Mentorship: The Solution To The 134-Year Gender Gap
134 years! If we don't redesign the system within which we work, interact and provide support, this is the amount of time it will take to achieve gender equality at a global level, based on the World Economic Forum's "Global Gender Gap 2024" report.
However, we don't need to accept this timeline. Change can happen faster—if women are willing to step into their power and support one another, and if men truly become allies in the quest for gender balance. And it's not just about balance; it is about human prosperity, more opportunities and a better world. At the center of this transformation? Mentorship.
Do you remember the best leader you've ever worked under? Most likely, they were not the only one at the top. Behind successful individuals is a group of mentors, sponsors and nurturers who assisted them throughout their career. Companies that promote mentorship are not only helping individuals but also creating teams that are more robust, innovative and stronger at problem-solving.
Effective businesses know that investing in mentorship not only helps employees build successful careers but also strengthens a culture of trust.
Undoubtedly, life as a woman in the workforce is challenging. From being talked over during a staff meeting to being sidelined in various leadership positions, the challenges are endless. However, supporting other women can drastically change everything.
I have seen that when women support each other through mentorship programs, friendship or even just someone to talk to, they help each other profoundly. With a little effort, we can demolish some of the obstacles standing in the way of work becoming a place where we all flourish.
When women mentor other women, sponsor them and advocate for their causes:
• There is increased confidence, as when someone believes in you, you are compelled to believe in yourself.
• Incrementally, more women assume leadership positions, resulting in the cycle of underrepresentation being broken.
• Slowly, barriers begin to break for subsequent generations to benefit.
This support, however, must be genuine and not shallow. This means recognizing one another's achievements, creating opportunities for other women to join the table and not subscribing to the fallacy that success is a scarce commodity.
The ugly truth? If women are the sole ones advocating for gender equity, change will be minimal. Men need to support women through mentoring and beyond as sponsors, advocates and allies.
Despite the increase in trainings to promote inclusion, the organization Lean In finds that men are still far less likely than women to recognize and respond to microaggressions against women. For these men, the reality is that they do not know how to be allies.
An ally does not focus on dominating the conversation. Instead, an ally builds the frameworks for women to speak and lead. That includes listening to women, promoting their voices and actively engaging in the work. Moreover, an ally speaks out when they see bias, fights for equal wages and uses power in ways that facilitate constructive change.
This extends beyond the field of business. It is a matter for humanity. Gender equity creates greater economies, improved communities and a more equitable world.
Per McKinsey, eliminating the gender disparity would increase the global GDP by $28 trillion. Ultimately, mentoring is not limited to improving career success. It involves breaking out of the cycles of underrepresentation and improving entire communities. Empowering one individual creates impacts that last for generations.
My work with the #OwnYourColor movement is dedicated to the simple but profound idea that when people show up fully as themselves and support others in doing the same, we all rise.
134 years is too long to wait. The world needs all of us—our voices, our differences and our commitment to lifting one another up.
Corporate leaders: It's time to invest in mentorship, sponsorship and allyship. By creating room for diverse leadership, we move toward a future where everyone can thrive. Let's create that world—together.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Forward-Looking Planning Is Key For Financial Services Providers
Matt is the CEO & co-founder of Origin, where he is working to solve employees' number one source of stress: money. Amid economic volatility and rapid technological change, access to financial planning remains deeply uneven. The financial services industry tends to prioritize high-income individuals, which can leave many households without the tools or support to plan for their financial futures. This gap is especially troubling as uncertainty around inflation, interest rates and broader economic disruption makes long-term financial stability harder to achieve. Many people face barriers to quality financial guidance. As an article by the World Economic Forum put it: "Often, those with lower incomes would benefit the most from financial guidance, but they are also the least likely to afford it or know where to seek it out." For providers of personal financial solutions, this moment presents both a challenge and an opportunity: How can we equip individuals with the clarity they need while adapting to a fast-moving economy and massive technological shifts? Why Consumers Need More—And Better—Guidance Today, middle- and lower-income households are often left to navigate life's biggest financial decisions, like buying a home, starting a family, changing careers or planning for retirement, largely on their own. The traditional financial system simply wasn't built for them. While the wealthiest typically have access to advisors and personalized planning, many others take the do-it-yourself route and often use tools that only show them where they stand today. What I believe is missing is the ability to connect that information to long-term goals and translate it into a meaningful plan for the future. My company provides a money management platform, and within our community, we're seeing a clear trend: Many people aren't just looking for help managing day-to-day finances—they want help planning for what's next. They're asking for tools that are personal, forward-looking and grounded in their actual lives. The problem is, this kind of planning can be complex and time-consuming to offer at scale. That's exactly what needs to change. Financial service providers have an opportunity to fill this gap, and they can use AI to help. How AI Can Change The Planning Experience From real-time cash flow analysis to scenario planning and behavior-based nudging, financial solution providers can use AI to deliver holistic, proactive and personalized financial guidance at a more affordable price point. Users could essentially have a context-aware, always-on financial advisor in their pocket. The ability to synthesize vast amounts of historical data, such as spending habits, income trends and investment performance, into meaningful, forward-looking projections is no longer a hypothetical—it's becoming table stakes. And yet, many financial institutions and benefit providers have been slow to fully embrace AI's strategic potential. A McKinsey report suggests that many financial services companies are not yet using AI to its full potential. I believe those that do could see improvements in client satisfaction, retention and engagement—especially among Millennials and Gen-Z, many of whom expect more intelligent, digital-first solutions. What This Means For Industry Leaders The financial planning experience can evolve from something static and reactive to something dynamic to help consumers achieve their life goals. I believe that today's mass market consumers aren't just looking for educational resources or generic calculators. Providers can strive to offer smarter, personalized guidance that reflects their customers' goals, circumstances and changing market realities. To stay ahead, industry leaders can: 1. Invest in data infrastructure and AI tools that enable real-time forecasting and personalized insights. Companies that build robust, scalable data pipelines and AI engines could not only improve customer outcomes but also create new monetization pathways through advisory, wealth and embedded financial services. 2. Combine digital tools with human advice to drive deeper engagement. Rather than choosing between automation and personalization, firms should integrate both. Adopting a tech-enabled human model can help build trust at scale and potentially improve outcomes across income levels and life stages. 3. Reframe financial planning as a continuous, iterative process, not a one-time event. Firms should think of financial planning not as a product or event, but as an evolving service layer that lives alongside the customer throughout their financial journey. Looking Ahead The personal finance market is on the verge of a fundamental shift. Tools once reserved for the affluent can become accessible to all. In my view, providers that fail to modernize risk falling behind. But those that embrace intelligent, forward-looking solutions will be best positioned to earn long-term trust, deepen customer relationships and create real impact. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
The Next Industrial Revolution: AI Agents At The Heart Of Transformation
Agentic AI is at the forefront of businesses of the future. The manufacturing sector has always been at the forefront of innovation. From the steam engine to the assembly line, each leap has redefined what's possible on the shop floor. Today, we stand at the threshold of another seismic shift—one powered not just by machines, but by intelligence itself. The World Economic Forum's latest whitepaper, 'Frontier Technologies in Industrial Operations: The Rise of Artificial Intelligence Agents,' paints a compelling picture of this new era. Why Now? The Case for Frontier Technologies Industrial operations have long relied on innovations such as robotics and the industrial internet of things (IIoT) to drive productivity and efficiency. But the challenges facing manufacturers today are as complex as they are urgent. Labor shortages, rising costs, volatile supply chains, and the relentless push for sustainability are all converging. Manufacturers must not only optimize cost and efficiency but also adapt to rapid change, ensure resilience, and meet sustainability goals. Traditional technologies, while powerful, are no longer enough to meet these demands. The answer lies in embracing what the WEF call 'frontier technologies." Those that push the boundaries of what's possible and unlock new forms of collaborative intelligence between humans and machines. But why the focus on AI agents, and why now? The answer is simple: AI agents are not just another tool in the digital toolbox. They represent a new paradigm—one where software and robots can autonomously perceive, decide, and act, freeing up human workers to focus on creativity, strategy, and innovation. The Rise of AI Agents: Virtual and Embodied Success requires a leap beyond incremental improvement—toward near-autonomous, AI-centric operations that empower people and machines to collaborate seamlessly. The whitepaper highlights two main types of AI agents driving this transformation: Virtual AI agents operate within software environments. Think of them as digital colleagues—always on, always learning, and capable of making decisions in real time. These agents can act as assistants, advisers, or even fully autonomous controllers, handling everything from production scheduling to predictive maintenance. For example, a virtual AI agent might monitor a production line, identify bottlenecks, and automatically adjust workflows to optimize throughput. In supply chain management, these agents can analyze vast amounts of data, anticipate disruptions, and recommend alternative sourcing strategies—often before a human would even notice a problem. Embodied AI agents take things a step further. These are robots equipped with advanced AI, capable of perceiving and interacting with the physical world. Unlike traditional robots, which are limited to repetitive, pre-programmed tasks, embodied AI agents can adapt to changing environments, handle complex assemblies, and even collaborate safely alongside human workers. Picture a robot that can not only pick and place components but also recognize when a part is defective, adjust its grip, or reroute itself to avoid an obstacle—no manual intervention required. This is the promise of embodied AI: robotics that are as flexible and intuitive as the people working beside them. Redefining the Human Role One of the most exciting—and perhaps misunderstood—aspects of this transformation is the role of people. Karim Lakhani, a professor at Harvard Business School, when asked, 'Will AI replace humans?', famously replied, 'Of course AI won't replace humans. But humans with AI will replace humans without AI.' Far from replacing humans, AI agents are designed to augment human capabilities. As operations become more autonomous, the role of the worker evolves from hands-on operator to orchestrator and innovator. Strategic Imperatives: Building the Foundations Of course, realizing the full potential of AI agents requires more than just deploying new technology. Manufacturers must lay strong organizational and technological foundations: Looking Ahead: From Experimentation to Transformation The journey to AI-driven, near-autonomous operations is just beginning. Early adopters are already seeing tangible benefits, from reduced energy consumption to higher product quality and more resilient supply chains. But the real prize lies ahead: a future where manufacturers can respond to change with agility, drive sustainable growth, and empower their people like never before. As the white paper concludes, manufacturers who embrace frontier technologies today will be the leaders of tomorrow. The Intelligent Age is here—are you ready to seize it? Want to learn more about how AI-powered supply chains meet today's needs while preparing for tomorrow? Check out this IDC Analyst Brief: 'AI-Powered Business Suite for Supply Chain."
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
When Millionaires Say They're Leaving—They Almost Never Do
Phil White, a British millionaire poses with a placard reading: "Tax the rich" next to the Congress ... More centre during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos on January 18, 2023. - Tax me and tax people like me urges in an interview with AFP Phil White, a British millionaire present at the Davos forum, believing that wealth inequalities fragment the world. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP) (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images) Every time a government proposes ticking up taxes on the wealthy, however modestly, the same rote routine begins: High-net-worth individuals, their accountants in tow, emerge to provide quotes informing the public that, sadly, they will now be forced to flee to some jurisdiction that has no designs on taxing their income. The threat is immediate and existential in scale—they're being driven away like a protected species poached to near extinction. The latest revival of this performance comes courtesy of the United Kingdom, where the government closed a centuries-old tax loophole that let wealthy foreigners reside in the U.K. but insist their income did not. The global rich are now in full performative retreat from London—selling their properties and booking one-way flights to elsewhere. Estate agents lament, tabloids predict doom for the tax base, and everyone seems certain that London's days as a center of commerce are numbered. Across the Atlantic, the same chorus plays in a slightly different accent. In New York, when Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani proposed a millionaire's tax, the upper crust began auditioning for the same role as put-upon wealth creator in search of a steamship to Florida. But here's the thing: they almost never really leave. If they do, it's in such small numbers that the fiscal impact is negligible at worst and, often, positive. We've seen this performance before. U.K Closes a Loophole, Wealthy Pack Their Bags (or Say They Will) In the U.K. the 'non-dom' regime was a tax perk long enjoyed by the ultra-wealthy. It permitted wealthy foreigners to live in Britain without paying tax on overseas income. In effect, it allowed the global elite to buy an address in London and enjoy the related public goods without contributing meaningfully to His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC). All the perks of residency, none of the fiscal responsibility. This spring, the U.K. government finally did the unthinkable and closed the non-dom loophole. The ascendant tax regime was projected to bring in £12.7 billion by 2030. To be fair, some of the beneficiaries of the old regime did seem to start heading for the exits. Several high-profile billionaires moved abroad and real estate sales in the poshest neighborhoods did fall. Anecdotes snap together like magnets and, from there, the narrative accelerates. There is a certain common-sense element to the idea that raising taxes on the wealthy will cause them to leave, so ad-hoc stories are all that is necessary to move many from assumption to certainty—the wealthy are on the move. The same argument was made the last time the U.K. trimmed non-dom benefits, in 2017. Back then, only 2% of the affected group actually left the country. The rest stuck around and paid 50% more in tax. The rich are better at making threats than following them and the media credulously reports on the bluster. Meanwhile, in New York New York faces down its own elite melodrama. Assemblymember and Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist with a preference for policy over donor appeasement, has proposed a state-level millionaire's tax. The reaction was instant. Business leaders issued grave warnings and his opponent conjured up images of a mass exodus to Florida. It seems the mere suggestion that the ultra-rich should pay a few percentage points more toward public transit or housing sends the elites into a private jet fuel-up pantomime. There is precedent in the U.S. to mirror that in the U.K.—when California raised taxes on high earners in 2010, despite opponents warning of an economic death spiral, California's share of the nation's million-dollar earners went up. Today, nearly one in five U.S. millionaires live in the Golden State. The myth of the millionaire on the move is politically useful but empirically bankrupt. Study after study, in Europe, the United States, and elsewhere, tells the same story: millionaires are even less likely to move than the general population. In the U.S. just 2.4% of millionaires move across state lines in a given year—below the national average of 2.9%. And yet, the myth persists—why? Why the Chased-Away Millionaire Myth Persists If the data doesn't support the millionaire migratory narrative, why is it still treated like gospel every time someone proposes a new tax bracket? Because it isn't really about economics—it's about politics. The threat of wealthy flight is a potent rhetorical weapon because it allows opponents of progressive taxation to cloak themselves in a self-serving argument that sounds in fiscal prudence rather than protection of the donor class. Opponents of progressive taxation can assure taxpayers they aren't defending inequality but are instead just exerting common sense policymaking to ensure the budget can be kept intact. It's austerity wrapped in the language of inevitability. The myth also thrives on anecdote. A billionaire leaves London for Dubai, and within the confines of one newspaper article a universe is created where the entire country is hemorrhaging wealth. One hedge fund manager moves to Florida and the lights are flipped off in New York. And yet, for every high-profile departure anecdote splashed across the headlines, there are thousands of high earners doing nothing of the sort. America in particular loves the image of the rugged capitalist jetsetter that can pull up stakes and relocate anywhere. The notion that the ultra-rich are nomads, unattached to place and ready to vanish abroad if offended, reflects the myth of individualism. And yet, it doesn't square with the reality that most wealthy people, like their less well-appointed counterparts, are deeply tied to their communities, industries, and local institutions. The board seat on the local nonprofit or country club doesn't fit in the luggage compartment of a private jet. Nonetheless, the myth will linger. In part because it provides cover, not just for the ultra-rich but also for the lawmakers who fear crossing them and offending their constituents in almost equal measure. The result is a political Pavlovian response where even modest tax reforms come with a side of millionaire exodus think-pieces.
