logo
‘You mislead people, you burn' – housing minister defends rent controls

‘You mislead people, you burn' – housing minister defends rent controls

BreakingNews.ie18-06-2025
The housing minister has accused the Opposition of whipping up 'false anger' over his housing proposals during a Dáil debate on extending rent controls nationwide.
While warning opposition politicians of the dangers of misleading the public, James Browne drew comparisons with the far-right, populism and of a 'Faustian pact'.
Advertisement
Mr Browne also said: 'Because you mislead people, you burn.'
The Government is being pressured again over its approach to solving Ireland's housing crisis, after announcing a swathe of new rent and housing measures.
This includes the introduction of rent caps nationwide of 2 per cent or to inflation, whichever is lower.
This will apply to around a fifth of tenancies not already covered and has been welcomed, but other measures have been criticised as a pathway to even higher rents.
Advertisement
Six-year minimum tenancies on offer from March next year have been criticised for allowing landlords to 'reset' rents to market value every six years or when tenants voluntarily leave a rental property.
There have also been criticisms of rents in new developments being capped only by inflation, in order to attract investors in an attempt to boost the supply of apartments.
The Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael government, supported by several independents, has insisted that boosting supply is the best way to encourage affordability, while opposition parties argue more state-owned homes and regulation is needed.
While debating the Residential Tenancies (Amendment) Bill 2025, which will introduce nationwide rent caps this summer, the government and opposition representatives criticised one another over their housing stances.
Advertisement
Fianna Fáil's Catherine Ardagh accused Social Democrats TD Rory Hearne of a 'sanctimonious rant'.
'It's very difficult to listen to my friend's sanctimonious rant in relation to this,' the Dublin South Central TD said.
'I'm sure you are familiar, I think you are a lecturer in economics. We know from Junior Cert economics when you increase supply in the market, prices stabilise if not come down.
'It's economics 101.'
Advertisement
Fianna Fáil's Catherine Ardagh (Niall Carson/PA)
She said the Bill would ensure 'fairness, certainty and protection' for renters across the country.
Independent Galway West TD Catherine Connolly said she was inspired to speak during the legislative debate to respond to Ms Ardagh's comments.
'I can't think of anything more inappropriate from a TD (who is) part of the government that is standing over a housing crisis.
'The only sanctimonious (rant) that I've ever heard in this chamber has been from successive governments, as a tool and a weapon to obfuscate, to avoid, to confuse as a way to not analyse the problem.'
Advertisement
She criticised the 'chaotic, disorderly fashion' that the draft rent control laws were introduced to the Dail without pre-legislative scrutiny.
'We keep adding the pieces of the jigsaw with no picture – expect the picture of 'the market will provide'.'
Green Party leader Roderic O'Gorman said the progression of the Bill was 'reckless' and said it was inevitable that problems would later come to light.
'I understand sometimes you have to work and move legislation rapidly, I've had to do it myself,' the former minister said.
'But this isn't rapid, this is reckless.
'I have no doubt that mistakes will come to light, in the debate here or in the debate in the Seanad, but because there isn't sufficient time to actually go through it in detail, to bring in the committee amendments, we will be bringing forward legislative amendments in the autumn term, I have no doubt about that.'
People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy said the government believed in 'the magic of the market' and that by increasing rents now, they would come down in the long term.
'The government won't own its own proposals. They tell us that what you're doing is going to increase investment in the rental sector and that ultimately will bring rents down.
'But you refuse to say the bit in the middle, in terms of why is this going to increase investment in the rental sector, which is the plan is to raise rents.'
Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín accused the government of an 'omni-shambles' in relation to rent controls and 'confusion' and 'chaos' over its latest housing measures.
'It really feels that this is amateur hour in relation to the government's approach.'
Mr Browne hit back, accusing the opposition of a 'Faustian pact' and of whipping up 'false anger'.
He said personal comments had been made in the Dáil but no solutions offered, and accused Sinn Féin of 'quietly shelving' their manifesto plan for 'a home you'll never own'.
He also claimed the opposition had 'worryingly' misled the public about the timing of plans to introduce rent controls nationwide.
He said a Bill cannot go on the Order Paper until it has government approval, which it secured last Tuesday.
'Yet here we have Sinn Féin and Labour and the Social Democrats, all who know the procedures, deliberately putting it out there that because it wasn't on the order paper it wasn't going to happen, and that suddenly there was some sort of fast change.
'That's the kind of politics we see from the far-right, and we see that introduced here now.'
He said that it was dangerous to 'whip up a false anger' and said it was 'pure populism'.
'You were deliberately misrepresenting the procedures to, again, whip up a false narrative. It is deeply dishonest.
'It's a kind of a Faustian pact, we've seen Labour do that to get into government before, and you get in a Faustian pact to whip up anger to try and get into government … if you get into government on the back of that kind of whipping up anger, you see what happened to Labour the last time and that's what happens.
'Because you mislead people, you burn,' he said.
It was agreed in the Dáil on Wednesday that the Bill would move to committee and final stages.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers
US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers

President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: What's in the agreement? Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on 'the vast majority' of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S. What's not in the deal? Trump said the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. What's the impact? The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' What is some of the reaction to the deal? German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations" and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' The Federation of German Industries was blunter. "Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry," said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, "the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet," said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy," Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' What about car companies? Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump's 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%. The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a 1.3 billion euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years. What were the issues dividing the two sides? Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade. Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for U.S.-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.

Britain facing pension poverty 'time bomb' as Rachel Reeves' tax grab helps crater retirement savings by 20 per cent in six months
Britain facing pension poverty 'time bomb' as Rachel Reeves' tax grab helps crater retirement savings by 20 per cent in six months

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Britain facing pension poverty 'time bomb' as Rachel Reeves' tax grab helps crater retirement savings by 20 per cent in six months

Britain is facing a pension poverty 'time bomb' after Rachel Reeves ' punishing tax grab helped plunge retirement savings by 20 per cent in six months. Survey figures suggest Britons may have been reducing their pension contributions since Christmas as the economy reacted to Labour's new tax regime. The Chancellor's national insurance hike has been partly blamed for high inflation this year, raising the cost of goods and services. Critics said last night the increased cost of living is 'squeezing' households and preventing people from putting money away for their retirement. As a result, the average monthly pension contribution has slumped to £53.40 this month from £59.10 in April and £65.10 in December. This is the first time in two years contributions have dropped for six months in a row, according to data from the House Money Index compiled by price comparison website MoneySuperMarket. At the same time, average household spending on bills and other outgoings surged by 12 per cent to £1,564 per month. The data showed the average Brit is now shelling out £52.14 per day on essentials, up from £46.40 in December. Kara Gammell, personal finance expert at MoneySuperMarket, said: 'People are reducing their private and workplace pension contributions, perhaps to help offset rising costs and stretched household finances.' Last night, Helen Whately MP, shadow pensions secretary, said: 'Britain is facing a pension poverty time bomb of Labour's making. 'By squeezing the public with more taxes and higher bills, people are being forced to make terrible choices – choices we won't see the full consequence of for years. 'The Conservatives will always stand on the side of the makers – those who work hard, do the right thing, and want to get on in life. 'And so we will hold Labour to account for the economic mess they are making.' John O'Connell, chief executive at the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'Sky-high taxes and soaring living costs mean hard-pressed households are dipping into their retirement savings just to stay afloat.' This month, the Office for National Statistics said UK inflation jumped higher than economists had expected to 3.6 per cent in June, up from 3.4 per cent in May. It marked the steepest increase since January 2024, with critics blaming Mrs Reeves' 'job tax'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government was reviving New Labour's Pensions Commission to help people save more. She said: 'People deserve to know they will have a decent income in retirement – with all the security, dignity and freedom that brings. 'But the truth is, that is not the reality facing many people, especially if you're low paid, or self-employed.

EU urges Ukraine to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies; Zelenskiy signals swift action
EU urges Ukraine to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies; Zelenskiy signals swift action

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

EU urges Ukraine to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies; Zelenskiy signals swift action

BRUSSELS, July 27 (Reuters) - European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called on Sunday for President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies, with the Ukrainian leader signaling that supporting legislation could be adopted within days. "Ukraine has already achieved a lot on its European path. It must build on these solid foundations and preserve independent anti-corruption bodies, which are cornerstones of Ukraine's rule of law," von der Leyen said in a post on X after a call with Zelenskiy. After a rare outburst of public criticism, Zelenskiy on Thursday submitted draft legislation to restore the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies - reversing course of an earlier bill aimed at stripping their autonomy. "I thanked the European Commission for the provided expertise," Zelenskiy said in a post on X after his Sunday call with von der Leyen. "We share the same vision: it is important that the bill is adopted without delay, as early as next week." Von der Leyen also promised continued support for Ukraine on its path to EU membership. "Ukraine can count on our support to deliver progress on its European path," she added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store