Kielland families welcome Norway rig deaths compensation
Ms Fleming, from Durham, previously said there were unanswered questions about the disaster, which killed her father Michael and five of his compatriots from the Cumbrian village of Cleator Moor.The compensation motion had been opposed by the government but passed through the Storting by 53 votes to 51.
Ms Fleming, who was six when her 37-year-old dad died, said: "It's only right the Norwegian government have eventually done the right thing and agreed to pay a tiny amount of their wealth to the people that unwillingly and unwittingly sacrificed their lives."This feels likes a weight has been lifted of our shoulders."She praised the Kielland Network, a campaign group set up by survivors and families of the deceased to call for justice."People have given years of their lives to this cause and we are very grateful for the work that has been done," Ms Fleming said.
Among the 40 members of the Kielland Network who attended the vote in central Oslo, there was a great deal of sadness that the group's founder, Kian Reme, was not there with them.Mr Reme, whose brother Rolf was killed in the disaster, died in 2024 from cancer."He was the reason we got this far," Ms Fleming said, adding: "He was a man with strength of fight but also full of peace and forgiveness."He'd be so happy if he were here, but I'm sure he's up there proudly looking down at what everyone has continued to achieve."
Tara Pender, who lives near Nottingham, was with Ms Fleming in Oslo to see the vote pass.Ms Pender, who was 13 when her 41-year-old father PJ Pender was killed, also paid tribute to Mr Reme."It's such a shame Kian is not here," she said, adding: "He was amazing and worked tirelessly on this for so many years."She said the result was "very bittersweet" as many relatives and survivors had died before they got the recognition of failings from the Norwegian government they had craved."It's just been such a long time coming," Ms Pender said.She said she had spoken to several other British families of the deceased in the aftermath of the vote and they were "all delighted".
The four-year-old platform was being used as accommodation for the nearby Edda rig in the Ekofisk oil field about 200 miles (320km) off the coast from Stavanger, Norway, when one of its legs broke off during a storm.A 1981 Norwegian inquiry attributed the disaster to a crack in one of the braces caused during its construction in France, but the manufacturers said it had not been maintained or anchored properly by its operators.Some people received compensation at the time from the company which ran the oil rig, Phillips Petroleum, but campaigners said the Norwegian state should also accept responsibility.
A University of Stavanger study published in 2025 said families and the 89 survivors were let down by official investigations, while a 2021 review by the Norwegian auditor general found "highly reprehensible" failures to hold any of the companies involved in the disaster to account, or to support families and survivors.The Norwegian government apologised and funded the study to assess the impact on those affected.The government has opposed the compensation proposal put forward by a coalition of opposition parties but it passed by two votes, with further details now to be determined.
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Church abuse victim stages quiet protest at General Synod
Jenny Read says she was abused as a little girl at a church in the north-east of England. Last week she protested outside a meeting of the Church of England's parliament as it signed off on a compensation scheme for abuse victims, which she says is too little, too late. It is 07:30 BST on a grey, humid July morning in city is hosting General Synod - the Church of England's parliament - which is about to approve the landmark compensation Read, who travelled from her north-east of England home because she "had to be here", has already set up says, as a child, she was "sadistically" abused over a number of years at her local church by her own father, and also by a male curate and a female church adulthood, she and her sisters, who also say they were abused as children by the same people, reported the allegations to the Church of England three times, but it never launched a formal investigation. Ms Read is at General Synod to protest. But she is not blocking traffic, nor is she chanting or shouting into a megaphone. She is sitting peacefully in a camping chair opposite Central Hall, where the event is being held, drinking a cup of tea and eating a is quiet, but she no longer feels silenced and her presence is her stands a banner she has made. In big red, black and green letters it reads: "Three sisters sadistically abused at a NE church still waiting for justice." Ms Read's appearance in the shadow of the chamber housing the most powerful figures in the Church of England is the day members of the public, bishops, clergymen and clergywomen approach her to ask what her story is. Some take over food and Read says she is here to tell Church leaders that there is an "urgent need" to treat people who report abuse allegations with kindness because "that hasn't been our experience".Her fight for answers has been re-traumatising, she says, but she has waived her right to anonymity in order to share her may have passed but the mental anguish caused by the abuse and the alleged "fobbing off" from Church leaders has not, she a face-to-face meeting with her in May, Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell, the interim leader of the Church, offered an "unequivocal apology" for the abuse she had experienced and "recognised that it will have affected her life in many ways".Last month, following a BBC investigation which revealed the Read sisters' story, the Church of England also said it was "truly sorry" for the response they received when they made their initial reports. 'Survivor focused' compensation The Church has put aside £150m for what it is calling the Redress Scheme, to which any victim of Church-related abuse can apply. It was agreed by General Synod, but still needs to be officially signed off by the Church says the scheme is "survivor focused" and "offers more than money".As well as financial compensation, which can range from £5,000 to £660,000, survivors and victims can also receive "a formal apology, acknowledgment, therapeutic support, and other forms of bespoke redress", it can be made via a designated website and "independently assessed by trained assessors" who will consider the type of abuse, aggravating factors and the impact on the victim, it will then decide the level of compensation and support given."This is about the Church facing its past failures with honesty and humility," it says. The Right Reverend Philip Mounstephen, who chairs the Church's Redress Board, says it is "a matter of great shame" that the scheme is needed. He has previously said it was unclear how many people would apply."I am confident the scheme will provide much needed redress to survivors," he says, adding it will be "bespoke" for each scheme has already been delayed by several years and, for Ms Read, it is too has already "spent so many hours and months" in therapy and does not want to "spend any more of my remaining years trekking to therapists", she says."Even if I got the highest award possible, that doesn't compensate for my trauma."Ms Read has been diagnosed with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder linked to her childhood abuse which has, at times, plagued her adult relationships have been affected and she has only ever been able to work part has panic attacks in religious buildings which make her feel "terrorised" to the point she "has to scream" and get out. Episodes of feeling suicidal mean she "has struggled to survive" on occasions. "Redress sounds good but, from past experience, I can't quite believe it," Ms Read says."It's really urgent to highlight the need for the Church to get safeguarding right, not just on paper but in actions."Her silent protest brought some closure and, after decades of her feeling dismissed, people have eventually listened, she says."I feel like my voice has finally been heard. I can now move on with the rest of my life." Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
The sneaky way Anthony Albanese will turn Australia into a high-taxing European nation with new super tax
Anthony Albanese risks turning Australia into a high-taxing European nation with his plan for a radical new tax on superannuation savings, an investment group warns. The federal government wants to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million, where capital growth would be taxed before assets are sold. Wilson Asset Management chairman Geoff Wilson said this departure from taxing capital gains after assets are sold would see Australia share a similarity with European nations, which are renowned for their high taxes and targeting the rich. 'Australia is proving to be no different from Norway, Spain and Sweden, where taxing unrealised gains led to capital exodus and therefore lower than expected tax revenue,' he said. In 2023, the Labor government announced that from July 1, 2025, 0.5 per cent, or 80,000, of super balances with more than $3million would be hit with a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains. This would be in addition to the 15 per cent tax on earnings that already exists for all super during the accumulation or working phase. The debut of a new tax on unrealised gains also marks the biggest change to the capital gains tax since it was introduced in Australia in 1985. Previously, European nations have been the main enthusiasts for taxing the notional or paper value of assets, based on gains during a financial year. Norway applies a 38 per cent unrealised gains tax on the wealth of those who leave. Sweden does a similar thing, but with a 30 per cent exit tax on unrealised gains. Spain also has an exit tax, based on unrealised gains, if someone with a large investment portfolio leaves the country to become a tax resident elsewhere. Germany during the 1970s and 1980s taxed unrealised gains on wealth, but the policy was notoriously difficult to administer. France still has a wealth tax that applies on assets worth more than €1.3million (AU$2.1million) of real estate assets, but it stops short of taxing unrealised gains. Other European nations, renowned for having higher income taxes to fund more services, do not touch retirement savings in the way Labor is proposing to do. US Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris last year campaigned to tax unrealised gains on wealth - but only for the ultra rich with assets worth US$100million (AU$152million) or more. Australia would be the first to apply an unrealised gains tax to superannuation, in a bid to raise $2.3billion a year in Budget revenue. Left-leaning crossbench senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie last year declined to back Labor's Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill, because they are opposed to taxing unrealised gains. The Greens back taxing unrealised gains but want the threshold reduced to $2million, but indexed to inflation. They hold the balance of power in the Senate, and Labor is still negotiating amendments with the minor party. The government has previously flagged giving Australians a year's notice from the time legislation is passed, with Mr Wilson noting panic selling was already occurring in self-managed super funds to avoid the potential new tax. 'Despite requiring Senate approval, the proposed tax on unrealised gains has already prompted a rush to liquidate assets ahead of the 30 June 2026 implementation date,' he said. Wilson Asset Management has proposed an alternative super tax strategy to Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains, in a submission to the government's Economic Reform Roundtable, where it argued it would raise $2.433billion in revenue. 'The outcome of the proposal would allow the government to increase tax revenue from high balance accounts without breaching the realisation principle of the tax act,' Mr Wilson said. 'Our proposal is in the national interest and a Budget-positive alternative to the government's proposed policy to tax unrealised gains in superannuation.' He proposes to keep the existing structure of taxing realised capital gains, but adding a new 15 per cent tax to balances of $3million to $6million. A 17.5 per cent tax would apply for balances of $6million to $10million, rising to 20 per cent for balances of $10million to $20million and 25 per cent for balances above $20million.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Reeves risks disaster if she meddles in the motor finance scandal
She has driven out the non-doms. She has hammered the farmers. And pubs and restaurants are being throttled with higher employment taxes and rates. Still, it is good to know that the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has finally found one group of businesses she would actually like to help: the car finance giants. The Treasury is reported to be looking at overruling the Supreme Court on a potential £44bn of compensation for mis-selling finance schemes. Seriously? In reality, that would fatally undermine consumer protection. And it is hard to think of a less deserving case for help than the auto finance industry. The car finance scandal has been rumbling on for several years now. It is a complex saga, stretching back many years. The nub of it, however, is this. Lenders were paying commissions to middlemen and dealers based on the interest rate that could be imposed on customers, and those commissions were not always disclosed. Back in 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority quite rightly banned that practice, but there are now claims for compensation for past deals. Last year, the Court of Appeal supported those claims, and the Supreme Court is poised to deliver its final verdict next Friday. A lot of money is at stake, with estimates of the total amount that could be paid out in compensation running between £30bn and £44bn, and with firms such as Santander, Lloyds, Barclays and Close Brothers likely to take the biggest hit. We will have to see what the Supreme Court decides when it delivers its judgment. But even if the Court does rule against the banks, they may have an unlikely saviour at hand. It is none other than the Chancellor. She has already tried to intervene in the litigation once, controversially arguing back in January that the courts should not deliver a windfall for consumers, and any compensation should be 'proportionate to any harm done'. Now there are reports that the Treasury may well go a whole step further and support retrospective legislation to limit the damage that could be done to the City. We can all see what Reeves is worrying about. The sums at stake are enormous. Close Brothers has already set aside £165m to deal with the potential claims against it, while Lloyds has put aside £1.2bn, and some of the other banks may face similar bills. If the mortgage mis-selling scandal from a decade ago is any guide, the final total could be two or three times the initial estimates, and while that would be a bonanza for the lawyers – and there are a lot of hucksters among them who hardly need any encouragement – and for the lucky few who collect a few thousand on a Ford or Nissan they bought on finance fifteen years ago, it could prove catastrophic at a time when the government is desperately trying to revive the City, and kick-start investment and growth. It will make the UK look even more off-limits to the global finance industry than it already is. 'I think having a vibrant car industry and motor finance industry in the UK is important,' argued Reeves when she first started meddling in the case back in January. The trouble is, this is absolutely the worst place to start interfering with the legal process. Here's why. First, the car finance industry might well be fiercely lobbying the Treasury, but the blunt truth is that it is hardly deserving of any help. As most of us will know from personal experience of buying a car, navigating the bewildering special deals, discounts, small print, and all the other shenanigans of the motor trade can be a complete nightmare. You generally come away with the feeling that you have been ripped off, and that is because you probably have been. A £30bn to £40bn bill for compensation might finally force the industry to clean up its act, and start offering far more straightforward deals that people can understand and take or leave as they feel is appropriate. It has worked, at least to some degree, in mortgages, and it can work in finance as well. Next, this is hardly a matter for the Treasury. The claims are being brought under the common law, not a specific act of parliament, and ministers interfere with that at their peril. In reality, we need to respect the common law, as it is fundamental to the rights we all enjoy as citizens of a free country. Just as seriously, we should be strengthening consumer protection, not undermining it just because it is an inconvenience for some big banks. If Reeves concedes on this issue, then the lobbyists will just be back asking for all kinds of exemptions from legal decisions. Finally, there are far better ways of helping the City than this. The Chancellor could rule out another windfall tax on banks; she could scrap stamp duty on share trading; she could increase the annual Isa limit; she could reduce the rate of Capital Gains Tax for investment in British companies; she could offer tax breaks for the booming market in crypto trading; or she could offer any one of a dozen different initiatives that would give finance a boost. Any of them would be far more useful than interfering with car finance claims. It seems extraordinary that a Government that is often far too deferential to lawyers and upholds every bizarre judgment handed down by one of the international courts should be looking to overturn a common law decision by British judges, which, as far as anyone can see, appears perfectly reasonable and will help ordinary consumers. It will set a terrible example.
