10 Safest Electric Vehicles for Families This Year
Trending Now:
For You:
A recent study by The Texas Law Dog set out to rank the safest options for families in 2025. Each EV was evaluated for its fatal crash rate per 1,000 vehicles, how many child seats it can handle and how safe those seats are judged to be once installed, per Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) rankings. Volume and passenger capacity also weighed in, because a family car that's safe but cramped doesn't cut it. The result is a safety score out of 100.
Below are the ten of the safest EVs with the highest scores.
Safety score: 91.32
Average price: $61,695
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.7554
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
The Q7 leads with a high safety score and a low crash rate. At $61,695, it's not the cheapest option, but it delivers on every metric that counts.
Check Out:
Safety score: 86.64
Average price: $48,485
Crashes per 1000 cars: 1.6183
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
The Pilot has strong child seat compatibility and a Good+ rating across all four available seat positions. Its higher crash rate of 1.6 per 1,000 cars pulls the score down slightly, but the $48,485 price point makes it a practical option.
Safety score: 85.76
Average price: $42,765
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.7883
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
The Ascent hits a balance between safety and value. At $42,765, it's the most affordable in the top three, while still seating seven and offering 153.50 cubic feet of room.
Safety score: 84.11
Average price: $41,406
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.1057
Child Seat Safety Score: Acceptable
The Palisade offers one of the lowest crash rates in the top five, at just 0.11 per 1,000 vehicles. Three child seats fit, although the child seat safety score is only Acceptable.
Safety score: 83.28
Average price: $46,725
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.9081
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
The QX60 balances safety and luxury, seating seven with 140.60 cubic feet of space.
Safety score: 80.46
Average price: $45,700
Crashes per 1000 cars: 2.8139
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
The most spacious EV on the list at 163.60 cubic feet, the Odyssey also has the highest crash rate, at 2.8 per 1,000.
Safety score: 80.32
Average price: $38,220
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.0061
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
This compact option has the lowest crash rate of all the EVs on the list, at 0.0061 per 1,000 vehicles.
Safety score: 79.08
Average price: $48,490
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.0482
Child Seat Safety Score: Acceptable
While the Model Y remains a safe pick, Tesla's broader reputation has taken a hit as Musk's political behavior draws criticism, according to CNN — raising concerns about long-term brand stability and resale value.
Safety score: 78.96
Average price: $64,275
Crashes per 1000 cars: 1.6217
Child Seat Safety Score: Good+
This premium SUV costs $64,275 and seats seven, fitting three child seats with a Good+ child seat safety score.
Safety score: 77.63
Average price: $46,195
Crashes per 1000 cars: 0.0255
Child Seat Safety Score: Good
The X1 rounds out the list with a safety score of 77.63 and the second lowest crash rate at 0.0255 per 1,000.
More From GOBankingRates
6 Used Luxury SUVs That Are a Good Investment for Retirees
How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region
7 Overpriced Grocery Items Frugal People Should Quit Buying in 2025
12 SUVs With the Most Reliable Engines
Sources
The Texas Law Dog, 'The Top 10 Safest Vehicles For Families.'
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 10 Safest Electric Vehicles for Families This Year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Is ‘Sleeping in the Office.' Why Tesla Investors Should Care.
Musk is back working hard at Tesla. Now investors want to hear his plans to get earnings growing again. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Luxury carmaker fires shot at Tesla in robotaxi wars
Luxury carmaker fires shot at Tesla in robotaxi wars originally appeared on TheStreet. Tesla's () has been steering the robotaxi narrative for the longest time, but recently a brand new player quietly slid into the frame. Behind the scenes, one luxury EV maker just threw its hat into the race and is ready to challenge the status quo. 💵💰💰💵 At this point, it's not trying to out-Tesla Tesla, but instead aim for an entirely different lane. As we see partnerships evolving quickly and rivals repositioning, the road ahead for autonomous driving has become a lot more crowded and a lot more interesting. The robotaxi race just got real Robotaxis aren't science fiction anymore, as they turn into arguably the fastest-growing bet in the tech space. To put things in perspective, estimates suggest that the global market for autonomous ride services could explode from $4.4 billion this year to $125 billion by 2034. That's a massive 45% compound annual growth rate, led by cheaper sensors, smarter AI, and a major push to cut costs in urban transit. Tesla finally entered the game in June with the quiet launch of its invite-only Robotaxi service in Austin. The cars operate using Tesla's robust camera-only Full Self-Driving system, avoiding the need for expensive Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) and instead relying solely on vision and machine believes that's the edge Tesla needs in scaling a lot faster and cheaper than the competition. But it's still early days. We've already seen glitchy behavior, including phantom braking and navigation errors, which complicates the bullish thesis. Google's Waymo, on the other hand, is the veteran. It recently crossed the 100 million driverless miles mark with zero humans behind the wheel. Its coverage in cities like Phoenix and Austin dwarfs Tesla's footprint, giving it a massive data lead in improving its software. China's not sitting this out, either. has already dished out its seventh-gen robotaxi and is testing in multiple countries. WeRide, another robotaxi upstart, launched Southeast Asia's first fully autonomous robobus in Singapore, aiming to expand swiftly. And then there's Uber, which is effectively becoming the nerve center of the robotaxi era. In Atlanta, riders can now hail Waymo vehicles directly through Uber. Similarly, in Austin, Waymo's 90-square-mile service also runs on Uber's platform. More News: Moody's drops 2-word warning on housing market Rigetti shakes up quantum computing with bold advance JPMorgan reveals 9 stocks with major problems By owning the rider interface and centralizing fleet access, Uber is positioning itself as the gatekeeper for robotaxi adoption. Lucid takes its shot at Tesla in the robotaxi wars Lucid () just made a massive foray into the robotaxi arena, and Wall Street's starting to pay attention. Luxury EV maker Lucid is teaming up with Uber and autonomous tech firm Nuro to roll out 20,000 Gravity SUVs on Uber's network over the next six years. Each of these cars will be equipped with Nuro's Level 4 self-driving technology, signaling Lucid's largest leap yet into AI-powered mobility. Morgan Stanley's Adam Jonas hailed that partnership as 'strategic.'Jonas says this isn't your regular one-off announcement; it's a clear sign that Lucid is looking to carve out a key position in the robotaxi race that's been dominated by Tesla and Waymo. According to Jonas, Lucid has mostly been an under-the-radar player in the self-driving conversation. However, the Uber–Nuro deal could change that, helping the EV startup move beyond luxury retail and into recurring revenue streams. The Gravity SUV, Lucid's next blowout launch, now carries a lot more weight. Jonas feels the vehicle should be treated as a platform, not just for electric driving, but for autonomy and smart mobility partnerships. That makes the Uber deal a lot less about volume and more about signaling where Lucid is headed next. Uber is shelling out big money, with a $300 million investment in Lucid. That's not enough to solve the company's cash burn troubles, but it helps in a big way. Also, it puts Uber in a much stronger position to shape Lucid's roadmap. For a company that's been called a "Tesla-lite," this is Lucid's most ambitious pivot yet. Whether it pays off long-term is up for debate, but it's clear that Lucid just pulled up a seat at the lucrative robotaxi carmaker fires shot at Tesla in robotaxi wars first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 18, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 18, 2025, where it first appeared. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's brain implant startup Neuralink called itself a 'small disadvantaged business' to the federal government
Elon Musk's Neuralink may have been recently valued at a reported $9 billion, but that did not stop the company from claiming a special designation as a 'small disadvantaged business' with the government. The self-designation is meant for companies majority-owned by someone belonging to a socially or economically disadvantaged group and can only be granted to business owners with a net worth of less than $850,000, excluding home equity. Despite being owned by the richest man in the world, Elon Musk's brain implant startup Neuralink identified itself as a 'small disadvantaged business' with the federal government. While Musk's DOGE was busy purging government diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, his company was claiming a special designation meant for companies that are 'unconditionally and directly' majority-owned by someone belonging to a socially or economically disadvantaged group, MuskWatch first reported. The designation also requires that the owners of such companies be 'economically disadvantaged individuals.' The company's profile on the Small Business Administration website currently lists Neuralink as a 'Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business.' Neuralink and the Small Business Administration did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. The SBA defines 'economically disadvantaged individuals' as 'socially disadvantaged individuals whose ability to compete in the free enterprise system has been impaired due to diminished capital and credit opportunities as compared to others in the same or similar line of business who are not socially disadvantaged.' Any person with a net worth of more than $850,000, not including their home equity, also does not qualify. Although as a private company, Neuralink's ownership structure is not publicly available, Musk's $364 billion net worth would clearly disqualify Neuralink from consideration for the SDB designation. In June, Neuralink also announced $650 million in fresh funding that reportedly valued the company at $9 billion, according to Semafor. The federal government has since 1988 granted contracts to small disadvantaged businesses in an effort to spur job creation and reduce historical inequities. Under the Business Opportunity Development Reform Act of 1988, Congress declared 'not less than 5 percent of the total value of all prime contract and subcontract awards for each fiscal year,' be awarded to small disadvantaged businesses. There is no evidence Neuralink received any disbursements from the federal government under this designation. Still, the Justice Department has previously sought to prosecute those who claimed false special designations with the government. In 2023, the owner of an investment properties company falsely claimed to be a 'service-disabled veteran owned small business' in SAM, the official website for companies conducting business with the federal government. The owner, who never served in the military, used the designation to claim two Department of Defense contracts worth more than $1.9 million. He later pleaded guilty to wire fraud and was forced to pay $72,000 in restitution and a $10,000 fine, and serve 15 months in prison. This story was originally featured on
