Yoon Suk Yeol to receive state protection for up to 10 years as ex-president
The Presidential Security Act states in the Article 4-3 that a president and his or her spouse shall be protected by the presidential bodyguards for 10 years after their term is concluded. If the president steps down from office before the end of their term -- such as via death or removal as in Yoon's case -- the protection period is shortened to five years.
This means Yoon will basically be guarded by the PSS until 2030, but a subclause of Article 4-6 of the same act states that a president could be guarded for up to five more years than the period set in Article 4-3.
The protection provided by the PSS includes conventional protection along with patrol of the areas surrounding Yoon's home in cooperation with local police forces. Officials could also protect the former first couple during transportation via land and air if necessary, upon their request.
Ex-President Park Geun-hye, the only other president in the country's history removed from power via impeachment, is to slated to be protected by the presidential bodyguards until March 2027.
Yoon, who was inaugurated as president in May 2022, was removed from office Friday after the Constitutional Court decided to uphold his impeachment by the parliament, effective immediately. The opposition-led National Assembly passed the motion for his impeachment in December, holding him accountable for insurrection and abuse of power for his orders related to his Dec. 3 declaration of martial law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
2 Chinese men indicted for allegedly filming US aircraft carrier at naval base in S. Korea
Two Chinese men have been indicted on charges of illegally filming a US aircraft carrier and a South Korean naval base with a drone in the southeastern port city of Busan, legal sources said Friday. The Busan District Prosecutors Office recently indicted the two Chinese nationals -- both students in their 30s and 40s enrolled at a university in Busan -- on charges of benefiting an enemy and undermining national military interests. Under South Korean law, individuals convicted of such offenses may face imprisonment of at least three years up to life imprisonment. The two are accused of flying a drone near the Korean Fleet Command in southern Busan nine times between March 2023 and June 2024. They allegedly used the drone to illegally record footage of the naval base as well as the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt while it was docked in Busan. The two proceeded with the filming even on June 25, 2024, when former President Yoon Suk Yeol visited the Theodore Roosevelt to inspect the vessel and meet with South Korean and U.S. service members, which heightened security. Their illegal filming content totaled 11.9 gigabytes comprising 172 photos and 22 videos, with some of them distributed to TikTok and other Chinese social media. Separately, another Chinese woman in her 30s is also under investigation by prosecutors after being referred on suspicion of violating the military base law, the sources added. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Court orders Yoon to compensate 105 claimants for distress caused by martial law crisis
The Seoul Central District Court on Friday ruled that former President Yoon Suk Yeol pay a total of 105 million won ($75,300) combined to 105 citizens for causing them to suffer emotional distress due to the imposition of martial law. The ruling in the civil case was in favor of 105 citizens who filed a suit against Yoon, demanding that former president pay 100,000 won ($75.30) in compensation per person. 'It is clear that the plaintiffs, who are members of the public, suffered pain expressed through fear, anxiety, despair and humiliation,' said the court Friday. The court fully accepted the plaintiffs' claims that the causes of their emotional distress are closely related with the martial law declaration and Yoon's subsequent measures after the martial law imposition can be judged as 'intentional torts to person' as defined in Article 750 of the Civil Act. 'The defendant must compensate the plaintiffs for the psychological damage and an amount of 100,000 won per person is reasonably justified,' said the court, adding that Yoon would also be responsible for all legal expenses. It was not the first time that citizens had sought compensation over a political crisis caused by a former president. A case concerning former President Park Geun-hye's abuse of power scandal in 2017 was dismissed by the top court in 2020. Lawyers in this case argued that their suit was different from the 2020 case, as the former President Yoon committed an unconstitutional act of insurrection. 'The abuse of power under Park Geun-hye was a matter of personal misconduct. But former President Yoon's illegal actions went beyond mere illegality. They were unconstitutional and he was even impeached by the Constitutional Court. That's why this case must be viewed differently,' said the legal representatives after a pretrial hearing on June 27. The Supreme Court of Korea previously ruled that the state was liable to compensate victims who had been arrested, punished or detained under the former President Park Chung-hee's emergency decree in 1975.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Ex-PM's house raided over suspected role in Yoon's martial law decree
A special counsel team on Thursday carried out a search and seizure operation at the residence of former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, accused of involvement in impeached former President Yoon Suk Yeol's attempt to impose martial law. The team led by special prosecutor Cho Eun-suk, formed to investigate the Dec. 3 martial law debacle, sent investigators to raid Han's residence in Seoul's central Jongno-gu district in the morning. Han is accused of adding his signature to the martial law decree, drafted by then-presidential secretary Kang Eui-gu, after martial law had already been declared to add legitimacy to the former president's actions. The special counsel claimed that Han then ordered the destruction of the document, which was allegedly hastily drafted after Yoon's surprise declaration. Han allegedly had the document destroyed to avoid 'additional controversy' if it were discovered that the document was drafted after the declaration. Article 82 of the Constitution states that 'acts of the President under law shall be executed in writing, and such documents shall be countersigned by the Prime Minister and the members of the State Council concerned.' It adds 'the same shall apply to military affairs.' Han is also accused of lying in his testimony to the Constitutional Court and the National Assembly about his prior knowledge of Yoon's martial law decree. Han said that he was unaware of the existence of Yoon's martial law declaration -- the version announced in Yoon's address to the nation -- until after the decree was lifted. He said he only discovered a copy in his pocket later and that he openly opposed Yoon's plans to impose martial law at the time. In contrast to Han's claims, the special counsel team secured surveillance footage showing Han leaving the Cabinet meeting room at the presidential office, after Yoon presided over a legally irregular Cabinet meeting, with copies of the decree. The raid came 22 days after Han was summoned and questioned by the special counsel team on July 2. The special counsel plans to analyze the seized documents and files before deciding whether to summon Han again.
