Pro-Duterte posts misrepresent ICC chief's comments on court's jurisdiction
The clip shows ICC President Tomoko Akane saying the court does not have jurisdiction if "crimes occur on the soil of non-state parties by non-state parties or persons".
Tagalog-language text on the video, using a popular nickname for Duterte, reads: "This is it! The ICC president herself said it. Father Digong can go home early."
The post surfaced following Duterte's arrest on March 11; he was then put on plane to the ICC in the Netherlands to face a crimes against humanity charge tied to his drug war in which thousands were killed (archived link).
The 79-year-old is awaiting a confirmation of charges hearing scheduled for September 23 where he will have the opportunity to contest the accusations against him (archived link).
The clip also circulated in other social media posts alongside the same claim, racking up over 150,000 views in total.
But the clip does not show the ICC president speaking about Duterte's case or whether it falls within the court's jurisdiction.
While Duterte pulled the Philippines out of the ICC's founding treaty, the Rome Statute, in 2019 after the tribunal began looking into allegations of systematic extrajudicial killings during his term, the court ruled that alleged crimes committed prior to the withdrawal remained under its jurisdiction (archived link).
The ICC reiterated this position after Duterte's arrest, saying the case "falls within the jurisdiction of the Court as the alleged crimes occurred during the period when the Philippines was a State Party to the Rome Statute" (archived link).
A keyword search on Google found the falsely shared clip corresponds to a longer video posted on the website of the European Parliament (archived link).
Akane was addressing a joint meeting of the European Parliament's human rights subcommittee and legal affairs committee on March 19 (archived link).
The clip used in the false posts shows part of Akane's response to a question raised by Dainius Zalimas, a member of the European Parliament from Lithuania.
At the video's 11:13:40 mark, Zalimas asks Akane whether there is any need to adjust the Rome Statute to include crimes such as ecocide or other crimes against the environment.
She begins her response at the 11:30:30 mark by stating that ecocide is not in the statute, and it is "up to the state parties to amend the Rome Statute if you feel it is necessary to incorporate it, likewise with other crimes as well".
The clip used in the false posts follows at the 11:31:40 mark, where she lays out the limits of the ICC's jurisdiction.
She does not mention Duterte's case in the answer, or in response to any other questions at the European Parliament meeting.
AFP has previously debunked a similar false claim spread by Duterte's supporters suggesting the ICC lacks jurisdiction to charge the former president here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former head of Central African football body jailed for war crimes
The former head of the Central African Republic (CAR) football federation, Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona, has been found guilty of committing 28 war crimes and crimes against humanity by judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC). He was accused, alongside Alfred Yekatom, of co-ordinating attacks against the country's Muslim population in 2013-14. Yekatom was found guilty of 20 charges. The judges gave their verdict after a trial lasting almost four years involving more than 170 witnesses and nearly 20,000 items of evidence. Ngaïssona was sentenced to 12 years and Yekatom 15 years. Violence has gripped the CAR for much of the past decade, but a recent peace deal led to the dissolution of two rebel groups this month. CAR was plunged into turmoil in 2013 when predominately Muslim rebels from the Séléka group seized power in the majority Christian country. A band of mostly Christian militias, called the anti-Balaka, rose up to counter Séléka after then-President François Bozizé was ousted. Ngaïssona and Yekatom were convicted of numerous crimes, including murder, torture and persecuting a religious group. The prosecution set out the alleged system of command, saying Ngaïssona provided funds and instructions to anti-Balaka groups in 2013 and 2014. Yekatom, nicknamed Rambo, was a commander who allegedly led fighters into the capital, Bangui, on 5 December 2013 where civilians were slaughtered. The prosecution said the pair's strategy was to make all Muslims their target, describing them as "enemies of the nation". Yekatom authorised his fighters to attack Muslim civilians, including to slit throats, cut off ears and bury people alive, the prosecution alleged. Asked to enter a plea at the start of the trial, both men rejected all the charges. Media reports at the time indicates that at least 1,000 people were killed in tit-for-tat clashes in Bangui in December 2013, and half the city's population fled in that month alone. Who is Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona? He was the self-declared political co-ordinator of anti-Balaka forces. Ngaïssona was barred from running for CAR president in 2015 because of his alleged role in the atrocities. He is a former head of the CAR's football federation and briefly served as sports minister before being elected to the executive committee of the Confederation of African Football (Caf) in February 2018. His appointment was criticised by several human rights groups. "If the allegations were true, I wouldn't be here today," he told AFP news agency at the time. "[I don't] mix politics and sport - everything I've done has been for the good of my country." French authorities arrested him in December 2018 and he was transferred to the ICC in January 2019. Who is Alfred Yekatom? Yekatom was elected as an MP in 2016, despite being subject to UN sanctions. He was arrested in October 2018 after he fired a gun in parliament, then ran away, after a row with a fellow MP. His extradition to the ICC was the first from CAR. The International Federation for Human Rights (known by its French acronym FIDH) said it signalled the authorities there were committed to fighting impunity. More about CAR from the BBC: Grenade attack survivor sings for peace Central African Republic's road to anarchy Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica BBC Africa podcasts Focus on Africa This Is Africa


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Christian Family Kicked Out of Their Home for Refusing To Convert
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Christian family has been barred from their village in India after refusing to convert to Hinduism, an international Christian human rights organization has reported. A man identified only as Vikram, his wife and their five children had lived in their Hindu-majority village in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh for years before villagers stormed their home and kicked them out on June 16, the International Christian Concern (ICC) said. Christians are facing persecution in India, according to the ICC and other organizations, amid a push for India to become a Hindu nation. Newsweek has contacted India's Ministry of Minority Affairs for comment via email. The Context This expulsion highlights intensifying religious pressures in India, where Hindu nationalist groups and politicians increasingly advocate for a Hindu-majority identity and stricter legal boundaries for religious minorities. Forced conversions, social boycotts, and anti-conversion laws have contributed to a climate of fear among Christian communities—particularly in states such as Chhattisgarh, where such policies are most aggressively enforced. There were 160 reports of violent attacks against Christians in India last year, the European Centre for Law and Justice reported in March, including attacks on church and prayer meetings and physical assaults. What To Know Village leaders confronted Vikram and his family last month, demanding that they abandon their Christian faith and participate in a Ghar Wapsi ("homecoming") ceremony to convert to Hinduism. When Vikram refused, a public meeting was held where it was announced that the family would be expelled from the village, the ICC said. Soon after, a mob attacked their home, throwing their possessions into the street and allegedly abusing their three daughters. Vikram went to the police, who advised villagers to let the family stay in their home but took no action when they refused, the organization reported. Newsweek has contacted local authorities for the state of Chhattisgarh for comment via email. Forced to leave, the family built a temporary shelter in a nearby forest, but ICC staff have since provided them with short-term housing, along with food and clothing. Chhattisgarh is one of 11 Indian states with anti-conversion laws that, despite being meant to prevent forced conversations, are widely reported to be used to intimidate and penalize religious minorities, the ICC said. Christian Persecution in India In recent years, India has witnessed a marked escalation in the persecution of its Christian population, driven in large part by the rise of Hindu nationalist ideology and the spread of anti-conversion laws across several states. At least 12 Indian states have enacted anti-conversion laws, which have roots from postindependence governments that feared colonial mass conversions. But religious freedom advocates say that, in practice, the laws are being used to intimidate and criminalize minorities. There have been multiple reports of Christian pastors and congregation members being arrested on charges of forced conversions during meetings with no evidence, according to the European Centre for Law and Justice. Indian Christians hold placards and shout slogans during a protest in Bangalore on March 13, 2013, against Hindu right-wing Bajrang Dal, a militant organization that had allegedly attacked Christian worshippers in Udupi in north Karnataka... Indian Christians hold placards and shout slogans during a protest in Bangalore on March 13, 2013, against Hindu right-wing Bajrang Dal, a militant organization that had allegedly attacked Christian worshippers in Udupi in north Karnataka five days earlier. More AP These developments are occurring against the backdrop of a broader ideological shift under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, which draws ideological roots from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh—a Hindu nationalist organization that promotes the vision of India as a Hindu nation. Its mission statement said, "From its inception, the goal before the Sangh was to attain the pinnacle of glory of the Hindu Rashtra [nation] … through organizing the entire society." What People Are Saying A Christian leader local to Vikram's village told the International Christian Concern: "This is not the first time they've been attacked. This is the fifth village meeting held to pressure the family into Ghar Wapsi." The European Centre for Law and Justice said in its March report: "Often hailed as the world's largest democracy, India has become increasingly hostile toward Christians and other religious minorities in recent years." It added: "Hindu nationalist influences have increasingly shaped state policy, undermining secular governance and institutionalizing discrimination against religious minorities." What Happens Next As calls for stricter legal definitions of religious identity gather support among Hindu nationalist groups and lawmakers, minority Christian communities in India may face increasing social, legal and physical risks. International advocates continue to monitor such incidents, pressing for stronger Indian government intervention to protect minority rights and urging U.S. policymakers to prioritize religious freedom in bilateral relations with India. The fate of Vikram's family remains uncertain as efforts to return them to their home have stalled and protection for displaced Christian families in Chhattisgarh is limited.


San Francisco Chronicle
6 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Hungary bans Irish rap group Kneecap from entering ahead of festival performance
BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — Members of the Irish-language rap group Kneecap were banned from entering Hungary ahead of their scheduled performance at the popular Sziget Festival as authorities argued the musicians' presence in the country would constitute a risk to national security. The Belfast trio, scheduled to play on Sziget's closing day on Aug. 11, is known for anarchic energy, satirical lyrics and use of symbolism associated with the Irish republican movement, which seeks to unite Northern Ireland, currently part of the U.K., with the Republic of Ireland. The group has faced criticism for lyrics laden with expletives and drug references and for political statements seeming to glorify militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Kneecap has accused critics of trying to silence the band because of its support for the Palestinian cause throughout Israel's war in Gaza and say they don't support Hezbollah and Hamas nor condone violence. Hungary's immigration authority, the National Directorate-General for Aliens Policing, published decrees on Thursday declaring Kneecap members Naoise Ó Cairealláin, J.J. Ó Dochartaigh and Liam Óg ÓhAnnaidh would be banned from Hungary's territory for three years since their 'entry and stay constitute a serious threat to national security.' Government spokesman Zoltán Kovács wrote on social platform X that the decision to ban Kneecap was due to 'antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah.' Hungarian authorities and other groups had earlier pushed Sziget Festival to cancel the band's performance. Hungary's minister for European affairs, János Bóka, noted the government's 'zero-tolerance' policy toward antisemitism in a July 11 letter to the festival's organizers. Hundreds of figures from Hungary's music and cultural community also have signed a petition calling for Kneecap's performance to be cancelled. The group performed in April at the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in California, where they accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians enabled by the U.S. government. That sparked calls for the rappers' U.S. visas to be revoked and several Kneecap gigs have since been canceled as a result.