logo
Global Media Forum 2025: Building bridges to beat populism – DW – 07/07/2025

Global Media Forum 2025: Building bridges to beat populism – DW – 07/07/2025

DW7 hours ago
DW has invited media professionals from all over the world to Bonn, where they will discuss strategies for solidarity in an age of polarization.
All over the world, authoritarian regimes are gaining power through populism and the curtailment of free media. DW is seeking to counter the populist rhetoric with this year's Global Media Forum (GMF). The two-day media congress opens on Monday in the western German city of Bonn, and the motto this year is "Breaking barriers, building bridges."
The presence of Steve Capus, the president of the US international broadcaster Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) is an indication of the pressure free media, such as public service radio, are currently under, even in the United States. Donald Trump's administration wants to stop funding the Prague-based broadcaster, which for decades has been a key pillar of the transatlantic partnership between Europe and the US.
Like DW, RFE/RL also broadcasts uncensored reports to countries where the media landscape is dominated by propaganda. "We have got to survive. If we don't, it is a huge gift to Russia and China," RFE boss Steve Capus said in the run-up to the conference.
In Bonn, Capus will be in discussion with Michal Broniatowski, head of the Polish international broadcaster TVP World, DW's Director General Peter Limbourg, and Jonathan Munro, Global Director for BBC News.
"Political instability is on the rise in many parts of the world, and the consequences for all of our audiences are enormous," says Munro. "At the same time, colleagues from the United States have been forced either to close or curtail their free media. That's a worrying development, particularly as misinformation and disinformation are aggressively growing all over the globe."
This year's Freedom of Speech Award, a prize given annually by DW for outstanding work in promoting freedom of expression and human rights, goes to Tamar Kintsurashvili from Georgia. She has similar concerns. "Under the aegis of the Soviet Union we had no say, and were completely dependent on a totalitarian system," she told DW. "But in a democratic country, all citizens must keep the government in check in order to preserve our freedom. The media have a particular responsibility to ensure the separation of powers."
As executive director of the nongovernmental Media Development Foundation in Georgia's capital, Tbilisi, Kintsurashvili shows people how to achieve this. She teaches journalists how to fact-check reliably and sensitizes them to hate speech.
Many of the discussion forums in the 2025 GMF program offer practical tools and assistance for people in the media. For example, one is titled: "How authoritarian regimes build digital walls — and how to overcome them."
Following on from an initial event on the subject of generative artificial intelligence in journalism at last year's forum, questions around the ethics of using AI in journalism will be central to the GMF 2025. To what extent is it acceptable for journalists to use AI for their work?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
One way for Europe to respond to division and populism is to expand, and admit more members. One of the most recent candidates for accession, Ukraine, is currently caught up in defending itself against Russia's war of aggression. There is therefore great interest in the keynote speech by the EU commissioner for enlargement, Marta Cos. Will the European community keep its word to the beleaguered country?
This year, the GMF will also welcome Syria's minister of information, Hamza al-Mustafa. The future of the multi-ethnic country is unclear now that its long-time ruler, Bashar Assad, who was supported by Vladimir Putin, has been overthrown. Al-Mustafa will speak about the role of the media in Syria's reconstruction.
How can the media help people overcome barriers, when so many, especially in the Middle East, are suffering wars that only entrench divisions? A documentary film, co-produced by DW, about the greatest war crime in Europe since World War Two seeks to provide an answer. "The Srebrenica Tape — from Dad for Alisa", directed by Chiara Sambuchi, will be screened by DW for the first time during the GMF.
The protagonist, Alisa, was nine years old when her father was killed by Serbian troops in the UN "safe area" of Srebrenica 30 years ago. He was one of 8,000 men and boys who died in the Srebrenica massacre, which took place over several days.
Today, Alisa lives with her mother and her daughter in the city of St. Petersburg, in the US state of Florida. At the start of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which lasted from 1992–1995, her parents took her to safety across the border with her maternal grandparents in Serbia. They then returned to Srebrenica.
During the blockade of Srebrenica, which went on for more than three years, Alisa's father, a movie enthusiast and hobby filmmaker, filmed their daily life under siege in the small town. In these recordings, he often talks directly to his daughter. He managed to get a VHS cassette to her before Srebrenica was overrun by Serbian troops led by the Bosnian Serb general Ratko Mladic.
For Alisa, the daughter of a Serbian mother and a Muslim Bosniak father, who was murdered by Serbs, overcoming barriers is a matter of existential importance. "Alisa decided, for her, not to take [sides]," the director, Chiara Sambuchi, told DW. The most important thing for Alisa was to make clear that she stands "against this terrible religious hate, ethnically religious hate, and what it implies."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poland Starts Border Checks With Germany In Anti-migrant Clampdown
Poland Starts Border Checks With Germany In Anti-migrant Clampdown

Int'l Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Poland Starts Border Checks With Germany In Anti-migrant Clampdown

Poland reimposed checks on its borders with EU neighbours Germany and Lithuania on Monday in a bid to crack down on irregular migration amid surging anti-immigrant sentiment creating political pressure in Berlin and Warsaw. Border guards and military police could be seen looking into passing cars and occasionally stopping vehicles for document checks on the bridge connecting the Polish town of Slubice with Frankfurt an der Oder in Germany. The new checks are a response to growing anti-migrant sentiment on both sides of the border. Poland says hundreds of migrants, mostly from the Middle East, cross into the Baltic states from Belarus every month, then travel through Poland into Germany. The issue has become a particularly sensitive one in Polish domestic politics and has led to tensions with Germany. Warsaw has accused Berlin of sending the irregular migrants it manages to intercept back into Poland. "The checks being implemented aim to combat illegal migration," Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak was quoted as saying by his ministry on X. Shortly after the new checks came into force on Monday, Polish border guards detained a man for assisting irregular migration. The Estonian national is accused of transporting four irregular migrants, believed to be from Afghanistan. Siemoniak said the detention was "proof that these checks are necessary". Germany, which introduced checks on the border with Poland in 2023, has welcomed the Polish initiative and called for collaboration against a common problem. Speaking to the daily Rheinische Post, the head of German police union GdP, Andreas Rosskopf, said the two countries needed a "workable procedure". He warned against Polish and German border guards engaging in a "ping-pong game" with asylum seekers by sending them back and forth. Representatives of German business associations have also voiced concern. "We are receiving worrying feedback from the business community," Helena Melnikov, chief executive of the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK), told the Handelsblatt newspaper. "If commuters can no longer get to work reliably and on time at the German-Polish border, there is an increased risk that they will look for work elsewhere on a permanent basis -- with consequences for the shortage of skilled workers in border regions," she said. Marek Klodnicki, an administrative employee who lives in Slubice but works in Germany, said the re-introduction of border controls was "very sad". "We have waited so long for open borders," he said, adding that the checks would result in "a disruption in social and economic life". Business owners, particularly hairdressers and tobacco shops, which get a lot of custom from Germans crossing the border, also voiced concern the checks could disrupt business. "Ninety percent of our customers are Germans. We may have less traffic, less revenue," Kinga Dziuba, a 29-year-old cigarette vendor, told AFP. But Dziuba said the checks were "very much needed" to control migration, adding: "Security is more important to me than trade". The issue of migration was central to June's presidential election in Poland, where nationalist Karol Nawrocki -- who ran on a slogan of "Poland first, Poles first" -- narrowly defeated the candidate backed by pro-European Union Prime Minister Donald Tusk. The Tusk government is now seeking to outflank its rivals by taking a tougher approach to immigration. In total, 52 checkpoints have been set up on the border with Germany and 13 with Lithuania, Siemoniak said. The controls will last from July 7 to August 5 but could be extended. They will mostly consist of spot inspections, particularly of vehicles carrying several people, officials said. In June, members of a far-right movement gathered at several points along the border to set up "citizens' patrols", which the government insists are illegal. In Slubice, Edyta Taryma, a 54-year-old hair salon owner, said her revenues had already dropped by 20 percent after Germany re-imposed border controls. "A great many people did not come, or came less often, because they were afraid of traffic jams," she said. She called the checks "unnecessary". Poland has temporarily reintroduced border controls with its EU neighbours Germany and Lithuania, saying they are needed to counter 'illegal immigration' AFP Polish border guards check drivers at the Polish-German border in Slubice, western Poland AFP

GMF25: Limbourg calls for European-led 'Public Service AI'
GMF25: Limbourg calls for European-led 'Public Service AI'

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

GMF25: Limbourg calls for European-led 'Public Service AI'

Under the theme "Breaking barriers, building bridges," DW's GMF25 opens with a strong focus on the future of AI and its implications for democracy and public access to information. The opening ceremony was streamed live on YouTube . Photos can be found here . "What kind of AI do we want shaping our information ecosystems?" DW Director General Peter Limbourg asked, "I call for the creation of a European AI – independent, transparent, and built on public values, not private profit. It can become a Global Public Service AI – if we build it together. This is our opportunity to shape the future – not just of the media, but of democracy itself. If we want to preserve the integrity of journalism and the diversity of voices, we must take responsibility for the tools that shape how people access information and understand the world." Limbourg also called for the need to regulate Big Tech platforms: "If we do not regulate Big Tech, it will regulate our democracy. Just take a look at the United States." His opening remarks set the tone for DW's 18th Global Media Forum, which brings together nearly 900 participants from over 100 countries across three venues in Bonn. As AI reshapes the flow of information and public discourse, the conference explores how media, policy, and technology leaders can collaborate to safeguard independent journalism and protect open societies. DW Director General Peter Limbourg Image: Björn Kietzmann/DW In her keynote address, EU Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos underscored the need for the EU to strengthen support for quality journalism: "Media organizations need financial sustainability. With the demise of USAID our work has become a lot more difficult in our partner countries. We're stepping in in many places, but we cannot replace U.S. financing everywhere," she said, adding: "Today we face an abundance of information. … This forces us to rethink how the EU supports quality journalism. We also need to defend democratic spaces … to make journalistic work possible. Our strongest tool is the EU's enlargement process itself. We are working with independent countries to make sure their legislative frameworks support free and independent journalism." Kicking off the forum, North Rhine-Westphalia's Minister for Federal, European and Media Affairs Nathanael Liminski highlighted the mounting pressure of the media amid a rapidly evolving media landscape shaped by AI and disinformation and underlined the need to regulate Big Tech: "We have major U.S. platforms dominate attention – and now I see two priorities: Introducing levy on large platforms. The new German government has committed itself to this role, ensuring that the revenues are used for strengthening the media sector. Second, we must protect the rights of content creators in the age of AI. Creative work must be rewarded fairly." EU Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos delivered a keynote speech at the Global Media Forum 2025 Image: Björn Kietzmann/DW DW's Global Media Forum 2025 is underway across three locations in Bonn – the Bundeskunsthalle, Kunstmuseum Bonn, and DW Headquarters – marking the conference's first tri-location format in the city. This year's program sees political leaders, journalists and media experts take on the most pressing challenges facing global media today – from fighting disinformation and pushing back against digital censorship to boosting media literacy in the age of AI. The agenda also zeroes in on shrinking funding for journalism, the fight for media pluralism, rebuilding public trust in times of conflict, and why inclusion and journalist safety matter more than ever. North Rhine-Westphalia's Minister for Federal, European and Media Affairs Nathanael Liminski Image: Florian Görner/DW Day 1: Breaking digital walls and ensuring access to information Digital censorship and access to information take center stage on day one of DW's Global Media Forum 2025, along with a range of other urgent media challenges. The panel "How authoritarian regimes build digital walls - and how to overcome them " brings together key voices including Andreas Gebhard (re:publica Berlin); veteran of the Tiananmen Square democracy movement Pokong Chen; and Gypsy Guillén Kaiser (Committee to Protect Journalists). Drawing on their varied backgrounds in civil society, journalism and digital advocacy, the panel explores how governments restrict access to information – and how international actors are pushing back to protect media freedom and journalists. Also on the day's agenda: members of the DG8 public media leaders, including the BBC, RFE/RL, and host DW as well as global media leaders including E-jicom and TVP World – will tackle another pressing challenge: "Ensuring continued access to information: How to build bridges in volatile times. " This session responds to the recent USAGM funding cuts that have impacted global media. At stake: how to sustain access to trusted news, independent reporting and civic information in the regions most affected. The day closes with the DW Freedom of Speech Award ceremony, streamed live on YouTube , honoring Georgian journalist Tamar Kintsurashvili for her work fighting disinformation and promoting media literacy in Georgia. Over two days, the program dives into how AI is reshaping journalism – raising new questions about ethics, accuracy, and editorial control – with keynotes, workshops, breakout sessions, and panel discussions tackling the toughest questions in conflict reporting amidst disinformation, post-crisis storytelling, and the shifting media terrain across the Global South and beyond. Check out the full GMF 2025 program for more details. For real-time updates, highlights, and behind-the-scenes impressions, follow @DW_GMF and the hashtag #GMF25 across all major social media platforms. Stay connected with the GMF on YouTube , LinkedIn , Facebook and X – and through our newsletter.

German polls show Merz gaining ground as SPD loses – DW – 07/07/2025
German polls show Merz gaining ground as SPD loses – DW – 07/07/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

German polls show Merz gaining ground as SPD loses – DW – 07/07/2025

Germany's new government has been in office for two months, and so far only Merz's CDU is making progress among voters, while the Social Democrats are struggling to retain trust — especially on military policy. Does Germany still need the Social Democratic Party (SPD), and if so — on what issues? This question was clearly hanging in the air at the party conference at the end of June. The center-left Social Democrats were shaken to their core by the February federal election, when the party recorded its worst result since 1887. The result of the latest monthly poll is unlikely to lift their spirits. The SPD, which governs as junior partner with the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Christian Social Union (CSU) parties, has only continued to leak support since the election. If national elections were held this Sunday, the SPD would only get 13%, according to the poll, conducted by the research institute infratest-dimap of 1,312 eligible voters between June 30 and July 2. Led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, the CDU/CSU has gained slightly compared to June, rising to 30% (+1). The Alternative for Germany (AfD), the far-right, anti-immigrant party that is officially considered partly right-wing extremist by Germany's domestic intelligence agency, would still have 23% of the vote. The Green Party and the Left Party, meanwhile, could expect to receive 12% (+/-0) and 10% (+1), respectively. Other parties, including the newly founded Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) (4%; +/-0) and the neoliberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) (3%; -1), would still not have enough of a vote share to enter the Bundestag. The more left-wing members of the Social Democrats have accused their party leadership of doing too little to secure peace in Europe. In June, they issued a manifesto calling for "peacekeeping in Europe through defense capabilities, arms control, and rapprochement." For the signatories, this means more diplomacy with Russia, and less rearmament of the German armed forces. Peace has historically been a signature priority for the SPD — going back to the days of Chancellor Willy Brandt's attempts to normalize relations with the Soviet Union in the late 1960s and early 1970s. But in the latest Deutschlandtrend poll, only 11% of respondents now said they considered the SPD to be a party of peace. Some 31% trust the CDU/CSU most to establish and secure peace in Europe, while 14% named the AfD. As many as 57% of respondents said they were frightened by how lightly the term "readiness for war" is currently being discussed in Germany. However, there are big differences on the issue between Germans from the former West and the former East. — the term frightens significantly more people in the eastern German states. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, also of the SPD, has long been calling for the Bundeswehr to be "war-ready" again. Some 62% of those Germans surveyed in the agree with Pistorius and see this as a prerequisite for securing peace in Europe. Not only that, 73% believe that Germany needs more soldiers to defend the country in an emergency. In their opinion, compulsory military service, which was suspended 2011, must be reintroduced. Overall, more than half of those surveyed are in favor of reinstating compulsory military or civilian service for both men and women. However, there is a generational conflict here: About twice as many people under the age of 35 support another suspension than in the overall population. Overall, armed conflicts, peacekeeping, and foreign policy is only the fourth most important issue for Germans — mentioned by 15% of those surveyed. Immigration/refugees (33%), the economy (21%), and social injustice (16%) were all mentioned more frequently. Indeed, both the CDU/CSU and the SPD have said that Germany's economic recovery is the top priority. In fact, only 20% of Germans believe that the situation will actually improve in a year's time, while 41% believe that nothing will change, and 35% even expect the economic situation to deteriorate. However, two-thirds of those surveyed say that this will not affect their personal economic situation. A good 60% of the population, meanwhile, believe that there is social injustice in Germany, the highest figure recorded by the Deutschlandtrend in 15 years. This perception is primarily due to the widening gap between rich and poor, while the tax and social security burden is perceived as too high or unequal. The gap between the lowest wage groups and the "citizen's income," as the basic unemployment benefit is called, is considered too small. In Germany, single people who are temporarily or permanently unable to support themselves and are in need of assistance receive €563 ($663) per month, as well as support with their rent and heating bills. Couples receive €1,012. The overall costs of this have risen sharply recently, to over €50 billion per year. The CDU wants to introduce tougher sanctions for citizens' income recipients who repeatedly refuse work. Currently, their benefits can be suspended for up to two months. Overall, around half of those surveyed consider the existing sanctions to be appropriate, while 12% think they go too far, and 35% believe that the unemployed should be sanctioned more. In their coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed in principle to apply stricter rules. But the parties are arguing about what exactly that means. The CDU/CSU wants to drastically reduce spending across the board, while the Social Democrats are opposed. They say that no more than €4.5 billion can be saved in the next two years. Getting people into work also costs money, for example for further training and qualification measures. Should the unemployed be placed quickly in reasonable jobs, or is it more important to provide them with appropriate training and further education so that they can find better jobs? Opinions are divided. However, a look at party preferences shows that the majority of CDU/CSU and AfD supporters would prefer to get people into jobs quickly. Supporters of the Left Party and the Greens, on the other hand, prefer to prioritize training. Among SPD supporters, there are equal numbers of people in favor of both alternatives. The dispute is not just about money. It is also a fundamental socio-political debate about how to treat people who need help and what basic social security in Germany should look you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store