Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' RFK Stadium Deal Over Team Name
But now, there is a need to focus on the nonsense, it seems. As President Trump continues to try to turn attention away from scrutinizing his relationship with the late alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, he posted twice on his Truth Social platform on Sunday about the name of the football franchise in the nation's capital as well as that of the MLB team in Cleveland, Ohio.
'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' he posted. 'There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!'
In a follow-up, Trump added: 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone. Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians. The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!'
(Dolan, a Republican who served five years in the Ohio House of Representatives and eight years in the state senate and whose father purchased the Cleveland baseball team in 2000, ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate in 2022 and 2024.)
Amid widespread concern about social injustices across the U.S. in 2020, both the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians decided to change their controversial names out of respect for Native Americans. Washington became the Washington Football Team that year, and in 2022 adopted the name the Washington Commanders, while the Cleveland Indians transitioned to its current name, the Cleveland Guardians, in 2021.
Read More: A Linguist's Analysis of the Redskins Defense
Trump was never a fan of the name changes, tweeting in 2020: 'They name teams out of STRENGTH, not weakness, but now the Washington Redskins & Cleveland Indians, two fabled sports franchises, look like they are going to be changing their names in order to be politically correct. Indians, like Elizabeth Warren, must be very angry right now!'
(Sen. Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has been mocked by Trump and other Republicans for her claims of Cherokee ancestry.)
Trump's urging of the sports organizations to reverse their rebrandings comes as his second-term Administration has targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in both the public and private sector.
Speaking to reporters Sunday, Guardians' president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti said, 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last 4 years and are excited about the future.'
The Commanders did not immediately issue a statement, but earlier this year, controlling owner Josh Harris said his team had no plans to change its name again. 'In this building, the name Commanders means something,' Harris said during a February press conference. 'It's about players who love football, are great at football, hit hard, mentally tough, great teammates.'
It's unclear whether Trump has the authority to upend a deal that the Commanders and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser announced in April to return the team in 2030 to its former home at the capital's Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium after having moved to Landover, Md., in 1997.
Amid years of discussions about redeveloping the storied-but-defunct sports and events campus, Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, signed into law in January a bill that transferred the land of the RFK Stadium from federal to local control for the next 99 years.
Still, earlier this month, as some members of the D.C. Council expressed skepticism about the timeline and financing of the mayor's deal with the Commanders, Trump suggested he could intervene if the council doesn't approve it. 'It's a very important piece of property. It's a great piece of property,' Trump said, referring to the RFK Stadium site, 'You know, ultimately we control that. The federal government ultimately controls it, so we'll see what happens.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bessent calls for internal review of Fed but doesn't think Powell needs to step down
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is taking aim at both the Federal Reserve and the rules the Fed enforces as a supervisor of big banks but making it clear he doesn't think Fed chair Jerome Powell needs to step down immediately. Monday he said on X that there should be a review of the central bank's $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters and a review of its non-monetary policy operations, arguing that 'significant mission creep and institutional growth have taken the Fed into areas that potentially jeopardize the independence of its core monetary policy mission.' He posted the comments on the same day he spoke at the opening of a Fed conference designed to review the capital framework governing big banks. That conference continues Tuesday. There he made a separate call for 'deeper reforms' of the regulations governing the nation's biggest banks, arguing that 'outdated capital requirements' impose 'unnecessary burdens on financial institutions.' Specifically he suggested that regulators scrap a dual capital structure proposed during the last administration but never enacted, calling it 'flawed.' "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth," Bessent said in his remarks. But he made it clear in a Fox Business Network interview Tuesday that he doesn't think Powell should step down immediately. His boss President Trump has been calling repeatedly for Powell's resigantion. Bessent is among the candidates being considered to replace Jerome Powell as chair of the central bank once Powell's term expires in 10 months. Trump and other White House officials have been hammering Powell and the Fed over the slow pace of interest rate cuts, with none being made so far in 2025, as well as the costs involved in the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters complex along the National Mall in Washington. Bessent joined that chorus on Monday. 'While I have no knowledge or opinion on the legal basis for the massive building renovations being undertaken on Constitution Avenue, a review of the decision to undertake such a project by an institution reporting operating losses of more than $100 billion per year should be conducted,' Bessent said in his Monday post on X. Trump has considered firing Powell and Bessent urged him no to do so, according to The Wall Street Journal. Powell has said repeatedly that he intends to serve out his term as chair and that his removal is not permitted by law. Bessent in his Monday comments on X did express support for the Fed's independence on the subject of monetary policy, saying that autonomy is 'a jewel box that should be walled off' and that the Fed's independence 'is a cornerstone of continued US economic growth and stability.' But the White House has also made it known that it wants greater control over the Fed's operations outside monetary policy, including the supervision of the nation's biggest banks. Bessent earlier this year said he would be coordinating a broad re-examination of financial regulation, with an eye toward making it easier for banks to lend as a way of boosting the US economy. And he said again Monday that the Treasury would be playing a central role. "The department will break through policy inertia, settle turf battles, drive consensus, and motivate action to ensure no single regulator holds up reform," Bessent said of the Treasury. "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth." US regulators have already proposed one of the most dramatic rollbacks of bank capital rules since the 2008 financial crisis, saying last month they wanted to alter the so-called enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR). Banks have complained that this ratio penalizes them for holding lower-risk assets such as Treasury bonds. Doing away with it "should simplify bank capital management" and "that will bring down costs and help banks more effectively manage their capital levels," TD Securities analyst Jaret Seiberg said in a Tuesday morning research note. Even with proposed curtailing of this leverage ratio, large banks would still be bound by their risk weighted capital constraints, Seiberg said. "This is not going to produce material capital relief for banks," Seiberg added. More regulatory changes for big banks could still be on the way. Michelle Bowman, the Fed's top banking regulator appointed by Trump, said in a speech last month that revisiting the eSLR requirement is just the start of broader capital rollback considerations. "More work on capital requirements remains, especially to consider how they have evolved and whether changes in market conditions have revealed issues that should be addressed," she said. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Latest: Trump hosting Philippines leader to talk tariffs and China
President Donald Trump hosts Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. on Tuesday at the White House, seeking closer security and economic ties at a time when China is increasingly assertive in the Indo-Pacific region. More than a month after their deployment by Trump, 700 Marines will leave Los Angeles, where they stood guard over two downtown buildings in what local officials called 'political theater.' Updated Congressional Budget Office projections show Donald Trump's tax and spending law will add $3.4 trillion more to the deficit and leave more than 10 million people uninsured. An AP-NORC poll found about two-thirds of U.S. adults expect the new tax law to mostly help the rich. And the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s family hopes his FBI case files, released as Trump tries to avoid scrutiny over the Epstein files, will be 'viewed within their full historical context.' The Latest: White House says Trump is serious about wanting Washington Commanders to go back to its former name Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at the White House Monday that sports is one of Trump's 'many passions' and 'he wants to see the name of that team changed.' The Commanders were formerly the Redskins, a name that was considered offensive to and by Native Americans. Trump threatened in a weekend social media post to hold up a deal for the team's new stadium in the nation's capital if the name isn't changed. ▶ Read more about Trump and the Washington football team Justice Department says it's in touch with attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell, former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein Deputy Attorney Todd Blanche says he's been in touch with counsel for Maxwell to find out if she's willing to speak with Justice Department prosecutors regarding the case against the convicted sex offender, Epstein. Maxwell is Epstein's former girlfriend. She was convicted in a jury trial in 2021 of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. The request to interview her represents an additional Justice Department effort to deal with the backlash from parts of Trump's base over an earlier decision not to release additional records from the Epstein investigation. Blanche said in a statement Tuesday, 'I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days.'
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coca-Cola to release soda with cane sugar after Trump pushed for it. Is it really better than high fructose corn syrup?
Coke confirmed that it will be changing all its American product to feature cane sugar this fall. Coca-Cola announced on Tuesday that it will release a new version of Coke using cane sugar later this year. 'As part of its ongoing innovation agenda, this fall in the United States, the company plans to launch an offering made with U.S. cane sugar to expand its Trademark Coca-Cola product range,' Coca-Cola said in a press release announcing its second quarter earnings. 'This addition is designed to complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences.' The announcement came days after President Trump said in a social media post that the company had agreed with him to do so. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post last week. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' Other countries, such as Mexico, already use cane sugar in their version of the soda — but the American version of Coke uses high fructose corn syrup, a different type of sweetener that has the same amount of calories. Many people prefer the so-called Mexican Coke, which, while less common, is also available for purchase in stores and restaurants around the United States. What is real cane sugar? Why aren't we using it? First, let's explain what 'real cane sugar' means. Cane sugar comes from sugarcane plants and is a natural sugar. High fructose corn syrup, on the other hand, is made from corn. Chemically, the two are slightly different: Cane sugar is made of glucose and fructose bonded together, while high fructose corn syrup has free glucose and fructose mixed separately. Cane sugar fell out of favor for use in food manufacturing about 40 years ago, when then-President Ronald Reagan put a limit on sugar imports, raising the price of domestic sugar. Enter high fructose corn syrup, which was cheaper to produce on U.S. soil. Now high fructose corn syrup is in so many foods for sale in the United States, from Coke to packaged baked goods to some pasta sauces. Even some brands of cottage cheese contain high fructose corn syrup. (And it's important to note that high fructose corn syrup is not the same as the sweet, sticky corn syrup you can find at the grocery store — it's made available only by food manufacturers.) High fructose corn syrup and cane sugar (chemical name: sucrose) may taste very similar, but they are absorbed differently by the body. When you eat sucrose, your digestive system breaks it down into glucose and fructose before they're absorbed into your bloodstream. High fructose corn syrup already contains free glucose and fructose, so your body absorbs them directly without needing to break them apart first. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump's secretary of Health and Human Services, has been a vocal critic of high fructose corn syrup. He called it 'a formula for making you obese and diabetic' in a promotional video during his own failed presidential run in 2024. However, this position has placed him at odds with corn farmers, according to the New York Times — many of whom supported Trump in the 2024 election. The Corn Refiners Association warned that removing high fructose corn syrup from U.S. foods could lower corn prices by up to 34 cents a bushel and cost farmers $5.1 billion in revenue, leading to job losses and economic harm in rural communities. But RFK Jr. is far from the first person to demonize high fructose corn syrup, and studies have been done to assess its true risks. Is high fructose corn syrup really worse than cane sugar? Both high fructose corn syrup and cane sugar come with health risks, especially when consumed in excess over time. They can raise blood sugar and contribute to weight gain and inflammation, leading to chronic issues like heart disease and diabetes. Sweetened soda is especially concerning from a health standpoint: A 2025 study found that drinking sugary beverages was linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, more so than consuming sugar within food. High fructose corn syrup, however, may be worse for you than cane sugar — at least, in theory. Because fructose is mainly processed by the liver, ingesting a lot of high fructose corn syrup can put extra stress on the organ, which may lead to the risk of liver problems and other health issues over time. A 2022 study also found that higher high fructose corn syrup intake in young adults led to more fat buildup in the liver and worse insulin sensitivity, both of which increase the risk of liver disease and type 2 diabetes. However, it did not compare high fructose corn syrup with sucrose, so it's unclear if sucrose would have also had the same effect. A 2022 study found that both high fructose corn syrup and sucrose had the same effects on weight, blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar but that high fructose corn syrup caused a small increase in C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation. This could increase the risk of chronic inflammation over time, which may lead to conditions like heart disease, diabetes and other metabolic disorders. More research is needed to know if that difference really matters for long-term health. Some animal studies have raised public concern over high fructose corn syrup, such as a 2024 study that linked high fructose corn syrup to tumor growth and cancer cell acceleration. And a 2010 study from Princeton found that rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained more weight than those with access to table sugar even with diets of equal calories. But, again, these studies were not done in humans, so it's unclear what impacts they would have on our bodies. The bottom line More research must be done to assess the true harms of high fructose corn syrup versus cane sugar. What is clear: Diets high in sugar, in general, come with health concerns. Changing Coke's formula, should the company choose to do so, may or may not make a major impact on one's health — but drinking less of the sweet stuff could do your body a service. Solve the daily Crossword
