logo
New pension changes for 20m people in Pension Schemes Bill

New pension changes for 20m people in Pension Schemes Bill

Pension changes introduced today could make managing accounts easier for millions of workers planning their retirement across the UK.
The Government's new Pension Schemes Bill is designed to support working people plan for their retirement by making pensions simpler to understand, easier to manage, and drive better value over the long term.
Keeping track of pensions is notoriously challenging, with the average worker accumulating 11 different pension pots over their lifetime.
This has resulted in £26.6 billion in lost pensions across the UK, according to the Pensions Policy Institute and the Association of British Insurers.
One of its biggest benefits is the merging of small pension pots.
The bill also introduces a new system to show how well pension schemes are performing, this will help savers understand whether their scheme is giving them good value and protect them from getting stuck in underperforming schemes for years on end, to help working people feel more secure about their retirement savings.
For those approaching retirement, the changes will mean clear default options for turning savings into a retirement income. This means people will have clearer, more secure routes to decide how they use their pension money over time.
The full changes are listed in detail here.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall says: "Hardworking people across the UK deserve their pensions to work as hard for them as they have worked to save, and our reforms will deliver a huge boost to future generations of pensioners."
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves describes the bill as "a game changer", giving "bigger pension pots for savers and driving £50 billion of investment directly into the UK economy– putting more money into people's pockets."
Government launches plans to automatically combine small pension pots, here's what it's likely to mean for you... https://t.co/GtTdErcABJ
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) April 24, 2025
What do these pension changes mean for workers?
The bill will transform the £2 trillion pensions landscape to ensure savers get good returns for each pound they save, and drive investment into the economy, through a suite of measures, including:
Requiring DC schemes to prove they are value for money, to protect savers from getting stuck in underperforming schemes.
Simplifying retirement choices, with all pension schemes offering default routes to an income in retirement.
Bringing together small pension pots worth £1,000 or less into one pension scheme that is certified as delivering good value to savers, making pension saving less hassle and more rewarding.
New rules creating multi-employer DC scheme 'megafunds' of at least £25 billion, so that bigger and better pension schemes can drive down costs and invest in a wider range of assets.
Consolidating and professionalising the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), with assets held in six pools that can invest in local areas infrastructure, housing and clean energy.
Increased flexibility for Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes to safely release surplus worth collectively £160 billion, to support employers' investment plans and to benefit scheme members.
What is the difference between a Defined Benefit (DB) scheme and a Defined Contribution (DC) pension?
There are two different ways pension schemes work.
With a Defined Benefit (DB) pension scheme, also referred to as final salary pension schemes, the amount you get is usually based on your salary and how long you've been part of the pension scheme.
For a Defined Contribution (DC) pension, the figure you get is based on how much you and your employer invest in the pension and how your investments perform.
Recommended reading:
What's the expert view on the new pension changes?
Nausicaa Delfas, chief executive of The Pensions Regulator (TPR) says: "The Pension Schemes Bill is a once in a generation opportunity to address unfinished business in the UK pension system.
"Making sure all schemes are focused on delivering value for money, helping to stop small, and often forgotten pension pots forming, and guiding savers towards the right retirement products for them, will mean savers benefit from a system fit for the future.
"We have long advocated for fewer, larger well-run schemes with the size and skill to deliver better outcomes for savers. As such we are also pleased to see the proposed legislative framework for DB superfunds, providing options and choice in defined benefit consolidation."
Andy Briggs, CEO, Phoenix Group says: "The bill sets a clear direction for the future of pensions with the emphasis on building scale and ensuring savers receive value for money.
"People across the country will feel the impact of these changes with plans to consolidate small pots, ensure the dashboard delivers and provide default retirement income options at the point of retirement.
Patrick Heath-Lay, Chief Executive, People's Partnership adds: "This is a pivotal moment in pension reform. The bill contains many measures that will require providers to deliver better outcomes for savers and improve the workplace pension system."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Funding confirmed for Haxby rail station project
Funding confirmed for Haxby rail station project

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Funding confirmed for Haxby rail station project

Funding for a new station at Haxby has been confirmed as part of a £10.2bn investment in rail projects across the Department for Transport announced it was backing the scheme, a year after chancellor Rachel Reeves had scrapped the £24m project in a bid to save minister Lilian Greenwood told the BBC the move would return rail services to the town for the first time since 1930."Reopening that station on the York to Scarborough line will support sustainable, accessible transport to the north of York [meaning] 20,000 people who live within one an a half miles will be able to travel to places like York and Leeds by rail," she said. Asked how much the government was committing to the scheme and when work would start she said: "I don't know the specifics for Haxby, because I've got 50 road and rail schemes on our books today, but I'm sure we will be able to provide more detail in the months ahead."The good news today is that new station at Haxby is going ahead."A planning application for the station, including a fully accessible footbridge with lifts and steps connecting the two platforms, bike shelters, a 154-space car park, taxi rank and a bus stop, was submitted in Douglas, Leader of City of York Council said: "We've been working hard to secure the funding for Haxby Station that will allow this important project to get started."We've been working with Network Rail and a range of other partners, the council itself has committed £4m to the project to help make the ambition of the new station a reality."However, Tony Fisher, Liberal Democrat councillor for Strensall, said while he welcomed the announcement he would "believe the new station when I see it.""I've been campaigning on this since 1985 and have heard it all before," he said."The scheme is shovel ready but they keep withdrawing the funding. Every extra delay costs the project more money." In addition to the money for Haxby, Greenwood said the government was also committed to funding the dualling of the A1237 York Outer Ring to the Department for Transport the work will be carried out between the A19 at Rawcliffe and the A1036 Malton Rd at the Hopgrove junction with the said there needed to be a "discussion" between the council and the government over how much of the £24bn set said for road upgrades it would get."The department funds the majority of the scheme but there is a contribution from the local authority and we will be working with them on the final details," she to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief
Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief

North Wales Chronicle

time15 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief

Colin Skellett, who helmed the south-west England utility from 1988 to 2024, argued against nationalising water companies because of the industry requiring 'continuous levels of investment'. He spoke as campaigners and experts urged the Government to explore public ownership during the UK River Summit in south London on Tuesday. Ministers have promised a 'fundamental reset' following years of companies paying out large dividend that diverted money away from infrastructure investment and maintenance, leading to sewage pollution and rising bills. However, they have ruled out nationalisation and instead are focusing efforts on tightening rules, increasing investment and strengthening penalties within the current system of regulated private firms. Minister Emma Hardy talking about tackling sewage with @RiverActionUK but the government is ignoring the reality: 7 European countries with highest average of 90%+ bathing sites achieving 'excellent' status – all are 90%+ publicly owned 🇨🇾🇦🇹🇬🇷🇲🇹🇭🇷🇩🇪🇩🇰 — Cat Hobbs (@CatHobbs) July 8, 2025 Speaking at the summit, Mr Skellett said he has seen the industry change since he joined it in 1974, saying it is one that 'requires continuous levels of investment'. 'The problem with public ownership is the Government always has other things it wants to spend its money on,' the former Wessex boss said. He argued that privatisation helped to get debt off the Government's balance sheet and boost investment but this changed when the 'wrong sort of investors' began stripping cash out of companies through high dividends. 'It was bloody criminal what happened – the amount of money that was stripped out of not just Thames (Water), but a number of companies,' he said. 'So we need that to change (in) the system. It's not so much about ownership, it's more about how you regulate it, how you control it, and how you make sure the investment continues.' It came as the Environment Department (Defra) announced an increase in funding for the Environment Agency from £114 million in 2022/23 to £189 million this current financial year, a sum which is understood to have been welcomed by the regulator. 🚨REVEALED: Over half of adults in England don't trust the Government to end the UK's sewage crisis. And who can blame them? 💩 158,000+ sewage spills already this year. 📣 We're in London today, demanding the radical change we need. Are you with us?✊➡️ Email your MP today and… — Surfers Against Sewage (@sascampaigns) July 2, 2025 Ministers are also currently awaiting the publication of the independent water commission's final report and recommendations, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected in two weeks. The review is not exploring nationalisation as an option, with campaigners at the summit indicating they will continue to campaign on the issue following its publication. Ewan McGaughey, professor of law at King's College London, argued that the Government should take away licences from failing water companies and transition them into a long-term sustainable model of public ownership, calling privatisation in England a 'broken model'. Mr McGaughey said 90% of countries and cities around the world have water in public ownership and cited examples such as Berlin and Paris, which brought their sectors back into public ownership in 2013 and 2009 respectively after the privatised model failed. 'Bills go down. Water quality goes up. It's actually not really that controversial. You just have to look at the evidence, and you can see that public ownership works better,' he said. Cat Hobbs, founder and We Own It, which campaigns for public ownership of public services, said the Government's decision to not allow the independent review to explore nationalisation is a 'scandal'. 'That has to change. They still have time to change it,' she said, And Ashley Smith, founder of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP), called privatisation a 'ludicrous scam', arguing that there has never been a single year since the firms were privatised when shareholders put in more money than they took out of the firms. Later, water minister Emma Hardy defended the Government's approach to reforming the sector. 'There's been a lack of sustained investment in the industry for an incredibly long time,' she told the summit. 'We have taken immediate action, but there are some things that, of course, are going to take longer to fix. 'We want to listen to you and we can have difference of opinion – that is absolutely fine but I want to make sure that we try and bring as many people with us as possible because fundamentally we're all trying to get to the same place and that place is an effective water system with reduced pollution which is better for customers and better for the environment.' Ms Hardy called the Cunliffe report a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to modernise (the sector)' and said the Government will give a top-level reaction to the review before looking at any potential further legislation.

Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief
Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief

Leader Live

time15 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief

Colin Skellett, who helmed the south-west England utility from 1988 to 2024, argued against nationalising water companies because of the industry requiring 'continuous levels of investment'. He spoke as campaigners and experts urged the Government to explore public ownership during the UK River Summit in south London on Tuesday. Ministers have promised a 'fundamental reset' following years of companies paying out large dividend that diverted money away from infrastructure investment and maintenance, leading to sewage pollution and rising bills. However, they have ruled out nationalisation and instead are focusing efforts on tightening rules, increasing investment and strengthening penalties within the current system of regulated private firms. Minister Emma Hardy talking about tackling sewage with @RiverActionUK but the government is ignoring the reality: 7 European countries with highest average of 90%+ bathing sites achieving 'excellent' status – all are 90%+ publicly owned 🇨🇾🇦🇹🇬🇷🇲🇹🇭🇷🇩🇪🇩🇰 — Cat Hobbs (@CatHobbs) July 8, 2025 Speaking at the summit, Mr Skellett said he has seen the industry change since he joined it in 1974, saying it is one that 'requires continuous levels of investment'. 'The problem with public ownership is the Government always has other things it wants to spend its money on,' the former Wessex boss said. He argued that privatisation helped to get debt off the Government's balance sheet and boost investment but this changed when the 'wrong sort of investors' began stripping cash out of companies through high dividends. 'It was bloody criminal what happened – the amount of money that was stripped out of not just Thames (Water), but a number of companies,' he said. 'So we need that to change (in) the system. It's not so much about ownership, it's more about how you regulate it, how you control it, and how you make sure the investment continues.' It came as the Environment Department (Defra) announced an increase in funding for the Environment Agency from £114 million in 2022/23 to £189 million this current financial year, a sum which is understood to have been welcomed by the regulator. 🚨REVEALED: Over half of adults in England don't trust the Government to end the UK's sewage crisis. And who can blame them? 💩 158,000+ sewage spills already this year. 📣 We're in London today, demanding the radical change we need. Are you with us?✊➡️ Email your MP today and… — Surfers Against Sewage (@sascampaigns) July 2, 2025 Ministers are also currently awaiting the publication of the independent water commission's final report and recommendations, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected in two weeks. The review is not exploring nationalisation as an option, with campaigners at the summit indicating they will continue to campaign on the issue following its publication. Ewan McGaughey, professor of law at King's College London, argued that the Government should take away licences from failing water companies and transition them into a long-term sustainable model of public ownership, calling privatisation in England a 'broken model'. Mr McGaughey said 90% of countries and cities around the world have water in public ownership and cited examples such as Berlin and Paris, which brought their sectors back into public ownership in 2013 and 2009 respectively after the privatised model failed. 'Bills go down. Water quality goes up. It's actually not really that controversial. You just have to look at the evidence, and you can see that public ownership works better,' he said. Cat Hobbs, founder and We Own It, which campaigns for public ownership of public services, said the Government's decision to not allow the independent review to explore nationalisation is a 'scandal'. 'That has to change. They still have time to change it,' she said, And Ashley Smith, founder of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP), called privatisation a 'ludicrous scam', arguing that there has never been a single year since the firms were privatised when shareholders put in more money than they took out of the firms. Later, water minister Emma Hardy defended the Government's approach to reforming the sector. 'There's been a lack of sustained investment in the industry for an incredibly long time,' she told the summit. 'We have taken immediate action, but there are some things that, of course, are going to take longer to fix. 'We want to listen to you and we can have difference of opinion – that is absolutely fine but I want to make sure that we try and bring as many people with us as possible because fundamentally we're all trying to get to the same place and that place is an effective water system with reduced pollution which is better for customers and better for the environment.' Ms Hardy called the Cunliffe report a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to modernise (the sector)' and said the Government will give a top-level reaction to the review before looking at any potential further legislation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store