GameStop And Trump's Bitcoin Buys: What It Means For Future Crypto Adoption In 2025
A clear legal framework is needed to support regulatory consistency and provide the stability ... More required for broader institutional participation in bitcoin.
Institutional adoption of bitcoin is gaining new momentum in 2025, driven by high-profile developments in both the private and public sectors. GameStop's purchase of 4,710 bitcoin and a $2.5 billion bitcoin initiative from Trump Media highlight how digital assets are entering mainstream financial strategy.
This article explores the cascading effects of GameStop and Trump Media publicly adding bitcoin to their balance sheets, indicating a growing institutional interest in digital assets. It also examines how President Trump's executive actions are reshaping the federal approach to digital assets and what these combined developments could mean for the future of institutional crypto adoption in the United States.
GameStop's Strategic Bitcoin Acquisition
In May 2025, GameStop announced it had purchased 4,710 bitcoin, confirming the acquisition in a press release on May 28. The purchase reflects a growing trend among public companies using bitcoin as a treasury asset and positions GameStop alongside other firms integrating digital assets into their balance sheets as a potential hedge against economic uncertainty.
CEO Ryan Cohen addressed the decision in a recorded interview at the 2025 Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas. He described bitcoin and gold as 'hedges against global currency devaluation and systemic financial risk.' When asked whether GameStop planned to increase its holdings, Cohen said the company's future strategy remains undecided and emphasized that it will continue making decisions based on what aligns best for the company as a whole.
Trump's Administration and Crypto Initiatives
Since taking office for his second term in 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump has aggressively advanced crypto-friendly policies to position the U.S. as 'the crypto capital of the world.' On January 23, 2025, the President signed Executive Order 14178, 'Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology,' revoking prior guidance on a central bank digital currency and creating a working group to develop a federal regulatory framework for digital assets. On March 6, President Trump issued Executive Order 14233 establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile funded with cryptocurrencies seized through forfeiture proceedings. These initiatives reflect a clear shift in policy, treating digital assets as reserve holdings alongside more traditional stores of value.
In addition to executive action, the Trump administration has shifted its approach to regulatory enforcement. Leadership changes at key agencies included the appointment of Paul Atkins, a proponent of digital assets, as Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the disbanding of the Justice Department's crypto enforcement unit. Legal proceedings involving major platforms such as Coinbase and Binance have been paused or dismissed under updated guidance from the administration's crypto task force.
Separately, Trump Media and Technology Group launched a $2.5 billion initiative to build a bitcoin treasury, with custody provided by Anchorage Digital and Crypto.com. These developments reflect a broader strategy to integrate digital assets into government policy and private-sector activity.
The Impact On Institutional Crypto Adoption
GameStop's bitcoin purchase marks a notable example of a public company allocating digital assets as part of its treasury strategy. The company's decision to acquire 4,710 bitcoin and publicly disclose the move highlights a growing corporate interest in alternative value stores. While not unprecedented, GameStop's actions add to the visibility of bitcoin as a financial asset and may prompt further examination of similar strategies among other publicly traded firms.
In parallel, the Trump administration introduced a series of executive actions that frame digital assets as legitimate components of the U.S. financial system. Establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, prohibiting a central bank digital currency and creating a federal working group on digital asset markets represent a coordinated policy shift. These developments have altered the regulatory environment, potentially shaping how institutions approach compliance, custody and long-term planning for digital asset involvement.
Regulatory Landscape
The regulatory environment for digital assets is changing, accompanied by increased engagement from businesses and individual investors. President Trump's executive actions related to digital assets have shifted the federal approach, introducing a new perspective on how executive agencies treat digital assets. These developments have taken place amid broader interest in digital assets across the private sector, as companies and financial service providers explore potential uses within existing economic and technological systems.
Despite these developments, Congress has not passed any federal legislation to formalize the new direction. The current framework is based solely on executive orders, which future administrations can revise or reverse. As a result, the long-term regulatory outlook remains uncertain. A comprehensive legal framework is needed to establish lasting economic stability and support sustained institutional adoption of digital assets. Legislative clarity also helps standardize compliance, reduce risk and encourage broader market participation.
The Outlook Of Institutional Crypto Adoption
In the short term, institutional interest in digital assets is gaining traction. High-profile moves by companies like GameStop and President Trump's actions have contributed to a more open environment for exploring bitcoin as part of financial strategies. Custodial partnerships, treasury allocations, and public disclosures are becoming more common as institutions test limited exposure to digital assets within existing risk frameworks.
Over the long term, the outlook for institutional adoption will likely depend on establishing a clear and consistent regulatory foundation. While executive orders and market signals have shaped current policy, the absence of formal legislation leaves room for uncertainty. The passage of comprehensive federal laws could provide the stability and legal clarity needed to support broader integration of digital assets across the financial system.
Bottom Line
Momentum is growing in digital asset adoption, including GameStop's bitcoin purchase and new executive actions, which show a deepening alignment between digital assets and institutional finance. These signals suggest that bitcoin is becoming more accepted in both corporate strategy and federal policy, with increasing visibility in treasury management and government planning.
However, these shifts rely on executive authority rather than formal legislation. Long-term adoption remains uncertain without a federal law to anchor the current direction. A clear legal framework is needed to support regulatory consistency and provide the stability required for broader institutional participation. In the meantime, companies and investors are navigating a landscape shaped by executive orders and market momentum, while watching closely for legislative efforts that could define the future of digital asset integration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dyne Therapeutics Announces Pricing of $200.0 Million Public Offering of Common Stock
WALTHAM, Mass., June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: DYN), a clinical-stage company focused on delivering functional improvement for people living with genetically driven neuromuscular diseases, today announced the pricing of an underwritten public offering of 24,242,425 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $8.25 per share. The gross proceeds to Dyne from the offering, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by Dyne, are expected to be $200.0 million. All shares in the offering are being sold by Dyne. The offering is expected to close on or about July 2, 2025, subject to customary closing conditions. In addition, Dyne has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 3,636,363 shares of its common stock at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. Morgan Stanley, Jefferies, Stifel and Guggenheim Securities are acting as joint book-running managers for the offering. Jones is acting as co-manager for the offering. The offering is being made pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') on March 5, 2024 and became automatically effective upon filing. This offering is being made only by means of a prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus that form a part of the registration statement. A preliminary prospectus supplement relating to and describing the terms of the offering has been filed with the SEC and may be obtained for free by visiting the SEC's website at A final prospectus supplement relating to the offering will be filed with the SEC. When available, copies of the final prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus may also be obtained by contacting: Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014, or by email at prospectus@ Jefferies LLC, Attention: Equity Syndicate Prospectus Department, 520 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022, by telephone at (877) 821-7388, or by email at Prospectus_Department@ Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Attention: Prospectus Department, One Montgomery Street, Suite 3700, San Francisco, CA 94104, by telephone at (415) 364-2720 or by email at syndprospectus@ or Guggenheim Securities, LLC, Attention: Equity Syndicate Department, 330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10017, by telephone at (212) 518-9544, or by email at GSEquityProspectusDelivery@ This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. About Dyne Therapeutics Dyne Therapeutics is focused on delivering functional improvement for people living with genetically driven neuromuscular diseases. We are developing therapeutics that target muscle and the central nervous system (CNS) to address the root cause of disease. The company is advancing clinical programs for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and preclinical programs for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) and Pompe disease. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this press release, including statements relating to the anticipated closing date of the public offering, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'continue,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'intend,' 'may,' 'might,' 'objective,' 'ongoing,' 'plan,' 'predict,' 'project,' 'potential,' 'should,' or 'would,' or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Dyne may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in these forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including the risks and uncertainties related to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions for the public offering and other factors discussed in the 'Risk Factors' section of the preliminary prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on June 30, 2025, as well as the risks and uncertainties identified in Dyne's filings with the SEC, including Dyne's most recent Form 10-Q and in subsequent filings Dyne may make with the SEC. In addition, the forward-looking statements included in this press release represent Dyne's views as of the date of this press release. Dyne anticipates that subsequent events and developments will cause its views to change. However, while Dyne may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing Dyne's views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release. Contacts: Investors Mia Tobiasir@ Media Stacy Nartkersnartker@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
20 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Career Strategies That Set Visionaries Apart In The AI Age
Artificial intelligence is a persistent force that is revolutionizing various industries, including ... More finance, fashion, logistics, and law. Artificial intelligence is here to stay, and it's rewriting the rules of every industry, from finance to fashion and logistics to law. As machines become smarter and automation transforms the way we work, professionals across sectors face a pivotal question: how do you stay not just relevant, but visionary? According to the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, artificial intelligence is poised to reshape the global labor market significantly. The report forecasts that AI will generate approximately 97 million new jobs worldwide by 2025, while simultaneously displacing around 85 million existing roles. These insights are indicative of a major shift in how work is done, reflecting the growing need for new skills and evolving job roles across industries. The AI age doesn't just reward technical skills or resumes filled with buzzwords. It favors those who think ahead, lead with insight and creativity, and know how to combine people-centered leadership with cutting-edge innovation. For those navigating systemic inequities, it's not just about staying relevant. It's about reclaiming power, owning the narrative, and creating spaces where it never existed before. Here are three career strategies that set visionaries apart in the AI-driven economy: 1. Lead With Adaptability, Not Just Experience In the past, experience and tenure often carried the most weight. But in the AI era, adaptability and the ability to communicate your skills clearly and creatively are often more valuable than being deeply rooted in a single role or way of working. Visionaries do not cling to what they have always done. They re-imagine what is possible. They ask questions like, What new problems can I solve? What skills should I unlearn and relearn? They approach their careers not as static ladders but as evolving ecosystems built on learning, experimentation, and reinvention. To thrive in this environment, it is important to stay curious and make strategic connections. Subscribe to cross-industry newsletters, take short-form courses in emerging technologies, and be among the first in your organization to explore new tools. 2. Design Your Career Like a Startup As a visionary, you do not wait for opportunity; you design it. Visionaries shape their careers like product road-maps, identifying market gaps, iterating on their value, and constantly refining their might mean launching a niche consultancy, leading AI transformation initiatives within your company, or building a cross-functional skill set that positions you as a hybrid expert. They are not afraid to pivot, prototype, or establish themselves as category strengthen your position in this AI age, regularly audit your skills, passions, and industry trends. Ask yourself, where do they intersect? Build a personal 'career thesis' that guides your decisions the same way a business plan guides a founder. 3. Integrate Humanity Into Innovation AI is fast, scalable, and data-driven. But visionaries understand what machines lack: context, compassion, ethics, and human intuition. The future of leadership belongs to those who do not just use AI; they humanize it. This means advocating for ethical AI use while remaining people-centered, ensuring equity in innovation, and designing solutions that reflect cultural nuance and community needs. It also means leading teams with emotional intelligence in an increasingly digitized workplace. You will want to position yourself as someone who bridges technology and people—a strategist and leader who speaks code, innovation, and connection. This will make you indispensable in any future-facing team. AI can be a powerful opportunity to shape the industries, roles, and economies of tomorrow. The AI age isn't about competing with machines. It is about elevating what makes us most human: creativity, vision, and adaptability, and using these qualities to lead change and develop new skills and frameworks. AI can be a powerful opportunity to shape the industries, roles, and economies of tomorrow.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The most surprising victim of Trump's terrible tax agenda
The Republican Party's saving grace is supposed to be its commitment to economic growth and consumer abundance. Sure, the GOP may see unemployed cancer patients as shiftless mooches — and the Lorax as literature's greatest villain — but for precisely those reasons, Republicans are allegedly able stewards of industrial development: Unconstrained by concerns about inequality, the environment, or social justice, the GOP will unleash the private sector's productive potential. Republicans won't balance Americans' hunger for cheap gasoline against their enlightened interest in cleaner air or a cooler planet — they'll get you the cheap fuel now. And they won't weigh America's stake in technological supremacy against the risks of unregulated innovation — they'll give cutting-edge companies whatever they need to achieve global dominance. At least, this is the impression that Republicans have tried to cultivate, and which voters largely bought last November. According to polling by Democratic data firm Blue Rose Research, Americans in 2024 believed that the GOP would be better than Democrats on the economy and cost of living — but worse on income inequality and the environment — and considered the former issues more important. But the GOP's priorities aren't as advertised. President Donald Trump's agenda does not ask Americans to accept a dirtier atmosphere and more inegalitarian social order in exchange for cheaper goods, faster technological progress, and national industrial dominance. Rather, it asks us to accept not only greater inequality and environmental degradation, but also, higher prices, slower technological progress, and worse industrial performance for the sake of…I'm not sure what. Perhaps the conservative movement's cultural grievances? Or Trump's odd ideological fixations? In any case, Trump has long made his disregard for affordability and economic growth plain. As of mid-June, Trump's tariffs were still poised to increase Americans' annual cost of living by $2,000 on average, while knocking 0.6 percent off of economic growth. His administration's assault on funding for scientific research, meanwhile, has undermined US tech companies. And his crackdown on immigration is both chasing top-tier talent out of the US and exacerbating labor shortages in the construction industry, thereby slowing the pace of housing and infrastructure development. Now, with his inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill (BBB) — which is poised to clear the Senate this week — Trump is rounding out his 'worst of both worlds' agenda. Predictably, his tax cut package would exacerbate inequality, taking health care and food assistance away from poor people in order to shower tax breaks on the wealthy. And the legislation also evinces contempt for the environment, offering new subsidies to American coal producers. More remarkably, however, BBB would also increase electricity prices for consumers while undermining America's competitiveness in a range of critical sectors. Specifically, the latest version of Trump's bill aims to throttle the production of renewable energy in the US. The legislation not only phases out federal subsidies for wind and solar power by 2027, but also imposes a new excise tax on renewable projects that use inputs made in China. Since Chinese firms dominate green energy supply chains, a very high percentage of all wind and solar development in the United States would be adversely impacted by the tax. What's more, Trump's legislation would actually reinforce American green energy companies' dependence on Chinese suppliers by curtailing subsidies to domestic manufacturers of solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries. (As of this writing, some Republican senators are pushing an amendment that would strike the excise tax from the bill. But that amendment's fate is unclear. And even if it is adopted, Trump's legislation would still curtail subsidies to the solar and wind industries.) Taken together, these measures could slash the amount of new clean energy capacity added to America's grid over the next 10 years by more than 72 percent, according to an analysis from the Rhodium Group. That scarcity will translate into higher electricity costs for consumers. According to a variety of recent studies, merely ending federal tax credits for wind and solar could push up the average family's energy bill by as much as $400 per year within a decade. While increasing US households' costs, Trump's bill also reduces American firms' competitiveness in some of the world's fastest-growing industries. On one level, this is obvious. Renewables accounted for more than 90 percent of all newly added electricity generation last year. Even if America clings tightly to fossil fuels, demand for wind and solar energy is going to surge worldwide in the coming decades. If the United States actively sabotages its clean power industry, it will cede a larger share of the global energy market to China and other rival nations. Less intuitively, the BBB also undermines America's artificial intelligence industry. AI companies need vast amounts of new electricity to power their data centers. And renewables are uniquely well-suited to provide such power. At present, utilities can build wind and solar much faster than new natural gas plants, as there is a years-long backlog in the global market for natural gas turbines. Likewise, nuclear energy takes an enormous amount of time and regulatory wrangling to expand. Thus, if the federal government makes building renewables slower and more expensive, then American AI firms' progress could also be stymied. This has led some in the tech industry to criticize the bill. 'We urge the Senate to prioritize a reliable and resilient energy mix that advances AI innovation and growth and reject provisions that will harm the U.S.'s ability to compete in the global race for AI and energy dominance,' Janae Washington, a spokesperson for the Information Technology Industry Council, told the Washington Post on Sunday. Elon Musk, meanwhile, declared Saturday that 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Even one of the bill's strongest proponents — the pro-fossil fuels advocate Alex Epstein — has lamented its new tax on renewables with Chinese inputs, as has the US Chamber of Commerce. Nevertheless, as of this writing, that tax remains in the legislation. It is therefore a mistake to see Trump's agenda as prioritizing innovation over equality or affordability over the environment. The BBB doesn't concentrate wealth or degrade the climate in pursuit of some higher objective. Rather, it treats increasing inequality and boosting carbon emissions as ends in themselves — goals that it is prepared to pursue even at great cost to America industrial competitiveness and living standards.
