‘So sad': Israelis shocked by Iran strike on hospital
The strike in the southern city of Beersheba caused extensive damage to the hospital's entrance hall and several departments, including the ophthalmology unit on the third floor of the surgical building.
The explosion shattered windows, hurling glass across the hospital, brought ceilings crashing down, destroyed medical equipment and left corridors in disarray.
'It's so sad, I never thought something like this could happen. Never. It's only medical professionals here, and patients... and look what happened to us,' Wasim Hin, an ophthalmologist at Soroka Medical Centre, told AFP.
'Here we have new equipment, everything was destroyed.'
Yael Tiv, an officer in the Home Front command, said the damage was the result of a 'direct hit' by a missile.
'You can see the damage inside. Shattered windows, the ceilings that fell. It's a really awful scenario inside,' she added.
The hospital's director and other workers said that lives had been saved because the structure hit in the attack had been evacuated in recent days.
- Building evacuated -
'It's a miracle. The building had just been evacuated,' maintenance worker Kevin Azoulay told AFP.
Even still, 40 people sustained injuries during the attack.
'Several wards were completely demolished and there is extensive damage across the entire hospital with damage to buildings, structures, windows, ceilings across the medical centre,' director Shlomi Codish told journalists.
Israel's multi-layered air defence systems have managed to intercept most of the missiles and drones targeting the country during the last week of fighting between Israel and Iran.
But some have managed to slip through, wreaking widespread damage at the point of impact.
The Soroka complex is the largest hospital in southern Israel and a primary medical centre for Bedouin communities in the Negev Desert, as well as for wounded Israeli soldiers returning from the war in Gaza.
The UN's World Health Organisation leader on Thursday denounced attacks on health facilities in the Iran-Israel war as 'appalling'.
At the WHO annual assembly last month, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus had also urged Israel to show 'mercy' in its bombardment and siege of Gaza, saying it was 'wrong to weaponise' food and medical supplies.
- 'Pay a heavy price' -
Arriving at the scene of Soroka Hospital to survey the damage Thursday, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed swift revenge for the attack.
'We will make the tyrants in Tehran pay a heavy price,' Netanyahu said in a post on X.
Iranian authorities later said the barrage had targeted a nearby Israeli command post and intelligence base, according to a report published by the state news agency IRNA.
Iran's powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps also weighed in.
'In this operation, the regime's command and intelligence centre near a hospital was targeted with highly accurate and guided missiles,' the force said in a statement.
Elsewhere in Israel on Thursday, buildings were also damaged in the central towns of Ramat Gan and Holon, close to coastal hub Tel Aviv, which has been repeatedly targeted by Iranian missiles since war broke out between the countries last Friday.
'The truth is, God is with us and the government must keep doing what it's doing,' said Renana, a resident of a building hit in Ramat Gan.
Back at Soroka Hospital, Boris Knaizer, who heads the ophthalmology department, was at a loss.
He said the department treated around 50,000 patients a year.
'And now, how are we going to receive them?' he asked. 'We have no idea, we have no space, we have no rooms, everything has been destroyed.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy
PARIS: France said Friday it could not seize $9.7 million worth of women's contraception products that the United States plans to destroy, after media reports suggested the stockpile would be incinerated in the country. The contraceptives were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden to be provided to women in some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. But Donald Trump's administration, which has dismantled USAID since Trump succeeded Biden in January, confirmed last month it intends to destroy the contraceptives being stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision 'insane'. But the health ministry told AFP that 'unfortunately there is no legal basis' for French or even European health authorities to intervene to recover the stockpile. 'Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks,' it added. The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. Where are they? It remains unclear where the contraceptives currently are -- or even if they have already been destroyed. French women's rights group Family Planning told AFP on Thursday they had been informed that the boxes had started being moved out of the Belgian warehouse 36 hours earlier. 'We do not know where these trucks are now -- or whether they have arrived in France,' the group's head Sarah Durocher said, calling on incineration companies to 'oppose this insane decision'. Exactly which company could be responsible for incinerating the products has also not been revealed. French company Veolia, which had been rumoured as a contender, confirmed to AFP that it has a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. However the company emphasised that the contract only covers 'expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile' in Belgium. The products, which include IUDs, implants and birth control pills, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. Belgium's foreign ministry told AFP earlier this week that it 'is exploring all possible avenues to prevent the destruction of these products, including temporary relocation solutions'. 'Senseless' The US decision has provoked an outcry in France. 'Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US?' said an opinion piece by five NGOs in the French newspaper Le Monde on Friday. Among the signatories was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan 'is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse'. Shaheen and Democratic Senator Brian Schatz have introduced a bill aiming to prevent further US aid being wasted. A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and 'no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed'. The spokesperson also pointed to a policy, reinstated by Trump earlier this year, which prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that promote or perform abortions. The NGO Doctors Without Borders, which has slammed the US plan as 'unconscionable', has pointed to reports that there is another warehouse with USAID-purchased contraceptives in the United Arab Emirates. A study published in The Lancet medical journal in June estimated that more than 14 million of the world's most vulnerable people could die as a result of the USAID cuts. Last month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits that had been meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive. - AFP
The Star
9 hours ago
- The Star
Tiny terror meets its match
Major pest: Aedes mosquitoes are the primary vectors of chikungunya.— AFP Scientists battling the country's largest chikungunya epidemic are releasing swarms of giant cannibal mosquitoes whose larvae devour the smaller insects spreading the debilitating disease. These so-called 'elephant mosquitoes', measuring nearly 2cm in length, are voracious predators. Public health experts hope these unusual allies will become unlikely heroes in stopping the painful, fast-moving virus in the southern province of Guangdong. With more than 6,000 infections reported in just three weeks in Foshan alone, authorities are also reviving familiar tactics from the Covid-19 playbook, including mass polymerase chain reaction testing, isolation of infected residents and neighbourhood-wide disinfection campaigns. Yet it's the unconventional methods – giant mosquitoes – that underscore the desperation of officials confronting an unprecedented outbreak. The larvae of these so-called elephant mosquitoes, also known as Toxorhynchites splendens, is released by a research team from Sun Yat-sen University's Zhongshan School of Medicine in Guangdong. They don't bite humans but prey on Aedes mosquitoes – the primary vectors of chikungunya, dengue, Zika and yellow fever. Foshan, a sprawling city in central Guangdong, is deploying another tool: a local variety of fish that eats mosquito eggs and larvae. More than 5,000 of the fish have been released into city ponds and rivers. The city has designated 53 hospitals for chikungunya treatment, offering more than 3,600 beds equipped with mosquito nets and plans to expand capacity, according to state broadcaster CCTV. In nearby Guangzhou, officials published a risk map of all 120 communities and launched a week-long campaign involving mosquito spraying twice a day. One larva of the elephant mosquito can consume up to 100 Aedes, according to Zhang Dongjing, associate professor and technical director of a 'mosquito factory' linked to Sun Yat-sen University. — Bloomberg
Malay Mail
10 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Can microplastics harm our brains? What we know so far
PARIS, Aug 2 — Tiny shards of plastic called microplastics have been detected accumulating in human brains, but there is not yet enough evidence to say whether this is doing us harm, experts have said. These mostly invisible pieces of plastic have been found everywhere from the top of mountains to the bottom of oceans, in the air we breathe and the food we eat. They have also been discovered riddled throughout human bodies, inside lungs, hearts, placentas and even crossing the blood-brain barrier. The increasing ubiquity of microplastics has become a key issue in efforts to hammer out the world's first plastic pollution treaty, with the latest round of UN talks being held in Geneva next week. The effects that microplastics and even smaller nanoplastics have on human health is not yet fully understood, but researchers have been working to find out more in this relatively new field. The most prominent study looking at microplastics in brains was published in the journal Nature Medicine in February. The scientists tested brain tissue from 28 people who died in 2016 and 24 who died last year in the US state of New Mexico, finding that the amount of microplastics in the samples increased over time. The study made headlines around the world when the lead researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, told the media that they detected the equivalent of a plastic spoon's worth of microplastics in the brains. Campen also told Nature that he estimated the researchers could isolate around 10 grammes of plastic from a donated human brain—comparing that amount to an unused crayon. Speculation 'far beyond the evidence' But other researchers have since urged caution about the small study. 'While this is an interesting finding, it should be interpreted cautiously pending independent verification,' toxicologist Theodore Henry of Scotland's Heriot-Watt University told AFP. 'Currently, the speculation about the potential effects of plastic particles on health go far beyond the evidence,' he added. Oliver Jones, a chemistry professor at Australia's RMIT University, told AFP there was 'not enough data to make firm conclusions on the occurrence of microplastics in New Mexico, let alone globally'. He also found it 'rather unlikely' that brains could contain more microplastics than has been found in raw sewage—as the researchers had estimated. Jones pointed out the people in the study were perfectly healthy before they died, and that the researchers acknowledged there was not enough data to show that the microplastics caused harm. 'If (and it is a big if in my view) there are microplastics in our brains, there is as yet no evidence of harm,' Jones added. The study also contained duplicated images, the neuroscience news website The Transmitter has reported, though experts said this did not affect its main findings. 'Cannot wait for complete data' Most of the research into the effects microplastics have on health has been observational, which means it cannot establish cause and effect. One such study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year, found that microplastics building up in blood vessels was linked to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke and death in patients with a disease that clogs arteries. There have also been experiments carried out on mice, including a study in Science Advances in January which detected microplastics in their brains. The Chinese researchers said that microplastics can cause rare blood clots in the brains of mice by obstructing cells—while emphasising that the small mammals are very different to humans. A review by the World Health Organization in 2022 found that the 'evidence is insufficient to determine risks to human health' from microplastics. However many health experts have cited the precautionary principle, saying the potential threat microplastics could pose requires action. A report on the health risks of microplastics by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health published this week ahead of the treaty talks said that 'policy decisions cannot wait for complete data'. 'By acting now to limit exposure, improve risk assessment methodologies, and prioritise vulnerable populations, we can address this pressing issue before it escalates into a broader public health crisis,' it added. The amount of plastic the world produces has doubled since 2000 -- and is expected to triple from current rates by 2060. — AFP
