Kielland families welcome Norway rig deaths compensation
Ms Fleming, from Durham, previously said there were unanswered questions about the disaster, which killed her father Michael and five of his compatriots from the Cumbrian village of Cleator Moor.The compensation motion had been opposed by the government but passed through the Storting by 53 votes to 51.
Ms Fleming, who was six when her 37-year-old dad died, said: "It's only right the Norwegian government have eventually done the right thing and agreed to pay a tiny amount of their wealth to the people that unwillingly and unwittingly sacrificed their lives."This feels likes a weight has been lifted of our shoulders."She praised the Kielland Network, a campaign group set up by survivors and families of the deceased to call for justice."People have given years of their lives to this cause and we are very grateful for the work that has been done," Ms Fleming said.
Among the 40 members of the Kielland Network who attended the vote in central Oslo, there was a great deal of sadness that the group's founder, Kian Reme, was not there with them.Mr Reme, whose brother Rolf was killed in the disaster, died in 2024 from cancer."He was the reason we got this far," Ms Fleming said, adding: "He was a man with strength of fight but also full of peace and forgiveness."He'd be so happy if he were here, but I'm sure he's up there proudly looking down at what everyone has continued to achieve."
Tara Pender, who lives near Nottingham, was with Ms Fleming in Oslo to see the vote pass.Ms Pender, who was 13 when her 41-year-old father PJ Pender was killed, also paid tribute to Mr Reme."It's such a shame Kian is not here," she said, adding: "He was amazing and worked tirelessly on this for so many years."She said the result was "very bittersweet" as many relatives and survivors had died before they got the recognition of failings from the Norwegian government they had craved."It's just been such a long time coming," Ms Pender said.She said she had spoken to several other British families of the deceased in the aftermath of the vote and they were "all delighted".
The four-year-old platform was being used as accommodation for the nearby Edda rig in the Ekofisk oil field about 200 miles (320km) off the coast from Stavanger, Norway, when one of its legs broke off during a storm.A 1981 Norwegian inquiry attributed the disaster to a crack in one of the braces caused during its construction in France, but the manufacturers said it had not been maintained or anchored properly by its operators.Some people received compensation at the time from the company which ran the oil rig, Phillips Petroleum, but campaigners said the Norwegian state should also accept responsibility.
A University of Stavanger study published in 2025 said families and the 89 survivors were let down by official investigations, while a 2021 review by the Norwegian auditor general found "highly reprehensible" failures to hold any of the companies involved in the disaster to account, or to support families and survivors.The Norwegian government apologised and funded the study to assess the impact on those affected.The government has opposed the compensation proposal put forward by a coalition of opposition parties but it passed by two votes, with further details now to be determined.
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
‘Bonkers' UN court ruling may allow countries to sue each other for climate reparations
COUNTRIES could soon be able to sue each other for climate reparations after a 'bonkers' court decision. The International Court of Justice ruling paves the way for poorer nations to launch multi-billion Pound compensation cases against rich powers like Britain. 2 The move sparked fury last night, with the Tories branding the top UN court's proclamation 'insane' and Reform UK warning it hands a blank cheque to foreign governments. Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said: 'We have to put Britain's interests first. 'The Government must make clear it sees no basis for this ruling to be acted upon.' Reform UK's Richard Tice fumed: 'This is another bonkers non-binding advisory judgment by the ICJ. 'They absurdly said we should give up the Chagos islands. 'They just hate us.' The judges said governments can be held responsible for climate damage — even if it stems from historic emissions pumped out decades ago. The court's opinion is non-binding, but legal experts say it could trigger real-world lawsuits as early as next week. The legal case was cooked up by law students from Pacific islands who claimed wealthy countries failed them. Flora Vano from Vanuatu island, said: 'The ICJ has recognised what we have lived through — our suffering, resilience and right to our future.' Keir Starmer's deranged drive for Net Zero with eco-zealot Ed Miliband is a threat to UK's national security- here's why The UK and others argued deals, such as the 2015 Paris Agreement, were enough but the court rejected that. Judge Iwasawa Yuji ruled not hitting the toughest climate targets would breach international law and said even countries outside the Paris pact must still protect the planet. He admitted it would be hard to determine who caused which part of climate change. Natural disasters, such as the 6.5-magnitude earthquake in Colombia in June, have also been linked to climate change. The ICJ's previous advisory ruling to hand back the Chagos Island to Mauritius was followed by the UK. 2
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
A former security guard at the US Embassy in Norway is accused of spying for Russia and Iran
A former security guard at the U.S. Embassy in Norway has been indicted by prosecutors there on suspicion of espionage after he allegedly spied for Russia and Iran, according to state broadcaster NRK on Wednesday. The Norwegian man, whose name has not been made public, was arrested last November on suspicion of having damaged national security. He is accused of handing over details about the embassy's diplomats, its floor plans and security routines, among other things, NRK reported. His defense attorney, Inger Zadig, told NRK that her client acknowledges the indictment's facts but denies guilt. The broadcaster reported that America's ties to Israel and the war in Gaza prompted the man to contact Russia and Iran. The defendant faces up to 21 years in prison, NRK reported. The U.S. Embassy, the prosecutor's office and Zadig did not respond to The Associated Press' requests for comment. At the time of his arrest, the man had been studying for a bachelor's degree in security and preparedness at Norway's Arctic University, UiT. It is a second such case at UiT in recent years, according to NRK. One of the people the West swapped with Russia in a major prisoner exchange last year was a UiT guest researcher who claimed to be a Brazilian named José Assis Giammaria, arrested on espionage allegations in 2022. The police revealed him to be Russian, Mikhail Valeryevich Mikushin. Norway has a 198-kilometer (123-mile) long border with Russia in the Arctic. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Norway has heavily restricted entry for Russian nationals. Last year, the Norwegian government said it was considering a plan to build a fence along all or part of its border with Russia.
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Huge change to Universal Credit rules that means benefits WON'T be stopped over cash mistake
A HUGE change to Universal Credit rules meaning benefits won't be stopped over a cash mistake has been confirmed by the government. Claimants who have received compensation after a criminal conviction is reversed will no longer be ineligible for some means-tested benefits. 1 Means-tested benefits are issued dependent on your income and capital - the value of any savings, investments and property you hold. Previously, compensation payments issued after wrongful convictions counted as income and capital for people on six means-tested benefits. This meant they were no longer eligible for payments and missed out on vital support. However, since yesterday and moving forwards, this rule has now ben scrapped. Sir Stephen Timms MP, minister for social security and disability, said: "Rebuilding trust in our systems begins by restoring trust with those the system has failed. "We can't return the years lost by miscarriage of justice victims — but we can, and must, ensure they have every opportunity to restart their lives so they can make the most of the years ahead." It comes after the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) boosted the maximum amount miscarriage of justice victims in England and Wales can receive to £1.3million from £1million - a 30% rise. Alex Davies-Jones, minister for victims and violence against women and girls, added: "Miscarriages of justice steal irreplaceable time and devastate lives. "Better benefit support combined with the uplift of the compensation cap will make a real difference, providing not just financial redress but rightfully deserved recognition to individuals affected." Who is affected? The new rule applies to those on six means-tested benefits in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The full list is: income-based Jobseeker's Allowance income-related Employment and Support Allowance Income Support Housing Benefit Pension Credit Universal Credit Three key benefits that YOU could be missing out on, and one even gives you a free TV Licence Any compensation payments issued to claimants on these benefits under The Miscarriage of Justice Compensation Scheme will no longer be classed as capital or savings. A miscarriage of justice compensation payment is issued when someone has been convicted of a criminal offence and: had their conviction reversed a new or newly discovered fact shows beyond reasonable doubt that there has been a miscarriage of justice If you are currently on one of the six benefits and have previously received a miscarriage of justice compensation payment, you need to report a change of circumstances to the department who pays that benefit. Your change of circumstances should explain you've previously received compensation and that this is no longer classed as capital. The department responsible for paying the benefit will then consider whether you are receiving the correct amount. You will need to provide a copy of your compensation award notification. How to claim a miscarriage of justice payment The maximum amount of compensation issued to a miscarriage of justice victim who has been wrongfully imprisoned for up to 10 years is £650,000. For those who were sentenced to 10 or more years, the maximum amount is £1.3million. Both these maximum amounts were increased by 30% earlier this month, from £500,000 and £1million, respectively. You can apply for compensation if your conviction has been overturned by the courts and any of the following apply: your appeal was successful and it was submitted 28 days or more after your conviction in the Crown Court, or 21 days or more after sentencing for a conviction in a magistrate's court your conviction was overturned after it was referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) you've been granted a free (unconditional) pardon You can find out more about applying for compensation payments via MOJ data published in March revealed 591 applications for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice were received between April 2016 and March 2024. Of these, 39 were approved and 35 payments were made totalling £2,380,700. Are you missing out on benefits? YOU can use a benefits calculator to help check that you are not missing out on money you are entitled to Charity Turn2Us' benefits calculator works out what you could get. Entitledto's free calculator determines whether you qualify for various benefits, tax credit and Universal Credit. and charity StepChange both have benefits tools powered by Entitledto's data. You can use Policy in Practice's calculator to determine which benefits you could receive and how much cash you'll have left over each month after paying for housing costs. Your exact entitlement will only be clear when you make a claim, but calculators can indicate what you might be eligible for.
