logo
No change in LTCG tax rates under Income Tax Bill 2025, clarifies IT dept

No change in LTCG tax rates under Income Tax Bill 2025, clarifies IT dept

The Income Tax Department has clarified that the proposed Income Tax Bill 2025 does not seek to change any tax rates, including those on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG), amid reports suggesting otherwise. The clarification was issued through an official statement on social media, responding to speculation in several media outlets regarding potential changes to the taxation structure.
According to the department, the new bill is focused solely on simplifying legal language and removing redundant or obsolete provisions from the current law. It emphasised that the draft legislation does not contain any proposals for altering tax rates applicable to any category of taxpayers.
"Any ambiguity in this respect shall be duly addressed during the passing of the Bill," the department said in its statement on X.
The Income Tax Bill 2025 is expected to replace the existing Income Tax Act of 1961 and has been designed to modernise the tax code, making it more streamlined and easier to navigate, particularly in the context of increasing digital integration and compliance automation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP backs school fee Bill, AAP seeks House scrutiny
BJP backs school fee Bill, AAP seeks House scrutiny

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

BJP backs school fee Bill, AAP seeks House scrutiny

The Hindu Bureau The Delhi Assembly on Tuesday saw a heated discussion on the School Education (Fee Regulation and Transparency) Bill, 2025, with the Opposition demanding that it be sent to a Select Committee to incorporate feedback from parents and other stakeholders. The debate came a day after Education Minister Ashish Sood tabled the Bill, which aims to regulate fee hikes in private schools. BJP MLA Satish Upadhyay lauded it as a 'revolutionary step' in Delhi's education history, while party colleague Ajay Kumar Mahawar said, 'With this Bill, CM Rekha Gupta is wiping away the tears of lakhs of parents.' However, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Prem Chauhan criticised the composition of the proposed fee regulation committees, pointing out that six out of 11 members would be from the school, potentially compromising impartiality. 'There should have been more parents than administrators,' he said, cautioning that the multilayered redress process could result in delayed justice. 'By the time a complaint is addressed, the child may have already passed out or left the school,' Mr. Chauhan said. He reiterated AAP's demand to refer the Bill to a Select Committee with members from both the BJP and AAP, and called for a freeze on fees for the current academic year, citing delays in the Bill's introduction. Responding to the Opposition, BJP MLA Mohan Singh Bisht said public turnout and support for the Bill demonstrated its urgency and relevance. Parent protests While the Assembly debated the Bill, some parent groups held protests and submitted their recommendations to Mr. Sood. One key demand of the protesters was that any parent, not just 15% of them, should be allowed to raise an issue with the district-level committee. On fee-related clauses, parents objected to subjective criteria such as the school's location and educational standard. They demanded a uniform fee structure and standardised fee heads across all schools to avoid ambiguity. 'False narratives' The Education Minister's office said he had met parents ahead of the Assembly debate and dismissed AAP's criticism as 'false narratives'. He clarified that the Bill supplements the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, by introducing stronger checks and balances to protect students and parents. The Minister assured that the Bill provides for three layers of oversight and includes penalties for violations.

AIS mismatch causes chaos for taxpayers with stock market exposure
AIS mismatch causes chaos for taxpayers with stock market exposure

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

AIS mismatch causes chaos for taxpayers with stock market exposure

Ahmedabad: With the income-tax return (ITR) filing deadline fast approaching, chartered accountants and tax practitioners are raising alarm over widespread mismatches in the Annual Information Statement (AIS), particularly for individuals with stock market investments including mutual funds. Several taxpayers have flagged discrepancies between actual stock market transactions and the data reflected in the AIS. According to sources, a key concern is that in many instances, the AIS shows a purchase value of zero for listed securities. This significantly inflates the capital gains — and consequently the tax liability — for the taxpayer. The inconsistencies are attributed to the use of multiple data sources by the Income Tax Department, such as stock exchanges, mutual funds and depositories. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad Further complications arise in cases involving equities and equity-oriented mutual funds acquired prior to 31 Jan 2018 — the cut-off date for the grandfathering clause — which are also appearing in majority cases with a zero purchase value in the AIS as there is no source of auto-capturing the cost in cases where shares were received as gift or inheritance etc. Karim Lakhani, a chartered accountant, said, "AIS has been a useful tool in recent years for retrieving transaction details at the time of filing returns. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo However, this year, the number of mismatches has been exceptionally high, making the process far more complex and time-consuming. Most salaried individuals now have stock market exposure, and this year, the AIS data related to such investments has been riddled with errors. " "For instance, one of my clients' AIS shows dividend income of around Rs 1.5 lakh from a company in which he holds no shares. We've also faced difficulty in calculating short-term or long-term capital gains because the data provided by the client's broker often does not align with the AIS or the Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS). In many stock market-related cases, the purchase value is recorded as zero, resulting in inflated tax liabilities. We are forced to raise feedback within the return to get it corrected," Lakhani explained. CA Jainik Vakil, chairman of the direct tax committee of the Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) said, "Mutual funds entry is sometimes reflected twice in AIS because same transactions are reported twice-- one by registrar and one by depository." Mukesh Patel, international tax expert said, "There are multiple data mismatch in AIS but fortunately, vigilante tax payers can compare their own data with AIS and correct it with feedback. It will help them in case of scrutiny." A senior chartered accountant added, "Return filing has become far more complicated this year due to the existence of two slabs for short-term and long-term capital gains — one applicable before 23 July 2024, and another post that date. We've also observed that in cases where shares were received as gifts, via succession, or acquired before 31 January 2018, the AIS lists the purchase cost as zero. The same issue applies in cases related to the grandfathering clause. " Tax experts advise taxpayers with stock market exposure to cross-check AIS and TIS data carefully against their demat statements and broker reports before filing. Where discrepancies exist, raising timely feedback within the ITR portal is key to rectification.

Mind‑Boggling Rs 1 Septillion Deposit To Dead Woman's Bank Account Sparks Meme-Fest, Bank Denies Claim
Mind‑Boggling Rs 1 Septillion Deposit To Dead Woman's Bank Account Sparks Meme-Fest, Bank Denies Claim

India.com

time6 hours ago

  • India.com

Mind‑Boggling Rs 1 Septillion Deposit To Dead Woman's Bank Account Sparks Meme-Fest, Bank Denies Claim

In what seemed like a bizarre twist of fate, a 20-year-old man from Unchi Dankaur village in Greater Noida was stunned to discover an astronomical amount credited to his late mother's Kotak Mahindra Bank account, a jaw-dropping figure of Rupees 1.13 lakh crore. The incident quickly went viral, with social media users joking that the man had overnight become richer than Elon Musk, Ambani, and even several nations combined. Memes poured in, and netizens dubbed him the 'richest Indian in history.' The enormous number nearing a septillion rupees was far beyond any realistic banking transaction. Deepak, who hails from a modest background, said he was simply trying to access the account for closure after his mother's death not expecting to be swept up in a national media frenzy. The man, Deepak, had checked the account two months after the death of his mother, Gayatri Devi, and was shocked to see the massive credited amount. Unsure of how to react, he reached out to local media, and within hours, the news was all over the internet, reportedly. However, Kotak Mahindra Bank quickly issued a clarification, calling the reports 'false and misleading'. The bank stated that there was no technical glitch and that the viral screenshot was inaccurate. The account has been frozen, and the matter has been reported to the Income Tax Department for investigation. While there's no official explanation yet, experts suspect a possible display error or a data glitch at the user interface level, though no official technical explanation has been provided yet. Such simiar incidents have occurred in the past in India and abroad where ATM receipts or mobile apps displayed unrealistically high balances due to technical issues, reportedly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store