Modivcare Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Continued Listing Standard
On July 7, 2025, the Company received confirmation from Nasdaq that it regained compliance with the MVPHS requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq, having confirmed that the Company's MVPHS had been above $15 million for at least the last 20 consecutive business days. Accordingly, the Company again satisfies all Nasdaq listing standards required for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
'We are pleased to regain full compliance with Nasdaq listing standards, and to have achieved this by means of stock performance and appreciation,' said L. Heath Sampson, President and CEO. 'We are continuing our efforts to enhance enterprise value and build a stronger, more connected Modivcare.'
ModivCare will continue to be traded on The Nasdaq Global Select Market, subject to its continued compliance with all applicable listing requirements.
About Modivcare
Modivcare Inc. ("Modivcare") is a technology-enabled healthcare services company that provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for public and private payors and their members. Modivcare's value-based solutions address the social determinants of health (SDoH) by connecting members to essential care services. By doing so, Modivcare helps health plans manage risks, reduce costs, and improve health outcomes. Modivcare serves as a provider of non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT), personal care services (PCS), and in-home monitoring solutions (Monitoring). To learn more about Modivcare, please visit www.modivcare.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this press release constitute 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are predictive in nature and are frequently identified by the use of terms such as 'may,' 'will,' 'should,' 'expect,' 'believe,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' and similar words indicating possible future expectations, events or actions. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our business and our industry, and are not guarantees of our future performance. These statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our ability to control or predict, which may cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. The Company has provided additional information about the risks facing its business in its most recent annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequent periodic and current reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K filed by it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth herein and in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which you should read in their entirety before making an investment decision with respect to our securities. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Digital Nomads Are Getting Caught in the War on Tourism
This is part of Reason's 2025 summer travel issue. Click here to read the rest of the issue. "It was a grueling three-hour commute to my Colorado office this morning. I left Telluride with a yellow day pack strapped to my back, and climbed north into the mountains through the golden glow of early-October aspens," wrote Steven K. Roberts in his 1988 book, Computing Across America. Roberts made his way through the remnants of a mining camp before settling at the desk he'd cobbled out of industrial junk the day before. "My chair is an old dynamite crate; my computer a Hewlett-Packard Portable. I flipped open the display, fired up Microsoft WORD, and here I am at work—pattering into a mountainside text file," he wrote. "No, I'm not on vacation. I am a high-tech nomad—pedaling a recumbent bicycle around the United States with a portable computer while funding the journey with a sporadic outpouring of words." A year and a half earlier, Roberts had decided to leave behind his stationary life in the suburbs of Columbus, Ohio. He built a bicycle that doubled as a mobile office—"an eight-foot-long machine bedecked with solar panels and enough state-of-the-art gizmology to start an engineering school"—and embarked on a yearslong 17,000-mile journey throughout the United States. Roberts worked as a computer consultant and freelance writer from the road, filing articles via pay phone. Roberts' lifestyle was completely foreign in the 1980s. People were fascinated by the pioneering digital nomad, whose story landed him on The Phil Donahue Show and the front page of The Wall Street Journal. And it raised big questions about the future of work. Before email, Zoom, and Slack became fixtures of everyday work life, the vast majority of the world's white-collar workers were bound to physical offices. Truly remote jobs were scarce. Slowly but surely, technological innovations allowed more people to work from an entirely different city or state than their coworkers. Then the COVID-19 pandemic showed that millions could work remotely and effectively, thanks to increasingly accessible and functional digital services. From 2019 to 2021, the number of Americans primarily working from home tripled from 9 million to 27.6 million, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Also during the COVID-19 pandemic, countries around the world buttoned up their borders and told their citizens to stay home. As the pandemic receded and international travel restrictions began to lift, many newly remote workers were keen to live and work beyond their countries' borders—and foreign governments began to notice. Looking to capitalize on an unprecedentedly mobile work force, countries rushed to create visas tailored to so-called digital nomads. Since summer 2020, dozens have unveiled programs designed to entice remote employees to work from their soil. These programs grant legal status for longer than the typical tourist visa, which may be as short as 90 days. That longer term gives digital nomads the chance to build deeper connections in their host countries and have a wider range of experiences than a tourist might. The benefits to remote workers are obvious, but countries benefit from digital nomad arrangements too. Some collect tax revenue from visa holders. Those that don't still reap the benefits of remote workers spending their foreign incomes and sharing their cultures and skills with neighbors. But not every kind of visitor is welcome in digital nomad–friendly countries these days. Even as governments set up visa programs specifically to attract the world's mobile employees, they're cracking down on tourists and the amenities they enjoy. Digital nomads may soon find themselves in cities and countries that have heavily restricted their Airbnb markets or imposed daily fees on tourists. Can these two approaches coexist? Even though countries don't treat digital nomads as tourists, they don't treat them as permanent residents either. Digital nomads are bound to be caught in the tourist battles. If legal digital nomad status comes with enough downsides, remote workers won't want it—and countries risk missing out on travelers who could help address tourism-related worries. Digital nomadism was already on the rise before COVID-era remote work freed more people to do their jobs from far-flung places. The term digital nomad predates the pandemic by more than two decades. Tsugio Makimoto and David Manners' 1997 book Digital Nomad "predicted a future workforce of globe-trotting travellers logging in from abroad" thanks to "technological advances and humanity's will to explore," reports the BBC. The idea gained more traction in "the 2010s, largely among young people looking for an early-career escape from the decades of 9–5 office work they saw looming before them." Estonia was the first country to unveil a formal digital nomad visa program after the pandemic began, doing so in summer 2020. Since then, dozens of countries have followed suit. More than 20 European nations offer digital nomad visas or other visas that are accessible to remote-working professionals. So do such expat favorites as Panama, Bali, Thailand, and Colombia. Tiny Caribbean island nations, bustling Asian economies, and some of the world's most populous countries have all joined in. Most of those visas allow remote workers to live in a country for at least a year. Most require an application fee and proof of regular income or available funds. Jobs must generally be based outside of the visa-issuing country. Beyond those basics, there's quite a bit of variation. For example, Croatia, the Czech Republic, and Georgia allow applicants to bring their families. Digital nomads who live in Panama can apply for tax residency and may be able to avoid paying taxes at home. (Unfortunately for Americans working abroad, the IRS views "worldwide income" as "subject to U.S. income tax, regardless of where you live.") Belize lets visa holders' kids attend the country's schools. Dominica offers the nomads duty-free goods and various discounts. In 2023 the World Youth Student & Educational Travel Confederation projected that the global number of digital nomads would reach 40 million by the end of that year and 60 million by 2030. But it's hard to say how large this globe-trotting work force is—is someone a digital nomad, or is he just working on vacation?—and not every digital nomad has a digital nomad visa. It's also difficult to quantify digital nomads' economic power; some put their global economic value in the hundreds of billions. Digital nomad visas are a way for countries to regularize a quasi-illegal practice. Someone who wants to stay in a country on a medium- or long-term basis but isn't able or willing to get an immigrant visa or a work visa might decide to work under the radar. They might be there on a tourist visa and resort to border runs—i.e., quick trips abroad to restart the clock on a limited visa. Working in a local job on a tourist visa is illegal, and the law isn't settled about working in a home country–based job from abroad. Border runs are risky and encourage shorter-term thinking: There's always a chance that someone will be denied reentry. Digital nomad visas can provide more certainty to federal authorities—and to nomads, who can build more permanent lives and deeper connections in their host countries. While digital nomad visas allow foreigners to stay in a country for longer than a tourist visa would, that doesn't mean they have an easy path to permanent residency. Looking at digital nomad schemes in 65 jurisdictions, the migration consultancy firm Global Citizen Solutions found that "three grant direct access to citizenship for time spent as digital nomads"—Spain, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic—"while 15 offer pathways to permanent residency, paving the way to eventual citizenship." Not exactly immigrants and not just visitors, digital nomads occupy a strange legal and social space. That has left them vulnerable to nearby battles. "We think tourist demand is unstoppable," a Barcelona deputy mayor told CNN in March. "Everyone is welcome. But there's a limit. The only possibility is to control the supply." The number of tourists staying overnight in Barcelona just about tripled between 2000 and 2016, jumping from 3.1 million to 9 million. Over 15 million overnight tourists stayed in Barcelona in 2024. While tourism is an important part of Barcelona's economy, many locals are concerned about how the growing number of visitors is changing their home. The city made international headlines last summer when thousands of locals took to the streets chanting, "Tourists go home." Things escalated when some protesters squirted water guns at tourists sitting at outdoor cafés. CNN called it "the water pistol shot that echoed around the world." That episode was a hyperliteral version of the tourists vs. locals debate, but it captured feelings that have been bubbling up in the world's hottest vacation destinations. In many of those places, governments are taking measures to crack down on what they see as excessive or undesirable tourism. Amsterdam directed a "stay away" ad campaign toward British men ages 18–35 who searched terms like stag party, cheap hotel, or pub crawl Amsterdam. Dubrovnik, in Croatia, banned tourists from rolling their wheeled suitcases down cobblestone streets in some parts of the city. Travelers visiting Venice's historic center in spring and summer 2024 faced a daily entry fee of 5 euros. Bali, Indonesia, introduced a 150,000 rupiah ($9.18) entry fee for international visitors last year, and local officials are reportedly considering raising it. Destinations such as Santorini, Greece, and Palma de Mallorca, Spain, have tightened regulations on daily cruise ship arrivals. Critics of "overtourism" say it's about bad tourist behavior. It's also about sheer numbers—the idea that too many people are flocking to too small a space. Some borrow environmentalist language about "carrying capacity" and sustainability when talking about overwhelmed destinations. The world does have plenty of disrespectful tourists and packed city centers. But discussions of overtourism often minimize the economic symbiosis between tourists and locals (or even view it as a negative). The sheer-numbers approach paints all visitors with the same brush, and the government policies stemming from it are likewise broad. Perhaps the most common and disruptive antitourism measure is banning short-term vacation rentals such as Airbnbs. The practice of converting long-term apartments into short-term rentals, which can be a lucrative option for property owners, is often blamed for raising housing costs and shutting residents out of desirable central neighborhoods. That's the argument behind New York City's de facto Airbnb ban, which has driven up hotel prices for travelers. Barcelona has stopped issuing short-term rental licenses and won't renew existing ones, aiming to phase out short-term rentals by 2029. (In May, the Spanish government demanded that Airbnb remove 66,000 rental listings from its site.) Vienna allows homeowners to rent out short-term units for only 90 days per year. Athens is in the middle of a one-year ban on new short-term rental registrations in several city districts. Several digital nomad visas require applicants to secure a 12-month lease (Portugal's and Italy's, for example), but digital nomads nonetheless make heavy use of short-term rentals. A digital nomad might want to live in a country for a year but not in just one city—something that's easier through Airbnb than a traditional lease. Short-term rental services also allow visitors to vet units via reviews from abroad rather than risking signing a lease for a unit that may or may not match online descriptions. Daily entry fees, sightseeing restrictions, and tighter Airbnb markets might seem like minor inconveniences, especially for digital nomads who are ostensibly living beyond day-to-day tourist experiences. But they help create the impression that visitors aren't traveling somewhere to experience a place but to impose upon it. And they eliminate some of the amenities that make the digital nomad lifestyle attractive in the first place. It's been over 40 years since Roberts pioneered the high-tech nomadic lifestyle. The oldest postpandemic digital nomad visa programs turn 5 this year. They came at a unique time in both remote work technology and global mobility, offering an office abroad to anyone with wanderlust and a Wi-Fi connection. Or at least that was the promise. What's been the payoff? By some estimates, it's been minimal. Nomads Embassy, a company that assists digital nomads, aggregates visa approval numbers from some of the top destinations for mobile workers. As of February 2023, Croatia had approved 680 digital nomad visas; Estonia had granted 535 by February 2024; and Malaysia had approved 1,506 by July 2024. In the first year of its digital nomad visa scheme, Portugal granted 2,600 visas. Thailand "has approved approximately 1,200 of its Destination Thailand Visas," reports Centuro Global, a company that helps businesses expand globally. According to Euronews, Spain "granted almost 7,500 digital nomad visas in the first 10 months following its introduction." That's a tiny fraction of the world's digital nomads. There are a few reasons for this. Many digital nomads can get by without visas; not everyone who wants to work remotely abroad wants to do so for a year. Complicated tax situations, scarce or expensive lodging, and doubts over the portability of benefits all might keep someone from making a long-term leap. Then there are all the bureaucratic hoops. That raises the question: What are these visas for? Governments across the world are still trying to figure that out. They talk about "transforming how people in the world choose to work," enabling "a lifestyle that allows you to explore incredible places," and attracting "highly qualified" and "top" professionals in desired fields. But if hardly anybody is taking advantage of the visas, what are those talking points good for? Countries hoping to lure digital nomads "will need to consider both what type of remote worker they wish to attract and how proactive they wish to be," explained the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) in a 2022 report. They might "develop a remote work strategy that integrates immigration priorities with economic development and inclusive growth objectives," it noted. Governments could also "create temporary-to-permanent pathways so that some remote workers on visitor and nomad visas can transition to more permanent residence." "To truly reap the benefits of remote work, governments need to understand that this is about more than generating revenue from digital nomad visa programs," the report continued, "but also making a country an attractive environment for temporary visitors." Visas haven't been necessary to legitimize the digital nomad lifestyle. But they could be an antidote to overtourism. Digital nomadism "offers a steady income stream throughout the year, reducing dependence on peak tourism seasons," wrote Cabo Verde's secretary of state for digital economy last year. "Digital nomads often stay longer and spend more locally than traditional tourists, creating a more sustainable economic model." Making it easier for remote workers to settle abroad in the medium to long term means that more people will have access to a slower, more deliberate way of experiencing a foreign country. Not all will flock to metropolises like Lisbon and Barcelona. Some entrepreneurial digital nomads are setting up co-living spaces in European villages facing depopulation, coming to agreements "with the town hall, with local associations, with businesses, with the community itself," Juan Barbed, co-founder of the co-living company Rooral, told Euronews last year. Countries have much to gain by introducing desirable digital nomad visas or improving existing ones. Digital nomads will never outnumber tourists, but they will suffer if they become collateral damage in a war on tourism. The post Digital Nomads Are Getting Caught in the War on Tourism appeared first on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rezolve AI (RZLV) Launches Global Professional Services Division for AI Growth
Rezolve AI PLC (NASDAQ:RZLV) is one of the most popular AI penny stocks to buy according to billionaires. On June 26, the company announced the creation of Rezolve Ai Professional Services, a global growth platform to meet rising demand in the enterprise AI services market. Source: unsplash The company appointed Sauvik Banerjjee to lead the division's efforts. Banerjjee, formerly the Global Commerce Head at Accenture and a founder and CTO at Tata Digital, is now the President of Rezolve Ai Global Professional Services and Chief Digital Officer. The new division will provide a range of services designed to help enterprises effectively integrate and utilize Rezolve's 'Brain Suite' AI technology. These services include C-suite advisory on AI roadmaps, data and architecture readiness assessments, tailored 'Brain Suite' model training and integration, as well as change management and continuous optimization. The creation of this division follows Rezolve's achievement of $70 million in Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) ahead of schedule, with expectations to exceed $100 million ARR by the end of 2025. The company's platform currently supports over 50 enterprise customers and engages 16.5 million monthly active users across 42 million devices. Rezolve AI PLC (NASDAQ:RZLV) provides generative AI solutions specifically designed for the retail and e-commerce sectors. Its platform enables real-time consumer engagement across millions of devices, powering dynamic search, personalized promotions, and transactional experiences. While we acknowledge the potential of RZLV as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: Top 10 Materials Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 10 Best Defensive Stocks to Buy in a Volatile Market. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 Beaten-Down Stocks That Haven't Hit Rock Bottom Yet
Canopy Growth seems unable to overcome the industrywide challenges it faces. Novavax's recent quarterly update, though strong, says little about its prospects. 10 stocks we like better than Canopy Growth › Buying shares of beaten-down companies only makes sense if there are good reasons to expect them to bounce back. If that's not the case, stocks that may look cheap and attractive aren't actually so. You should be careful to avoid catching falling knives. Let's consider two stocks that have significantly lagged the market in recent years but could still fall further: Canopy Growth (NASDAQ: CGC) and Novavax (NASDAQ: NVAX). Canopy Growth emerged as a leader in the cannabis industry toward the end of the past decade. The company has significant operations in Canada, the U.S., and various countries worldwide, including Germany. Despite its position in these markets, Canopy Growth has been a profoundly disappointing investment over the past five years. Its latest results provided another example as to why. During the fourth quarter of its fiscal 2025, which ended March 31, Canopy Growth's net revenue declined by 11% year over year to 65 million Canadian dollars ($47.6 million). The company's loss per share for the period was CA$1.43 ($1.05), worse than the CA$1.03 ($0.75) it reported in the prior-year quarter. In fairness, Canopy Growth's troubles aren't entirely its fault. The cannabis industry has been a mess due to legal and regulatory challenges; competition from illicit channels, sometimes even where the product is legal; and oversupply, particularly in Canada, which legalized recreational use of cannabis for adults in 2018. Hardly any pot company has found consistent success over the past five years, despite different focuses, strategies, and executions across the industry. That may suggest the problem is not exclusive to specific companies. No matter whose fault it is, though, Canopy Growth's business is in shambles, and things are not about to get better. True, the company is engaged in cost-cutting efforts while refocusing its portfolio in Canada on in-demand items, such as vapes and pre-rolls. Management predicts that it will achieve positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in "the near-term." Yet, even if Canopy Growth gets there, positive EBITDA would only be a step toward profitability. The company's efforts to reduce expenses may help boost margins in the short term. But it's challenging to envision a path for it to perform well in the long run, given the industry challenges that have led to inconsistent financial results over the past half-decade. Are investors to believe that, after all this time and countless failures across the industry -- both those of Canopy Growth and of others -- the company has finally cracked the code? Convincing the market that that's the case will require more than just positive adjusted EBITDA. I see little reason to expect the pot grower to perform well over the next five years. In fact, I'd expect the stock to sink even further -- and advise investors to stay far away. Examining Novavax's financial results and recent progress may suggest that the stock is a compelling investment opportunity. In the first quarter, the company's revenue was $666.7 million, compared to just $93.9 million for the comparable period of the previous fiscal year. Net income was $518.6 million, compared to a net loss of $147.6 million in the first quarter of 2024. Furthermore, Novavax recently reported positive results from phase 3 studies for its stand-alone influenza vaccine and combination COVID-19/flu vaccine. That's to say nothing of the partnerships it's signed with companies like Sanofi and Takeda Pharmaceuticals, which have paid Novavax for the rights to its COVID vaccines in various countries. But can the company sustain its performance over the long run? Probably not, and here's why. First, the coronavirus vaccine market has been inconsistent and hard to predict. Recent regulatory guidance in the U.S. may further complicate matters, with the Department of Health and Human Services no longer recommending the vaccine for certain populations, including pregnant women and healthy children. It's also worth noting that Novavax has generally played second fiddle to the leaders in this space, Moderna and Pfizer. Novavax's strong financial results in the first quarter are not at all indicative of how it will perform year in and year out. Second, the company's phase 3 wins for its two leading vaccines were not significant achievements. Although they induced strong immune responses in participants, Novavax itself states that these trials were not designed to demonstrate statistical significance. In other words, these results won't support approval. And while they're a good stepping stone to phase 3 studies that would, Novavax is waiting for a partner with big pockets to run these trials. That means it either doesn't have the funds to go at it alone, or management doesn't think doing so without a partner will be worth the investment -- or both. Even if it does find a partner, other companies (including Moderna) have made significant strides in developing competing vaccines. Lastly, the infusion of cash it received from its partnership with Sanofi will eventually run out. The company's business will likely have little to show for itself after that point. All these factors make Novavax unattractive to long-term investors, as the stock could fall much further than it has in the past five years. Before you buy stock in Canopy Growth, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Canopy Growth wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $694,758!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $998,376!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,058% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Prosper Junior Bakiny has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Pfizer. The Motley Fool recommends Moderna. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Beaten-Down Stocks That Haven't Hit Rock Bottom Yet was originally published by The Motley Fool
