
Twilio has announced the appointment of Howard Fyffe as Director of Sales for Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). Fyffe will oversee Twilio's Communications business in the ANZ region, leading a sales team tasked with supporting brands in delivering personalised digital engagement to customers. The remit for Fyffe includes fostering sales growth in the region and guiding operational priorities to support brands in strengthening their digital connections with customers. His responsibilities will encompass driving the expansion of Twilio's services in the ANZ market, as well as supporting existing clients in their engagement strategies. Fyffe brings more than 20 years of industry experience to the role, with expertise spanning AI, automation, data centre, hybrid cloud, and risk and compliance. During his career, he has held leadership roles at organisations such as xAmplify, where he served as Chief Revenue Officer, as well as multiple positions at Cisco Systems in Asia Pacific, Australia, and New York. Inclusion of prior appointments at VAST Data, Veritas, and Nutanix further highlights his breadth of experience in both enterprise sales and operations management. Commenting on the appointment, Robert Woolfrey, Vice President for Communications, Asia Pacific & Japan at Twilio said: "Howard is a proven enterprise leader with a strong track record of driving strategic growth in Australia and New Zealand. He joins Twilio at a pivotal time, as we double down on new business, account expansion, and operational excellence in ANZ. With his leadership, we'll accelerate our momentum and help even more customers build smarter, AI-powered customer experiences." Fyffe's appointment comes as Twilio intensifies its focus on business growth, account development, and operational strategy throughout the region. His leadership will include enabling high-performing teams to deliver digital solutions that assist brands in establishing and deepening customer relationships. On taking up the new post, Fyffe stated: "I'm thrilled to join Twilio to lead a dynamic and talented team focused on helping businesses across Australia and New Zealand strengthen their customer engagement. Twilio sits at the intersection of technology and human connection, helping organisations turn digital interactions into meaningful experiences. Throughout my career, I've always been passionate about using innovation to solve real customer challenges, and I look forward to contributing to the strong work the team is already doing to advance Twilio's mission." Fyffe's experience and perspective are expected to support Twilio as it seeks greater penetration in ANZ's digital engagement market. The company's strategy in the region is aimed at helping organisations leverage communications technology and data to optimise and personalise customer interactions across a range of applications, including sales, marketing, growth, and customer service. The appointment aligns with ongoing trends in customer engagement, where personalisation and digital transformation remain a focus for businesses seeking to maintain competitive advantage. Fyffe's leadership is anticipated to play a role in facilitating the adoption of digital and AI-powered solutions among Twilio's current and prospective clients in Australia and New Zealand. Twilio continues to operate across 180 countries, providing its customer engagement platform to a wide range of businesses and developers globally. Follow us on: Share on:
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
OMG! Is it WW3?, AI telling us what we want to hear
It was hard for media all around the world to work out what happened in the Middle East. But claims that WW3 and global recession might be upon us here were rolled back within a day. Also: Chat GPT's been accused of lying, making stuff up and gaslighting a UK journalist while Google's AI seems to be telling us what we want to hear. Is AI human after all?
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
'Pretty damn average': Google's AI Overviews underwhelm
Photo: JAAP ARRIENS Most searches online are done using Google. Traditionally, they've returned long lists of links to websites carrying relevant information. Depending on the topic, there can be thousands of entries to pick from or scroll through. Last year Google started incorporating its Gemini AI tech into its searches . Google's Overviews now inserts Google's own summary of what it's scraped from the internet ahead of the usual list of links to sources in many searches. Some sources say Google's now working towards replacing the lists of links with its own AI-driven search summaries. RNZ's Kathryn Ryan's not a fan. "Pretty damn average I have to say, for the most part," she said on Nine to Noon last Monday during a chat about AI upending the business of digital marketing. But Kathryn Ryan is not the only one underwhelmed by Google's Overviews. Recently, online tech writers discovered you can trick it into thinking that made up sayings are actually idioms in common usage that are meaningful. The Sydney Morning Herald 's puzzle compiler David Astle - under the headline 'Idiom or Idiot?' reckoned Google's AI wasn't about to take his job making cryptic crosswords anytime soon. "There is a strange bit of human psychology which says that we expect a very high bar from machines in a way that we don't from humans," the BBC's head of technology forecasting Laura Ellis told Mediawatch last month. "But if you've got a machine making a mistake, where does that accountability fall? We've just not tested this out yet." UK Sky News deputy political editor Sam Coates tried to make ChatGPT accountable after it made up an entire episode of his own politics podcast when he used it to help archive transcripts of it recently. "AI had told a lie that it had got the transcript. And rather than back down it invented an entire fake episode without flagging that it's fake." When challenged on this, the technology insisted Coates had created the episode himself. When ChatGPT can't find an answer or the right data to draw on, it can 'hallucinate' or just make up a misleading response. "Chat GTP is gaslighting me. No such thing exists. It's all a complete fake," Coates spluttered. After turning ChatGPT off and on again in 'conversation mode', it did eventually own up. "It said; 'Look, you're absolutely right to challenge that. I can't remember the exact time that you uploaded.' And then: 'What I can confirm is that I did it and you're holding me to account,'" Coates told viewers. He went on to challenge ChatGPT about its hallucinations getting worse. "The technology is always improving, and newer versions tend to do a better job at staying accurate," ChatGPT replied. But Coates - armed with data that suggested the opposite - asked ChatGPT for specific stats. The response: "According to recent internal tests from OpenAI, the newer models have shown higher hallucination rates. For instance, the model known as o3 had about a 33 percent hallucination rate, while the 04 mini model had around 48 percent." "I get where you're coming from, and I'm sorry for the mixed messages. The performance of these models can vary." When Coates aired his experience as a warning for journalists, some reacted with alarm. "The hallucination rate of advanced models... is increasing. As journos, we really should avoid it," said Sunday Times writer and former BBC diplomatic editor Mark Urban. But some tech experts accused Coates of misunderstanding and misusing the technology. "The issues Sam runs into here will be familiar to experienced users, but it illustrates how weird and alien Large Language Model (LLM) behaviour can seem for the wider public," said Cambridge University AI ethicist Henry Shevlin. "We need to communicate that these are generative simulators rather than conventional programmes," he added. Others were less accommodating on social media. "All I am seeing here is somebody working in the media who believes they understand how technology works - but [he] doesn't - and highlighting the dangers of someone insufficiently trained in technology trying to use it." "It's like Joey from Friends using the thesaurus function on Word." Mark Honeychurch is a programmer and long serving stalwart of the NZ Skeptics, a non profit body promoting critical thinking and calling out pseudoscience. The Skeptics' website said they confront practices that exploit a lack of specialist knowledge among people. That's what many people use Google for - answers to things they don't know or things they don't understand. Mark Honeychurch described putting overviews to the test in a recent edition of the Skeptics' podcast Yeah, Nah . "The AI looked like it was bending over backwards to please people. It's trying to give an answer that it knows that the customer wants," Honeychurch told Mediawatch . Honeychurch asked Google for the meaning of: 'Better a skeptic than two geese.' "It's trying to do pattern-matching and come out with something plausible. It does this so much that when it sees something that looks like an idiom that it's never heard before, it sees a bunch of idioms that have been explained and it just follows that pattern." "It told me a skeptic is handy to have around because they're always questioning - but two geese could be a handful and it's quite hard to deal with two geese." "With some of them, it did give me a caveat that this doesn't appear to be a popular saying. Then it would launch straight into explaining it. Even if it doesn't make sense, it still gives it its best go because that's what it's meant to do." In time, would AI and Google detect the recent articles pointing out this flaw - and learn from them? "There's a whole bunch of base training where (AI) just gets fed data from the Internet as base material. But on top of that, there's human feedback. "They run it through a battery of tests and humans can basically mark the quality of answers. So you end up refining the model and making it better. "By the time I tested this, it was warning me that a few of my fake idioms don't appear to be popular phrases. But then it would still launch into trying to explain it to me anyway, even though it wasn't real." Things got more interesting - and alarming - when Honeychurch tested Google Overviews with real questions about religion, alternative medicine and skepticism. "I asked why you shouldn't be a skeptic. I got a whole bunch of reasons that sounded plausible about losing all your friends and being the boring person at the party that's always ruining stories." "When I asked it why you should be a skeptic, all I got was a message saying it cannot answer my question." He also asked why one should be religious - and why not. And what reasons we should trust alternative medicines - and why we shouldn't. "The skeptical, the rational, the scientific answer was the answer that Google's AI just refused to give." "For the flip side of why I should be religious, I got a whole bunch of answers about community and a feeling of warmth and connecting to my spiritual dimension. "I also got a whole bunch about how sometimes alternative medicine may have turned out to be true and so you can't just dismiss it." "But we know why we shouldn't trust alternative medicine. It's alternative so it's not been proven to work. There's a very easy answer." But not one Overview was willing or able to give, it seems. Google does answer the neutral question 'Should I trust alternative medicine?' by saying there is "no simple answer" and "it's crucial to approach alternative medicine with caution and prioritise evidence-based conventional treatments." So is Google trying not to upset people with answers that might concern them? "I don't want to guess too much about that. It's not just Google but also OpenAI and other companies doing human feedback to try and make sure that it doesn't give horrific answers or say things that are objectionable." "But it's always conflicting with the fact that this AI is just trained to give you that plausible answer. It's trying to match the pattern that you've given in the question." Journalists use Google, just like anyone who's in a hurry and needs information quickly. Do journalists need to ensure they don't rely on the Overviews summary right at the top of the search page? "Absolutely. This is AI use 101. If you're asking something of a technical question, you really need to be well enough versed in what you're asking that you can judge whether the answer is good or not." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
