&w=3840&q=100)
FATF can salvage its counter-terrorism credentials by cracking down on Pakistan
Should the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) take a sharper and closer look at Pakistan's counter-terrorism reality? With the second meeting of the FATF scheduled to commence on 10 June 2025, like-minded countries invested in the fight against terrorism and its financing need to re-evaluate Pakistan's role in failing to crack down on terrorism from its soil.
Pakistan has thrice been listed on FATF's Grey List in the past, from 2008-2010, 2012-2015 and 2018-2022. The third time around, it landed on the list after the motion was initiated by the United States and supported by the United Kingdom, France and Germany due to Pakistan's glaring deficiencies in counter-terrorist financing (CFT).
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The recent events around the conduct of Operation Sindoor are a stark reality check on the complicity of the Pakistani state in supporting, funding and participating in terrorism. If the world needed any further proof, Pakistan did not hesitate to provide it in full glare of the world media. Shortly after the successful precision strikes, senior military commanders stood in solidarity at the funeral prayer meeting, led by Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist commander Hafiz Abdul Rauf. Pakistani military personnel went a step further by carrying the coffins of terrorists to reinforce their support and backing for UN-proscribed terrorist groups and their leaders.
Terrorist leaders from the LeT and JuD have since been seen openly galvanising support for terrorism from Pakistan and collecting funds to provide an impetus to their 'jihad'. The Pakistani 'establishment' and terrorist handlers are confident that, having escaped the FATF clutches, they can continue to support terrorism as a state policy.
Pakistan has been at pains to highlight Kashmir as the point of contention with India. On the contrary, it is Pakistan's employment of terrorism as an instrument of hybrid war that should remain the focus of attention of world capitals. And the best way to curb Pakistani adventurism is to retain strict control over the proliferation of terrorism by organisations like the FATF. There is no better way to ensure stability in the region and restrict the export from the terrorism factory of the world, and curbing its funding.
The FATF is a 40-member, inter-governmental, multinational body that acts as a 'watchdog' against money laundering and terrorist financing. India is a member of the grouping. The FATF sets standards to fight terrorist finance and, along with its affiliated bodies, evaluates member countries for their compliance with its guidelines. This includes technical compliance, such as the absence of or inadequacy of laws. More importantly, its focus on the effectiveness of implementation highlights weaknesses or, worse, wilful defiance of countries like Pakistan in fighting terrorism.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pakistan's last evaluation by the FATF was done in 2019. Its report was a national embarrassment for the country, at the very least. If Pakistan's evaluation is compared to a student's school report card, then, of the 11 effectiveness parameters, Pakistan failed in 10 and got a compartment in one! The rowdy kid's abysmal report card was not a sign of inability or a lack of resources to study. It came from the confidence to successfully fool not only the class teacher but the entire school faculty.
This does not come as a surprise, given the country's record of nurturing and sheltering UN proscribed terrorist groups and their commanders. The evaluation report noted that 'Several UN-listed organisations continue to operate openly in Pakistan, including holding fundraising events.'
Pakistan has mastered the art of obfuscating reality and window dressing the true face of its parallel terror economy. The appeasement of major powers by handing over selective terrorist leaders and promising to safeguard economic interests like the CPEC corridor is not a guarantee against the spread of the contagion.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
If the FATF does intend to expose Pakistan's age-old strategy of running with the hares and hunting with the hounds, then its record of fighting terrorism deserves closer scrutiny. Member countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany that have been victims of Pakistan's terror factories should support India's attempt at stabilising the region by curbing the funding of terrorism in Pakistan.
The international community must realise that the Pakistani establishment's repeated claims of being a victim of terrorism are inherently flawed. It is not the West that is responsible for Pakistan's terror woes, unlike Defence Minister Khawaja Asif's repeated assertions. It is Pakistan's strategy of promoting extremist thought and sowing jihadi ideology that is hollowing its social fabric.
Pakistan has been fooling the world by selectively fighting terrorism and equally selectively sharing figures of terrorists prosecuted and acted against. If this continues, little change can be expected. It is time to reintroduce the motion in the FATF to at least place Pakistan on the Grey List. This is despite the reality of mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the blackest of them all? Pakistan.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Col Vivek Chadha (Retd) is a Senior Fellow at Manohar Parrikar IDSA. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliament Monsoon Session Day 1 LIVE: Government ready to discuss all issues
The Government is open to discussing all issues in Parliament, including Operation Sindoor, it said in an all-party meeting held on the eve of the monsoon session, which begins on Monday (July 21, 2025). At the same time, it cautioned the Opposition that any debate on the subject has to be held within the laid-down rules and procedures. At the all-party meeting, the Opposition parties, meanwhile, insisted that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should respond on the matter, as well as on U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated claims that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan. They also demanded a discussion on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju made it clear that the final call on discussions in Parliament will be taken by the Business Advisory Committees of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The Houses of Parliament will have 21 sittings during the Monsoon Session.
Hans India
2 minutes ago
- Hans India
Govt transparency can contain Trump taunts and help India emerge stronger
For the nth time, US President Donald Trump has remarked about the recent conflict between India and Pakistan that followed the Pahalgam terror attack. Speaking at a private dinner with Republican lawmakers, he said, 'In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually.' It goes without saying that such remarks are unnecessary as they hurt India's prestige globally without offering any benefits to the US or even Trump himself. While the US President has been less than prudent in making such utterances, the Narendra Modi government has not done much better on this count. The swift mobilisation and coordination of armed forces reflected a high level of preparedness and resolve. For this, the Prime Minister deserves praise. However, beyond that, the government has done precious little to elicit applause. Despite having the upper hand at a critical juncture, India did not sufficiently degrade Pakistan's military capabilities—particularly its air force. This was a squandered opportunity. Given the extent of the provocation and the clarity of intelligence on militant operations emanating from Pakistani soil, a more decisive and sustained military response could have had a greater deterrent effect. To compound matters, a perception soon took root that New Delhi had accepted a premature ceasefire, allegedly under pressure from the United States. Although there has been no official confirmation of Washington's role, the circumstantial evidence—including the timing and statements by US officials, and subsequent diplomatic moves—suggests that American pressure could have indeed influenced New Delhi's decision-making. If true, this only reinforces the view that India ceded strategic ground just when it had the moral and military high ground. This impression, unless effectively countered, can prove damaging in the long run. It can send the wrong message to both adversaries and allies, thus affecting India's deterrence posture and complicating future military and diplomatic calculations. The government now needs to set the record straight—and do that through transparency. An impartial and comprehensive inquiry must be conducted into the entire episode. The inquiry must investigate the military objectives, the chain of decisions taken at the highest levels, the diplomatic pressures involved, and the actual outcomes, both in terms of gains and losses. This would not only help bring clarity to the sequence of events but also serve as a vital learning tool for future conflicts. Over two months have passed since the hostilities ended, and the public, as well as Parliament, deserves to know the facts. How many casualties were there? What were the exact losses on both sides? What were the goals set out by the political leadership, and were they achieved? Without this information, speculation will continue to fill the vacuum, potentially harming public morale and weakening trust in the government. In democracies, transparency is not a luxury but a necessity. A government that withholds information under the guise of national interest risks undermining that very interest by alienating its people. If the Modi government continues to remain tight-lipped, it will not only prolong the confusion and unease surrounding the incident but may also damage its own credibility in the eyes of the electorate. India must chart its own strategic course—assertively, confidently, and transparently. Only then can India emerge stronger.
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Parliament Live Updates: As Monsoon session begins today, Operation Sindoor, Trump's ceasefire claims on agenda
Monsoon Session of Parliament: As the Monsoon Session of the Parliament kicks off today (July 21), Operation Sindoor and US President Donald Trump's ceasefire claims remain among the key issues the government is set to take up for discussions. The session will comprise a total of 21 sittings, spread over 32 days, and will conclude on August 21. In between, both the Houses will be adjourned on August 12, 2025, and will reassemble on Monday, August 18, to facilitate Independence Day celebrations. Bills are likely to be tabled: A total of 17 bills are expected to be tabled during the Monsoon Session, including the Income Tax Bill, 2025; the Coastal Shipping Bill, 2024; the Bills of Lading Bill, 2024; and the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025 — which will replace an ordinance. Discussions and voting on the Demands for Grants (Manipur) for the year 2025–26 are also scheduled. Resolution seeking approval of extension of President's Rule imposed through Proclamation issued by the President on the 13th of February, 2025 in Manipur is also expected to be tabled. © IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd
